Why Sarah Palin isn’t the one


I like Sarah Palin for all the obvious reasons. But all through out the campaign season something about her never seemed to click with me. This is not to say that she can’t be helpful in inspiring the party. However, I do not think she is a suitable canidate for 2012 for the following reasons.

  • contrary to popular opinion, her performance in the debate was not good. She was wobbly on a lot of answers and sounded like she was spouting Mccain populism. If you want a good debate performance, refer to the Cheney/Edwards debate where Cheney took John to the woodshed. Then compare it to the Palin/Biden debate; Palin needed to be as tough as Cheney and she wasn’t.

  • I think we would do very well to hit the reset button and not have anyone who is connected with the McCain Campaign. Sarah is damaged goods in that regard.

  • We need a young hot shot conservative from California which would give us a good chance of winning that state and all of its electoral votes.

Sarah Palin can serve the party in other capacities. However running her as a canidate is very risky and another uphill battle. We don’t need someone who only has a chance of a narrow win. We need an electoral landslide for the purposes of both mandate and morale


Category:

RSS feed

39 Comments Leave a comment

Ummm ... three points:

Leverkuhn (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 6:05AM EST (link)

First, I’m with you on Palin not being “the One.” That’s because we Republicans don’t have a “One.” We have candidates, and if they lose we get other candidates.

Second, I do think that Sarah Palin probably isn’t presidential material, but that’s because I think she’s better suited to the governorship of Alaska, not because she did anything to drag down the McCain campaign. Her speech at the RNC was a fine one, and she did a decent job in the VP debate (especially when you consider that she’d had absolutely no experience with national politics until nine weeks ago).

Ultimately, she’s too nice and too normal to be in national politics. That’s why I don’t like all these hit pieces that are coming out now. They’re launched by bitter people who can’t handle their own failure in this campaign. You might be right about hitting the “reset” button on the McCain campaign, but that doesn’t mean that Sarah Palin herself bears any personal responsibility for the campaign’s failure. She did what was asked of her, she did it reasonably well, and now we should move on.

Third, we don’t have a “young hot shot conservative from California.” The only major Republican politician in that state is Arnold, who is neither young nor conservative. It’s no use wishing for what we ain’t got.

“Senator Joe Biden is … a man so full of cr*p his speeches bear an awful resemblance to twenty minutes of flatulence preceded by ‘Good evening ladies and gentlemen,’ and followed by ‘God bless America.’”

- Leverkuhn

Write-Off Strategy

whitman4562001 (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 6:25AM EST (link)

Lever in response to your assertion that we do not have a young hot shot canidate from California, I will cede you that point for now. However this does not mean that we should not try to groom someone in the future. What I am really wanting us to move away from is this write-off strategy that Republicans keep employing. And what I mean by that is this:

  • write off conservatives and the Christian Right because who else are they going to vote for.

  • write off states like California because we couldn’t possibly win them.

  • write off the media because we can’t pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrelful.

I don’t know about you… but I am tired of people who make up excuses not to fight the good fight… even if it is a bloody one.

note: I am speaking in general and not about you… I appreciate your comments and we are on the same side.

 
 

Too freaking early

KeyWestConservative (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 6:42AM EST (link)

to write off Palin for 2012. The Sarah Palin of 2008 will not be the Sarah Palin of 2012. Give her four more years of executive experience and preparation and then let’s see what kind of candidate she will be.
I fully supported Palin this time around, and unless she gets a case of liberal leprosy, I fully expect to support her in four years.

Right

Shawn Gillogly (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 7:22AM EST (link)

1) She’s not damaged goods anymore than Reagan was for losing a Primary in 76 that got him tarred by some in the Establishment for running against the incumbent in their own party.

2) Palin’s positives in the Republican Party are all that matter right now. And 91% view her positively. Nearly 3/4s of the party think she helped the ticket, and when you stack her up against potential 2012 nominees now she crushes them in polls.

3) Comparing someone’s performance in running as the #2 to how they run as the “big show” is always dodgy. Simply put, she wasn’t allowed to be herself and was heavily managed by the staffers how are now trying to torpedo her.

That points out that;

a) She is seen as a threat. If she wasn’t, they wouldn’t savage her.

b) McCain or members of his staff were very much afraid of her popularity. They wanted the boost she gave them, but I think they were surprised at how combative she was in the Campaign Speech. Which would explain why they never let her express herself so forcefully again. They read the Leftist drivel about her speech being “snarky” and reeled her in.

Frankly, I don’t think anyone, even Jindal, stands a chance against her in 12 if she decides she wants the chance. And I think she puts a lot more in play than most realize when she is stripped of the “Main Street Republican” veneer that the McCain staff painted over her.

