See more at TheHayride.com.
The President gave a speech on jobs at the Brookings Institution today. This one was on jobs and the economy. It had his usual elements – blame for his predecessor, leftist delusion, outright lies and a thorough contempt for individual Americans. To wit:
Almost exactly one year ago, on a cold winter’s day, I met with my new economic team at the headquarters of my presidential transition offices in Chicago. Over the course of four hours, my advisors presented an analysis of where the economy stood, accompanied by a chilling set of charts and graphs, predicting where we might end up. It was an unforgettable series of presentations.
Christy Romer, tapped to head the Council of Economic Advisers, and Larry Summers, who I’d chosen to head the National Economic Council, described an imminent downturn comparable in its severity to almost nothing since the 1930s. Tim Geithner, my incoming Treasury Secretary, reported that the financial system, shaken by the subprime crisis, had halted almost all lending, which in turn threatened to pull the broader economy into a downward spiral. And Peter Orszag, my incoming Budget Director, closed out the proceedings with an entirely dismal report on the fiscal health of the country, with growing deficits and debt stretching to the horizon. Having concluded that it was too late to request a recount, I tasked my team with mapping out a plan to tackle the crisis on all fronts.
And the first thing Obama did was to throw out $800 billion in “stimulus” dollars to Democrat special interest groups.
It was not long after that meeting, as we shaped this economic plan, that we began to see these forecasts materialize. Over the previous year, it was obvious that folks were facing hard times. As I traveled across the country during a long campaign, I often met men and women bearing the brunt of not only a deepening recession, but also years – even decades – of growing strains on middle class families. But now the country was experiencing something far worse. Our Gross Domestic Product – the sum total of all that our economy produces – fell at the fastest rate in a quarter century. $5 trillion of Americans’ household wealth evaporated in just twelve weeks as stocks, pensions, and home values plummeted. We were losing an average of 700,000 jobs each month, equivalent to the population of the state of Vermont. The fear among economists across the political spectrum was that we were rapidly plummeting toward a second Great Depression.
This was about when Obama equated the Dow to a daily political tracking poll, was it not? Yeah, he was so serious about the economy that he signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, sought to prosecute Bush administration lawyers over “torture” and embarked on an international Apology Tour. Oh, and the STIMULUS. It created jobs in all 57 congressional districts here in Louisiana, dontcha know.
So, in the weeks and months that followed, we undertook a series of difficult steps to prevent that outcome. And we were forced to take those steps largely without the help of an opposition party which, unfortunately, after having presided over the decision-making that led to the crisis, decided to hand it over to others to solve.
Always blame Republicans. Always. Because that’s productive.
We acted to get lending flowing again so businesses could get loans to buy equipment and ordinary Americans could get financing to buy homes and cars, to go to college, and to start or run businesses. We enacted measures to stem the tide of foreclosures in our housing market, helping responsible homeowners stay in their homes and helping to stop the broader decline in home values which was eating away at what tends to be a family’s largest asset. To achieve this, and to prevent an economic collapse, we were forced to extend assistance to some of the very banks and financial institutions whose actions had helped precipitate the turmoil. We also took steps to prevent the rapid dissolution of the American auto industry, which faced a crisis partly of its own making, to prevent the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs during an already fragile time. These were not decisions that were popular or satisfying; these were decisions that were necessary.
Necessary for what? Nobody, outside of the statist left, seriously believes that had Chrysler and GM gone into bankruptcy there wouldn’t be other players entering the automotive market IF THE GOVERNMENT HAD TAKEN STEPS TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSED THEIR DEMISE IN THE FIRST PLACE. What Obama did with the automakers was to bail out the UAW, which is a client of his.
And getting lending going again is hardly a fix for the economy. America is in too much debt as it is, and with so much bad paper already in the system the problem isn’t a dearth of money being lent. Rather, it’s that the banks are undercapitalized. What steps has the government taken to alleviate that problem? Has Obama cut taxes? Has he looked at relaxing unnecessary regulations so as to lower costs and make marginal borrowers in the business sector more solvent? Has he done anything other than demonize corporate executives and attempt to cut their pay while forcing cash on financial institutions directed toward more of the same uneconomic lending practices which caused the problem in the first place?
