The Mosque: What Would King Solomon Do?


Is the Islamic community within its rights to build a mosque near Ground Zero? Probably so.

But is justice served when we focus on rights?

Consider the story of King Solomon in 1 Kings Chapter 3. The wise king was confronted with the case of two mothers; when the baby of one mother was accidentally smothered during the night, that mother switched babies. From Solomon’s perspective, both mothers had equal legal claim to the living child:

 24 Then the king said, “Bring me a sword.” So they brought a sword for the king. 25 He then gave an order: “Cut the living child in two and give half to one and half to the other.”

 26 The woman whose son was alive was filled with compassion for her son and said to the king, “Please, my lord, give her the living baby! Don’t kill him!”
      But the other said, “Neither I nor you shall have him. Cut him in two!”

 27 Then the king gave his ruling: “Give the living baby to the first woman. Do not kill him; she is his mother.”

So how might Solomon answer this current request? I take a stab at the answer below the fold.
“Sure. Build your mosque. But it’s important that it be done right.

“So we need a model.

“Pick the Middle Eastern capital of your choice: Amman, Damascus, Cairo, Riyadh, Teheran, … it makes little difference. Build your model mosque there, and dedicate it to the memory of the 3,000 innocents.

“Dedicate it to the 343 firefighters and paramedics of the NYFD, to the 60 NYPD and Port Authority officers who selflessly gave their lives out of love and service to their fellow man. Make it a tribute to the heroes of United Flight 93. Yes, make it a tribute to the two dozen or so innocent Muslim victims of the unholy, misguided demons who committed this evil atrocity on the American people.

“We’ll judge your application based on the peace and healing that flows from your model mosque. Given the sincerity of your mission, we’re sure it will be a great success.”

Such a lesson was probably not covered during Mr. Obama’s 22 years in the Rev. Wright’s pews, conflicting as it does without the values of Liberation Theology. Naturally, as a lawyer, Mr. Obama focuses first on rights, but as the story shows, rights and justice are often at odds.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

79 Comments Leave a comment

NYC has the right to allow the mosque to be built at Ground Zero, but property owner has a right

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 11:25AM EST (link)

to build any particular structure at any particular place for any particular purpose. The right to conduct business as one exercises liberty to pursue happiness is just as protected as the right to the free exercise of religion and speech, but not anywhere at any time.

NYC would be within their rights to fashion zoning laws in particular places for an infinite number of reasons considering an infinite number of considerations, and one factor that would trump any challenge in a civil suit, would be the availability of other properties within the City available for mosque construction.

more later

I wonder how many of those in NYC govt approved of this building out of fear they would lose a lawsuit? They shouldn’t fear losing one if they have competent counsel.

Liberals in NYC are weenies again, despite 911 in their backyard and frontyard.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Liberals everywhere are weenies, not just in NYC.

jdw4america (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 11:40AM EST (link)

That’s why they’re opposed to war whenever it raises it necessary head. They are cowards, hoping that no one will notice the fact if they speak of war in terms of its objective horrors. They never speak of the objective good which only just wars accomplish.

But then, vice is like that – immoral people do not embrace just one vice, because it would render their lives imbalanced. They must embrace them all in order to sustain them. Likewise, a virtuous man does not subscribe to a single virtue, but seeks to embrace them all, even if he knows he will sometimes falter.

Liberals are inherently cowards, liars, cheats. They are greedy, selfish, lascivious and pride-filled. They desire nothing more than to be allowed to indulge their gluttonous, immoral appetites while others protect and defend their freedoms.

 

Liberals don't live by fear and revenge

truthandbeauty Sunday, August 15th at 12:15PM EST (link)

Conservative definition of “weenie”: don’t be afraid, act not like your low enemies but your ideal self, revenge is for the weak.

Yes, we are proud brave, high-minded and strong. We do not stoop the the level of the worst of humanity.

I claim that liberals are morally more pure than conservatives, while my first comment here started with an insult. “Irony?” Does that mean “contains iron?”

I don't think you're going to be happy here, "truthand beauty." nt

Achance (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:24PM EST (link)

In Vino Veritas

 

you're on the wrong escalator, for sure

tngal (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:34PM EST (link)

Your’s is the one over there, Going down.

 

You say: "We do not stoop the the level of the worst of humanity."

gekster (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:40PM EST (link)

I say: Bushs daughters, Palins kids.
Most recently a “plane crash.”

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

 

But would you stoop to the level of submitting yourself to the tender mercies of Islam as a female or gay or lesbian? - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:27PM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Stooping away

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:36PM EST (link)

So T&B where are you in this video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA7yluQDfpY&feature=player_embedded#!

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

 

or even a dhimmi?

JSobieski (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:51PM EST (link)

nt

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 
 

A "must see" from Jhad Watch

Dr. Botkin Sunday, August 15th at 5:50PM EST (link)

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/pat-condell-on-ground-zero-mosque-is-it-possible-to-be-astonished-but-not-surprised.html

Where, other than here, is the American speaking like that?

Achance (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:32PM EST (link)

Why cannot the political elite and the elite journalists in this Country see what they are seeing. That mosque is like a triumphal arch in Rome or the Arc d’Triomphe in Paris; it is being built to commemorate a great victory and to show the vanquished the identity of the victors. And liberal American fools simply cannot see what they see.

In Vino Veritas

There is far more conversation along these lines than there used to be

JSobieski (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:43PM EST (link)

I think in many ways that this move will turn out to be a strategic and tactical mistake by those who wish to spread Islam’s influence in the US. Nobody is immune to overeach and arrogance, and those wanting to pursue stealth jihad just made the spread of Islam a topic of national prominence for several weeks.

In fairness to leaders in the US, we have far more politicians speaking out on this issue than the UK does, and things are far worse there. Heck, Germany actually shut down the 9/11 Mosque, which given their PCness, is quite amazing.

The Western world is waking up. Its just that you are more likely to hear an unfettered analysis at your local barbershop or bowling alley than you are from an elected official.

Liberal Americans think that to the extent evil exists in the world, it is limited to American conservatives. Self-loathing is a sin, it is a form of narcism. Should liberalism be classified as a mental illness?

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

Michael Savage

Dr. Botkin Sunday, August 15th at 9:21PM EST (link)

alrerady has so-labeled it in a very successful book by the title, “Liberalism Is A Mental Disease.”

 
 
 
 
 

Vlad, wise though you are, the backers of the

throwback59 Sunday, August 15th at 11:32AM EST (link)

mosque have already been exposed as frauds.
They tell us the goals of the mosque are peace, understanding and acceptance. When given proof that it will instead lead to anger, opening old wounds and rejection and that if they are sincere they will move it to another site, their response is “screw you.”
Appealing to their sense of decency, or seeking a good will gesture from them is pointless. All we can do at that is put enough pressure on them to abandon this mini-jihad.

yes Vlad, the mosque leader refuses to characterize Hamas as a terrorist organization - LINK

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:03PM EST (link)

http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2010/08/14/obamas-friday-the-13th-ground-zero-mo/

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 

Vladimir,

muffin Sunday, August 15th at 11:40AM EST (link)

Your channeling of King Solomon is most excellent. Bravo, Sir.

Fortitudine vincimus – By endurance we conquer

but, NYC zoning laws COULD be changed tomorrow - For instance, what if a snail darter were found swimming in a pothole near

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:07PM EST (link)

Ground Zero! NYC authorities could stop the mosque from being built and battle in court. So NYC officials should not be allowed to get away with acting as if their hands are tied. This seems to be the new argument by Dems to weasel their way away from this issue.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 

I'm not a king.

Kenny Solomon (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:05PM EST (link)

……and don’t ask me what I’d do.

;)

The Sunday line by NY Dems and their mosque apologists is that government can do NOTHING

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:09PM EST (link)

when the fact is they could retract/reject permission to build tomorrow by making an exception under the current law or change law based on the circumstances and fight it in court. They cannot be allowed to act as if they would love to stop the mosque but can’t.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 

King Solomon and the Constitution

truthandbeauty Sunday, August 15th at 12:32PM EST (link)

Why is it when the Constitution and what is REALLY written there (unlike gun ownership) come up in a way that conservatives don’t like, suddenly there is some greater wisdom?
I’ve actually observed that it’s a game called, “my precedent is greater than your precedent”. It has some great potential for comedy, much of which can be enjoyed on the Stephen Colbert show. Here’s one I’d offer, but give the later precedent greater force:
What would King Solomon say about gun ownership? Well, some say guns should be everywhere and others say they should be nowhere. Well, I invoke the Constitution and say let only those in “a well regulated militia” have them.

I claim that liberals are morally more pure than conservatives, while my first comment here started with an insult. “Irony?” Does that mean “contains iron?”

Something to think about, before you're gone.

msctex (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:37PM EST (link)

Given your all-too obvious way of looking at the world (and yes, two posts were more than sufficient), answer this one question: compare your way of looking at the world, and that of 95% of the posters on this site. Which worldview do you suppose the terrorists who brought the Trade Centers down would rather confront in the American people?

5. Why does it seem like someone

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:43PM EST (link)

forgot to put screens on the windows and a noisy gnat is flying around in here? The gnat may buzz at will for all of me. I’ve got important stuff to do, like take out the garbage.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

let the fly buzz, just not build its house near ground redstate? - smile - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:32PM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Good one, GC.

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 2:45PM EST (link)

The life-cycle of a gnat is rather short on these our stomping grounds. Gnats should not spread their ignorant talking points around where stompers make their home. Some gnats live to adulthood (takes about a week). This one notsomuch.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

I just like the opportunity to stomp the talking points away with logic before blam sticks as

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:10PM EST (link)

oftentimes such trolls have their follower/useful idiots/yutes that will have a seed planted when they hear a refutation, that grows into an eventual conservative epiphany and FUTURE CONSERVATIVE VOTER! I have never had a Snot Otter sneeze boogers thru the screen onto my shirt via the web…

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 

What would Solomon have thought of the Second Amendment?

Steve Maley (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 3:09PM EST (link)

Maybe Samson, one of the Judges, can give us a clue:

And Samson said, With the jawbone of an ass, heaps upon heaps, with the jaw of an ass have I slain a thousand men.

The blogger formerly known as ‘Vladimir’.

I can't speak for my ancestor.......

Kenny Solomon (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 3:25PM EST (link)

…..but as for me, I exercised my Second Amendment right this morning in a very good session at the range.

Big advantage of being an Eeeeevil Jooooooooooo…… While y’all sinners and assorted miscreants are either confessin’ or singin’ praise on Sunday mornin’, the long range here is almost empty and I’m a shootin’ all sorts of evil scary-lookin’ guns.

As for CQC with a jawbone, I prefer the always-at-my-side scaled-down Fairbairn.

But I know just about everybody here realizes that most anything can be used as a weapon and all in the know have trained for that possibility, yes ?

Thanks, somebody's got to be on duty Sunday morning,

cactusjack Sunday, August 15th at 11:52PM EST (link)

that’s when they attacked Pearl Harbor.

 
 
 
 

How to manage a no-winner

alaskaescapeartist (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:34PM EST (link)

In the words of a famous boxer, “no mosque” from anyone on our side does nothing more than fuel the intolerant stereotype. I’m not going to lose any sleep over someone disagreeing with me, but the purpose of our politics and indeed the purpose of this site is to help win elections. Stuff like this and our philosophical responses to it just turns so many of the casual bystanders (aka semi-informed voters). I almost wonder if this whole thing would implode if our side just kept quiet….at least on a national level.

How we walk the fine line on this is beyond me… but in the grand scheme of things, Christians get ambushed while Islamists get building permits.

Maybe we can actually find a solution from our Federal Government…..we turned Pearl Harbor into a National Park didn’t we?

Given that the last numbers I saw this morning on the mosque question were

janis (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:56PM EST (link)

64% opposed and 30% for, I think you are off base on this one. Those numbers were quoted by Brett Baer on FoxNewsSunday. And do you really think that this issue would have even been debated at ALL if we had “just kept quiet” about it?

Sometimes you do what is right even if it doesn’t make you any friends. Tell me, if you had lost a large number of friends and family in, say, a gang attack at some neighborhood park, would you be just fine with gangbangers building their block headquarters there? Or would you consider it adding huge insult to grievous injury?

I see your point

alaskaescapeartist (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 4:54PM EST (link)

But I don’t need the gang analogy, I lost 5 friends on 9/11.

I oppose this thing, make no mistake… but your neighborhood analogy doesn’t work. It is if to suggest that the actual hijackers came back and built the mosque. I suppose you could make an argument, by extension that could be what is happening….and it illustrates our vulnerability on the whole intolerance issue.

We are in a heap of trouble. Financially, security, you name it. Our first priority is to win elections.

And yes Vladimir, there are “casual bystanders” in this country. As abhorrent to us as that may be, they still wield a vote.

Ideally, we would persuade and educate them. Fine and dandy, but most of that effort is us singing to our own choir. As distasteful as it may be to many, we must first appeal to the sensibilities (if you can call it that) of the broad voting base…. most of whom, by our definition are quasi-informed by a poison media and make their voting decisions based largely on emotion.

It takes very little for one of those “bystanders” to justify the notion that conservatives are intolerant, bigoted, and paranoid.

I’m aghast by the fact that this structure may be built, insulting the memory of my friends… but if we don’t fingure out how to turn this country around, it’s not going to matter.

I understand the “do what’s right” even if you lose friends. Fine. But the “bystander” voters aren’t my friends. They have something we need and we had damn well better get it for the next dozen or so election cycles.

 

Consider, too, that of the 64%, prob. most are Dems.

renny (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 5:26PM EST (link)

because NYC is 3-1 Dem. registration.

So, the people who want to make the mosque question a “racist/bigoted” Rep. dealie of some kind do not know what NYC is like.

And, regardless of party affiliation, NYC people know exactly what religious tolerance is and when it does not apply.

Is the polling from NY?

alaskaescapeartist (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 10:23PM EST (link)

Your points are well taken. I certainly don’t have a NYC perspective on this.

This may be such a universally awful idea, and simultaneously botched magnificently by POTUS that it is one of those battles to choose….. and I mean that strictly within the prism of gaining wins in elections.

We can’t survive on a 2010 wave alone. We need a sustained and broad base of voter support at every level. There is a bad feeling I have that our side feels as though we are somehow doing things to win over the electorate. I’m not that optimistic. We’re witnessing a liberal collapse, unfortunately at the expense of our country. If and when the country stops collapsing, we need to have a means of sustaining electoral majorities.

My question about how the mosque argument is made within the context of not shooting ourselves in the ballot box by seeming intolerant by the “bystander voter”. I used to believe in the collective good sense of the electorate. I do not have that belief any longer. Voting preference has turned into “whatever is fashionable” for a large portion of vacuous, ballot-wielding voters. If the person whose news research consists of glancing at the current cover of Time magazine while waiting to pay for their groceries “feels” like those conservatives are just too backwards to embrace our enemies, then we’re toast once again.

 
 
 

Any American that considers his/herself a "casual bystander"...

Steve Maley (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 2:47PM EST (link)

…after the attacks of 9/11 is either clueless or pathetically hopeless.

The blogger formerly known as ‘Vladimir’.

 

There's often wisdom in. . .

msctex (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 2:55PM EST (link)

. . .the “sit quietly and let them destroy themselves” school of thought, given that Progressive thought is by nature non-functional when put to practice. We don’t have to fear it, just ride it out. But when something absolutely beyond the pale is broached as a serious possibility — and this mosque might actually happen — then we should make as much noise as possible. This is an issue where we must divide ourselves from the opposition as much as possible.

 
 

I think I see where you're heading with this

partyof1 Sunday, August 15th at 12:42PM EST (link)

Great God Almighty!

pamela1631 (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:15PM EST (link)

Where did you find that fabulous piece of equipment
and can I PLEASE borrow it?

I’ll return it cleaned of debris and properly greased.

I’ll even include some brownies.

This republic was not established by cowards; and cowards will not preserve it. ~~Elmer Davis

I am stone forged from the fires of creation into flesh ~~Pamela1631

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.~~Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret.)

 

Two Questions

alaskaescapeartist (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:28PM EST (link)

How did you get in my garage?
And when do you plan on returning my highway-trimmer?

There's this little renovation project

pamela1631 (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 5:59PM EST (link)

which is long overdue

38° 34? 35.66? N, 121° 29? 36.28? W

Some of the debris will need haz-mat remediation.
It’s really toxic and has been for a long while.

This republic was not established by cowards; and cowards will not preserve it. ~~Elmer Davis

I am stone forged from the fires of creation into flesh ~~Pamela1631

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.~~Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret.)

What city is that; it's close to SFO, but not the "official" SFO lat and long? nt

Achance (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:15PM EST (link)

In Vino Veritas

OK, found it; Sacramento. Yeah, it could stand renovation. nt

Achance (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:18PM EST (link)

In Vino Veritas

 

Sacramento, CA - N St - facing the State Capitol building. nt

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:22PM EST (link)
 
 
 

Oonga! Oonga! Grunt, grrr!

taxpayer1234 (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:47PM EST (link)

Love, Tim the Tool Man…

Cool photo!

 

I **GOT** to get me one of those ;) [nt]

qixlqatl (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 9:28PM EST (link)

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

Yeah, me too, qixlqatl

lineholder (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 9:36PM EST (link)

I’ve been dreaming of the hydraulic circuits and PLC system is this baby all afternoon.

Circuirt Smirkit, I wanna **chaw** sumpin up wid it....[nt]

qixlqatl (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 10:21PM EST (link)

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

 
 
 
 

Interesting....

annas Sunday, August 15th at 12:43PM EST (link)

that when Democrats/Liberals are speaking about “religious freedoms,” they are NEVER speaking of Christianity! We cannot have a Christmas scene on the courthouse lawn or say Merry Christmas in our schools, BUT we MUST attend to freedoms involving muslims! The Federal Government is all powerful and knows what is good for us on the one hand–BUT cannot get involved in local politics on the other….just saying.

...

CairoFaulkner (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 12:53PM EST (link)

Schools and courthouses are property of the state…the ground on which this mosque is proposed to be built is not. Can you seriously not see the difference?

Nice dodge, Cairo, but you're wrong because

acat (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 8:00PM EST (link)

the same government (and libtard supporters) who say things like “No manger scene on the county courthouse steps” issued the permit for the mosque.

So, while I can see the difference in the nature of the property, I also see the sameness in the people making the decisions.

Can you?

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Not a 'dodge' at all...

CairoFaulkner (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 8:30PM EST (link)

You’ve actually said it yourself: ‘…I can see the difference in the nature of the property’.

Of course you see the sameness in the people making decisions. The state enforces planning laws. So what? Who else is supposed to? It’s hardly worthy of controversy that the state enforces the law.

The state allowing the construction of a place of worship for a private organisation is *entirely different* from the state promoting a particular religious festival on public property.

The court house is public property committed to constitutional (including secular) principles. There is just no comparison. As well as allowing the construction of mosques the state also allows the construction of churches and synagogues and all manner of other religious buildings because such buildings are, unlike the court house, private. I can’t believe Republicans of all people are trying to dance around this.

Now if the government was saying ‘no mangers in the court house, but you can have displays celebrating Ramadan’, then the comparison would be apt and your complaint would be fair.

But this is not what is at issue. What is at issue is whether it is consistent for the state (in the interests of secularism) to deny religious displays on public property, and at the same time to allow construction of private places of worship…and the answer is it entirely is.

The real test of this is whether you would oppose the construction of a church in the same place, and I expect you wouldn’t. In which case your issue is not with the allegation of hypocrisy that you level re: mangers, but rather with the fact that this is an *Islamic* place of worship. Rather than ducking and diving behind court houses (which are an entirely separate issue, though one I have sympathy with you on) and talk of rights (even here Vladimir couldn’t bring himself to admit that the answer to his question ‘Is the Islamic community within its rights to build a mosque near Ground Zero?’ is yes…only managing the ridiculously shady ‘Probably so’), I wish people would just come out and admi that their problem isn’t a place of a worship or religion in general, it is *Islam*.

No, Cairo, the problem isn't Islam.

acat (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 10:44PM EST (link)

The problem is those who seek to use the political system in the Koran to dominate free men. (and women, and cats) Those who are purely interested in the religion aspects of the Koran are no threat.

That said, this mosque is a political statement, rather than a religious one. Were it a religious one, it would come with much more of an “outreach” approach, and much less a “dominance” one. Wouldn’t be named Cordoba.

You, though, are dodging the point that the very same liberals in NY and NYC government who approved this Bronx cheer of a project would be apoplectic at the thought of a manger at the courthouse.

So, on the one hand that they’re “defending” the public building from those dangerous christians, but with the same breath they’re approving a victory monument for those who would literally kill them.

Yeah, okay. You’re not dodging. Suuure.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Let me quickly point out

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 16th at 2:14AM EST (link)

that Cordoba’s primary historical association is not with conquest: in fact, the name “Cordoba” is quite possibly one of the more benign names they could have chosen. Cordoba was, among other things, the the capital of the Caliphate of Cordoba, and a Taifa whose government was republican (one of the first of its kind, particularly in the Muslim world). In addition, it was a cosmopolitan, pluralistic, and advanced city in its own right during medieval times, and is seen as an example of Islamic enlightenment. It and other centers of learning within Andalusia helped to preserve the knowledge lost in Europe and pass it on to Europe intact, and allowed those of the Orthodox and Jewish religions (but mostly Jewish) to add to this base of knowledge. That has been the pre-eminent association among historians for some time now.

That’s not to say that the interpretation latched onto by conservatives is inaccurate, or that their overall impression on the malignant nature of the mosque is wrong (I believe that their impression is largely correct, for other reasons). I simply make the statement to correct the historical record, and to make clear that it is not as cut-and-dried as some conservative commentators make it seem. The Republic of Cordoba is something that, were I a Muslim, I would make copious reference to to show my allegiance to the US and its republican form of government.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

A good example of letting the opponent define the terms.

acat (Diary) Monday, August 16th at 10:00AM EST (link)

And I’m not sure who’s going to win, but as you say the name Cordoba is certainly preferable to Medina or Vienna… however.

It’s still referencing an area taken and held by conquest; however much velvet may wrap the steel gauntlet, it’s undeniably there….

Also, IIRC, the end of Islamic rule of Cordoba did not end peacefully – i.e. once the population shifted, rather than submit to the will of the governed ….

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 
 

...

CairoFaulkner (Diary) Monday, August 16th at 5:44PM EST (link)

This is just ridiculous. Not only am I not dodging the issue, pretty much my entire post was on it. Did you even read it, or were you too excited to get out another formulaic pre-packaged response?

I’ve already explained the clear difference between a private place of worship and a religious display on public property. I have no problem with court houses displaying mangers, but I can clearly see that it’s an entirely different matter from what a legal, private organisation does with it own property. There is a world of difference, and I can’t believe you can’t see it. When liberals start protesting the construction of churches, then you’ll have a point.

Your assertion, Cairo, is a distinction of no difference.

acat (Diary) Monday, August 16th at 6:15PM EST (link)

Among other things, there have been plenty of protests of churches being built or expanded or offering programs over the years. I can count two in my own backyard.

Church A wanted to tear down a house *they already owned* to build a parking lot to *reduce congestion* – denied by city council.

Church B wanted to run a low-cost preschool and after-school program in their sunday school rooms to serve low-income housing nearby. City council denied, due to increased traffic.

So, if you think church builds don’t get protested, I’m not sure what to make of it.

As for the difference between public and private spaces, I understand the distinction, I just don’t see it as being a distinction that makes a difference in this case because, again, the only people who object to the manger scene on the courthouse square are the same liberals who either make up the government that’s rolling over public opinion, or are opposing the governments’ ability to say “Maybe the mosque should be somewhere else”.

I know about the splinter in my eye, Cairo. Suggest you find a mirror.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 
 
 

It's the fact that the WTC was attacked in the name of Islam.

