Here’s Why Mike Lee Opposes Federal Aid for Flint

If you give a city a bailout, it’s bound to ask for another. That’s the philosophical foundation of Sen. Mike Lee’s opposition to federal aid for Flint, Mich., the city with contaminated drinking water.

Not only can Michigan handle its own problems, Lee told The Daily Signal, but federal intervention would do more harm than good.

“If we create a precedent that suggests anytime there’s a significant problem with a locally operated utility that operates entirely intrastate,” Lee said, “I would ask where’s the stopping point? What’s the limit?”

A one-man dam, the Utah Republican is holding back an emergency aid package worth $250 million. He argues the money doesn’t target Flint specifically and it’s instead an opportunity for politicians to capitalize on the controversy.

There’s plenty of legitimate tumult in the Michigan city to exploit: more than 40 percent of Flint homes contained dangerous levels of lead in their drinking water.

But Lee points to an overflowing $386 million state rainy day fund and $575 million budget surplus as reasons for Michigan to deal with it’s own problem.

“What’s really happening here is that Washington politicians are using the crisis,” Lee wrote in a statement Friday, “as an excuse to funnel taxpayer money to their own home states.”

Lee adds a philosophical consideration to political and pragmatic concerns: bail out Flint and the government will start federalizing even more local concerns. He told The Daily Signal there’s “definitely a federalism-based argument” to be made against that option.

He fears the federalization of traditionally local responsibilities and the encroachment of national government on the individual states.

Read the rest of the story here and follow Philip Wegmann here.