Now, even as we worked to address the crises in our banking sector, in our housing market, and in our auto industry, we also began attacking our economic crisis on a broader front. Less than one month after taking office we enacted the most sweeping economic recovery package in history: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The Recovery Act was divided into three parts. One-third went for tax relief for small businesses and 95 percent of working families.
Another third was for emergency relief to help folks who’ve borne the brunt of this recession. We extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 17 million Americans; made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families relying on COBRA; and for state and local governments facing historic budget shortfalls as demand for services went up and tax revenues went down, we provided assistance that has saved the jobs of hundreds of thousands of teachers and public school workers, firefighters and police officers.
The last third is for investments to put Americans to work doing the work America needs done: doubling our capacity in renewable energy like wind and solar; computerizing medical records to save money and lives; providing the largest boost to medical research in history; renovating classrooms and school laboratories; and upgrading roads and railways as part of the largest investment in infrastructure since the creation of the Interstate Highway System half a century ago.
The ARRA was certainly expensive, but it’s a stretch to call it “sweeping.” The “tax relief” Obama touts was nominal at best and violated all of our known prescriptions for jump-starting an economy – namely, making it easier to accumulate capital which can be used to initiate new economic projects. So that third of the stimulus was a failure.
The second third only made things worse – while it’s certainly a humanitarian thing to do to extend unemployment benefits, by doing so you prevent the kinds of personal decisions about careers and employment which may eventually be necessary and thus retard the adjustment of the workforce a recession brings about. The COBRA benefit didn’t do anything to put people back to work. And shoveling money out to state governments which have overspent and in the process soaked up far too much of the private sector’s human and financial capital is anything but a good idea. State governments needed the tough medicine this recession supplies and must cut spending down to more manageable levels; bailing them out prevents them from making difficult but necessary choices and rewards political cowardice and sloth.
And even as the Recovery Act has created jobs and spurred growth, we have not let up in our efforts to take every responsible action to get the economy growing and America working. This fall, I signed into law more than $30 billion in tax cuts for struggling businesses, extended an effective tax credit for homebuyers, and provided additional unemployment insurance for one million Americans. And the Treasury is continuing to adapt our financial stability plan, helping to facilitate the flow of credit to small businesses and families. In addition, we are working to break down barriers and open overseas markets so our companies can better compete globally, creating jobs in America by exporting our products around the world.
The ARRA has created no jobs and no growth. Unemployment sits at 10 percent, a number which is likely to be revised upward given that jobless claim figures come from the week of Thanksgiving when many of the unemployed weren’t filing due to the holidays. It was in the sixes when Obama took office. And for Obama to claim that the stimulus has created economic growth in this economy is beyond laughable – but nothing compares to his claim that he’s breaking down trade barriers at the same time he started a trade war with China over tires, refuses to sign a free-trade pact with Colombia and scared the pants off Canada and Mexico with his union-goon NAFTA rhetoric.
Partly as a result of these and other steps, we’re in a very different place today than we were a year ago. We can safely say that we are no longer facing the potential collapse of our financial system and we’ve avoided the depression many feared. Our economy is growing for the first time in a year – and the swing from contraction to expansion since the beginning of the year is the largest in nearly three decades. Finally, we are no longer seeing the severe deterioration in the job market we once were; in fact we learned on Friday that the unemployment rate fell slightly last month. This is welcome news, and news made possible in part by the up to 1.6 million jobs that the Recovery Act has already created and saved according to the Congressional Budget Office.
It’s too bad Joe Wilson wasn’t in the audience at the Brookings Institution today, because he would have given us a nice show at this point in the speech. Every sentence in this paragraph is a lie. We’re worse off economically than we were this time last year. Fears of a depression remain widespread, particularly among those who have actually studied the history and causes of the Great Depression and understand how instrumental bad government policies were in deepening and prolonging it. As for his “30-year economic swing” claim, he might well regret that statement when the 4th quarter economic figures come out – Gallup reports holiday spending is off 21 percent this year from last year’s depressed numbers, while the consumer confidence score for the day is an awful -28. We’ve already touched on why his bragging on the unemployment figures is premature at best and more than likely fools’ gold, and the claim to have created or saved 1.6 million jobs is so blatantly fraudulent as to defy the imagination.
