Trump Was Right About Sweden, but He Was Wrong About Which Night by Two.

The world had a ton of fun pointing and laughing at Trump him over his statements about Sweden last Saturday. Numerous articles claimed he insinuated some terrorist attack happened in Sweden the night before his rally when in fact, he never made such claim. But people hear what they want to hear and tweet what they want to tweet even if it’s not accurate. That’s their right. But they might be wrong.

By now his words have been analyzed to death to discern his real meaning. It’s true that he’s not always artful with his words but it’s also true that he’s been correct on many issues.

We’ve got to keep our country safe,” he said. “You look at what’s happening in Germany. You look at what’s happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this? Sweden. They took in large numbers. They’re having problems like they never thought possible. You look at what’s happening in Brussels. You look at what’s happening all over the world. Take a look at Nice. Take a look at Paris.

He described countries that have taken in large numbers of migrants, let’s face it, mostly from Muslim countries, and said that it’s wreaking havoc in Western countries. That rings true to me.

Nearly all of the terrorist acts committed in Europe and here at home are done by Muslims, some are even citizens of the countries they attacked! He doesn’t want the same thing to happen here by opening our doors to unlimited and unchecked immigrants which has plagued Europe.

So what has been happening in Sweden? Well it’s peaceful and lovely according to the former PM Carl Bildt.

Oh dear, seems the same day that the former PM tweeted that out, riots broke out! Two days after Trump’s remarks. Even WaPo covered it with this glorious contradictory sentence (my emphasis here and elsewhere):

Just two days after President Trump provoked widespread consternation by seeming to imply, incorrectly, that immigrants had perpetrated a recent spate of violence in Sweden, riots broke out in a predominantly immigrant neighborhood in the northern suburbs of the country’s capital, Stockholm.

Surely this was a one-off rioting thing. Mmm, no. Same WaPo link:

The neighborhood, Rinkeby, was the scene of riots in 2010 and 2013, too. And in most ways, what happened Monday night was reminiscent of those earlier bouts of anger. Swedish police apparently made an arrest on drug charges at about 8 p.m. near the Rinkeby station. For reasons not yet disclosed by the police, word of the arrest prompted youths to gather.

Over four hours, the crowd burned about half a dozen cars, vandalized several shopfronts and threw rocks at police. Police spokesman Lars Bystrom confirmed to Sweden’s Dagens Nyheter newspaper that an officer fired shots at a rioter but missed. A photographer for the newspaper was attacked and beaten by more than a dozen men and his camera was stolen.

But the kicker is, as usual, Sweden likes to keep a lid on violence by Muslims as that’s a sensitive issue and downplays the actual crimes.

The rate of rape in Sweden has tripled in ten years. The response of the Swedish government is to cover it all up – Sweden does not record the ethnicities of rapists. It ostracizes those who dare speak out.

And sometimes worse than ostracize:

In fact, the truth seems very inconvenient for Sweden’s multiculturalist program. So much so, that the nation’s complicit media will tell bold-faced lies to advance it. For example, Carlqvist and Hedegaard point out that a brutal gang rape aboard a Finnish ferry this month was reported by the following newspapers thus:

•“Several Swedish Men Suspected of Rape on the Finland Ferry” (Dagens Nyheter).

•“Six Swedish Men Raped Woman in Cabin” (Aftonbladet).

•“Six Swedes Arrested for Rape on Ferry” (Expressen).

•“Eight Swedes Suspected of Rape on Ferry” (TT – the Swedish News Agency).

The problem? All the suspects were Muslim — and all were foreign nationals, having no Swedish citizenship. This didn’t stop the media from turning them into “honorary Swedes,” however.

Oh, when journalists from Aftonposten and Expressen were asked by Internet radio station Granskning Sverige about this blatantly dishonest reportage, they said it was “irrelevant” and that they were “offended” at the suggestion they had a responsibility to tell women the truth. As Carlqvist and Hedegaard wrote:

One journalist asked why that should be their responsibility.

“If the women knew, then perhaps they would have stayed away from these men and avoided being raped,” said the reporter from Granskning Sverige. Whereupon the journalist slammed down the phone.

Sweden, like other European countries, is willing to sacrifice its female citizenry for the sake of political correctness.

It seems that Sweden has its share of fake news too. Kind of similar to what Trump tweeted to clarify his rally remarks:

My statement as to what’s happening in Sweden was in reference to a story that was broadcast on @FoxNews concerning immigrants & Sweden.

Give the public a break – The FAKE NEWS media is trying to say that large scale immigration in Sweden is working out just beautifully. NOT!

So unless someone claims those rioters are simply peaceful protesters, then Trump’s statement and tweets are accurate. And as PJMedia.com stated, Sweden has more problems, and so does their current PM.

The migrant violence is just part of the problem. The UK’s Express reported several weeks ago:

Sweden’s Prime Minister was brutalised in Parliament for allowing Sweden to crumble into a lawless state.

This was not hyperbole:

In February 2016, the National Criminal Investigation Service was forced to admit more than 50 areas in were now labelled as “no-go zones” as sex crimes, attacks on police, drug dealing and children carrying weapons were common occurrences.

Malmo, Sweden’s third-largest city, has been so hard hit by crime and car fires, the Social Democrats demanded soldiers should be sent in to reestablish law and order.

As I stated before, what comes next is the cover-up and denial of the root cause:

Police spokesperson Ewa-Gun Westford explained:

“Some cases concern rapes while in other cases it’s sexual molestation, and we think [this situation] could escalate. We do not want to create a rancorous atmosphere among the public but want to tread carefully. The information we have leads in a certain direction, but it is very sensitive and [these are] difficult issues for the vulnerable.”

What? (says PJ Media)

The “sensitive,” “difficult” nature of fighting back against rape? Westford is referring only to the fact that Muslim migrants were perpetrating these crimes — and no one wanted to discuss the implications of that.

Many outlets pointed to the former Swede PM as proof that Trump should be mocked for his statements. Curious me had to know about this so-called Trump expert and Twitter troller.

As it turns out, he was the PM for just four years in a country that doesn’t have term limits. His only term ended in 1994. He’s an Obama and Hillary lover.

On the eighth of November, the former leader of Sweden’s centre-right Moderates Tweeted a picture of himself stood with Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, captioned: “The vote is for the citizens of the US, but clear with whom the hope of most of the world is today.

Awww, he had a sad face on our election day. But wait, there’s more.

On 11/15/16, as a contributing columnist for WaPo, he wrote an OpEd where he claimed that the sky was falling! Ok, that was fake but he did say that “it’s the end of the West as we know it” with Trump’s election. He also praised Obama and then worried that Trump will undo Obama’s actions:

By design or by default, he transmits a signal of support to those dark forces in various countries trying to undo what generations of U.S. and European statesmen have worked to achieve.

But the list of European concerns certainly doesn’t end there. It also includes his talk of abrogating the Paris global climate agreement, undermining the Iran deal, questioning important free-trade agreements — signature achievements and goals of the past few years that are suddenly up in the air.

The point is, he has zero credibility as having an objective opinion about Trump.  Give me a source that’s shown credible objectivity and I’ll believe their words.

Blitz is very concerned that Trump undermines the Swedish socialist mentality and that of other European nations and one that Obama tried desperately to enact in America.

In other words, he and those that think like him are most afraid that Trump is raising the curtain on the great socialist Oz. Then the people will see just how small and impotent their ideas really are in reality-ville and might even reject them.

Welcome to the new world order where people are rejecting open borders and socialism with their votes. Brexit anyone? Trump was right about that too. If Marine Le Pen wins, the gig is over.