Beware the Lame Duck Session


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recently made a vow to a large gathering of liberal activists that should have every American concerned.

Frustration with the Democratic Party was a major theme during the four-day event, where progressives voiced their loss of patience with those in power for not doing enough to make major policy changes. … “We’re going to have to have a lame-duck session,” Reid promised. “So we’re not giving up.”

Leftists do not think ObamaCare’s unconstitutional mandate to buy insurance went far enough. They do not think the failed $862 billion stimulus created a large enough deficit. They do not think Democrats have done enough to “change” America into an economically and militarily weak cradle-to-grave welfare state. They want more – and Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi are planning to give it to them in a lame duck session of Congress.

Of course, most Americans have had enough. And more Democrats are beginning to realize that their agenda is incredibly unpopular. They know the American people’s dissatisfaction could cost them control of one or both chambers of Congress next year. And they know if that were to happen, a lame duck session would be their last chance to defy the will of the public and enact the remaining items on the liberal wish list.

That is why I went down to the House floor last Thursday and offered a plan to halt a lame duck session this year except in the case of an unforeseen, sudden emergency requiring immediate action from Congress.

But instead of taking a clear position on this important question, Speaker Pelosi’s Democrats delayed the vote and then left town for a six-week summer recess.

Americans should know where their Representatives stand on the issues before going into the voting booth. But Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid have delayed dealing with a number of far-reaching and controversial issues until after Election Day precisely so Democrats do not have to reveal to the electorate their support for more trillion dollar deficits, tax hikes on families and small businesses, and a job-killing national energy tax. You still do not know what your 2011 tax burden will be for the same reason.

Our republic is based on the consent of the governed. But over the last 19 months Democrats have purposefully ignored and refused to listen to the American people. The ObamaCare debate proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that they are more than willing to abuse the public’s trust.

Clearly, this is not how the Founders intended the federal government to function. When Congress returns in September, I will once again offer this plan and give my colleagues another chance to show if they support the use of a lame duck session to override the will of the American people. But over the next six weeks, it is up to you to hold their feet to the fire.

House Republicans know we must restore Americans’ faith in their elected Representatives by listening when you speak. To make your voice heard, there is no better way than via AmericaSpeakingOut.com. I encourage you to read through the solutions, draft your own, and show your support.

Follow me on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.


Category: , , , , ,

RSS feed

20 Comments Leave a comment

Dumb Harry tips his hand, shows more contempt

johnt Tuesday, August 3rd at 10:47AM EST (link)

for decency, freedom, the meaning of elections, the will of the people, any respect for those people, & monetary and fiscal sanity.
Not bad for one speech to a bunch of loons. Who, btw, are never to be satisfied no matter what power driven slop the Democrats come up with. These frenzied losers are in the grips of a powerful addiction,and it has nothing to do with a fantasy called progressivism, a term only about 120 years old.
I trust Senator McConnell is reviewing his parliamentary procedures right now, and in the back of what might be called Reid’s mind, he is preparing for a bad election.
And may we cease referring to the rabies victims of the left as “progressives”?

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

I trust Senator McConnell

NoDoze Tuesday, August 3rd at 12:38PM EST (link)

to dither,quibble, dribble at the mouth, then vote for the Lame Duck session.

If we understand what “progressives” are progressing toward, it is the destruction of America, and the establishment of Communism/Socialism. That is what they mean by “progressive.” I think we should consistently use the description that truly fits them. That is “anarchist nihilists.”

 
 

Relax

paramedichess Tuesday, August 3rd at 11:27AM EST (link)

A number of republicans are on TV freaking out about a lame duck session full of cap and tax, card check, a public option, and maybe concentration camps for tea party activists. The reality is that Pelosi can cram whatever she wants through the house and nothing substantial will get done in the Senate. Not only do you have several democrat senators running scared for their 2012 re-elections (Nelson, McCaskill, etc) but you should have a couple new republicans sitting immediately after their special elections (IL, DE, WV?) giving us 42-44 votes…easy filibuster territory.

Don't count on any filibuster.

deano64 (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 12:35PM EST (link)

WV just appointed a Dem to fill out the remainder of Byrd’s term. IL isn’t a special election and a new Senator won’t be sworn in until the next congress. DE is the only place where if a Republican wins they get sworn in right away. So that would give us 42 in the senate with 4 northeastern RINOS. Not great odds based on recent history.