But our work is far from done. For even though we have reduced the deluge of job losses to a relative trickle, we are not yet creating jobs at a pace to help all those families who have been swept up in the flood. There are more than seven million fewer Americans with jobs today than when this recession began. That’s a staggering figure and one that reflects not only the depths of the hole from which we must ascend, but also a continuing human tragedy. And it speaks to an urgent need to accelerate job growth in the short term while laying a new foundation for lasting economic growth.
Wait, didn’t you just say you created 1.6 million jobs?
My economic team has been considering a full range of additional ideas to help accelerate the pace of private sector hiring. We held a jobs forum at the White House that brought together small business owners, CEOs, union members, economists, folks from non-profits, and state and local officials to talk about job creation. And I’ve asked people to lead forums in their own communities – sending the results to me – so we are hearing as many voices as possible as we refine our proposals. We’ve already heard a number of good ideas, and I know we’ll learn of many more.
Yeah, it’s going to get better very quickly now that he’s brought in the unions and the nonprofits to tell him how to create jobs. And local community forums on job creation are going to produce some real hum-dingers of ideas. Can’t wait to see what Obama announces out of that.
Today, I want to outline some of the broader steps that I believe should be at the heart of our efforts to accelerate job growth – those areas that will generate the greatest number of jobs while generating the greatest value for our economy.
First, we’re proposing a series of steps to help small businesses grow and hire new staff. Over the past fifteen years, small businesses have created roughly 65 percent of all new jobs in America. These are companies formed around kitchen tables in family meetings, formed when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, formed when a worker decides its time she became her own boss. These are also companies that drive innovation, producing thirteen times more patents per employee than large companies. And, it’s worth remembering, every once in a while a small business becomes a big business – and changes the world.
That’s why it is so important that we help small business struggling to open, or stay open, during these difficult times. Building on the tax cuts in the Recovery Act, we’re proposing a complete elimination of capital gains taxes on small business investment along with an extension of write-offs to encourage small businesses to expand in the coming year. And I believe it’s worthwhile to create a tax incentive to encourage small businesses to add and keep employees and I’m going to work with Congress to pass one.
This is actually a good idea. The problem is, when the economy stinks all around, targeting small businesses for free money to get started won’t help make them profitable. Small businesses have to have a market for their goods and services. What is he doing about that?
These steps will help, but we also have to address the continuing struggle of small businesses to get the loans they need to start up and grow. To that end, we’re proposing to waive fees and increase the guarantees for SBA-backed loans. And I am asking my Treasury Secretary to continue mobilizing the remaining TARP funds to facilitate lending to small businesses.
Unbelievable. OK, the TARP money was borrowed from the Chinese and the Saudis, and the government is going to have to pay interest on it. With the government issuing billions in debt, they’re borrowing money you’d ideally want the private sector to have access to. So taking China’s money and lending it to small businesses who are struggling to find a market for their products, rather than using the unused TARP funds to pay down the national debt and save tens of billions in future interest payments, is going to accomplish little. SBA loans are fine, but ultimately if the economy is robust you don’t have to depend on the federal government to facilitate lending. This is precisely the opposite approach to what we ought to be doing. Cut tax rates across the board, including payroll taxes, and you’ll see more disposable income for businesses and individuals and more capital to be accumulated. Obama neither knows nor cares about any of this.
Second, we’re proposing a boost in investment in the nation’s infrastructure beyond what was included in the Recovery Act, to continue modernizing our transportation and communications networks. These are needed public works that engage private sector companies, spurring hiring across the country. Already, more than 10,000 of these projects have been funded through the Recovery Act. And by design, Recovery Act work on roads, bridges, water systems, Superfund sites, broadband networks, and clean energy projects will all be ramping up in the months ahead. It was planned this way for two reasons: so the impact would be felt over a two year period; and, more importantly, because we wanted to do this right. The potential for abuse in a program of this magnitude, while operating at such a fast pace, was enormous. So I asked Vice President Biden and others to make sure – to the extent humanly possible – that the investments were sound, the projects worthy, and the execution efficient. What this means is that we’re going to see even more work – and workers – on Recovery projects in the next six months than we saw in the last six months.
More roads and bridges, which means more cost for the states to maintain them. And Joe “Plugs” Biden is going to make sure the whole thing runs like Beijing. This is a good plan.
Even so, there are many more worthy projects than there were dollars to fund them. I recognize that by their nature these projects often take time, and will therefore create jobs over time. But the need for jobs will also last beyond next year and the benefits of these investments will last years beyond that. So adding to this initiative to rebuild America’s infrastructure is the right thing to do.
