How can we possibly trust him with the presidency?

How can Mitt Romney call himself a “conservative?”

After what we have already been experiencing on the campaign trail…..…

…how could we support a man who like Obama forced Christian hospitals to issue the abortion drug, who allowed Planned Parenthood to be written by name into RomneyCare, who mandated same sex marriage in Massachusetts, and who remains publicly committed to the radical, homosexual political agenda, to the dissolution of our society’s fundamental building blocks of ontologically sane marriage and family?

…how could we vote for either Obama or the other side of the coin, Romney, in November?*

…how could we violate our own consciences, by voting for a Quisling, one who sides with our pitched enemy?   Romney’s ideals aren’t too far from Senator Ted Kennedy’s considering his record in MA.  Romney has yet to demonstrate conservative ideals nor has he tried to reach out to Tea Partiers.  You can’t get elected on independents, moderates, uniformed  and single issue voters.

Video names him Mitt “Fee Fee” Romney because of tax hikes renamed as fees that killed jobs.

Romney is aggressively compliant with Agenda 21, Millennium Goals, which destroy American sovereignty, the very foundation for our freedoms. Agenda 21 & ICLEI establish unelected regional governance in America, soviet-style, instructed by one-world mandates. That is all we should need to know about any Quisling who would support it.

Mitt Romney shall see diminishing returns from negative advertising and his endless lies about his record while his competitors are far more honorable men. As time wears on and voters continue to learn of Romney’s past an see he is not a conservative nor a “trusted” business leader the support shall decline and so shall the votes. Romney received fewer votes than in 2008, a clear sign of internal problems coupled with polls that expose weaknesses across the board. Romney and the pro-Romney Super PAC Restore Our Future spent a $15,389,287 on advertising in Florida. Gingrich and the pro-Gingrich Super PAC Winning Our Future spent a total of $3,389,805.

The Associated Press reported that 771,842 votes went to Romney, while 531,294 went to Gingrich after all precincts were counted. Which means the Romney campaign and its Super PAC spent $19.94 per vote, while the Gingrich campaign and its Super PAC spent $6.38 per vote.

Santorum is leading in Missouri polls, this too shall take the wind out of Romney’s sails. We can take Romney down just like in 2008. The competition needs to stay negative and focus on his core weaknesses on Romneycare, medicare fraud and the fact he can’t run on his record without exposing more weaknesses.

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/romney-losing-independents-poll/2012/01/31/id/426187

The Florida primary has exposed some of Mitt Romney’s flaws. Romney appears to be losing ground, especially with independents. The image that Romney has cultivated for years has come under attack and the damage shows in several polls, the New York Times reports.

“In a Washington Post/NBC News poll showed, 49 percent of the respondents nationwide held an unfavorable view of Romney, while only 31 percent had a favorable one,” the Times says.

The same Washington Post/NBC News poll shows Romney’s favorability rating among independents cut in half. It’s now down to 23 percent from a high in the mid-40’s in November.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/romneys-fight-to-win-comes-at-a-cost-polls-show/?ref=politics#

The monthlong feud with Newt Gingrich has identified clear vulnerabilities for Mr. Romney on issues like his wealth, his work for Bain Capital, a private equity firm, the taxes he pays and his positions on immigration, Medicare and health care.

It also has cost Mr. Romney — at least for now — the generally likable image that he has nurtured for years. In polls during the last several weeks, the number of people who view him favorably has plunged, especially among independent voters who will likely decide the general election later this year.

In one advertisement titled “Blood Money” produced by a “Super PAC” backing Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Romney is accused of having “supervised a company guilty of massive Medicare fraud. That’s a fact.” The ad shows the words “illegal activity” on the screen.

Mr. Obama’s campaign manager made it clear last week that he intends to try and capitalize on the weaknesses.

“As Mitt Romney moves through the Republican primaries, he finds himself in an increasingly weak position among every category of voter critical for a Republican to win the general election,” the campaign manager, Jim Messina, said in a memorandum to reporters. “The bottom line is this: the more voters learn about Romney, the more unfavorably they view him.”

