My take on Mark Steyn’s latest. His column was published in the Orange County Register.
Summary: Airport measures taken since the Christmas terror attack have made things worse for passengers while not hindering more terror attacks.
First, the bureaucrats at the TSA swung into action with a whole new range of restrictions.
Against radical Yemen-trained Muslims wearing weaponized briefs? Of course not. That would be too obvious. So instead they imposed a slew of constraints against you. At Heathrow last week, they were permitting only one item of carry-on on U.S. flights. In Toronto, no large purses.
Um, the Pantybomber didn’t have a purse. He brought the bomb on board under his private parts, and his private parts weren’t part of his carry-on. . . .
My Views: Valid point – National Security thinking needs to get away from all this politically correct, no profiling stuff. Clearly, the Fort Hood shooter should never have been promoted to Major in the US Army. It wasn’t that his problems were unknown; it was the fear of official retribution if he was denied promotion – or (ahem!) kicked out of the army, entirely. Kicking him out of the country would have been too sensible.
Not valid point – the criticisms of Obama. Yes, he ought not have allowed the Christmas Terrorist a civilian trial but once he did, his remarks couldn’t prejudice the prosecution. So the reliance on the word “allegedly” and so on. More significant are the President’s latest statements on how the system failed and how things need to be improved.
Steyn’s column is correct in critizing the President’s actions; not so correct in criticizing the President’s words. Sadly, actions still speak louder than words.
Mark Steyn is a syndicated columnist from Canada. Here’s his Wiki bio.
His is the book got several Human Rights Commissions in Canada hot and bothered. With free speech under unprecedented attack, Mark Steyn managed to pull out a badly needed victory. This was the first time a Canadian Human Rights Commission found a defendant innocent.