[sigh] And it’s incumbent upon the federal government, using more borrowed money from China, to fund these projects rather than having states and local governments set their own priorities and fund them within their own means. Pork is gooooooooood.
Third, I’m calling on Congress to consider a new program to provide incentives for consumers who retrofit their homes to become more energy efficient, which we know creates jobs, saves money for families, and reduces the pollution that threatens our environment. And I’m proposing that we expand select Recovery Act initiatives to promote energy efficiency and clean energy jobs which have proven particularly popular and effective. It’s a positive sign that many of these programs drew so many applicants for funding that a lot of strong proposals – proposals that will leverage private capital and create jobs quickly – did not make the cut. With additional resources, in areas like advanced manufacturing of wind turbines and solar panels, for instance, we can help turn good ideas into good private-sector jobs.
In other words, when Spain did the exact same thing and lost 2.2 jobs for every one they created, spent some $400,000 for every “green job” they spun up and drove their unemployment rate to 18 percent, that was a fluke. It’ll work MUCH better here. Van Jones might have been run off, but every single one of the ideas he attempted to foist on the country is still dancing around in Obama’s head.
Finally, as we are moving forward in these areas, we should also extend the relief in the Recovery Act, including emergency assistance to seniors, unemployment insurance benefits, COBRA, and relief to states and localities to prevent layoffs. This will help folks weathering these storms while boosting consumer spending and promoting jobs.
More goodies for special interest groups, more wasted money and more debt. We have already had two stimulus packages (the first one was under the previous administration in 2008, if you’ll remember) and neither one accomplished anything. Third time’s the charm?
Of course, there is only so much government can do. Job creation will ultimately depend on the real job creators: businesses across America. But government can help lay the groundwork on which the private sector can better generate jobs, growth, and innovation. After all, small business tax relief is not a substitute for the ingenuity and industriousness of our entrepreneurs; but it can help those with good ideas to grow and expand. Incentives to promote energy efficiency and clean energy manufacturing do not automatically create jobs or lower carbon emissions; but these steps provide a framework in which companies can compete and innovate to create those jobs and reduce energy consumption. And while modernizing the physical and virtual networks that connect us will create private-sector jobs, they’ll do so while making it possible for companies to more easily and effectively move their products across this country and around the world.
He sics the EPA on every productive enterprise in America on Monday, and on Tuesday he says it’s up to the private sector to grow the economy. Anybody else see a disconnect here? Guy is lying through his teeth – he believes in the free market like he believes in the war in Afghanistan.
Given the challenge of accelerating the pace of hiring in the private sector, these targeted initiatives are right and they are needed. But with a fiscal crisis to match our economic crisis, we also must be prudent about how we fund it. So to help support these efforts, we’re going to wind down the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP – the fund created to stabilize the financial system so banks would lend again.
There has rarely been a less loved or more necessary emergency program than TARP, which – as galling as the assistance to banks may have been – indisputably helped prevent a collapse of the entire financial system. Launched hastily under the last administration, the TARP program was flawed, and we have worked hard to correct those flaws and manage it properly. And today, TARP has served its original purpose and at a much lower cost than we expected.
Another shot at Bush. Charming.
In fact, because of our stewardship of this program, and the transparency and accountability we put in place, TARP is expected to cost the taxpayer at least $200 billion less than what was anticipated just this summer. And the assistance to banks, once thought to cost the taxpayers untold billions, is on track to actually reap billions in profit for the taxpaying public. This gives us a chance to pay down the deficit faster than we thought possible and to shift funds that would have gone to help the banks on Wall Street to help create jobs on Main Street.
By a show of hands – how many believe that TurboTax Tim Geithner fixed the TARP program that was busted before he got there? I didn’t think so. Geithner, when he was running the New York Fed, had nothing to do with initiating and crafting the busted TARP program in the first place, too. Riiiiight.
