Larsen: Rhetoric becomes nasty

Richard Larsen or our local paper The Ventura County [red] Star writes;

“So, to set the record straight: Obama is not a radical Muslim, he does recite the Pledge of Allegiance, he did not use the Quran when he took his oath of office, he has not been endorsed by the Ku Klux Klan, he never suggested he would like to replace the national anthem with “I’d Like To Teach the World To Sing,” he was born in Honolulu and not Kenya, and Michelle Obama did not spend $500-plus for lunch at a New York hotel (she was in Indiana at the time).”

Larsen drivel

Ok Larsen, now I’ll set the record straight. This has nothing to do with what some “toothless redneck from flyover country” thinks, this is what Obama thinks, who he’s associated with over the years. You’ve obviously read one or both of his books, Dick. Doesn’t it bother you that he “chose [his] friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist Professors and the structural feminists…”? Probably you went to the same type schools in your youth, Larsen, so nothing wrong with Marxist principles in a US President.“From each according to their ability – to each according to their need” you would reject because you know the source. But “The rich need to pay their fair share”, and “”My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” Sounds so much better, doesn’t it?Same exact principle, Larsen, but you want to call the comparison a “vicious attack” I suppose? Setting the record straight, then, when you tell the truth about a liberal, it’s a “vicious personal attack”, correct?

He’ll never read this, he hates red states.