What do you get when you do not vet the people you appoint as Czars in America? Jennings, Sunstein and Holdren.
Kevin Jennings, Obama’s Safe School Czar, appointed by Arne Duncan, has a problem with reporting statutory rape. According to the Washington Times “ According to Mr. Jennings’ own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy
Cass Sunstein, Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget aka “Regulatory Czar” is in a class all his own. Much like Obama, he has a number of past records that have been “lost.” Sunstein wants to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, and advocates a “First Amendment New Deal,” a new “Fairness Doctrine” that would include the establishment of a panel of “nonpartisan experts” to ensure “diversity of view” on the airwaves.” (HT, WND)
“[A]lost all gun control legislation is constitutionally fine. And if the Court is right, then fundamentalism does not justify the view that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms. ”
– Cass Sunstein, writing in his book, “Radicals in Robes”
“Animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives …”
– 2004 book Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions
“[Humans’] willingness to subject animals to unjustified suffering will be seen … as a form of unconscionable barbarity… morally akin to slavery and the mass extermination of human beings.”
– Cass Sunstein, in a 2007 speech at Harvard University
“A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government.”
-Cass Sunstein, arguing for a Fairness Doctrine for the
Internet in his book, Republic.com 2.0 (page 137).
In short, Sunstein is anti-1st amendment, anti-2nd amendment, and the fertile San Joaquin Valley in California is so screwed.
Alternatively, the authors suggested unwed mothers might place their babies up for adoption, writing: “If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it.”
While observing that government-imposed coercive measures should be considered “only if milder measures fail completely,” the authors acknowledged extreme ecological situations could justify governmental intervention with coercive population control measures,
“It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society,” they write. “
Holdren denied his intent was to have coercive population control, even though the 1970’s book advocates that and much worse, like adding sterilants to drinking water. Politifact agrees that the book does not advocate coercive population control, but these lines do not lie: Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods–ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time–Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society-AND Under questioning by Sen. David Vitter, R-La., during his Senate confirmation hearing, Holdren said he “no longer thinks it’s productive to focus on optimum population for the United States.” No longer, eh? That in and of itself is admission these are his thoughts. This article in Science Magazine clearly shows the same school of thought under a different name, kind of like CO-OP in lieu of government run healthcare. Same pig, different lipstick. These thoughts are right in line with the UN’s population control policy, Agenda 21. It goes without saying that anything the UN advocates, must be scrutinized because the policies coming out of the UN are NEVER good for the US and ALWAYS meant to steal the wealth of the US for some insipid thing that will paralyze us for years to come. Please look up CEDAW for confirmation of this.
These 3 Czars are a danger to America and the freedoms we have so long enjoyed. The are about as far left as one can get. Obama has stated that if you want to know his character, look at who he surrounds himself with. I am looking, and I don’t like what I see. There are a lot of questionable characters surrounding the president and they reflect badly on his character and content. There are only two explanations; either we have the dumbest president ever calling the shots, or he is the Marxist repeatedly pointed out by conservatives and his vision of hope and change are actually Socialist ideas repackaged and put forth as new ideas. Either way, we are in trouble as long as these people are in charge.