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/gingrich-santorum-lead-romney/2012/01/31/id/426186

Former Sen. Rick Santorum and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich lead the way in states with upcoming primaries, according to The State Column. In Ohio, Gingrich leads with 26 percent, followed by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney with 25 percent. Santorum is not far behind, with 22 percent, while Texas Rep. Ron Paul has 11 percent. Ohio’s primary election will be held on Super Tuesday, March 6.

Gingrich’s name is not on the ballot in Missouri, where Santorum leads with 45 percent, followed by Romney with 34 percent and Paul with 13 percent. Missouri’s primary is scheduled for Tuesday, Feb. 7, which is the same day of the Colorado and Minnesota caucuses.

This is the man who now calls himself a conservative. Nothing could be further from the truth considering the importance of the Contract with America. Long time till debate so someone should ask questions at a townhall to hear the excuse for disliking the CWA. As the dirt unfolds the mudslinging shall subdue Mitt Romney on worse terms than 2008. The past has a way of catching up with all politicians……and then some.

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Romney-Was-Independent-Not/2012/01/28/id/425824?s=al&promo_code=E100-1

As the Florida primary looms closer, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has more and more strongly identified himself as a consistent conservative and Republican voter, and in Thursday’s GOP debate he implied he always has been.

But a review of the facts paints a different picture and counters Romney’s assertions. In the past, Romney has often gone to considerable lengths to distance himself from Republicans and conservatives.

• Romney had been a lifelong independent before he decided to run for Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat in Massachusetts in 1994, the Boston Globe reported at the time.

• The Los Angeles Times reported that after Romney entered the ’94 Senate race, his wife Ann said: “We didn’t know a single Republican when we jumped in.”

The Times also disclosed that Romney even considered running as an independent “before rejecting the idea as impractical.”

• When House Speaker Newt Gingrich was promoting his “Contract with America” in 1994, Romney’s aides said he “had not read the document and had no plans to support it,” the Globe reported.

The Washington Times observed that Romney “criticized the Republican campaign agenda, the ‘Contract with America,’ as too partisan.”

• Brent Bozell’s Conservative Victory Committee attacked Romney in 1994 for “running away from conservative Republican themes” and espousing a “left-wing agenda.”

• Washington Post columnist David Broder observed during the 1994 Senate campaign: “Eager to show that he is a moderate independent and no ideologue, Romney stressed his support for universal health insurance and abortion rights, criticized the Republican ‘Contract with America,’ and was more outspoken than Kennedy in arguing that the Boy Scouts should not exclude homosexual youths.”

• Romney donated to the 1992 campaign of U.S. Rep. Dick Swett, a New Hampshire Democrat; Rep. John LaFalce, a New York Democrat; and Democrat Doug Anderson, who was running for the Senate from Utah.

Is it no wonder Erick said Romney would tear the party apart, this article came in a Newsmax.com email. Fight after fight, Romeny smears while running from his record while newt takes the heat and keeps going and going and going. Like the Energizer Bunny!!!

Limbaugh, Mike Reagan Blast Romney for Smears on Gingrich

Ronald Reagan’s eldest son Mike Reagan has issued a statement lambasting Mitt Romney and his supporters for claims that Romney’s Republican presidential rival Newt Gingrich was a strong critic of President Reagan. Mike Reagan says such claims are false.

Even Rush Limbaugh, shocked by the Romney claims, chimed on his Thursday radio broadcast to say, “This is obviously a coordinated attack to take Newt out here in Florida.”

Rush slammed the Romney-backed smear campaign against Newt.

“That kind of stuff is why people hate Romney so much,” Limbaugh said.

Limbaugh added that Newt has always been a conservative from his early days in national talk radio in the 1980s.

“He was perhaps the premier defender of Ronald Reagan,” Limbaugh said.

On Thursday, Mike Reagan, a respected conservative commentator, responded to the Gingrich critics with this statement to Newsmax:

“I am deeply disturbed that supporters of Mitt Romney are claiming that Newt Gingrich is not a true Reaganite and are even claiming that Newt was a strong critic of my father.