Precinct Committeeman before it was cool.

“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”
Alexis De Tocqueville

There's more

paramedichess Tuesday, August 3rd at 2:01PM EST (link)

CO is a special election and IL has been ordered by the courts to have a special election along side the general for the last 6 weeks of Obama/Burris’ term. Presumably whoever wins the general will also win the special since they will be next to each other on the ballot and will contain the same two candidates. WV is voting in November for the two remaining years of Byrd’s term (the appointed senator only serves until then). Although Manchin is the favorite, anything can happen this year. That gives us a shot at 4 new republican senators for the lame duck in the unlikely case that we can sweep the specials. In any case, Nelson and McCaskill have little interest pushing unpopular bills for an unpopular president in the aftermath of a resounding defeat at the polls. They want to keep their seats in 2012.

 

Wow. This Post Is Full of Wrong.

IJB Tuesday, August 3rd at 2:34PM EST (link)

1. WV *is* having a Special Election, and the Nov. winner *will* immediately take the seat.
2. The exact same thing is true in IL.

What I’m not sure about is when the CO, DE and FL Special Election winners would be seated…

OK

paramedichess Tuesday, August 3rd at 3:24PM EST (link)

WV, IL and DE are true special elections (as is Gillibrand’s NY seat, but we have almost no chance of winning that), and the winners will sit immediately. FL and CO are normal elections, as both appointed senators will finish the term of the person they replaced.

 
 
 
 

This

downcold (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 12:32PM EST (link)

whole idea of no work in the lame-duck session bothers me. Those Senators elected in 2004, whether Democrat or Republican were elected to serve (and ya know, do stuff) until January 3, 2011. Voters in 2008 elected House members to serve until January 3, 2011 (preferably doing stuff), not September 30. Democrats control the Senate and can attempt to do anything they want until January 3. (who knows if they will) That’s the power of being in the majority.

Personally, I hope no destructive “jobs” bills are passed during that time, and there be more “neutral” bills on the floor. It happens every lame duck session because terms don’t end until January. If you want to move that up to the day after the election, that’s another story.

Downcold

NoDoze Tuesday, August 3rd at 12:44PM EST (link)

Are you saying that congressmen should just “do stuff” because we elected them to do something?

How does it serve the nation for them to push destructive and mostly irreversible laws?

You sound like a RINO squishy.

Sounds like Lindsey Graham's

ceili_dancer (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:21PM EST (link)

Justification for voting to approve incompetents to the Supreme Court.

 
 

You already posted this once (nt)

Joshua Persons (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:54PM EST (link)

Formerly jpers36
NARF

 
 

No

downcold (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:21PM EST (link)

I meant that Reid & Pelosi have the right to pass anything they want (stuff stands for card check, cap and trade, etc etc) until January 3, because that’s when the Congress ends.

It doesn’t serve anybody well at all for Reid and Pelosi to push their legislation through.

Let’s be clear. Nobody wants card check or cap and trade or spending and tax increases. And we should be fighting against them now just as hard as we would in a lame duck session. However, Democrats have the right to pass anything they want until January 3, no matter how awful it is. Congressional terms don’t end until January (when the new Congress is sworn in)

 

downcold, your post presupposes

johnt Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:22PM EST (link)

that Congress must do something. Anything? What? Given who we are dealing with, you did read the link I hope, nothing is a blessing..

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

They

downcold (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:36PM EST (link)

don’t have to do anything. But they certainly can attempt do anything if they want. The 111th congress and the big Democratic majorities are until January 3, 2011. Reid & Pelosi can attempt to (filibuster) pass whatever destructive legislation they want down the American people’s throats.

Are you saying the inauguration should be earlier to avoid unelected bureaucrats voting on things for two months? Maybe.

Let’s be clear. My point is because the 111th Congress doesn’t end until January, Reid & Pelosi can try to do anything they want, but they will likely fail. Just like Frist did a lot of things in December 2006. (No, they weren’t as controversial as the Reid & Pelosi agenda) Because there will be more Republican Senators in the lame duck session, (Special elections in IL, DE etc), it will likely be filibustered.

Nobody denies that Dems can do anything

NoDoze Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:54PM EST (link)

they can get away with until the end of this congress.

