Alexi Giannoulias watching his dirty lobbyist money diet.


He wants only free-range dirty lobbyist money, apparently. None of this factory-grown, federal dirty lobbyist money for him:

Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias says he’s swearing off campaign contributions from lobbyists, but not all lobbyists.

Giannoulias, the state treasurer, promised at the start of his Senate campaign a year ago that he wouldn’t take contributions from corporate lobbyists or political action committees. But that proscription applies only to federal lobbyists and PACs. He has taken money from state-registered lobbyists. He says there’s a difference: Since he’s running for a federal office, a state lobbyist can’t try to influence him if he wins.

Riiiiiiiiight. So, the following scenario?

  • Giannoulias takes money from state lobbyist group contracted to foster the building of widgets.
  • Giannoulias somehow wins in November, becomes US Senator.
  • There is an appropriations bill.
  • State lobbyist group contracted to foster the building of widgets calls Giannoulias’ office.
  • L0 and behold, an earmark is put in the appropriations bill that provides a federal subsidy for widget manufacturers in Illinois, a grant for researching widget technology by Illinois manufacturers, and/or the creation of a fund to raise public awareness of the need for Illinois widgets.
  • The lobbyist group cuts Giannoulias a check for his re-election bid.

…all of that?  According to Alexi Giannoulias, that scenario violates the laws of physics and the nature of space-time itself.  It can’t happen!

CAN’T!

Moe Lane

PS: Mark Kirk for SenateHe knows that you’re brighter than that.

PPS: You can argue the nature of earmarks, the validity of earmarks, and the morality of earmarks.  What you cannot do is argue that earmarks do not exist.  Or that a state entity is not as capable of making… arrangements… to get them as a federal entity is.  And if we’re going to talk about whether Giannoulias’ powers of discernment are sufficient to keep him out of ethical hot water in that regard… ahem.  Broadway Bank.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.


Category: , , , ,

RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

You forgot one piece of the earmark....

Brian Hibbert (Diary) Thursday, July 22nd at 1:11PM EST (link)

A grant program for community action groups (ACORN) to create an education program to teach disadvantaged youths how to use the widget.

Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.

Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots

 

This is just Giannoulias trying to look squeaky clean...

acat (Diary) Thursday, July 22nd at 1:24PM EST (link)

failing miserably, but .. hey, he still looks better than the Dem lieutenant governor candidate, so that’s something… right?

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 

Kirk v Giannoulias =

spoutinghorn Thursday, July 22nd at 1:33PM EST (link)

Worse v Worser

So the obvious choice is Mark Kirk

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, July 22nd at 1:36PM EST (link)

Next time his opponents need to try harder in the primary.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Absolutely

southernilpat Friday, July 23rd at 3:26PM EST (link)

I did not vote for Kirk in the primary but will certainly vote for him in the general. Since the conservatives didn’t choose to get their bickering out of the way and coalesce behind one candidate early on, they allowed Kirk to win. So be it. At least he won’t be embarrassing like Giannoulias (Dubin Lite II) would be.

 
 
 

I'm sure the lobbyist donors would love to hear that

jsanzone (Diary) Thursday, July 22nd at 1:44PM EST (link)

(That) their money only yields state-level favors and contracts. Who knew?

http://www.2010blog.net
20/10 Blog