“Recently I endorsed Newt Gingrich for president because I believe that Newt is the only Republican candidate who has both consistently backed the conservative policies that my father championed and the only Republican that will continue to implement his vision.

“It surprises me that Mitt Romney and his supporters would raise this issue — when Mitt by his own admission voted for Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale who opposed my father, and later supported liberal Democrat Paul Tsongas for president.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Romney’s achievement was the most socialistic healthcare plan in the nation up until that time.

“Say what you want about Newt Gingrich but when he was speaker of the House he surrounded himself with Reagan conservatives and implemented a Ronald Reagan program of low taxes and restrained federal spending.

“Newt’s conservative program created a huge economic boom and balanced the budget for the first time in more than a generation.”

Mike Reagan concluded: “I would take Newt Gingrich’s record any day over Mitt Romney’s.”

And Nancy Reagan, Reagan’s wife, has stressed Gingrich’s close relationship with her late husband.

In a 1995 speech at a dinner honoring Ronald Reagan, Nancy said: “The dramatic movement of 1995 is an outgrowth of a much earlier crusade that goes back half a century. Barry Goldwater handed the torch to Ronnie, and in turn Ronnie turned that torch over to Newt and the Republican members of Congress to keep that dream alive.”

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/GingrichvideoC-SPANReaganism/2012/01/26/id/425683?s=al&promo_code=E092-1

Video of Gingrich Bashing Reagan Was Edited To Be Misleading

The C-SPAN video, titled “Newt Gingrich bad-mouths Ronald Reagan in 1998” on YouTube, was part of a huge coordinated campaign against Gingrich that was launched on Thursday, five days ahead of the vital Florida primary.

But it cuts off before Gingrich explains what he means.

But what the clip does not show is Gingrich’s rationale behind his statement, which shows he was not bashing Reaganism, but merely suggesting that then-Vice President George Bush needed to take it forward.

The entire clip, which was discovered by the website RiehlWorldView, shows Gingrich going on to say he wanted “A Republicanism of the ’90s that builds on Reaganism, but goes beyond Reaganism.”

He continues, “This is the country where ‘new’ and ‘improved’ are the two most powerful words in advertising,” and says if the two candidates in the 1988 election had similar stances and were equally “pleasant” the Democrat would win simply because it would signify

change.

First Romney says he won’t Repeal Obamacare, now its interest income and of course then comes the flip flop.

Question, is Romney passing an open secret by leaking something to entice voters then pulls back or is he communicating his intentions if he wins 2012? It cuts both ways considering the unstable platform and lack of integrity couple with a clearly moderate record in office. Clearly he’s not a Reagan Bush supporter.

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/romney-carried-interest-gingrich/2012/01/25/id/425538?s=al&promo_code=E04C-1

If elected president, Mitt Romney might be willing to end the “carried interest” provision in the tax code that helped him amass his estimated $260 million-plus fortune, according to a campaign aide.

Lanhee Chen, the former Massachusetts governor’s policy director, told reporters on Tuesday that Romney could consider ending the tax break as part of a comprehensive tax overhaul — a move that would significantly raise taxes on many American investors.

But later in the day, the Romney camp “tried to step back” from the aide’s remarks, stressing that Romney doesn’t want to raise anyone taxes, The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

The carried interest provision gives private-equity and venture-capital executives a relatively low 15 percent capital gains tax rate on much of their income. Carried interest is a share of profits from an investment fund or partnership given to managers as compensation. Romney took advantage of the tax break as founder of private-equity firm Bain Capital.

Speaking to a small crowd at a Staples, Mitt Romney touted his independence from the political machinery of Washington—a tactic so old and dry you’d fall asleep watching the video if AP reporter Glen Johnson hadn’t decided to cut Romney off mid-sentence to call “bullcrap.” Notice how uptight Romney becomes when called out, then chooses to go one on one with the reporter.

“That is not true—Ron Kaufman is a lobbyist,” Johnson brazenly interrupted. If Romney had been president instead of a candidate standing in a Staples it would have almost have recalled Congressman Joe Wilson’s famous “You lie!” scream during President Obama’s 2009 address to Congress.

