It has been a difficult few days on social media since Nick Shirley’s video was posted documenting his visits to Somali-run daycare centers in Minneapolis which exposed the obvious fraud many of them are almost certain to be.


NEW Happy New Year: Trump Pausing Child Care Payments to All States, Not Just MN, Pending Records Reviews


But among the most egregious instances of outright fabrications have come from conservative “social media influencers” who are using the Minnesota fraud schemes to attack the performance of DOJ under the stewardship of Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Before I go into a discussion of what DOJ is currently doing with regard to welfare and health program fraud schemes, I want to lay out FACTS in a timeline about when the fraud is alleged to have begun, when the investigation started, what has been accomplished so far, and what is happening today.

Those are all the defendants charged by the Biden DOJ — 67 total — between September 2022 and February 2024. Every case was related to the “Feed Our Future” fraud scheme involving a childhood nutrition program funded by the Dept. of Agriculture.

There were numerous guilty pleas between September 2022 and June 2024. The only other trial, in March 2025, involved only 2 of the original 14 defendants charged in one of the five original cases listed above, with the remaining defendants all pleading guilty prior to trial. All other dispositions have been by guilty plea.

The total loss in the FOF fraud scheme is estimated to be only $250 million.

Remember, the Biden DOJ last charged anyone in the FOF fraud scheme on Feb. 5, 2024. No additional charges over the final 11 months prior to Trump taking office, and it had no investigations into any other fraud schemes.

Working almost from scratch, the Trump/Bondi DOJ — beginning in May 2025 — has now charged 21 additional defendants in less than 7 months, and expanded the investigation into Autism treatment, housing assistance, and the Integrated Community Supports services.


READ MORE: Feds Now Looking at 'Feeding Our Future' Org. for Possible Fraud - Is MN Gov. Walz Implicated?


Catherine Herridge posted on X Wednesday that Dir. Kash Patel said the FBI has 16 investigations open into 32 healthcare and homecare providers. This is a joint effort with HHS OIG’s Medicaid Fraud Unit, IRS, and Postal Inspectors. The HHS OIG unit is particularly noteworthy since their primary responsibilities are Medicare and Medicaid fraud investigations.

At a 35-minute televised press conference on December 18, 2025, the Acting U.S. Attorney for Minnesota said his office has investigations looking into 14 different programs funded by Medicaid and operated by the Minnesota state government.

“The fraud is not isolated. It is not small. The magnitude cannot be overstated…. [It] is not a handful of bad actors…. It is a staggering industrial scale fraud.”

Since 2018, the 14 programs have been funded with $18 billion in Medicaid money. These are just the programs that have been flagged so far, and they only involved Medicaid money. Remember the FOM fraud involved childhood nutrition funding from the Dept. of Agriculture.

But for context — keep in mind that California’s Economic Development Department, which oversees Unemployment Compensation, paid out approximately $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment claims, including more than $1 billion to inmates in California prisons and county jails. Tim Walz has some ground to cover before he can hold a candle to Gavin Newsom.


DIVE DEEPER: How Many Recall Elections Can You Fund With $32 Billion? Asking for Gavin Newsom.


Note what is completely absent from any of what is described above. There is nothing that suggests the Biden DOJ ever looked into whether Minnesota state officials or politicians were criminally complicit in massive and systematic fraud in programs where Minnesota paid the money out to the fraudsters.

Tolerating fraud, overlooking fraud, knowing about fraud but doing nothing to stop it — none of these are necessarily federal crimes. Any acts by Gov. Tim Walz and others would need to be in support of or to advance the fraudulent scheme for them to be charged. Knowing about it but not doing anything isn’t going to lead to him being indicted.

But there is NO evidence that any campaign finance investigations were ever done to determine whether elected officials in Minnesota — almost all Democrats — received money from any of the indicted/convicted defendants.

I have seen reports on X and elsewhere that donations to ActBlue were made by indicted defendants. Given that the Trump/Bondi DOJ is already looking into ActBlue’s receipt of illegal donations, I expect this issue will now be added to that inquiry.

This article is in response to the moron conservative social media influencers who have made specious and bogus claims that the Bondi DOJ has not be active and aggressive in its efforts directed at fraud in Minnesota. That is a false and malicious smear intended to undermine AG Bondi who many have never supported, and to fatten their own bank accounts with X revenue sharing money by engagement farming through their outrage porn posts.

Investigations of these kinds of schemes are methodical. No arrests can be made until warrants are obtained. Warrants can only be obtained after there is a charging document filed — either an Indictment or Information. Those aren’t filed until the investigation is complete or nearly complete.

I expect we will see rolling indictments involving multiple schemes to defraud over the next 2-3 years — right up to the 2028 election cycle. I also expect this investigation is going to expand far beyond the borders of Minnesota.

But it is also not likely to be the case that “thousands” of perpetrators are involved. Most of the fraud involved nothing more than billing the State of Minnesota for services that were never provided, and the State of Minnesota sending out checks. The two people charged in connection with the autism services fraud are alleged to have been responsible for $20 million in invoices. A few dozen bad actors working over time, without any effort by the state to detect them, can extract massive amounts of funds when there is no oversight to their entry into the program or their conduct participants in the program.

What is being exposed here is the “Poster Child” example of what happens with federal tax dollars when the Democrats are in charge and use those funds to support liberal/progressive/socialist/communist NGOs and the “programs” they rely upon to exist.

This is DOGE at its most real — evidence to support Congress cutting funding for crap like this, and people going to jail as a result.

(EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is crossposted at the author's Substack.)