Diary

Attorney Phil J. Berg vs. Barack Obama and the DNC

This Video by Attorney Phil J. Berg just came in to me (url below). Hear what Berg’s legal credentials are, and why he filed this lawsuit in August 2008. The outcome is pending, because Obama and the DNC, in a delay tactic, filed a motion for dismissal. But Berg then filed a motion for discovery, requesting a list of appropriate certified documents from Obama and the DNC, and the outcome is pending.

Attorney Berg explains his legal credentials, why he filed the lawsuit against Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee (DNC): in federal court in Pennsylvania, to force Obama to prove that he is a natural born citizen of the United States.

If you already know about this lawsuit, still pending outcome, please skip to the URL below to hear clearly from Attorney Berg himself, all the pertinent answers as to why this is a crucial lawsuit, and the implications it means for the November 4, 2008 Presidential Election.

This Video by Attorney Berg just came in to me (url below). Hear what Berg’s legal credentials are, and why he filed this lawsuit in August 2008. The outcome is pending, because Obama and the DNC, in a delay tactic, filed a motion for dismissal. But Berg then filed a motion for discovery, requesting a list of appropriate certified documents from Obama and the DNC, and the outcome is pending.

Attorney Berg explains his legal credentials, why he filed the lawsuit against Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee (DNC): in federal court in Pennsylvania, to force Obama to prove that he is a natural born citizen of the United States.

If you already know about this lawsuit, still pending outcome, please skip to the URL below to hear clearly from Attorney Berg himself, all the pertinent answers as to why this is a crucial lawsuit, and the implications it means for the November 4, 2008 Presidential Election.

Further, he explains in great simplicity the basis of the outcome of the court case, even in the face of Obama’s legal team filing for dismissal and potentially delaying the outcome of the case. Berg asks, “Why not provide the certificates of documentation?” “Why simply ask for a dismissal? And in the end, “What are you hiding?” if not that Obama is not qualified to become U.S. President.

You can hear and see Berg in this video in his own words, that the evidence as of this date is that Obama was actually born IN Kenya, including that his Kenyan grandmother bragging even today of being present for his birth in Kenya. Circumstances were, though, that it’s possible Obama became “naturalized” as a citizen of America. However, a U.S. President is constitutionally required to have been naturally born on American soil, or to have had proper papers filed within a certain time-frame by his American birth mother–which would provide U.S. Citizenship as natural born to her, the same as with military personnel having children born outside the U.S. But the question remains: did this happen in Obama’s case, or did he remain as a stepchild to her second husband, and instead, carrying forward his citizenship of Kenya until he came to America to live with his maternal grandparents in Kansas?

Berg filed for discovery information to be provided, in the form of a list of documents that would satisfy the question of Obama’s actual citizenship in Kenya as of today–and whether, in fact, Obama has a dual citizenship, as a legally naturalized citizen of America, after the fact. Or can he provide proof from the formerly claimed position, saying that he was “born in Honolulu, Hawaii”? That certified birth certificate should be available, at his personal authorization for Hawaii to provide it–if this is true. The computer “Certification of Birth” formerly on the Obama Campaign site, purported, to be authorized by Hawaiian authorities–has been proven to be clearly a fake, and has already been removed from Obama’s Campaign site online. (If you would like a copy of the original image I downloaded before the reduced copy was removed, please write and ask me to send it to you.)

After you view this video at the url below, you can decide whether there is, in fact, a real basis for this lawsuit, and then, America continues to await the coming outcome….

This Video by Attorney Berg just came in to me (url below). Hear what Berg’s legal credentials are, and why he filed this lawsuit in August 2008. The outcome is pending, because Obama and the DNC, in a delay tactic waiting until the deadline to respond, filed a motion for dismissal. But Berg then filed a motion for discovery, requesting a list of appropriate certified documents from Obama and the DNC, and the outcome is pending.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyspCRmJv7w&eurl=http://www.obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/1-main/31-new-video-posted-at-you-tube-details-the-issues-in-be