After admitting that Kaufman, a lobbyist, is a senior adviser, Romney engages in a semantic discussion about whether that qualifies as someone “running his campaign.” Romney is surrounded by lobbyists like
Charlie Black, a man known to work for Somali war lords aka politicians.

Romney then circles back around after an aide pulls him away to talk further with Johnson. This man does not like defiance nor anyone to correct him. Sure lobbyists are advising Romney. Good timing Johnson!!

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/757944/meet_charlie_black…_mitt_romney%27s_corporate_lobbyist_campaign_strategist/
Mitt Romney has added a veteran Washington lobbyist — Charlie Black, a top political aide to Senator John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign — to the circle of informal advisers who are trying to help to guide him to the White House. […]

Mr. Romney’s current presidential campaign is … wary of being linked to the culture of Washington, casting Mr. Romney as an “outsider” and a “businessman” who will clean up the way politics is done in Washington.

But on Monday, aides to Mr. Romney confirmed that Mr. Black, a veteran Washington power broker, is supporting Mr. Romney’s 2012 effort.

But for those who’ve forgotten, it’s worth revisiting Black’s interesting lobbying background. The lobbyist served four years ago as McCain’s senior campaign strategist and chief political advisor, but before that, Black put together quite a client list, featuring a motley international crew of thugs and authoritarian tyrants.

In addition to his extensive corporate work, Black’s client list included (but is by no means limited to) Iraq/Iran’s Ahmad Chalabi, Mobutu Sese Seko, Ferdinand Marcos, Somalia’s Mohamed Siad Barre, Nigeria’s Ibrahim Babangida, and Angola’s would-be dictator Jonas Savimbi. In each instance, Black was paid (handsomely) to boost their access, influence, and stature among U.S. policy makers.

In 1990 Bain Capital purchased the controlling interest in Damon Corp.  a Medical Testing Company…. Mitt Romney joined the Board of Damon Corp. to help manage the Company…… two whistle blowers tipped off the government and Medicare Fraud Charges were brought against Damon Corp.    In 1996 Damon Corp Plead Guilty to Frauding Medicare, they were fined  $35,273,141.00 as a criminal fine in addition to $83,726,859.00 to resolve related liabilities.. Total Fines 119 Million Dollars.

This represented a recovery of  $3  for every  $1 that they Stole from Federal and State Healthcare Programs…The U.S. Attorney who prosecuted the case is quoted as saying    “A case pure and simple of Corporate Greed Run Amok”.     The Company went Bankrupt in 2002, thousands of jobs were lost. Bain walk away with a Profit of 12 Million Dollars.  Companies close all the time, what’s at stake are the crimes, not job losses.

At one point Romney denied knowledge of the crimes and later yes he flip flopped to say he was aware and on top of the problem.  Serial flip flopper, sure and then some.   This story is important because the Obamabots have instant access to all medicare and justice records as well the Obama administration has been playing fast and loose with facts that help Obama.  Feds say Romney did not help uncover the investigation and that Corning later bought the company and cleaned up the mess.    Dems used medicare crimes (Columbia HCA) against in the Florida election against Rick Scott for Governor…….it was ugly but it will be small in comparison to 2012.

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2834443/posts

Romney Sat On Board Of Damon Clinical Laboratories, A Bain Capital Portfolio Company Fined Nearly $120 Million In 1996 Due To Medicare Fraud. “A Needham clinical laboratory agreed yesterday to pay $119 million in criminal and civil fines after pleading guilty to charges that it defrauded the nation’s Medicare system by seeking reimbursements on millions of dollars worth of unnecessary blood tests. … Damon Clinical Laboratories Inc. admitted it tried to boost its profits by submitting the unnecessary tests. The company, the government said, misled doctors into ordering the tests, ensuring that they would be covered by Medicare, the federal health care program for the elderly.” (Kimberly Blanton, “Needham Lab Fined $ 119m For Fraud,” The Boston Globe, 10/10/96)