“Liberals are always talking about pluralism, but that is not what they mean. In public school, Jews don’t meet Christians. Christians don’t meet Hindus. Everybody meets nothing.”- Dennis Prager

Let's hope so

whitman4562001 (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 7:27AM EST (link)

I hope she will be a different canidate. I want her to live up to the moniker of Sarah Barricuda. But I didn’t see any evidence of that. All I saw was a lovely, charming woman. If you are going to put yourself in this arena you better be ready to crack some skulls(figuratively speaking). Being nice and virtuous isn’t enough.

ditto

emgbane (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 7:32AM EST (link)

mega dittos

Alaska

emgbane (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 7:59AM EST (link)

Of course you didn’t, you saw someone running with John McCain. Obviously that is not who she is or she would not be the Governor of Alaska. Look at her record and ask if being nice and charming defeats two former Governors, takes on your party, pushes through major ethics reform, and slashes billions from the state budget with the enemies to prove it.

I trust the voters of Alaska more then a RINO limited campaign and a MSM frame for determining my opinion Sarah Palin.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we judged politicians by their record? Just look at President-elect Obama everyone is saying he is a centrist base on a campaign and ignoring his liberal record. Time will tell, but I would not be shocked if he did govern the way he legislated.

 
 
 
 
 

I've already got my Palin 2012 bumper sticker on the way.

Tim_Schieferecke (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 8:33AM EST (link)

Plain speak is my speak. If she chooses to run, she’ll have my backing.

Tim Schieferecke

 

AmericaC2C.org

jstop88 Sunday, November 9th at 8:45AM EST (link)

I just wanted to invite anybody who holds conservative to moderate political values to check out AmericaC2C.Org. We are a free online group of people from across the U.S., who are working together toward things like Honesty in Journalism, promoting traditional American and Constitutional values, and ensuring a continued conservative/moderate voice in America.

We could use additional like-minded people to work alongside of us. Thank you very much.

www.AmericaC2C.Org

So whitman you saw a lovely charming woman?

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 8:55AM EST (link)

did you hit any of the rallies…..or is this illusion of the “lovely charming” woman something you witnessed through the prism of the media?

I personally saw her at a rally and I personally saw a pitbull with lipstick….so do not dismiss out of hand a potential candidate in 2012.

going away thought is McCain was an “endearing cautious” man kind of like your grandfather….but that didn’t stop everyone from making him the Republican candidate……so I will see where Sarah comes from in 2010 and make my decision’s there…..that is TWO years of preparing while working to make a run for the WH!…..do not prejudge her!

 
 

Tough to beat hope

vernonia Sunday, November 9th at 9:18AM EST (link)

The Republican candidate in 2012 will have to a likeable, charming, quick-witted debater.

Even as the Silver-tongued Obama will fall short of the unrealistically high hopes of 65 million voters, Obama can still work a crowd into a frenzy. The Republicans in ’96 thought a trustworthy old warhorse would be the right counterattack to Slick Willie, and Willie beat ‘em.

In 2012 the Republican best positioned to go toe-to-toe with the preacher-of-hope-cum-agent-of-change is the man from Hope: Mike Huckabee.

No, I don’t think Huck is a “Leave-Us-Alone” conservative as I am, but he’s socially conservative, doesn’t seem cranky, plays to the middle-class, and could win back parts of the South and Lower Midwest.

Dave Ramsey in 2012!

Whitman, "All I saw was a lovely, charming woman." Really?

Wubbies World (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:21AM EST (link)

First off, I suggest you disregard the skirt at your own peril as an opponent.

The one component you give no regard too in your analysis is that she was managed by McCain’s people. She operated under their guidance. This was not fully here with her people running things.

I suggest you go to this radio interview on an Alaska radio station and listen to her and see how she responds in the aftermath of the campaign.

I do not know how old you are, but I remember Reagan, and she has all the class and polite outspokenness of Reagan. She is not damaged goods anymore than Reagan was after the 1976 election.

One of the huge advantages Reagan had campaigning was that he went on tours during WWII to meet and motivate the public for the war effort. If I remember correctly GE sponsored the tours. Reagan knew the American people and he knew what mattered to them. Most importantly, he knew how to talk to them. He was one of them (us).

Sara Palin is that kind of person. Sara Palin is an unabashed conservative and she knows how to speak to the American people.

She is the most dangerous thing to come on the American scene to the liberals of this country since Reagan. The liberal news media knows it. That is why they didn’t even pretend to be fair in their attempted destruction of her!

How she has come out of this is simply amazing and speaks volumns to how “undamaged” she is today.

She is the real deal and she is the future. You appear to be too short sighted to recognize this.

Actually I have a better reason why you feel this way. You are an Obama operative who is working to dispirit Republicans before the next elections by discrediting any potential opponents on this sight before they become a threat to him.

Rush has Seminar Callers.

You “Whitman” are a Seminar Blogger for Obama.

Red State Strike ForceWubbies World, MSgt, USAF (Retired):
Join The Red State Strike Force
><> If It’s Worth Doing, It’s Worth Doing Right The First Time.