Small business, infrastructure, clean energy: these are areas in which we can put Americans to work while putting our nation on a sturdier economic footing. That foundation for sustained economic growth must be our continuing focus and our ultimate goal. For even before this period crisis, much of our growth had been fueled by unsustainable consumer debt and reckless financial speculation, while we ignored the fundamental challenges that hold the key to our economic prosperity. We cannot simply go back to the way things used to be. We cannot go back to an economy that yielded cycle after cycle of speculative booms and painful busts. We cannot continue to accept an education system in which our students trail their peers in other countries, and a health care system in which exploding costs put our businesses at a competitive disadvantage. And we cannot continue to ignore the clean energy challenge or cede global leadership in the emerging industries of the 21st century. That’s why, as we strive to meet the crisis of the moment, we are laying a new foundation for the future.
Finally, a meaningful statement. Obama says we can’t have an economy based on individual consumer spending, and he wants to outlaw the business cycle. I guess a five-year plan works a lot better. And his objectives are small business (rather than expanding business, because given the taxes and regulations he wants to foist on the economy almost nobody will make investments to grow), infrastructure (also known as government spending) and clean energy (as opposed to the 85 percent of our economy which works on fossil fuels when we have the world’s largest reserves of them). He’s going to outlaw the business cycle, all right – he’ll lop the top of it right off and turn us into Japan circa 1990-2000.
Because an educated workforce is essential in a 21st century global economy, we’ve launched a competitive Race to the Top fund through the Recovery Act to reform our schools and raise achievement, especially in math and science. And we’ve made college more affordable, proposed an historic set of reforms and investments in community college, and set a goal of once again leading the world in producing college graduates by 2020.
Some of those initiatives make sense, but since the federal government doesn’t run any schools they’re none of Obama’s business and he needs to get out of the way and let local folks – or better yet, parents and kids – make the educational decisions which are right for them. That ain’t gonna happen with this guy.
Because even the best trained workers in the world can’t compete if our businesses are saddled with rapidly increasing health care costs, we’re fighting to do what we have discussed in this country for generations: finally reforming our nation’s broken health insurance system and relieving this unsustainable burden.
Obamacare as a prescription for economic growth? It’s wintertime – maybe we can go snowskiing on Bullshit Mountain.
Because our economic future depends on a financial system that encourages sound investments, honest dealings, and long-term growth, we’ve proposed the most ambitious financial reforms since the Great Depression. We’ll set and enforce clear rules of the road, close loopholes in oversight, charge a new agency with protecting consumers, and address the dangerous, systemic risks that brought us to the brink of disaster. These reforms are moving through Congress, we’re working to keep those reforms strong, and I look forward to signing them into law.
This from the guy who basically exploded the bankruptcy laws, put a czar in charge of who could make what, demonized professionals for taking bonuses they had contracted for and has crooks like Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer and Chris Dodd working on “reforms” of the financial system. Feel better?
And because our economic future depends on our leadership in the industries of the future, we are investing in basic and applied research, and working to create the incentives to build a new clean energy economy. For we know the nation that leads in clean energy will be the nation that leads the world. I want America to be that nation. I want America’s prosperity to be powered by what we invent and pioneer – not just what we borrow and consume. And I know that we can and will be that nation, if we are willing to do what it takes to get there.
Spain led on clean energy. Are they leading the world? Windmills have been around for hundreds of years – they don’t compete with oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy. And if you want an economy powered by invention and innovation, then GET OUT OF THE WAY.
There are those who claim we have to choose between paying down our deficits on the one hand, and investing in job creation and economic growth on the other. But this is a false choice. Ensuring that economic growth and job creation are strong and sustained is critical to ensuring that we are increasing revenues and decreasing spending on things like unemployment so that our deficits will start coming down. At the same time, instilling confidence in our commitment to being fiscally prudent gives the private sector the confidence to make long-term investments in our people and on our shores.
Confidence? Nobody is willing to take economic risks at all because they see Obama’s policies on health care, taxes, “climate change,” regulation and federal debt. And he wants to talk about confidence? The mind boggles. This is a guy who holds a jobs summit and doesn’t bring in anybody from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce or the National Federation of Independent Business. And he expects confidence?
One of the central goals of this administration is restoring fiscal responsibility. Even as we have had to spend our way out of this recession in the near term, we have begun to make the hard choices necessary to get our country on a more stable fiscal footing in the long run. Despite what some have claimed, the cost of the Recovery Act is only a very small part of our current budget imbalance. In reality, the deficit had been building dramatically over the previous eight years. Folks passed tax cuts and expensive entitlement programs without paying for any of it – even as health care costs kept rising, year after year. As a result, the deficit had reached $1.3 trillion when we walked into the White House. And I’d note: these budget busting tax cuts and spending programs were approved by many of the same people who are now waxing political about fiscal responsibility while opposing our efforts to reduce deficits by getting health care costs under control. It’s a sight to see.