At The Time, Largest Criminal Fine In Massachusetts History: “The settlement … would mark the largest criminal fine ever levied in Massachusetts.” (Kimberly Blanton, “Needham Lab Fined $ 119m For Fraud,” The Boston Globe, 10/10/96)

At The Time, Largest Health Care Fraud Criminal Fine In History: “The $35.3 million criminal fine in the Damon case, one piece of the $119 million total settlement, is the largest ever recovered in a health care fraud case.” (Kimberly Blanton, “Needham Lab Fined $ 119m For Fraud,” The Boston Globe, 10/10/96)

 

Romney Was On Damon’s Board Of Directors While The Fraud Took Place – He Initially Claimed He Was Unaware Of Any Criminal Investigation. “Mitt Romney, former Republican challenger to US Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, who was a member of Damon’s board, said he was unaware of any investigation. … Romney said that [Damon’s then-CEO Robert] Rosen told the board in about 1992 ‘that all current practices at the company were now in conformity with government regulations and that in the past there may have been practices which would not be deemed appropriate.’” (Kimberly Blanton, “Needham Lab Fined $ 119m For Fraud,” The Boston Globe, 10/10/96)

 

As A Gubernatorial Candidate, Romney Claimed He Helped “Uncover” And Stop The Fraud At Damon.

“[R]omney said Thursday he helped uncover the fraud at Damon and hired an outside law firm to investigate it.

We took action based on what was told to us by the law firm,’ Romney said …” (Ron DePasquale, “Romney Downplays Report He Profited From Firm Tied To Fraud,” The Associated Press, 10/10/02)

Federal Investigators Rebuffed Romney’s Claims, Saying The Fraud Continued Until Bain And OtherOwners Sold Damon To Corning In 1993. “A spokesman for Romney, Eric Fehrnstrom, said Thursday that Romney and other board members helped uncover the fraud at Damon after similar fraudulent practices were found at another laboratory in 1992. … But court records, including statements by prosecutors and by Damon officials, indicated that the fraud continued until Corning purchased the firm. Prosecutors gave Corning sole credit for cleaning up the fraud.” (“Report: Mass. Candidate Romney Profited From Sale Of Firm That Later Admitted Medicare Fraud,” The Associated Press, 10/10/02)

After reading the details and seeing reactions from the left Mitt Romney‘s plan is dismal at best and not passable since it won’t aid the economy.   The liberal community says….it raises taxes on the middle class and ends the earned income tax credit.  The EITC is free money, up to $3600 or so and illegal aliens qualify if they know how to apply.   Better to close that out but it shifts to education credit.

If Romney knows how the economy works then where’s the beef ?  Oh yea, corporate tax rates drop to 25%, the same as China.  We really need 20% to put us in a position to compete globally and take jobs from China if industry sees capacity to repatriate jobs.  If Romney wins and were successful in cutting the budget and closing a couple of agencies then everything improves but I don’t expect dems to give an inch on new tax breaks coupled with closing anything, it only empowers them to think 2016 and hurt the economy further.  He’ll have to do better than this.  Details from the non partisan Tax Policy Center.

http://taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/romney-plan.cfm

Governor Romney would permanently extend all the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts now scheduled to expire in 2013 and continue to “patch” the alternative minimum tax, but would allow some recently enacted provisions to expire and would repeal certain tax provisions in the 2010 health reform legislation. Tax provisions in the 2009 stimulus act and subsequently extended through 2012 would expire. These include the American Opportunity tax credit for higher education, the expanded refundability of the child credit, and the expansion of the earned income tax credit (EITC). The plan would also eliminate tax on long-term capital gains, dividends, and interest income for married couples filing jointly with income under $200,000 ($100,000 for single filers and $150,000 for heads of household) and repeal the federal estate tax, while continuing the gift tax with a maximum tax rate of 35 percent.²

At the corporate level, the Romney plan would make two major changes: 1) reduce the corporate income tax rate from 35 to 25 percent and 2) make the research and experimentation credit permanent and extend for one year the full expensing of capital expenditures. It would also allow a “tax holiday” for the repatriation of corporate profits held overseas but does not specify whether repatriated earnings would face any tax (and, if so, at what rate). In the longer run, Gov. Romney would reduce the corporate rate further in conjunction with base broadening and simplification and would move the corporate tax to a territorial system.

