It must be admitted that when I read this particular article:
In a move that seemed to surprise many members of Maine’s Republican Party, a group of tea party-style activists redefined the party platform at the convention Saturday.
After the vote, in which a vocal majority supported a wholesale replacement of language worked on by the party establishment since at least January, a string of delegates congratulated Horatio “Ted” Cowan III, a retired marine electrician from Rockland who wrote the adopted amendment.
…I mostly snickered at The Outrage over what happens to be a fairly straightforwardly party platform that should have a good deal of appeal to conservatives, libertarians, and populists. I personally would have argued the hard line on illegal immigration and same-sex marriage, but the former is an argument over tactics and 53% of the voting population of Maine disagrees with me on the latter anyway. So, really, business as usual, nice to see that the Ron Paul people were actually participating in local party structures like we had been asking them to do throughout all of 2008… and, yeah, Maine’s lost to conservatism, so let them have their fun.
Then I read a few more details of what actually happened.
To begin with – and somewhat contrary to the first article – this platform apparently was drunk up by the conventioneers like thirsty plants drinking up rain:
The wide acceptance of the platform at the convention surprised even its co-authors. “I had no inkling this would pass, and frankly we’d been told as much by people running the convention,” says co-author Steven Dyer, an evangelical youth pastor and vice chair of the Knox County Republican Committee, which sponsored the document. “They didn’t even make copies of it for the delegates. They just read it to them from the podium.”
Mr. Dyer says he and his co-authors aren’t members of the tea party, although some have attended such events. They were motivated by disappointment with the party’s “progressive” wing, which had “forgotten what it means to be a Republican,” he says.
He agrees that the document is vague in parts, but that was because they had expected it to be merely a draft to begin negotiations with less-conservative party members. To their amazement, it passed with the support of not only tea-party groups, evangelical Christians, and Ron Paul libertarians, but also a large number of presumably rank-and-file conventioneers.
(Via Instapundit) Apparently the Maine GOP organization was chafing a little bit over their current platform – but only moderates can get elected in Maine, right? Hold on, let’s get a quote from a local political guy:
“If you’re not a moderate, you don’t get elected in Maine,” says political consultant Chris Potholm, a professor of government at Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine. “Any candidate who gets nominated is going to ignore that platform, or he or she is going to lose.*”
It’s the standard argument, but it has one small problem: the Maine GOP has been apparently acting in accordance with that principle, and it currently ‘enjoys’ a three-to-two disadvantage in the state legislature and hasn’t elected a Republican to Congress for over fifteen years**. The entire ‘must be moderate to win’ has as its assumption that both conservatism and liberalism must be best considered as mere intellectual concepts, and never mind their practical utility. Because of this assumption, te idea that one or the other could be simply better at running a city, state, or country – and that it could be shown to be better – must then be squashed. Particularly in a state already dominated by Democrats, as then there would be no pesky alternative political theories to provide a contrast to the existing paradigm.
So let’s see how this turns out, shall we?
Moe Lane
*I am ashamed to admit that I assumed that the quote from Potholm above was provided on command… because if I had actually went to confirm that, I wouldn’t have delayed the pleasure of reading this charmingly mean review* of one of Potholm’s books. Word of advice for budding political writers: always make sure that you spell right the names of anybody who might conceivably end up reviewing one of your books someday.
**I grant (unlike some reading this) that Maine’s two sitting Senators are both Republican and ‘moderates’ – but they’re also personally popular; if you replaced either Collins or Snowe with Republicans who were equally ‘moderate’ the seats would probably flip at the next election, and by Democrats who would not be moderate.
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Having met and voted for Senator Collins...
From ME to You (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 10:46AM EST (link)she was a radical shift to the right compared to her opponents!
When she first ran for office I figured she had no chance whatsoever to win. Her first opponent for the senate seat was the opponent to whom she had lost the gubernatorial election, Joe Brennan. Governor Brennan was not a flaming liberal but he was decidedly to the left of her political philosophy. Her subsequent opponents can be described as flaming liberals!!
Our current District 1 Representative, Chellie Pingree (D-ME1), may not be as far left as The One™ but she can see it “up close and personal”. Her methods may not reflect “The Chicago Way” but her progressive/socialist views aren’t much different. Representative Pingree, is the former president and CEO of “Common Cause” so I don;t think I have to elaborate on her political philosophy.
Her other opponent, former District 1 Representative Tom Allen, is pretty much cut from the same cloth. Had Senator Collins not had the popularity/name recognition that she had Mr. Allen would now be, in all probability, our current Senator.
Mr. Allen’s political philosophy can be readily assessed by checking his voting record in the House of Representatives. There is no ‘reaching across the aisle’ there!
OH Yeah and another thing!
From ME to You (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 10:54AM EST (link)I downloaded and read the adopted platform..
I don’t see anything radically conservative about it! In fact I think it’s a little tame! The fact that the Republican “powers that be” were told off by a majority of the convention delegates that they were headed in the wrong direction is (to me anyway!) a good sign!
Great Party Platform
quill67 (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 11:03AM EST (link)I encourage all to read the link to the party platform. It is a very good short document.
