The White House *has* been stumbling, Politico.


Well, this is rich.  In the process of complaining about how the White House seems to be a combination of Mayor Daley and Barney Fife – no, really, that’s explicitly the two figures that they used – Politico reports:

One senior House Democrat said it is baffling “how one group of people can be so good at campaigning and so bad at politics” — a phrasing nearly identical to that of a second veteran House Democrat who expressed the same sentiment.

(H/T: Instapundit) No, what’s baffling is that there are senior members of the Democratic party who are actually still possessed of the belief that the Obama administration was good at campaigning. I mean, I understand that it’s necessary to keep telling the rank-and-file that they won in 2008 because their leader was off playing… what’s the phrase? “12-dimensional chess?”… but surely the higher-ups need to be firmly in contact with Reality Non-Unicorn, yes?

No, seriously, the Obama’s campaign strengths in 2008 were not in campaigning. They were in the following:

  1. Gaming the primary system.  As witnessed by the fact that the Obama campaign got the nomination without managing to win the popular vote in the California, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas primaries – or, in fact, the actual popular vote in total.  Essentially, they took advantage of every quirk in the nomination process to finesse delegates out of the system.  Which is fine – but it’s not campaigning.
  2. Fundraising.  No argument here: the Obama administration squeezed a godawful amount of money out of the American voting electorate.  Which is fine – but it’s not campaigning.
  3. Keeping their mouths shut and letting people – particularly the ones in the media – project their own views of the candidate onto the candidate.  I believe that he even said something along those lines, at some point.  Objectively speaking, that’s fine – but it’s not campaigning.
  4. And, of course: Letting the other side self-destruct on its own time and at its own schedule.  Which, speaking as somebody who was privately shouting at the GOP every single day on precisely that issue, was frustrating, demoralizing, and infuriating – but it’s not campaigning.

And since then… well.  You tell me.  The White House spent ten months and double-digits’ worth of House seats (latter payable November 2010) to pass a hideously unpopular health care monstrosity when it already had a lopsided majority in Congress. The White House has killed the electoral hopes of every post-2008 candidate that it’s personally intervened for.  The White House can’t even get the card check and cap-and-trade bills out of neutral.  And as it stands right now, thanks to this administration’s priorities and goal achievement strategies the Democrats are planning to run in November on… the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  Which I had to look up, too – and I’m a political junkie who has written about it.

So why are people so surprised that this administration is awful at politics, too?

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.


Category: ,

RSS feed

15 Comments Leave a comment

Quibble.

acat (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 1:20PM EST (link)

Fundraising. No argument here: the Obama administration squeezed a godawful amount of money out of the American voting electorate. Which is fine – but it’s not campaigning. —

Umm, given the *extremely* lax settings that were on the Obama online fundraiser site (and may well still be … ) there is no guarantee that the squeeze was limited to eligible voters, or even U.S. citizens.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

great minds...

glorybee Thursday, June 3rd at 1:24PM EST (link)

and I owe you a Coke!

 

Acat - beyond no guarantee

azred (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 1:39PM EST (link)

The fact that there were both reported amounts in odd ranges that indicated foreign exchange from international credit cards and documented proof showing the site allowed such transactions, it is quite clear that *some* portion of those funds were not from US citizens. And it was obvious the plan was well known to keep the amounts at or under the $250 reporting limit so they could sweep it all under the rug.
Since I’ve been involved in payment processing for longer than I want to admit, the ‘experts’ they hired to build the site knew exactly what they opened themselves up for. Add the acceptance of prepaid cards, and suddenly nothing is traceable. One individual could drop any number of pre-paid donations with different (and unverifiable names & addresses).

Expose a hole for the crooked and they will crawl through it.

 

Rooster just wonders if Dems abandoning Obamaship could lead to resignation - LINK

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 2:08PM EST (link)

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/06/02/the-coming-resignation-of-bara

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Read the article...

acat (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 4:39PM EST (link)

There is a bit much pride and vanity on his part, though…

I’m voting for a medical reason….

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Which article are you talking about? Obviously I read the article I linked to. - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 7:55PM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Cat most humbly apologizes for mangling the language.

acat (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 8:51PM EST (link)

I most humbly apologize for the confusion, I was rushed and was not typing in complete sentences.

What I should have said was: “I have read the article…”

While I think a lot of the article makes sense, I don’t see Obama resigning. The man is too vain, too arrogant, too convinced of his own chosen-ness for that.

I suspect (rather strongly) that Clinton wants to be the Dem’s senior statesman and kingmaker – the role Teddy Kennedy used to play, including waitress sandwiches. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Hillary is *not* the king he wants to make in the next attempt. Sestak and Carville reinforce this suspicion – both are Clintonites, both are speaking out against Obama.

This loss of moderate (or, more accurately, alleged-moderate anti-Obama-deathwish) Dem support will not dissuade Obama. My expectation there is that Obama soldiers on, working through executive orders and czars, until either he loses the nomination in 2012 or he is removed from office some other way.

The thinking members of the Democrat party know perfectly well that there has to be a goose laying eggs in order for them to steal the golden ones – they can see Obama’s overreach for what it is, but the general public has to see it, or be on the cusp of seeing it, for them to peel off – and they’ll need a new lightning rod to rally around. Clinton could serve very well in this capacity.

Hmm. Maybe it was better for me to be working in incomplete sentences after all. Now I’m worried I might be right.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Yeah, I can't see him resigning either, but the same author makes a good case for an LBJ-like move here - LINK

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 11:26PM EST (link)

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/04/21/take-the-painkiller-and-go-hom

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 
 

Minor addition to fundraising...

glorybee Thursday, June 3rd at 1:23PM EST (link)

Recall that the donations website of the campaign had no filters, no trackback, no records and was wide open to any & all money from foreign entities., not just the American public.

 

They Weren't That Good at Campaigning, Either

msctex (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 2:06PM EST (link)

It is just that the Media completely suspended its sense of the absurd. Waves Rolling Back and Greek Porticos, entire cable channels dedicated to the same droning infomercial. . .

On that note, does anybody have a copy of that thing? It would be fascinating to compare the Reality of the last two years to what was presented in that commercial.

Campaigning, one only has to be better than one's opponents: Governing, on the

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 11:28PM EST (link)

other hand, requires one to deal with the whole world.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

And, It's Easier To Be "Better. . ."

msctex (Diary) Friday, June 4th at 11:38AM EST (link)

When one’s opponent has no intention whatsoever of winning, and is actually financially backed by the same people you are.

ditto! - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Friday, June 4th at 12:30PM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 

One shot gambits.

toadold Thursday, June 3rd at 3:36PM EST (link)

The Obamites lett a lot of resentment behind them ibecause of the way they gamed locals in the caucus states. I’d say a lot of the stuff they pulled will turn out to be nowhere as effective this go around and will not work at all because both local Democrats and Republicans will be watching for them and have counter measures.

 

it didn't hurt that there wasn't a competent campaign to oppose him either...nt

AceInTX (Diary) Thursday, June 3rd at 7:57PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson