The ‘Democrats ready for 2010′ myth, exploded.


This New York Times article was probably not meant to give the game away, but many things are done these days that have had results that were not actually meant.  It was probably not the author’s intent to subvert the obligatory optimism of the article with such a stark headline, either.  Here’s the mistake, in a nutshell: while the title (“Democrats Plan Political Triage to Retain House”) is an accurate enough summation of the article it’s still using a politically disastrous word (“triage”).  Let me explain why.

Here’s the executive summary of the article: the Democrats have tacitly conceded that they could lose up to fifty seats net (they’ve gained something like fifty five in the last two cycles and they have some hopes for about five or so [I would say three, if that]), so they’re going to try to firewall about two dozen of them and let the rest go down in flames.  Whether this works or not is a matter of some lively debate; personally, I expect that most of the Democrats’ vaunted fundraising advantage will go towards protecting people like Ike Skelton and John Spratt and other long-term Congressmen who are in unexpected trouble this year.  Either way, triage is hardly surprising, given the circumstances…

…or is it?

You see, for the last two years pretty much every article that reported on the increasing likelihood of strong Republican gains in 2010 has featured a variation of the sentence “Democratic strategists point out that, unlike 1994, they’re aware of the possibility of strong Republican gains, and have made plans accordingly.”  It’s one of their standard lines; they know that the possibility of a 1994 blowout existed, and since obviously the only thing that cost the Democrats the House that time was their unpreparedness then this time they’ll be fine.  Except… triage is an emergency measure, traditionally performed under suboptimal conditions.  It’s usually not required if you’ve had time and opportunity to prepare beforehand.

In other words, the Democrats shouldn’t have needed to make hard electoral decisions in September.  They knew that this day was coming, and there were a variety of things that they could have done to minimize the damage.  But they didn’t do any of them, apparently… or perhaps they did, and none of those things helped.  Either way, if this is what a Democrat thinks is ‘preparedness,’ then roll on, November.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.


Category:

RSS feed

38 Comments Leave a comment

Yep. "Triage' sez the same thing to me.

Ron Robinson (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:13PM EST (link)

They were discarding ‘preparedness’ when they cast those votes….

________________________________________
Ron Robinson
Chair, AD 49 Republican Central Committee
California Republican Central Committee
PROCINCT Author/ Founder
The Precinct Project
Unified Patriots – How-To: Activists Taking Action!
Follow Ron on Twitter

 

They ARE Ready

Matthew (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:16PM EST (link)

They are ready. But it reminds me of when I was in high school and our first soccer game was against last year’s state champions. Sure, we were prepared. But we all knew that it was not going to end well.

You can not plan

texasgalt (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:25PM EST (link)

for Teadal wave. There’s never been one before.

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com

Sure there has.

Mike (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 1:14PM EST (link)

Just ask the British how it worked out for them :D

Ah, yes

texasgalt (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 8:47PM EST (link)

and I pray for the same fate for the Donks.

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com

 
 
 
 

If they have members assigned to "Triage",

blacktrain Monday, September 6th at 12:28PM EST (link)

I wonder who has the position of “casualty identification”, and “gravedigger”?

Acta Non Verba!
“Saddle up, boys, the Sons of Liberty are ridin’ tonight!”

I'll give you

outbackjon Monday, September 6th at 1:11PM EST (link)

One guess who the “corpseman” is…

 
 

Moe

rdelbov Monday, September 6th at 12:29PM EST (link)

I think the NY Times is a bit behind the times so to speak. If you accept the Real Clear Politics numbers of 206 GOP safe/lean/likely plus the tossups of 35 that gets you to 241. If all the tossups go GOP.

Yet recent polls in KY3-CA47-Iowa race seems to indicate that likely and lean Dem seats are more like tossups. The field of combat for the house races seem more like 80 seats or more then 60 seats. The Times article implies that fire walling 24 or so of the 60 tough seats gets you to 220 or democrats. It looks more like a firewall of 24 out 80 tough seats.

Let me downplay a bit the advantages of money in house races.

1. Like in the Brown /Mass sentate race we will be facing a blizzard of ads. No double the Blizzard in 2010 in same states. Think OH with gov ads/senate ads/statewide office ads. How exactly will house ads have an impact? tune out time. List the states with competitive senate & gov races. Money advantage in house races will be less important

2. GOTV will be huge for the GOP with the teaparty help. Would you rather have a million dollars in a house race or a 1000 volunteers talking you up to friends/family/co workers/neighbors.

