The future history of human ownership

 Two hundred years ago, Pro-slavery advocates justified their position by arguing that the slaves were not human. Regardless if they were sincere in this belief and truly ignorant in their ability to discern humans from non-humans, truth prevaild and history has recorded these individuals as "Pro-Human Ownership".  Likewise, when truth eventually prvails and reveals to all that a fetus is a human, will history not be obligated to categorize those who justified the practice of abortion on demand also as Pro-Human Ownership?  Again, the majority of the Democrat party has sided with the practice of human ownership, while the majority of the Republican party has sided with freedom, spearheaded by the radical republicans of the religious right.