I will admit that the New York Times largely did not attack South Carolina governor Nikki Haley (R) all that harshly in this article; in fact, they said some things that were actually complimentary (given that the governor is openly going after entrenched Republican interests in SC, that’s probably not a surprise).  But they couldn’t quite resist playing silly games by getting local liberal political flack Jack Bass to say “Her understanding of the role of state government appears rather limited”  – and presenting Bass as an authority.  Here’s a radical notion for the NYT: if you simply must use a liberal to attack a conservative, could you at least mention the following?

In short: I suppose that what I’m asking for here is that if the NYT feels obligated to stealth-use a liberal to go after a conservative, I suppose that I can understand if not approve.  But, please.  Use one that has a better track record than I do when it comes to political outcomes.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: All that being said… really, Madame Governor?  The Black-Eyed Peas?  Did you lose a bet?