3. GOTV and party efforts tend to overlap. You can plug an extra million into Ike Skelton’s district but guess what? The DCCC or DNC can buy ads but they cannot pay for local democratic offices in 34 counties and staff them with local volunteers. The GOP has an a foundation in MO4 and its gearing up for Blunt and legislative races this year. The Congressional nominee will be along for the ride in this effort.

I think the NY times is just reprinting the white house rescue memo. Don’t buy it

 

Some Other Democrat Theories Blasted...

johnconradarens (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:35PM EST (link)

The Democrats other much-publicized strategy is an attempt to convince folks that the election won’t be a blow-out because the Republicans insisted on nominating too many extreme, far-out, hard-boiled conservatives, that it will drive away the “moderates” and “independents”. The holes in this theory:

1) Most republican “moderates” already have no problem voting for liberal Democrats, and have done so in the past, and are calculated in the polling sample, and party weighting.

2) The thoroughgoing majority of “independents” have been forced, over the course of the last 18 months to witness there is nothing but extreme, left-wing, Marxist-tinged statism in store for you if you vote Democrat, which is why they’ve abandoned Obama in vast battalions.

3) There is no such thing as a “Moderate” democrat. They are ALL extremists, as witnessed by their governance over the last 18 months. Democrats will try to paint solid, liberty-loving, constitutional conservatives as “extreme”, but, voters will prepare this mental balance sheet: Which is more extreme, to follow Paul Ryan’s roadmap to fiscal solvency, or to have the Federal Government seize the Healthcare industry? Which is more extreme, to cut the size, scope and reach of government, or to nationalize major industries? Which is more extreme, to repeal the disaster of Obamacare, or to destroy the energy sector with a knee-capping “carbon tax”.

You Forgot #4

IJB Monday, September 6th at 12:43PM EST (link)

4) Most of the GOP candidates around the country cannot, in fact, in any way be described as “extremist”, esp. on the House candidate side. Most of the real ‘firebrands’ in fact lost primaries.

Perhaps the only “hard-core” nominee they can still point to is Labrador of ID-01, and because of his district I wouldn’t even count him out (though Labrador is going to need some cash in order to pull that race out).

Anyway, the “GOP candidates are too extreme, even for this cycle!1!” meme is thoroughly exploded when you look around and see what GOP candidates have actually been nominated for House races.

In fact, I chuckle every time the Dems and the LSM try to trot that line out! ;)

Exactly right, IJB...

azaeroprof (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 3:16PM EST (link)

our district, AZ-01, is typical of what you say. We have a first-term Dem, Ann Kirkpatrick, trying desperately to portray herself as a “moderate” Democrat, though she voted for Obamacare. Bradley Beauchamp, the more firebrand Constitutional conservative came in 3rd in the primary. The winner was Paul Gosar. Paul is fairly conservative, but not what you would call a “movement” Conservative. In fact, one audience member at a GOP debate asked him if he were a Democrat (an unfair question, IMHO). But Paul is well-connected, well-funded, and Palin-endorsed, and will be extremely difficult for Kirkpatrick to paint as an “extremist”. I think you’re correct that this is more the norm than the exception around the country.

 
 
 

I Would *Love* To See Who's On The Dems' Official "KIA" List!

IJB Monday, September 6th at 12:38PM EST (link)

If they’re plan to “triage” 2 dozen, it means THEY’VE ALREADY CONCEDED 2 DOZEN!

The article mentions four who the Dems are going to leave swingin’ in the wind: Markey of CO-04, Kravoti of MD-01, Kilroy of OH-15 (which is *odd*, when you think about it – that’s a D+1 seat! so the Dems are already assigning “KIAs” to Dems in D+1 seats?!?!!), and Periello of VA-05 (who, along with Grayson of FL-08, is about a 100% Dem “kill chance” for our side as of now).

But I’d love to know who the other 20 are, who are getting thrown under the bus! I can guess at some of them (e.g. Boccieri of OH-16, Grayson, probably Kosmas of FL-24…)

But who are the others?! :)

So much for House Dems sticking their neck out on the line and voting for ObamaCare.

SoFiMil (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:47PM EST (link)

I understand their contentedness with Obama abandoning them. However, I bet they’re furious that the Dem leadership is abandoning them and not providing funding for their races.

www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com

They voted on principle....

clintonformccain Monday, September 6th at 1:20PM EST (link)

Baaaa waaaa haaaa haaaa….

 

We tried to warn them, but they wouldn't listen to us.

Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 2:21PM EST (link)

Karma’s a real b***h, isn’t she?

Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..

 
 

Who is roadkill, and who gets the cash?

joecollins (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 2:47PM EST (link)

Agreed. Let’s hope the list leaks.

But, let’s not get complacent . . . we all need to keep up our efforts to win in November.

 
 

What could be a more perfect visual of Obamacare?

usadying (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:44PM EST (link)

Pelosi’s triage unit deciding who is more important and throwing everyone else under the bus. And the kicker is that those under the bus are there because of their Obamacare and stimulus votes.

Yep! - It's Dem Political "Death Panels"! LOL!! (nt)

IJB Monday, September 6th at 12:57PM EST (link)
 

Well the political wave here in Texas has the

Richard Mullins (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 12:51PM EST (link)

Texas Congressional Delegation in the 112nd congress at 22-10(TX-17 and TX-23 flipping to Republican). I think that the number might be more like 23-9 and if EBJ keeps being stupid, 24-8. If TX-30 and TX-25 flip to Republican, a Trip from my parents house to my grandmother’s house in Dallas will be all Republican congressional districts. Heck, it would be that way for me too and I’d be in Friendly county all the way up. I suspect that everything is going to get bad and it’s going to be much different in 112nd congress.

Richard Phillip Mullins BlogThe Squash Satire SiteNews on Happy Jet Airlines
Rmullins Pics
Rpmullins Twitter

Joe Biden is like a Decrepit Park owner with a Meth lab that happens to not only be a dealer but a user.

Let’s Bankrupt the Democratic paty. Make spend all the money to defend thier candidates.

 

Clinton Strategery

lukematthews (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 1:07PM EST (link)

I agree with your assessment completely. I think their entire plan was to run around flaunting health care deform and financial strangulation, however those two creatures are as warm and fuzzy as a black widow and a brown recluse. The stimulus is even more unpopular and they thought it would be a club to use against Republicans. Clinton’s pronouncement that they only need pass the thing to get the political bounce from it proved especially wrong. The Dear Leader’s political popularity was supposed to seal the deal in those districts where the above mentioned strategeries didn’t work. The Won is now ballot box poison and they must rely on repeating narratives supported by lies and buttressed by falsehoods to get people to vote for them.

Clinton knew there would be no bounce

clintonformccain Monday, September 6th at 1:24PM EST (link)

He was smiling sweetly and sticking the knife in Obama with his comment about public disapproval going down after the bill was rammed through.

I remember thinking the same thing at the time - Clinton was loving every minute of the Obamacare vote

Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 2:24PM EST (link)

because he KNEW that it was going to be political suicide. Slick Willie’s been stirring the pot for a while now, and BamBam isn’t bright enough to see what’s going on…..

Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..

55555 and 5, I don't think the Clinton's are the type to go down without a fight.

ywhyvon1 Monday, September 6th at 8:00PM EST (link)

nt

Socialist with fork looking for Socialist with pork pie-unknown

 

Possibly, but you do remember that Bill Clinton went to Capitol Hill and twisted arms of Dems that finally got ObamaCare passed, so

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 8:34PM EST (link)

I hold him responsible along with Obama and elected Dems

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 

Not to listening to the public is priceless

walter_hanson Monday, September 6th at 1:24PM EST (link)

I think the biggest problem they have is something that all the money in the world can’t buy. They ticked off the public by refusing to listen to them.

* That victory march on the health care vote showing we’re going to pass it even though you don’t want it! Oh and you’re racist by the way since we’ll have a couple of black Congressmen lie and say they were called the N word mulitple times.

* When I run townhall meetings I’ll control everything not you.

* We can do anything we want.

And here’s the worse part from their prespective. Even if you’re not the Democrat Congressman who did the last two stunts you’ve got voters in your own district who believe that.

