House Ethics Panel Calls for Censure of GOP Rep. Chuck Edwards Over Conduct With Female Staffers

The bipartisan House Ethics Committee is recommending that the full chamber censure Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards (NC-11) after concluding that his conduct toward two young female staffers violated the House Code of Official Conduct. The committee released its findings Monday after conducting 16 witness interviews and reviewing nearly 1,500 pages of evidence.

The panel found no evidence Edwards had a sexual relationship with either woman or explicitly propositioned anyone in his office. No quid pro quo sexual harassment was alleged.

The report described a sustained, years-long pattern of personal attention toward two young women on his staff: comments on their clothing, appearance, and weight; late-night texts; invitations to private dinners he sometimes asked be kept off his official calendar; and a stream of lavish personal gifts. A reasonable observer, the committee concluded, could interpret the conduct as romantic advances. Edwards maintained that was never his intent.

The gifts alone ran to more than $1,000 in jewelry, designer purses, and personalized guns, plus shoes, flowers, a laptop, a cellphone, a KitchenAid mixer, a robotic vacuum, concert tickets, vacations, and spa treatments.

One staffer told investigators she felt obligated to wear a necklace he had purchased for her. When she stopped wearing it, the report said, he expressed disappointment.

"That Representative Edwards did all these things to two young staffers, repeatedly over a sustained period, was beyond inappropriate."

The committee also documented several elaborate outings. On one occasion, Edwards allegedly planned a helicopter ride, dinner and a Broadway show during a political trip to New York, tacking on an extra day for his own birthday without telling the staffer who accompanied him. He also arranged for a singer to appear at one staffer's birthday party, perform Ed Sheeran's "Hills of Aberfeldy," and tell her it was from "a special someone."

The staffer later told a friend in a text message that the performance made her think Edwards did not see her as "just a daughter figure." She described herself as feeling "scared lowkey," according to the report.

Investigators also questioned gaps in the text messages he produced. His submission excluded more than 400 nonofficial messages with one staffer, along with a nine-month window in which at least 400 more were exchanged. The committee found that the missing portions made it appear the women were initiating contact or showing more interest in spending time with him than they actually were. He testified he deleted messages "at a whim" and sometimes cleared anything he thought could be misinterpreted.

Watch: Platner Weighs in on 'Sexting' Story - It's an Absolute Trainwreck

Both women eventually left the congressional office, giving him other explanations at the time. Investigators concluded his conduct drove their decisions. The attention also poisoned the broader office environment; other staffers believed the two women received preferential treatment, and resentment followed.

Edwards strongly disputes the committee's conclusions. In his formal response, he argued that the report itself cleared him of violating the three House rules that most directly address sexual misconduct: the prohibitions on sexual relationships with subordinates, sexual harassment, and unwanted advances. His attorneys contended that neither woman ever told him his conduct was unwanted, that gifts motivated by genuine personal friendship are permitted under House rules, and that one staffer was not pressured into accompanying him on a Las Vegas trip.

Edwards separately challenged the process itself, accusing the panel of using an abbreviated procedure that denied him a full adjudicatory hearing where he could cross-examine witnesses and contest evidence.

His response included only one concession:

Representative Edwards sincerely regrets that his behavior created discomfort in any way for Staffer 1 or Staffer 2.

The committee rejected that defense. It found that Edwards violated requirements that members act in a manner reflecting creditably on the House and adhere to both the letter and spirit of its rules. Investigators said he failed to recognize the power imbalance between a member of Congress and young employees whose careers could be affected by crossing him.

Committee leaders now intend to bring a privileged resolution to the floor for a vote. If a majority of the House approves the censure, Edwards would remain in office but would be required to stand in the well of the chamber while the resolution is read aloud as a public rebuke. Censure is a lesser penalty than expulsion, which requires a two-thirds majority

The House is out of session until August 31. No floor vote is expected before lawmakers return.

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.