A 200-page book could be written about the white-hot lies in this paragraph. I don’t even know where to begin.
The fact is, we have refused to go along with business as usual; we’re taking responsibility for every dollar we spend. We’ve done what some said was impossible: preventing wasteful spending on outdated weapons systems that even the Pentagon said it didn’t want. We’ve combed the budget, cutting waste and excess wherever we could. I’m still committed to halving the deficit we inherited by the end of my first term. And I made clear from day one that I would not sign a health insurance reform bill if it raised the deficit by one dime – and neither the House nor Senate bill does. We have begun to not only change policies but also to change the culture in Washington.
The deficit is $1.4 trillion. It was less than half that number in Bush’s last year. And Obama claims the mantle of fiscal responsibility. He claims to have created jobs in congressional districts which don’t even exist on a website he spent $18 million to build, and he says he’s accountable for every dollar. You’ve got to hand it to the guy.
In the end, the economic crisis of the past year was not just the result of weaknesses in our economy. It was also the result of weaknesses in our political system. For decades, too many in Washington put off hard decisions. For decades, we’ve watched as efforts to solve tough problems have fallen prey to the bitterness of partisanship, to the prosaic concerns of politics, to ever-quickening news cycles, and to endless campaigns focused on scoring points instead of meeting our common challenges.
Specifically, the Community Reinvestment Act and the federal government’s tampering with prudent lending standards while creating a secondary market for bad loans through Fannie and Freddie brought the economy low. Obama supported these abuses every step of the way, as did his team of stooges currently in charge of Congress. It’s not our political system which broke the economy – it’s a particular political party, abetted by another party which lacked the stones to fight them, which broke it.
But more generally, what is Obama saying here? Is he saying there’s a structural weakness in the American political system which needs to be fixed? Partisanship is killing the economy? And that gets fixed how? One-party rule?
We have seen the consequences of this failure of responsibility. The American people have paid a heavy price. And the question we’ll have to answer now is if we are going to learn from our past, or if – even in the aftermath of disaster – we are going to repeat it. As the alarm bells fade, and the din of Washington rises, as the forces of the status quo marshal their resources, we can be sure that answering this question will be a fight to the finish. But I have every hope and expectation that we can rise to this moment, that we can transcend the failures of the past, that we can once again take responsibility for our future.
Sounds kinda like one-party rule. Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but this looks like a fairly fascist speech.
Almost every night, I read letters and emails sent to me from folks across America – people who share their hopes and their hardships, their faith in this country and their frustrations with what’s happened in this economy. I hear from small business owners worried about making payroll and keeping their doors open. I hear from mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, who have seen one or two or more family members out of work. The toughest letters are in children’s handwriting: kids who can’t just be kids because they’re worried after mom had her hours cut or dad lost his job and with it the family’s health insurance. These folks aren’t looking for a hand out. They’re not looking for a bail out. They’re hoping for a chance to make their own way, to work, to succeed using their talents and skills. All they’re looking for from Washington is a seriousness of purpose that matches the reality of their struggle.
If all Obama is getting is letters from people who want him to take over their lives and make them better, we’re in a lot of trouble. I guess the Joe The Plumbers of the world aren’t writing letters for fear of getting audited or having the local paper conduct and publish opposition research on them.
Everywhere I’ve gone, every stop I’ve made, there are people like this, men and women who have faced misfortune, but who stand ready to build a better future. There are students ready to learn. Workers eager to work. Scientists on the brink of discovery. There are entrepreneurs seeking the chance to open a small business. And once-shuttered factories just waiting to whir back to life in burgeoning industries. There is a nation ready to meet the challenges of this new age and to lead the world in this new century. And as we look back on the progress of the past year, and look forward to the work ahead, I have every confidence that we will do exactly that.
My head is spinning. How’s yours?
These have been a tough two years. And there will no doubt be difficult months ahead. But the storms of the past are receding. The skies are brightening. And the horizon is beckoning once more.
As of this posting, the Dow has fallen 104 points today. We’ll not do too much navel-gazing as to the cause, but it doesn’t look like Obama did much to inspire investors with this speech.