The immigration language should be spelled out more clearly. The language is both too strong and too weak on immigration. It is too strong in that it needs to make very clear that we welcome legal immigration and we will make legal immigration easier. It is too weak in that it should do away with birth right citizenship. For those who mistakenly believe that this is in the Constitution, read the following (from Wikipedia):
During discussion of whether to pass the 14th Amendment, there was great debate over granting citizenship to anyone born in the United States. The author of the 14th Amendment, Senator Jacob M. Howard, stated, in reference to the Amendment, “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the family of ambassadors, or foreign ministers accredited to the the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”[2]
In 1873, The United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the 14th Amendment meant,
The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment..Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them.
Oh, God, not this again.
Moe Lane (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 12:52PM EST (link)Take it up with the Maine GOP; I’m declaring this a threadjack.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
Ooops
quill67 (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 3:18PM EST (link)Sorry.. didn’t mean to “threadjack”.
I was originally going to disagree with you because the language seemed too strong:
“Arrest and detain, for a specified period of time, anyone here illegally, and then deport, period.”
That would be 10-12 million people living here to deport. Pretty strong stuff. But if paired with easier LEGAL immigration, it might work– if no backdoor entry through birth-right citizenship.
(I did provide too much information to support this last point though)
What's the connection with Ezra Pound
texasgalt (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 11:06AM EST (link)the yawp and the Maine GOP?
Mostly the author being a dummy.
Moe Lane (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 12:48PM EST (link)Dag, I’m always confusing Pound and Whitman.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
Ah, yes, Whitman :-) /nt
texasgalt (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 12:58PM EST (link)Forgetful or confused perhaps,
The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 1:36PM EST (link)but never an idiot or a dummy.
Good post. Better signs from Maine.
Two GOP's
belcatar (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 1:42PM EST (link)I was involved in the Aroostook County Republican Committee last year. I was a town chair for the bustling metropolis of Haynesville. (My wife was the co-chair. I don’t think anyone else in Haynesville was even aware of this.)
I can tell you that this “new” platform didn’t spring up overnight. A lot of the stuff in it was introduced at the 2008 State Convention, but pretty much all of it was voted down.
When I first started attending committee meetings, The Aroostook County Republican Committee was dominated by political insiders who went along with whatever senators Collins and Snowe wanted. However, a small but growing group of conservative activists (The first I ever heard of a Tea Party was announced at one of these committee meetings) began to offer very conservative resolutions. We passed resolutions condemning Collins and Snowe for their votes on TARP and the Stimulus Package. We passed resolutions against gay marriage, school consolidation, and a bunch of other stuff. By the time I stopped going to those meetings, the Tea Party people had overtaken the moderates and were on the verge of running the show.
I think a lot of the discontent probably started at the county level. The State Committee passed a rule barring county committees from submitting resolutions to the state committee. It’s possible that a lot of the county reps felt that their concerns weren’t be addressed at the state level. I know there was a lot of dissatisfaction with the job that the State chairman, Charlie Webster was doing. A lot of people believed that he was too willing to compromise conservative principles in order to raise money.
Speaking for myself, I stopped attending the meetings because the two hour drive to Presque Isle wasn’t worth all the useless bickering that tended to eat up most of the meeting time.
Bottom line: if we want a more conservative GOP, more conservatives need to get INSIDE IT
ColdWarrior (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 3:54PM EST (link)belcatar, thanks for your report from the trenches INSIDE the Maine Republican Party.
Conservatives CAN change the Party IF they get inside it into the internal voting ranks — the precinct committeemen ranks — and this has demonstrated now in Nevada, Utah, Maine and Minnesota. And, I hope, elsewhere. Some of us conservatives are changing the Party from the inside here in Arizona.
Shouting at it from the bleachers doesn’t work. The real ball game of politics is played by the ball players — the precinct committeemen.
For Liberty,
ColdWarrior, PC (that’s “precinct committeeman,” not “political child!”)
Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW!
In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?
Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Unified Patriots.
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and
Oh, it's still a PAUL!tard coup.
NickLevi86 (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 3:01PM EST (link)There’s precious little in it about actual MAINE issues. It’s a PAUL!-tard laundry list for the national level only. To quote Matthew Gagnon of PinetreePolitics.com
“Where is MAINE in the Maine Republican Party’s new platform? If I am an independent voter in the state considering a registration change to the GOP or maybe just voting for the party’s slate of candidates, what in this document would inspire me to do so?
I find it ironic that a party and a movement that is so (rightly) obsessed with the power of the state and local authorities over the Federal, would so willfully write and approve a document that contains virtually nothing but Federally charged language.”
“Any love letter is incomplete without a Ronald Reagan quote”
–my sophomore year roommate
www.robbinsblog.wordpress.com
kowalskiing- The GOP's endemic problem
NickLevi86 (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 3:05PM EST (link)The Planks are good on principle. But there are not specifics. No Republican in this race has specific plans to BE conservative in government. Just the usual boilerplate “small govt. less taxes!” pablum.
“Any love letter is incomplete without a Ronald Reagan quote”
–my sophomore year roommate
www.robbinsblog.wordpress.com
Of course a true conservative platform would pass
tankertodd (Diary) Tuesday, May 11th at 3:08PM EST (link)Once you moderate the GOP, then it becomes nearly the Democratic Party, except you get less stuff for yourself. In order to be a truly different option we need to be the party that elects people who are there to decrease their own influence, not increase it. This is something new to current politics, but completely in line with the Founders and the Constitution. This must be our approach in all states and counties, else we fall to the inevitable collapse of the nation due to the entitlement math.
Moderating a failed approach is no victory, except for those who are self-serving.
———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race – Chief Justice Roberts