Diary

Napolitano, Obama Endangering America

Americans need to arise and to understand the malicious incompetence of president Obama for his feigned concern over continuing terrorist attacks like the Christmas Day assault on the flight into Detroit.

 

The media are treating the Northwest Airlines attack as one that failed. It did not. It was successful. A radical anti-American African Muslim name Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab – whose own father had reported to American officials in Nigeria his son as a threat – received an open-ended visa to enter the US, successfully boarded an America-bound plane without a passport, and detonated an explosive device sewn into his underwear. Luckily it did not reach final blast stage and bring down the flight, but only caught fire. Thus sheer luck prevented the destruction of the airplane.

 

This is the third successful attack of 2009 during the first year of the tenure of a president who refuses to even use the words “war on terror” and whose own Homeland Security secretary, former Arizona Democrat governor Janet Napolitano, is so tortured by political correctness that she has decided that “terrorist attacks” should really be called “man-caused disasters”…

 

This is the loopy pre-9/11 mindset that it leading us to another big attack. And Napolitano must be held to account and removed from office for dereliction of duty.

 

Remember when George Bush was president and the nation suffered zero terrorist attacks in the seven years after 9/11? And the media talked about what a tyrant Bush was? And about how much the world hated us because Bush was such a bully?

 

Yet now we have a weak president reaching out to the world. And his hand has been bitten every single time – by the Russians, by the Iranians, by the North Koreans. And strangely, the world is not seeking to kiss and make up with Obama’s America. In fact the terrorists are ramping up their assaults on a soft president just like they did in the 1990s with Clinton, leading to 9/11.

 

Why?

 

Because the world is commanded by many wicked communists, evil Islamists and other anti-American tyrants who know weakness when they see it, just like an animal does.  They will never be satisfied until America is brought down. That is the reason for terrorism itself. Because Islamic terrorists, often from wealthy families like bin Laden is, wish to bring America down rather than elevate their own destitute cultures. Because they recognize Islamic cultures as failures that never can be elevated, and are ashamed of those cultures. So it is infinitely easier to bring America down to their level.

 

Now we have had three successful attacks in just the last 7 months starting with the June 1 murder of US Army Pvt. William Long who was standing in front of an Army-Navy career recruiting center in West Little Rock, Arkansas when an American-born Islamic convert Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad (born Carl Bledsoe) gunned him down from a passing vehicle. Bledsoe was known to American anti-terror officials. Then there was the November 5 Fort Hood attack by Nidal Malik Hasan, the Islamic Army major who was well-known to his fellow military personnel for bizarre, pro-Islamist and anti-American rants. He killed thirteen people. And then came the Christmas attack.

 

But a Missouri homeland security group issued a report in February 2009 outlining what in Obama’s America is perceived as the real threat – right-wing radicals (i.e., caucasian Americans) on American highways with third-party presidential bumper stickers(!). A federal report issued around the same time warned about the danger of single-issue voters, like people opposing abortion, and added:

 

‘… rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat… The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today… After Operation Desert Shield/Storm in 1990-1991, some returning military veterans—including Timothy McVeigh—joined or associated with rightwing extremist groups….A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.”‘ (end)

 

So do we need to be on the alert for Africans who are actually reported as a threat to US officials? Naaah… How about hatemongers like Hasan who had posted on extremist Islamic websites and was well-known to many in the Army for being an extremist nut? Fughetaboutit. He’ll bring a lawsuit for discrimination… Carl Bledsoe? No, he’s harmless….

 

No, we apparently need to be strip-searching little old white ladies from Kansas who obviously are toting C4 explosive in their Depends on behalf of rural militias, skinheads and pro-life radicals.

 

Interviewed on Fox & Friends on December 28, Napolitano would not even confirm if she ever had personally reviewed guidelines for screening out people like Abdulmutallab – or rather failing to do so. Napolitano even had denied that she had ever personally reviewed the ‘rightwing extremists’ report that was issued last Spring.

 

And so you wonder: Why is this female in the position she is in?

 

Napolitano is incompetent and dangerous and must go. And if Republican candidates are smart in November, they will run not only against the economic mess that Obama has created but against this increasing and blatant negligence toward our national security. “No More Attacks!” sounds like a good GOP slogan to be shouted in every congressional race in America.

 

This is the same Obama who had close ties to 1970s domestic terrorist William Ayers. But no, that was not important, the left assured us. Obama is just a public-spirited community organizer who just happened to live in the same neighborhood as Ayers. But us rightwing extremist nuts have been warning about Obama and his associations since well before he was elected. We warned that these terrorist attacks would escalate. And we were right.

 

Here are excerpts from a Nikitas3.com editorial recommending that Napolitano be denied confirmation as Homeland Security secretary based on her approach to illegal immigration in Arizona:

 

Napolitano’s past is not encouraging. While making feints to stem the illegal alien tide, she has not really done so at all. In July 2007 she signed a sanctions law on employers that hire illegal aliens. While some applauded, skeptics saw this as just another way for liberals to punish business while the same liberals do nothing to stop the flow at the border.

 

Meanwhile Napolitano also vetoed a bill that would have put restrictions on day laborers, many of whom are illegals. So in being “tough” on illegals, she offered sanctions for business but not on illegals themselves.

 

When Arizona House bill 2345 was passed requiring a driver’s license or two forms of ID in order to vote on election days, Napolitano vetoed the bill while supporting legislation to grant driver’s licenses to illegals. It is important to note that all of the 9/11 hijackers had one or more state driver’s licenses, which enabled them not only to board the planes but also to live and travel easily around the US.

 

Napolitano also supported the US senate legislation that would have, over time, offered amnesty to illegals.

 

Also in 2007, Napolitano sent Arizona National Guard troops to the Mexican border, as did Democrat New Mexico governor Bill Richardson. Critics claim, however, that these actions were merely grandstanding on illegal immigration in an attempt to embarass president Bush.

 

Meanwhile Arizona Republican state representative John Kavanagh said that Napolitano has been very weak on “internal enforcement”, having vetoed an Arizona law that would have required local police to enforce federal immigration laws. This veto is seen as de facto protection for illegals.

 

Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, says that “she is probably the least bad person that an Obama administration could have picked.”

 

Is this the time to pick the least of all bad candidates?

 

Or a time to pick someone who will enforce the laws?

 

With the Terrorism Commission warning about an attack by 2013, this is no time to guess about our national security. Napolitano is a bad choice. And our nation will pay the price if she is confirmed. (end)

 

Napolitano must go. She is the real threat to our homeland security.

 

And Obama must go in 2012. Or sooner…

 

Please visit my website at www.nikitas3.com for more. You can print out for free my book, Right Is Right, which explains why only conservatism can maintain our freedom and prosperity.