Gov. Romney would also permanently repeal the 0.9 percent tax on wages and the 3.8 percent tax on investment income of high-income individual taxpayers that were imposed by the 2010 health reform legislation and are scheduled to take effect in 2013.

TPC’s analysis measures the change in tax liabilities against two alternative baselines: current law, which assumes that the 2001-10 tax cuts all expire in 2013 as scheduled, and current policy, which assumes that the 2011 law is permanent (except for the one-year payroll tax cut and temporary investment incentives). Compared with the current law baseline, the Romney plan would cut taxes for about three-fourths of taxpayers by an average of more than $4,700. In contrast, compared with current policy, about 13 percent of tax units would see their 2015 taxes go up an average of more than $900 while 42 percent would get tax cuts averaging nearly $2,900.

Some people would see their taxes rise relative to the current policy baseline because of the expiration of the American Opportunity Tax Credit and expiration of the expansion of the earned income credit and the child credit enacted in 2009.

The Romney plan would reduce federal tax revenues substantially. TPC estimates that on a static basis, the Romney plan would lower federal tax liability by $600 billion in calendar year 2015 compared with current law, roughly a 16 percent cut in total projected revenue. Relative to a current policy baseline, the reduction in liability would be roughly $180 billion in calendar year 2015.

The Romney plan would change the distribution of the federal tax burden, as shown in these tables.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/us-usa-campaign-romney-economy-idUSTRE80B0AH20120112

Economists and political strategists are skeptical that his economic plan will remain so radical as the campaign evolves. It sits uneasily with his track record as a moderate, could alienate independent voters he would need to defeat Obama, and deep, rapid budget cuts would risk tanking a shaky economy growing at a 2 percent pace.

“I do think he is quite pragmatic,” said Greg Valliere, political economist at Potomac Research Group.

Romney wants to create the image of someone determined to scale back Washington pitted against a big-government president in order to pick up enough voters to secure the Republican nomination quickly.

“He has latitude to move back to the center in time for November where the criticism that he is a moderate will be a plus for him” to win over independents, Valliere said.

Thomas Gallagher, a former Wall Street economist and principal at the business advisory firm Scowcroft Group, agrees.

“I don’t think his economic platform is very predictive of what he would do in 2013.”

By laying out a blueprint on his website that lacks much detail, it allows Romney to embrace touchstone issues such as a balanced budget amendment dear to Tea Party activists on the Republican right, while retaining the leeway to shift course later, Gallagher said.

This vagueness on economic policy also creates vulnerabilities.

“He is trying to play both sides of the fence which is what worries a lot of conservatives about him. That may play well in the election, but people want some authenticity in what their leaders are telling them,” said James Campbell, political scientist at State University of New York in Buffalo.

And if Romney fails to convince the right that his plan is sufficiently anti-tax and anti-big government, it could inspire an independent candidate who would splinter the Republican vote and weaken his chances of winning in November.

Since Mitt Romney opened the door to calling candidates desperate then we must examine his anti-capitalist  views. Clearly he’s desperate to shut down legitimate debate and his followers fail to discuss rationally why his career matters not what he did for a living.  Investing or buying businesses is not in question but the man’s business practices are fair game.  Make no mistake, we must vet all issues because if he can’t close the sale with voters on his past, then its fair to assume general election voters could follow the words of the incumbent.

Romney supported government run healthcare over private market solutions.  Not capitalist.

Romney supported mandates and still does.

Romney supported TARP.

Romeny supported the auto bailouts.

Romney said Newt Gingrich should give back pay earned because of a false claim that the Speaker was a lobbyist advising banks.  Doesn’t Mitt respect lobbying and the fact that lobbying is a capitalist endeavor that connects businesses, bureaucrats and politicians as well as serving the public’s needs?

