A recent news report said that a 95-year old caucasian woman with advanced leukemia who was confined to a wheelchair was given extra security screening for 45 minutes at a Florida airport and ultimately was ordered to remove her adult diaper. Transportation Security Administration screeners contended that the diaper could have concealed a weapon.
This is outrageous and just the latest affront to the American people. And this is the Obama multicultural agenda at work that targets and humiliates white people, particularly the weakest and most innocent ones.
Meanwhile Paul Broun, a Republican US congressman from Georgia, recently said in a video statement that TSA officials had patted down “an old lady” and a child, then allowed “a guy in Arabian dress” to “walk…right through.” The Republican president who is elected in 2012 should make clear that these TSA agents will be prosecuted for this type of harassment under anti-discrimination laws. Obama and his bigoted agenda must go.
Here is another report. Reported CNN.com (note italics added for emphasis): ‘
Washington (CNN) — Don’t like the way airport screeners are doing their job? You might not want to complain too much while standing in line. Arrogant complaining about airport security is one indicator Transportation Security Administration officers consider when looking for possible criminals and terrorists, CNN has learned exclusively.
And, when combined with other behavioral indicators, it could result in a traveler facing additional scrutiny. CNN has obtained a list of roughly 70 “behavioral indicators” that TSA behavior detection officers use to identify potentially “high risk” passengers at the nation’s airports. Many of the indicators, as characterized in open government reports, are behaviors and appearances that may be indicative of stress, fear or deception. None of them, as the TSA has long said, refer to or suggest race, religion or ethnicity.’ (end of CNN excerpt)
In other words, after telling us for years that they do not use any type of behavioral profiling, the TSA list says it is using behavioral profiling. Except for the most effective type, which is racial profiling. But there is more to this story than meets the eye.
Look at this nonsensical quote again: ‘Arrogant complaining about airport security is one indicator Transportation Security Administration officers consider when looking for possible criminals and terrorists,..’
So does the government think that terrorists are going to stand in line and complain about airport security? Are not terrorists going to be the last ones to complain? Does not Terrorism 101 demand as Rule #1 that the bad guys always try to “blend in”? Of course it does.
Here is CNN.com:
‘But some experts say terrorists are much more likely to avoid confrontations with authorities, saying an al Qaeda training manual instructs members to blend in. “I think the idea that they would try to draw attention to themselves by being arrogant at airport security, it fails the common sense test,” said CNN National Security Analyst Peter Bergen.
“And it also fails what we know about their behaviors in the past.”’ (end of excerpt)
So what is this about complainers being targeted? Answer: It is bogus. It is just another way to say that TSA is keeping us safe when they are not. It is another way to harass innocent people who are frustrated by the system, and to focus on white grandmothers from Illinois instead of Muslim males from Pakistan. Because after decent people see others being harassed like the little girl being groped by a TSA agent, some are bound to get angry and speak up. Then TSA really puts the hammer down. This is outrageous.
There are two videos on youtube.com of TSA agents harassing children. And rest assured that there are many such cases every day. One video shows an agent patting down a little 6-year-old girl like she is a terrorist at Guantanamo Bay. It is shocking. Another shows a mother picking up her frightened child and the TSA agent continuing to grab the child’s leg and frisk it.
These TSA people are out of control. Or rather, Obama is out of control. Because these are people working on Obama’s orders. And Obama’s orders are to harass and intimidate all airline passengers – primarily white people – so that everyone suffers in the War on Terror, rather than the most likely evildoers.
And this Everyone Suffers approach is making us much less safe. Because it means that TSA is wasting time on the wrong people and avoiding the most effective tactic which is racial profiling. CNN.com reported:
‘The TSA is expanding the behavior detection program, formally known as SPOT, for Screening Passengers by Observation Technique. Currently, some 3,000 uniformed behavior detection officers are deployed at about 175 airports. President Obama is calling for an additional 175 such officers in his 2012 budget proposal, and the TSA is expected to spend a total of $1.2 billion on the program over the next five years. In recent years, the TSA has also expanded the scope of the program. Originally intended to look only for suspected terrorists, the program now also seeks to ferret out possible criminals in airports.’ (end of excerpt)
We should not be looking for criminals at airports. That is for the police. We are looking for terrorists. But don’t tell that to Obama. And don’t wait for ACLU to get on the airport security bandwagon.
“Expressing your contempt about airport procedures — that’s a First Amendment-protected right,” said Michael German, a former FBI agent who now works as legal counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. “We all have the right to express our views, and particularly in a situation where the government is demanding the ability to search you.”‘ (end of excerpt)
So in other words, ACLU does not even want to do behavioral profiling, never mind racial profiling. But the moment an angry white grandmother is hauled in and strip-searched, or a 95-year old woman is stripped of her diaper, ACLU will be on a lunch break, rest assured.
And when TSA feels up little caucasian girls, well that is OK to ACLU. Because good Americans are being harassed. Which is the type of the ‘racial profiling’ that now exists – the profiling of innocent white people. This is how ACLU always turns the tables on law-abiding people and sides with criminals and terrorists.
CNN.com said: ‘
The ACLU’s German, who has not seen the behavioral indicators list, said he fears the indicators “are being used simply as a proxy for racial profiling or other inappropriate police activities.” The number of people arrested at airport checkpoints for immigration violations suggests the behavior detection officers are profiling, he said. Thirty-nine percent of the 1,083 people arrested during the first four and a half years of the program were arrested because they were illegal aliens, according to the Government Accountability Office.’ (end of excerpt)
So in other words, 39% of 1,083 people is 432 people over four and a half years out of more than 3 billion American air travelers in that same period. But that is far too much for the ACLU. Because we know whose side ACLU always is on. Here is more from CNN.com:
‘Members of Congress also expressed concern about the number of “false positives” — people flagged for additional screening that resulted in nothing being found. For every person correctly identified as a “high risk” traveler by (the behavior detection officers), 86 were misidentified, Willis said. At random screening, for every person correctly identified, 794 were misidentified.’ (end of excerpt)
OK, so use racial profiling. It is much more effective. Period. End of story.
Please visit my website at www.nikitas3.com for more. You can read excerpts from my book ‘Right Is Right’ which explains why only conservatism can maintain our freedom and prosperity.