“To the extent veterans read it as an accusation … an apology is owed,” she said during an on-air interview on FOX News Thursday, a day after veterans’ groups and members of Congress blasted her for the report, which they said libeled members of the armed forces.
The problem with that apology is that she retracts it almost as soon as it is uttered by stating the following:
“I’m not running away from it, but I will say it was an assessment. It was not an accusation, and quite frankly, these are products that are produced and shared with law enforcement on a routine basis.”
Does she know the definition of assessment? I think not when the free online dictionary defines it thusly:
1. Analysis of the security, effectiveness, and potential of an existing or planned intelligence activity.
2. Judgment of the motives, qualifications, and characteristics of present or prospective employees or “agents.”
Not to mention the fact that the entire document slams anybody and everybody who holds opposing views to the present administration.
Others have tried to argue the point that there is a left wing extremism report, which can be found here. But the stark and profound differences between the two reports is eye opening. Read it and the contrasting right wing report for yourselves.
Yesterday was the first time in my life I’ve ever attended a protest of any kind. I’m old, fat, and dumpy but now I’m a right wing extremist because I hold opposing views to the socialist attempts at taking over my country.
And proud of it!!!!!