Throw in a trillion dollar stimulus bill that didn’t work. Real unemployment of 18%. Man Custer had a better chance at Little Big Horn than the Democrats do in 2010.

Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN

 

Hey, If You Want a Good Chuckle From an Article On The Same Topic...

IJB Monday, September 6th at 1:38PM EST (link)

Check this baby out.

I had some epic LOL’s reading that one! ;)

5 , thnaks for the link

ywhyvon1 Monday, September 6th at 8:12PM EST (link)

Socialist with fork looking for Socialist with pork pie-unknown

 
 

This is actually a terrible plan for Democrats.

sacody Monday, September 6th at 2:06PM EST (link)

Dumping money into toss-up races to try and retain an already-lost House is only going to casue more currently Lean-D races to sink underwater, as well. In my district and the district just to the north, SD-AL and ND-AL, both incumbent Democrats have been pouring money into ads against their Republican opponent, and both are getting no where in the polls. If the Democrats still dream about retaining the House in November, it is races like these they will have to defend. You could pump another million into SD and ND each and get absolutely no where. Personally, I hope the Democrats spend like a bunch of drunken sailors on lost races. Then they will all see what damage a true wave can do.

The SD rep was allowed to vote no!!!!

walter_hanson Monday, September 6th at 2:28PM EST (link)

Nancy when she counted her votes allowed the SD rep to vote no. Both times when she passed the bill it won narrowly just because in part she was allowing some reps to vote no to claim that they listened. If I were the Democrats here is a rep who proudly claims that she voted no and she’s losing.

Wonder how all those reps who voted yes are feeling today. The passed bill is killing the whole group.

Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN

 
 

Pretty dumb to reveal strategy.

ithos Monday, September 6th at 2:10PM EST (link)

Now that the GOP knows their game plan, the effectiveness of it will be diminished. The Republicans now have time to adjust their campaign efforts accordingly.

Which makes you wonder...

swami7774 (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 3:24PM EST (link)

…if this really IS their strategy.

Today, there is a name for the political doctrine that rejoices in scarcity of everything except government. The name is environmentalism.

Never underestimate Pelosi.

usadying (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 5:11PM EST (link)

I’m with you, swami.

 
 
 

Siege mentality

banzaibob (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 2:47PM EST (link)

I think the Democrats are making a big mistake here. When you withdraw to protect your core you lose the big picture. If they decide to cut funding to losers and those on the edge, that would allow the GOP to spend more on the seats they think they can pick up.

For you Freshman and Sophomore Reps just remeber what Alex Karras said in Blazing Saddles;

Mongo is just pawn in game of life

You were just pawns in game of Politics

Prefiero morir de pie que vivir de rodillas
It’s better to die upon your feet than to live upon your knees!
Emiliano Zapata

 

First time I heard the word "triage" was when I

throwback59 Monday, September 6th at 4:41PM EST (link)

watched the TV show “Mash.” Casualties came in, doctors looked over the wounded, decided which ones could or might be saved and the rest put on the side to expire.
No matter how many were saved the doctors always felt terrible afterwards because of all the ones they could not save. I guess “Mash” is a pretty good description of the chaos the dems are in.

 

10 man lifeboat? Check. 50 straws, 10 long, 40 short? Check.

Tbone (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 4:49PM EST (link)

50 Dems. Check.

Roll!

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

 

Democratic Death Panel

Viator Monday, September 6th at 6:25PM EST (link)

Is Nancy Pelosi going to be a member of the Dems death panel?
Pity the poor congressman or woman who is put out in the rain or allowed to twist slowly in the wind and expire, fundless and unwanted.

 

Remember Art Chance's point

Stan(ley) Pruss (Diary) Monday, September 6th at 7:00PM EST (link)

The losing D’s will find well paying jobs in the D’s non-profits, universities & main stream news organizations. They will be waiting for the pendulum to swing back if the R’s screw up.

Won't happen

GT350 Monday, September 6th at 10:04PM EST (link)

There’s not enough non-profits and universities. And there sure as heck aren’t any MSM jobs either. Those people are going to be job-hunting in private industry. To them I say: Good Luck.

I regularly call my congressman, and tell the staffer on the other line to look around the office: I tell him/her: Every one of you is going to be unemployed in January. And thanks to that anti-business agenda in office, you will be unemployable in private industry.