However, that doesn’t stop Reps from using every strategy and method under law to block and stop them. Neither does it mean that the American people must just sit and let it happen. We need to go to DC in mass and clog the city until the danger is over. Americans still have the right of peaceful assembly and demonstration

I agree with you NoDoze

downcold (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 2:58PM EST (link)

Every strategy means filibustering anything and everything that comes to the Senate floor, voting down the day’s journals in the House, making the clerk “Read the bills” and doing anything else including offering many amendments. That will insure that if It might pass the House, but not the Senate.

However, what I’m trying to say, and what I didn’t say clearly is that I don’t think Republicans should demand that Congress can’t meet at all.

 
 

downcold, you tossed me a change of pace.

johnt Tuesday, August 3rd at 7:15PM EST (link)

Note closely your 1st two sentences of your 12:32 post, most especially your generic comment ” no work done in a lame duck session bothers me”. It is precisely with this band of thugs that inactivity should be regarded as a blessing.
However you seem to have retreated into territory more bland, to the point of being boring. Of course the thugs can try anything, that’s what thugs do, and of course & thank God most of it ,or all. will fail, for different reasons and not just a Senate filibuster.
No downcold, we needn’t change dates for sitting Congresses, the mechanisms are already there, plus fear, which you can bet will be there even for the thugs that return & have to do it again in ’12.

Oh, did I leave out morality and shame, which should be a part of a rapacious party’s make up, the sort of thing that would to a degree limit trying “anything”

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

 
 
 

And thank you Congressman Price.

johnt Tuesday, August 3rd at 1:25PM EST (link)

Keep it up.

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

 

So, they are threatening...

Paul_In_Houston Tuesday, August 3rd at 2:40PM EST (link)

…”If you vote us out, we’ll destroy you!”
(Never mind that if we vote them back IN, they’ll STILL destroy us).

Is this what Obama means by “the Chicago way”? — “Nice little country you’ve got here; be a shame if anything happened to it.”
-

 

Rep. Price, what's your STRATEGY for putting the Dems on the defensive NOW?

ColdWarrior (Diary) Tuesday, August 3rd at 3:37PM EST (link)

Thanks for the information, and I like your resolution, but it is unlikely to be read by most Americans. And most Americans will probably never hear about it.

Have you and your conservative Republican colleagues come up with a strategy to go on the offensive against the incumbent Democrats to put them on the defensive on the issue of the possibility of a lame duck session?

For example, have you and your colleagues considered holding a press conference announcing something along the lines of:

We hereby challenge all incumbent Democrat and Independent representatives and senators running for re-election pledge NOW, in writing, that, whatever the outcome of the November 2 elections, they will not disabuse the will of the people and will not, therefore, participate in any attempt to conduct a lame-duck session of Congress. And we will provide this pledge in written form to every Democrat and Independent representative and senator running for re-election and daily post the names of those who refuse to take this simple written pledge to respect the will of the American voters.

Then, thereafter, get every Republican candidate to deliver a shorter pledge to the office of their Democrat incumbent challenger’s office, with cameras rolling, asking that their Democrat adversary sign the pledge. Make the pledge short and sweet so it’s digestible by the American voter. By carrying out your purpose with this strategy, you put the issue in front of every voter in every local congressional and senate race. You attack on every front, not just in the Congress itself. You give every Republican candidate a short, sweet “club” with which they can clobber their Democrat incumbent foe. The Republican candidates go on the offensive, putting the Democrat incumbents on the defensive.

Also, Rep. Price, you stated:

To make your voice heard, there is no better way than via AmericaSpeakingOut.com.

Would you not agree that an individual can best make his voice heard in party politics by becoming a voting member of a political party. I realize you may be trying to remain non-partisan, as you represent all the citizens in your district, but could you not at least encourage people to get involved in the party of their choice by becoming precinct committeemen, so they may vote for the party leaders and be in the best position to help get out the vote for the candidates of their party in both the primary and general elections. You may recall at the Redstate Gathering last year I told you that the Republican Party was at HALF strength in the precinct committeemen ranks. You said at the time you were unaware of that fact and that you’d talk to “your people” about improving those numbers. I hope you can come back here and tell us what you’ve been doing since then to urge conservative Republicans to become precinct committeemen.

I hope you will urge conservative Republicans to become precinct committeemen and get engaged in Get Out The Vote efforts NOW!

For Liberty,
ColdWarrior, PC (that’s “precinct committeeman,” not “political child!”)
Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW! (91 days until Nov. 2 — what are YOU DOING to help get out the vote in your precinct?)

In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?

Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and Unified Patriots.