Gee, Had, it's been once, twice, three times, M'Lady!

On the night before Christmas, while all through your house there were visions of sugarplums dancing, in other parts of the world, a craven cabal of sixty forced a coup d’etat of the constitutional underpinnings of the United States, and Al-Queda just barely failed at blowing an airliner out of the sky over most Muslim part of the United States, Michigan, due to the heroic actions of passengers and crew. Hope you had a merry Christmas, it’s time to get back to the counter-revolution, if you plan on a happier new year.

Once is an incident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an act of war!

Just as occurred before Christmas in 2001 when Richard C. Reid tried to ignite the plastic explosives hidden in his shoe on a trans-Atlantic flight, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, resident of Lagos, Nigeria, screamed a now famous Arabic phrase, according to his intended victims, as he ignited an incendiary device aboard Northwest Flight 253, an Airbus A330, bound from Amsterdam to Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in Detroit, with three pilots, eight flight attendants, 278 passengers.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, studied mechanical engineering from September 2005 to June 2008 at University College, London, England.

Mr. Abdulmutallab, who left Lagos, Nigeria, late on Christmas Eve and changed planes in Amsterdam, on Christmas Day, known in “extremist” Muslim circles as “the Crusaders’ Holiday”.

Abdulmutallab’s is reported to have confessed to law enforcement agents, after he was carried off the plane handcuffed to a stretcher, his trousers sheared off, suffering from leg burns, that he had been trained and supplied by Al Qaeda operatives in Yemen.

What led a worldly young man, who had studied at an elite British university, while he shared a six million dollar apartment in London, to choose suicidal violence?

What indeed? Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the main organizer of the Sept. 11 plot, was raised in Kuwait by Pakistani parents and earned an engineering degree in North Carolina.

What indeed would lead a born in Virginia, pampered American Muslim citizen, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, M.D., to ambush civilians and military, at a military processing center at Fort Hood, to murder 14 patriots and to wound 30?

Nidal Malik Hasan graduated from Virginia Tech. He joined the US Army, which put him through medical school, from which he graduated in 2003, the Edward Hébert School of Medicine in Bethesda, Md., which is part of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Its curriculum is nearly 700 hours longer than those found at other U.S. medical schools, with students getting training in areas specific to career-oriented military physicians.

Nidal Malik Hasan, M.D., is a psychiatrist licensed in Virginia who was practicing at Darnall Army Medical Center at Fort Hood, according to military and professional records. Previously, he worked at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

Hasan has been a Muslim his entire life. He allegedly sought guidance from top Al Qaeda leader Imam Anwar al-‘Awlaki, who was quoted in a television interview with Al Jazeera as saying that Hasan asked him “about killing U.S. soldiers and officers” and if it was legitimate under Islamic law” . Al-‘Awlaki’s response, ” I may have a role in his intellectual direction, but nothing beyond that, and I am not trying to absolve myself of what he did because I do not support it. No, but because I wish I had had the honor of having a bigger role in what happened [at ft. Hood] than the role I really had.”

Al-‘Awlaki said the two first became acquainted when Al-‘Awlaki served as the imam of the Dar Al-Hijra Islamic Center in Falls Church, Va. Also, it is reported that he was imam at an Islamic center in Washington, D.C. In addition to serving as an imam in northern Virginia, Al-‘Awlaki worked at a mosque in San Diego. U. S. counterterrorism officials have closely watched him after finding evidence of contacts he had with three of the Sept. 11 hijackers.

Lest the name al-‘Awlaki mislead that he is a foreign born terrorist, note that al-‘Awlaki is a New Mexico native who graduated from Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colo., in 1994 with a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and in education leadership at San Diego State, according to his Web site. . In 2002, he moved to Yemen

The Christmas episode on Flight 253, was at least the tenth plot or attempt at “jihadi violence aimed at the United States” in 2009. As such, it capped a year in which plots of violence inside the United States surged.

Al-‘Awlaki supplied AlJazeera.net with copies of his email exchanges with Hasan, because, “I told you about the correspondence, and I explained it, and I even gave you [those original copies], so that you can publish it, because the American administration forbade its publication,” Al-‘Awlaki said. “Why don’t they want this correspondence out? What is the reason? [By banning it from publication,] do they want to cover up their security failure, or is it because they do not want to admit that Nidal Hasan is a man of principles, and that he did what he did in the service of Islam? They want [the operation] to be viewed as individual, unexpected behavior. America does not want to admit that what Nidal did, and what thousands of other Muslims do against America, is because of its policies regarding the Islamic world. Nidal Hasan is a Muslim before he is an American.”

Thus, in a nut-shell, this is the situation. A person, who occupies the White House, who refuses to provide documentation of citizenship needed to buy cigarettes from 7-11, and, who has the Muslim middle name of Hussein, tells us only radical Muslims wish us harm. The Koran teaches that it is permissible to lie with a smile before beheading your enemy who will not submit. Who then is not a radical Muslim, except those who are hypocrites of their religion? While we have strip searches to board airliners, and bomb sniffing dogs, have we yet invented hypocrite-detecting technologies? How do we identify the radical from the not-so-much? Has it ever occurred that a professed Muslim, radical or not, has condemned, or even criticized, a single act of the most egregious barbarities committed in the name of their religion of peace?

