Have you seen the controversial Pepsi commercial that appeared during the 2011 Super Bowl telecast? And the reaction to it?
Here’s the ad: A black female is having dinner with her black husband. She kicks him under the table. She pushes his face down into his food. She shoves a bar of soap into his mouth in the bathroom. Then when an attractive white woman sits down next to the black couple in the park and smiles at the black man, the black woman hurls a can of Pepsi and hits the white woman, knocking her unconscious. The black couple slinks away.
And this is our new era of “civility” that Obama wants?
No it isn’t. This is just more violence from the Media Left. This is just more feminist sexism against men, and it is anti-white racism and black violence against white people, of which there is a tidal wave in the streets of our nation every single day. But since it was a Super Bowl ad, we are supposed to think it is cute. It is not. It is vicious.
To get a perspective, imagine if it were the other way around: That a white man was kicking his white wife, shoving her face into her food, sticking a bar of soap in her mouth and that he hurled a can of Pepsi and hit a black woman in the head, knocking her out, and then ran off.
There would be riots that would make Egypt look like child’s play. Feminists would be in the streets of every city and and Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and all the rest of the racial hucksters would be boycotting Pepsi. Or burning it down.
But don’t let the true nature of the ad get in the way of the perpetually indignant black left in America in the person of congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee. She twisted the ad around to call it “demeaning” to blacks in light of the fact that “February is Black History Month!” What baloney…
Said Lee: “In this month of African-American history where we’re trying to celebrate what is good and great, it certainly seems ridiculous that Pepsi would utilize this kind of humor. It was not humorous. It was demeaning — an African-American woman throwing something at an African-American male and winding up hitting a Caucasian woman.”
What is that supposed to mean? This ad was demeaning to everyone except black females… like Lee. It was demeaning to men, to white people and to white women. It celebrates feminist/black rage. It is blatantly violent like much of what comes out of Lees’ friends and benefactors on the Media Left (violent Follywood movies, violent network prime-time TV etc.).
Lee’s critique of “an African-American woman throwing something at an African-American male and winding up hitting a Caucasian woman” is nonsense. The real effect of the ad, and what will be remembered, is that the white woman was hit by a missile hurled by a black woman. And that certainly would be part of the left’s template – yet another black assault on a caucasian out of millions every year, this time in a national television commercial. The only thing better would have been a white man as the target.
By the way, where all the white feminists to protest this attack?
Answer: They are silent. Because they don’t defend “women”. They defend the left’s agenda. And this ad fit the left’s Black Power political template.
This is not a ‘corporate’ ad, either. This is a product of the left-wing advertising industry, which creates this type of biased advertising all the time, ads that feature smart blacks (particularly women) and that marginalize whites, make men look stupid, make white men look stupid etc. They are on all the time; just watch closely. And these lefty media people who create this stuff are friends of Lee. This ad was a walk in the park for them. It was anti-man and anti-white. What else could feminist Black Power advocate Lee want?
And corporate chiefs are so intimidated by the black agenda that they never question such an ad. Just imagine if it were the other way around? The CEO would be resigning…
And of course Lee needs to be in the spotlight like a good black leftist. And so she completely twists the ad around and makes a big controversy. Because when a strident, publicity-hungry black politician like Lee starts whining, the Ancient Media snap to attention to breathlessly report every word.
No mention by Lee of the ad’s sexism against men, and the anti-white racism and black violence against white people. Which is the way the left twists everything. In other words, if a black murders a white in America, people like Lee blame the white guy for, well, slavery, racism, discrimination etc., etc., etc. This is the way the left always operates – blame whitey, blame righty, and never ever blame black America for its self-inflicted crises (poverty, unemployment, illegitimacy, violence, murder etc.) It is always someone else’s fault.
Remember that Al Sharpton came to national prominence in 1986 falsely accusing a group of white men of raping a black teenage girl named Tawana Brawley. Have the media held Sharpton to account for that?
Of course not. They treat him like black royalty. And quite intentionally Sharpton has never apologized to those men or shown any remorse over this event.
In a case that is telling about the state of race relations in America today, a black Skidmore College sophomore named Justin Tavarez in December attacked a white man in a diner in Saratoga Springs, New York. But since the attacker was black and the victim white, the cops let Tavarez off easy. If Tavarez were white and the victim were black, he’d be in jail charged with a hate crime.
And you can rest assured that the elite left-wing Skidmore faculty pressured the local cops to go easy on Tavarez. After all, he is Not White. Like the black woman who perpetrated the violence in the Pepsi ad. The woman who looks an awful lot like Sheila Jackson Lee.
Please visit my website at www.nikitas3.com for more. You can read excerpts from my book, Right Is Right, which explains why only conservatism can maintain our freedom and prosperity.