Steve Maley (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 11:02PM EST (link)

We didn’t build a Shinto shrine over the USS Arizona. Healing and reconciliation has happened, but it has taken time and has been on our terms, which is appropriate.

American troops were forbidden to bring whiskey and Playboy magazines into Saudi Arabia out of respect for Saudi sensibilities.

Westerners avoid graphic depictions of the Prophet, partly out of respect, partly out of fear of the response.

This respect deal works a whole lot better when it’s a two way street.

The blogger formerly known as ‘Vladimir’.

I'm sorry...

petrarch Monday, August 16th at 10:39AM EST (link)

… but yes, the problem IS Islam. Are there peaceable Muslims? Sure there are. But as a religion, as an institution, Islam is an enemy power opposed to all the freedoms we hold dear.

“Islam is a religion of peace.” Yeah, right – show me some proof.

We should no more allow mosques paid for and operated by non-US Citizens than we would allow Nazi training camps in 1942 or Communist agents in 1958. That’s what the FBI, grand juries, and treason trials are for.

http://scragged.com/articles/islam-america-and-religious-freedom.aspx

Scragged – Conservative Online Opinion Magazine

Petrarch, that's oversimplification.

acat (Diary) Monday, August 16th at 6:24PM EST (link)

See my post above re. Islam.

The problem isn’t the religion, the problem is the system of government (Sharia law, etc.) that’s built into the religion.

There’s also a system of government built into Judaism and Christianity – read the pentateuch* some time – and the long and short that I come to is that some religions are able to put aside legal components of their holy books that are no longer necessary.

Perhaps it’s because there’s no Caliph, but Islam seems to attract people who instead of putting aside the old, want to bring it back stronger than ever, to have a temporal kingdom to go with the religion.

Not buying that it’s all of Islam, but once any society tears down enough of the education system it becomes easy to lead about by the nose using a religion…

Mew

* the Torah, or the first five books of the Old Testament.

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Good in theory

petrarch Tuesday, August 17th at 10:49AM EST (link)

but, alas, irrelevant in practice.

I wouldn’t want to be ruled by the Catholics of the days of Torquemada’s Spanish Inquisition. That was a long time ago; the Pope has pretty firmly set that attitude aside, and Catholics are 100% welcome today.

Someday, maybe the religion of Islam will do the same thing, and at that point they’ll be welcome in civilized society too. Until that happens, though, they aren’t and can’t be as an organization.

Yes, if you take the government system out of Islam it wouldn’t be so bad – though that doesn’t address the honor killings, female genital mutilations, burkhas, and polygamy, which can perfectly well be enforced by individuals and families without the assistance of government. When we reach that point we can revisit the issue; until then, it’s academic.

It’s like saying that cannibal religions would be fine if they stopped eating people. True, but not particularly helpful to note, nor overwhelmingly likely in the near future.

The problem is evil DOCTRINE. Cannibalism is an evil religious doctrine. Sharia is an evil religious doctrine. We cannot permit religions whose inherent doctrines assault the fundamental liberties of the American people, and until those doctrines are thoroughly rejected and cast aside, they have no place here.

Scragged – Conservative Online Opinion Magazine

Don't entirely disagree, Petrarch, but ...

acat (Diary) Tuesday, August 17th at 1:53PM EST (link)

broad statements condemning all muslims are false on the face.

Had you stated “Muslims who believe X” or “Muslims who practice Y” you’d make a much stronger statement.

In other words, make it about the evil doctrine, whether it’s in the koran or an arab cultural thing that’s barnacled on along the way.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Again, you're right

petrarch Wednesday, August 18th at 9:25AM EST (link)

but the trouble is, given the doctrine of taqiyya or holy lying, it’s almost impossible to tell which is which. In the opinion of virtually all the leading muftis, ayatollahs, sheikhs, and other Islamic luminaries, a loyal American is a bad Muslim by definition, and a devout Muslim is a treasonous American by definition.

What we really need is an independent American branch of Islam that explicitly rejects sharia and all Islamic authority over non-Muslims; doctrinally accepts the existence of apostates with no punishment (other than by Allah in the afterlife, of course); recognizes the right of non-Muslims including Jews to live, exist, and practice their beliefs without any bias (other than, again, excluding them from explicitly religious ceremonies as all religions do); and views the US Constitution as almost a companion of holy writ in practical terms, as most American Christians do.

If we had a well-recognized and organized Islam like that, I’d have no problem with it. No doubt there are some individuals who’d claim to be Muslim who do believe this way, and I have no problem with them either. But from the point of view of the overwhelming majority of the Muslim world, such a person wouldn’t be “Muslim” at all, they’d be apostate themselves.

And for sure, Muslims raised up in other countries would certainly not adhere to such a creed; they’d have to have almost a full religious conversion themselves to be acceptable in the American context.