This person of questionable nationality and arguable religious faith and political orientation urges the American people to continue their policies regarding the Islamic world which, to me, means:

* Muslims are not discriminated against. They can practice their religion unfettered and are allowed to convert new members.

* The is no stigma attached to being Muslim. No “yellow crescent” is forced to be pinned to clothing to identify adherents. In fact, many Muslims go out of their way to wear garb that sets them apart. Others demand that a veiled face be allowed on their identification documents. In the name of diversity, serious consideration is given to granting what would be considered preposterous, if anyone else requested such.

* We educate domestic, and foreign, “radical” Muslims in our finest schools, sometimes at taxpayer expense, even after the radicals make public statements of their murderous intentions towards the rest of us.

* Muslims are granted dispensation to conduct religious practices in public spaces that bar any hint of Judeo-Christian tinge. Airports that bar space for a Nativity scene, or Menorah, grant space for prayer rugs.

* Commanding generals, not fit to spit shine the boots of real war-fighters, like General Patton, demand the “diversity” of Muslims in the officer corps of our military, even after proof that such are a clear and present fifth column danger in our midst.

* Internationally, a Muslim named, American president actively leads a Christmas Eve coup d’etat on the Constitution of the United States, while simultaneously, he dithers with diplomacy as to how to respond to the creation of an Islamic nuclear weapon. Bolstered by the aid and comfort the actions of that president give them, Al-Queda executes a plot to destroy a large passenger plane on Christmas, and Iranian dictator, Madman I’monajihad, perfects an “Islamic nuclear weapon” for the express purpose of vaporizing you to restore his Savior the “True Mahdi”.

As a devout man of principles in his faith, he acts consistently with one who believes that if he dies in the furtherance of his religion, he will be embraced by seventy celestial virgins, but that the hypocritical infidel “wants to go to heaven, but doesn’t want to die!”

As with Hitler, who was candid about his beliefs and goals, as detailed in “Mein Kampf”, but was dismissed from acceptance as a real threat by many Jews, I’monajihad is candid about his belief and his goals: “To those who are angry with us, we have one thing to say: be angry until you die of anger!”

His adviser, Hassan Abassi, is rather more eloquent. “The Americans are impatient,” he says, “at the first sight of a setback, they run away. We, however, know how to be patient. We have been weaving carpets for thousands of years.”

* There is no automatic negative economic consequence for being a Muslim. Dearborn, Michigan is the hometown of Henry Ford and the world headquarters of the Ford Motor Company. Many years ago Muslim immigrants to the United States were drawn to the relatively high-paying jobs associated with the auto industry in the area.

Dearborn, Michigan now has the largest single concentration of Arab Muslims in North America. Dearborn is one of the few places in the US where one can actually hear the call to prayer publicly over a loudspeaker. Many are Shi’a, co-religionist with Iranian dictator, Madman I’monajihad.

All are allowed to participate in the economic engine that is America. Some are quite wealthy because of that. A few divert their wealth to finance a religion-based war, against the American people, that has no uniformed army, nor respects any national jurisdiction.

Consequently, the non-religious want to conduct civil trials for enemy combatants, as if those persons were but common criminals, and smug religious types want to hide themselves from the truth by calling for more interfaith councils and sloganizing that “if God be for us, who can be against us?”.

To paraphrase General Patton, “Bull****!”

From an international perspective, although founded as a republic with a constitution rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics, America has evolved into a secular socialistic dictatorship, whose most wide spread religious faith is hypocrisy. America has banished the Judeo-Christian God from its public discourse and refuses to submit to an Islamic one. So what God is suppose to be “for us”?

“But the LORD said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not trust in me enough to honor me as holy in the sight of the Israelites, you will not bring this community into the land I give them.”

Numbers 20:12

“‘I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth.

Revelation 3:15-16

But the hypocrites shall be detected and shall be cut off, either in life or in death, even as I will; and woe unto them who are cut off from my church, for the same are overcome of the world.


From a national perspective, a sitting American president with an Islamic name refuses to allow the words, “war on terrorism (and certainly not, ‘war on Islamic extremism’)” to be used in public documents or official speech. He encourages those who have shown themselves to be in concert with those who have proven themselves duplicitous to become integrated into all aspects of the fabric of our society.

Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?

2 Corinthians 6:14

Meanwhile the enemy recognizes the stupidity and weakness of such a behavior and uses that weakness born of lack of wisdom and an excess of hypocrisy to attempt and succeed at killing even more of us.

Ironically, could it be that Al-‘Awlaki is correct? Should we re-tool our policies regarding the Islamic world?

Once is an incident. Twice a coincidence. Three times is an act of war! The Koran teaches that it is permissible to lie with a smile before beheading your enemy who will not submit. Who then is not a radical Muslim, except those who are hypocrites of their religion? While we have strip searches to board airliners, and bomb sniffing dogs, have we yet invented hypocrite-detecting technologies? How do we identify the radical from the not-so-much? Has it ever occurred that a professed Muslim, radical or not, has condemned, or even criticized, a single act of the most egregious barbarities committed in the name of their religion of peace?

Should we re-tool our policies regarding the Islamic world? If so, in what way?