Other candidates have been put under a microscope except Romney, seems to me the scrutiny is not only fair game but for a candidate to use leftist tactics long before the  “firing” issue clearly still paints Romney as someone who has not only hurt the party first but he also hasn’t taken responsibility for his misgivings either.  Nor has he stopped the leftist practices.

None of these remarks are things a capitalist nor a Republican would say except for Romney said them all and possibly more could be found.   

Doesn’t that mean Mitt Romney is an anti-capitalist too?  Of course it does if you follow the campaign sound bytes coming from the man who uses a teleprompter while also using leftist strategy to demonize his opponents and undecided voters as well as those who have chosen someone other than a man who hired liberals.  Seems easy to just say not to hiring liberals for key positions since they are anti-capitalist types who regulate and tax industry.

If you think Rick Perry or Newt Gingrich or RS members are anti-capitalist then you’ve failed to comprehend the leftist tactic to shut down a legitimate concern…………Romney’s career history.   We have time to vet and choose wisely, what we should avoid is adopting the Romney attack style because it divides the party.   This is the same man who attack Jon Huntsman for serving our countries capitalist needs in China. 

It wasn’t really a TARP style bailout — worse — Romney‘s Bain placed a $10 million dollar liability with the taxpayers. All this while he benefited $4 million dollars directly.

The way the company was rescued was with a federal bailout of $10 million. “The rest of us had to absorb the loss … Romney? He and others made $4 million in this deal. … Mitt Romney: Maybe he’s just against government when it helps working men and women.  But this flip flopping moderate who also claimed to be progressive was for and against Obama’s wall street bailouts.  Make up your mind, jeese!

The facts of the Bain & Co. turnaround are a little more complicated, but a Boston Globe report from 1994 confirms that Bain saw several million dollars in loans forgiven by the FDIC.

Fact remains an FDIC bailout only occurs when the Fed and politicians agree, not too mention the bailout comes from funds paid by every bank customer who eat higher costs as a result of funds going to Vulture Capitalists who have a lot of questions to answer when they want to be POTUS.

No exceptions Mitt and no its not anti-capitalist to scrutinize someone who opened the door to attacks when Romney went after Speaker Newt Gingrich for consulting slash lobbyist work…….which is also a form or capitalism.  In fact, those with integrity shall remember Newt backed President Bush’s banking reform in 2002 and 2005.  Dems at the same time claimed the GOP were racist, hated the poor and reform would kill the housing market……in fact dems killed the market fighting reform.

Pro-Moderate RomenyBots should heed my words because its all fair game considering months of Romney PAC games while Romney touted many messages his PAC’s ran as if most were true even though fact checkers said the ads were mostly false.  Heck its bad enough Ron Paul is using the Dem playbook so its fair game if you think Newt in anti-anything and clearly the 75% could care less till its down to number 2 dropping out, god forbid Romney lasts that long.

Think about this, the majority shall judge Romney the same as they judge other bosses and some don’t care for their bosses and too many voters were hoodwinked in 2008, so expect more of the same only worse.  Better we pure Romney and focus on Gingrich,  Huntsman and Perry.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58952.html#ixzz1hqSHP532

“The way the company was rescued was with a federal bailout of $10 million,” the ad says. “The rest of us had to absorb the loss … Romney? He and others made $4 million in this deal. … Mitt Romney: Maybe he’s just against government when it helps working men and women.”

The facts of the Bain & Co. turnaround are a little more complicated, but a Boston Globe report from 1994 confirms that Bain saw several million dollars in loans forgiven by the FDIC, which had taken over Bain’s failed creditor, the Bank of New England.

Romney aides pushed back strongly on the Democratic charge that Bain & Co. received anything like a TARP-style “bailout.” While the FDIC is a government agency, it is funded by deposit insurance payments rather than taxes. The agency agreed to reduce Bain & Co.’s liability to the Bank of New England, but didn’t pump new funds into the flagging firm. Other Bain creditors also took a haircut in order to avert the company’s collapse.

Please pass this on.  Thank you.  Fyi, real conservatives file for bankruptcy, or seek investors, the fed is not the way!