I know this view is harsh, and it grieves me, but it’s reality. By hosting a 5th column of people who are loyal not to America, but to a foreign enemy power, a whole lot more Americans and others are going to die. We didn’t let devoted Communists run around freely during the cold war, nor dedicated Nazis in 1942; no more should be allow devout Muslims, and certainly not foreign ones.

Scragged – Conservative Online Opinion Magazine

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Solomon

jarrod21 Sunday, August 15th at 12:51PM EST (link)

I’m not 100% sure, but I imagine something is getting cut in half.

 

Look, the local neighborhood residents

cwilson (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:04PM EST (link)

didn’t want my church to build near their homes. It wasn’t anti-christian animus, but they just didn’t want increased Sunday afternoon traffic around their homes.

So they fought it every way they could — eventually winning when a mysterious “box turtle” was suddenly discovered, after years, in the “wetlands” area of the property. We lost $400K on that little episode, having to sell at a loss since now NO ONE would be allowed to develop the property (no, we did not get any compensation under the Takings clause, thankyouverymuch).

So, NO, you do NOT have the right to build anything anywhere at anytime just because you’re a “religious” organization. And even the government can oppose such projects with the full force of law, in pursuit of other goals (“preserve the precious box turtles”, “city planning”, … or “prevent urban strife cause by the deliberate provocation this edifice will represent”.)

Or do we have different rules for Christian churches and Islamic Mosques? If so, then we are already dhimmis.

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen! –Samuel Adams

 

On Saturday afternoon, the O tried to walk back

Scope (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 1:59PM EST (link)

his Friday night comments on the 9/11 mosque issue.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/obama_backs_away_from_ground_z.html

Friday night, the O said- “Muslims have the right to build the mosque, on a piece of private property, in lower Manhattan.”

Saturday, the O said- “It (his Friday comments) shouldn’t be construed as an endorsement of locating a mosque near Ground Zero.”

I wonder if the O was on or off teleprompter on Friday night? Someone messed up badly. As is speculated in the above article, his handlers pulled him by the ears, into a quiet room, and told him he just screwed up the November elections even worse for the Democrats. He tried to walk it back, but, only succeeded in screwing up the message even further. Now he has the Muslims mad at him. I don’t know who else is left that the O hasn’t peed off, or peed on, whichever way you want to look at it.

 

This mosque should have been built immediately after 9/11

jmimac351 Sunday, August 15th at 2:02PM EST (link)

Or should it?

If they tried to do this a month or year after 9/11 what would people have said? Would people have made the case for religious freedom or would they have, rightly, said this was nothing but a provocation?

What was true then is true now.

I’ve heard stories that there are a lot of union guys in NYC who refuse to work on this project and they are putting heat on all other union members to likewise refuse to do it. It would be quite fitting if the clueless government in NYC wanted to build this but The People said, “Build it yourself, Bloomberg.”

Since when do liberals care about religious freedom anyway? Most liberals are athiest, empty souls.

 

Poetic Justice

daggett (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 2:24PM EST (link)

This is not a serious suggestion, but if we wanted poetic justice, then we should let them build the mosque.

Then we could fly a few (unmanned) planes into it. Then build a Jewish Synagogue overlooking the crater — you know, to promote peace and tolerance.

 

don't forget lockerbie

tngal (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 2:29PM EST (link)

King O, in his wisdom, decided for humanitarian reasons it would be better to let the bomber go free what with the terminal cancer thing and all…but wait, bomber still lives after killing over 250 people.

King O’s warm and fuzzies are going to doom us all.

Community Organizer/Agitator

daggett (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 2:40PM EST (link)

I don’t think he does warm and fuzzies. He’s a professional agitator. He loves to create animosity.

 
 

Building on municpal property is not a right.

johnt Sunday, August 15th at 3:19PM EST (link)

Otherwise, well, let your mind roam over the possibilities. For starters consider the mountain of regulations.
The other arguments against this I’m sure have already been stated.
But it is good to see The O take another giant step out of the closet, showing himself as the swine he is, and where, again, his loyalties lie.
Way to be Hussien.

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

 

A matter of Trust

Superheater (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 4:11PM EST (link)

I find it difficult to trust Islam. The Koran says “there shall be no compulsion in religion”, but that appears to be interpreted by some adherents as meaning so long as they are Muslims. I’ve read the book, and quite frankly, there’s way to many exhortations to violence against “infidels” for me to let my guard down. Then again, I used to work in a state corrections system, and I know Ramadan is used by the aggressively proselytized inmates as a rich source of specious grievances. No other religion gets the acquiescence that Islam does.

I still believe this Mosque to be a symbol of triumphalism, now supported by the our first “cultural Muslim”, Barack Obama.

I’m not interpreted in Dhimmitude.

I’ll support the NYC Mosque as soon as a Cathedral is built in Mecca. Respect requires reciprocity.

