At a Trump rally Wednesday night, some in the crowd burst into a bit of “Send her back!”

The mantra was, of course, resultant from  The Donald’s series of tweets against the congressional Freshmen Fab Four:

So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly……

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 14, 2019

….it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 14, 2019

For more on that whole dustup, please see here, here, here, here, and here.

As reported by RedState’s Brandon Morse, the President claims not to have liked the chant:

Asked if he would stop the "send her back" chant if it comes up again at a future rally, "I will try. I will certainly try," he said. And he repeated that he didn't like the chant and tried to bring it to an end by resuming his speech quickly. pic.twitter.com/tgcAEW0izz

— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) July 18, 2019

Someone who liked it even less: The View’s Joy Behar.

On Thursday, the left-wing host, in fact, questioned whether or not the Leader of the Free World could be sued or charged with a crime for the outburst.

Seriously — she really did.

So what law did Trump break? According to Whoopi, he “possibly [incited] violence” toward Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, and cowfart fighter Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. And it’s a threat to “every woman in America.”

But back to Joy…from the horse’s mouth:

“He doesn’t care or doesn’t acknowledge the fact that what he is doing is possibly inviting violence towards these women, and women who are saying this is wrong. I don’t like this.”

She then offered this:

“Why can’t he be brought up on charges of hate speech? Why can’t he be sued by the ACLU for hate speech?”

It should be noted that “hate speech” is legal. It’s otherwise known as “free speech.”

It’s also a marvel that an organization for “civil liberties” would sue someone for speaking.

This wasn’t the first time the program’s broached the notion of an arrested Commander-in-Chief.

In March, former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara deeply disappointed the gals on ABC’s long-running talker by saying Trump wouldn’t be taken away in cuffs courtesy of the Mueller investigation (here).

Megan noted Joy’s disappointment:

“A lot of people in the country, like Joy, are hoping that the President is going to be walking out of the White House in handcuffs when all of this is over.”

Well, a girl can dream, can’t she?

-ALEX

Relevant RedState links in this article: here, here, here, here, and here, and here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Tries To Keep From Bursting Into Tears Over Non-Incriminating Mueller Report

GRAPHIC VIDEO: Brutal Subway Attack On Elderly Woman Reveals Something Very Wrong With America

Authorities Threatened To Place Autistic Teen In Foster Care After Parents Opposed His Sex Change

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”