 

Look.

msctex (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 4:30PM EST (link)

Laws are a means to an end: justice. Justice is the mechanical means to another end: what is right. And we all know, deep down where it matters, that this is a horrible idea, born of the worst intentions on the part of some awful people. So we can debate the letter of the law all day, but it won’t matter. We can ponder whether Justice is truly served whether the mosque be built or not. But there is no getting around the fact we know this is wrong, and if there is any doubt, ask yourself: “Why wasn’t this idea put forth on 9/12/01?”

If it was unthinkable then, what has truly changed that would make the idea acceptable now?

Not a dam-ed thing.

 

HEH. I think that someone should build a...

yoyo (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 5:08PM EST (link)

“The First Fire-and-Brimstone Southern Baptist Church, K-12 School, and Community Center of Lower Manhattan” at 54-and-a-half Park. Seating capacity of, say, 6000+ parishioners.

On the other side of the Mosque, a nice Catholic Cathedral – with one of the largest pipe organs on Earth [cuz, this is the U S of A].

Ahhh, just think of all the bridge building we could accomplish!

Nemo me impune lacesset
“No one will provoke me with impunity!”
=============================
Pukin’ Dogs – The Fighting 143
Sans Reproache
=============================
The ‘yoyo’ replaced my cigarettes January 22, 2006….

 

Wisdom

pamela1631 (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 6:50PM EST (link)

I find myself thinking on the subject of Wisdom.

At what time does a person become wise. Is it based on experience or observations of what succeeded and what failed.

In my mind, the choice of building a mosque in that particular area is a desecration of the memories of those murdered that day and telling the survivors too bad for you.

Are the backers of the mosque project wise? No. Wisdom does not play into their view of life, living or belief. Any possible wisdom, which might have been gained, ceased and was frozen in time by their religion’s progenitor. No room for change or opinion.
No questions allowed. Only this way or die. Their hearts and minds appear stuck in the late sixth century even while utilizing current century technologies.

As humans, as Americans we question everything to gain knowledge and to make informed choices. Some of us seek out the truth or wisdom of the situation and find it insulting to be told we must not question anyone or anything from a specific group.

Especially when that group calls for total submission to their will from all other groups under threat of annihilation.

Where do you find wisdom when it has been outlawed.

This republic was not established by cowards; and cowards will not preserve it. ~~Elmer Davis

I am stone forged from the fires of creation into flesh ~~Pamela1631

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.~~Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret.)

 

Turnaround is fair play

havasu Sunday, August 15th at 7:11PM EST (link)

I think it’s perfectly fine for them to build their mosque.
IF—and ONLY IF—they allow Christians to build a cathedral
(multidenominational, Catholic, rotating, what-have-you)—in Riyadh, so as to pray for the souls of those lost on 9/11 and bring the promise of Christianity to Saudi Arabia. And allow free entry for all, without persecution.
It seems only fair, yes? I’m sure Muslims here and in Saudi will immediately embrace it as a just, fair and openminded solution.

…or, perhaps, not.

Newt's point exactly

bobmontgomery (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 11:21PM EST (link)

The other thing is that, just as in not being”cowards in matters of race” we are going to have to stop being ‘cowards in matters of religion”. The fact that all things Christian are banned in many Mid-east locales gives the lie to the oft-spouted dictum that Islamists just want to ‘get along” with us. The Muslims in this country TO THIS DAY will not disavow the goals of Islam and Sharia and will not call for Christianity to be tolerated in Arabia. Reason? They fear the wrath of the Islamic jihadists for betrayal.
It will be a cold day when Obama calls on the leaders in Riyadh and Teheran to allow Christianity.

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington

This is almost scary how this is all playing to

cactusjack Sunday, August 15th at 11:39PM EST (link)

Hillary Clinton’s advantage. All she has to do is resign as SecState (a perfect backdrop for the following move – ) then step in and have a Sister Solja moment about restoring traditional support of Israel within the Democrat Party, and she would both cripple the 0 and preempt the Repubs.

Hillary is studying the "Clintonian triangulation"

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 11:50PM EST (link)

A little off one way or another and it fractures, just splits in half what we call the democratic party. The “Hillary triangulation” would count on the independents shoring up her left flank and the conservative women shoring up the right flank.

But let’s not forget – Hillary is, was and will always be a socialist.
Obama never sleeps with both eyes closed. He has Hillary under 24/7 video & audio surveillance. He knows what Hillary says & thinks before she does.

Fasten your seat belts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

 
 
 
 

Once again Obama takes the side of our enemies.

hunter (Diary) Sunday, August 15th at 11:12PM EST (link)

He is not taking the American side.
As usual.

hunter

 

What Solomon would do

K. (Diary) Monday, August 16th at 12:41AM EST (link)

…would probably depend on which religion you’re viewing Solomon from — the Muslims actually also venerate him. The story shares many elements with the Biblical version, such as Solomon’s great wisdom and the voyage of the Queen of Sheba. (Though I don’t recall any commanding of Jinns in the Biblical version.)

Just thought this an interesting coincidence.

;-)