This commercial was brought to you by... -nt-

NightTwister (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:23AM EST (link)

-nt-

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

 
 
 

whitman4562001 - Seminar Blogger for Obama

Wubbies World (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:26AM EST (link)

We know Obamabots work to dispirit Republicans to aid his campaign.

Job one of the Obamabots is to dispirit and discredit Sara Palin. They can’t do that with obvious posts, but by gentle chipping away at credibility.

I don’t buy it!

Red State Strike ForceWubbies World, MSgt, USAF (Retired):
Join The Red State Strike Force
><> If It’s Worth Doing, It’s Worth Doing Right The First Time.

He checks out, Wubbies_World.

Moe Lane (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:37AM EST (link)

I know that jstop88 should not have pimped...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:58AM EST (link)

this new conservative site so obviously however I have checked the site and it was teh awesome and if you are interested in working across the nation with likeminded conservatives than you will enjoy the site.

I am a networking site neophyte so it will take me time to learn the in’s and out’s BUT it is really cool!

don’t ban them for trying to get at the core of the base….thanks to the management ahead of time :-)

Huckabee is now doing what he is best suited for

janis (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:58AM EST (link)

and that’s being an entertainer. As to social conservatism, that’s all he’s got. He’s a fiscal disaster and ignorant as a stone on foreign policy.

Agreeing in part, and dissenting

Sean (SIConservative) (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 10:36AM EST (link)

I fully agree that Palin isn’t the candidate for 2012. In the interests of full disclosure, I wasn’t too happy with the pick in the first place mainly because of her lack of experience. That said, her interview with Katie Couric was a disaster and will continue to be a running joke as long as she remains in the national spotlight. It was her Dan Quayle moment, if you will. Call it anecdotal evidence, but several of my moderate friends who were considering voting McCain before the interview were afraid to put her a heartbeat away from the Presidency afterwards. So bad was the interview that I actually considered – albeit briefly – voting for Obama.

As to an attractive conservative from California, it’s not going to happen. California’s electoral votes will only go for a Republican if that Republican doesn’t need them. We have to pick our battles. While we do need to work on becoming more competitive on the coasts, it’s not a wise expenditure of time or energy to focus on winning California in a Presidential election. We were told during the primary season that McCain could be competitive there, and he wasn’t even close. There are much more winnable battles to be fought.

The Couric interview was a MSM hit job

sickofitall Thursday, December 4th at 11:22AM EST (link)

I think that 50% of what the public perceived to be a “disaster” was 50% gotcha journalism and 50% manipulative editing. Same for the Charlie Gibson interview. Look at how well Gov. Palin did in her first interview with Chris Wallace which was conducted fairly and impartially, and look at how well she did taking questions from the press on the stump despite the best efforts of her staffers to muzzle her. Gov. Palin is an articulate and knowledgeable woman about domestic and foreign policy, and I think perhaps the only truly accurate thing that McCain said in his campaign is that she knows as much or more about energy policy as anyone in this country. Just because ABC, CBS and NBC decided to attempt to destroy her doesn’t mean that she’s in any way “a disaster” and I think that the hundreds of thousands of people who turned out to see her speak on the stump would agree with me.

“You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany.” – Rep. Paul Broun

 
 
 
 
 
 

Diasagree.

Josh Painter (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 10:39AM EST (link)

To say your arguments are less than compelling would be an understatement.

Anyone who uses “damaged goods” to refer to a human being loses credibility in my book.

  • JP

“An armed society is a polite society” – Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon” (1942)

 

I would be curious as to which Conservative women would be the right candidates for 2012?

Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 10:53AM EST (link)

Sarah Palin is more than a charming woman. Her voice resonated with the every man (or woman). She has governed, she knows how to inspire and if she chooses to run in 2012, there will be many who thought she should have been at the top of the ticket in 2008.

Which conservative/Republican women do you feel are more than just charming and are capable of doing more than just helping the party in other ways?

To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher

Not an Obamabot, just green and ignorant.

Tbone (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 11:04AM EST (link)

However, he is an experienced Debate Judge!

“contrary to popular opinion, her performance in the debate was not good.”

ROFLMAO.

“We need a young hot shot conservative from California which would give us a good chance of winning that state and all of its electoral votes.”

And this is a parfait of stupidity.

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

Jerri Thompson would be another conservative woman...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 11:16AM EST (link)

who should consider running for office another would be Sen. Pat Pariseau from MN who sponsered legislation in MN for more people to get gun permits…of course one of my favorites…again from MN….Sen. Michele Bachman….WHY is MN so blue with these great women?

More you say….

Kellyanne Conway conservative pollster, Janine Turner the actress and they were part of Team Sarah… well I could go on but you get the picture…they are out there and they are legion!!!

?

Chad (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 12:42PM EST (link)

You saw what those intellectual titans that managed McCains campaign allowed you to see. They certainly did a GREAT job running the campaign now didn’t they.
Palin is a Governor. She has four years to bone up on Foreign Policy. Her Philosophy IS SPOT ON. She gets it. She understands Federalism. She believes in Liberty.

If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism.
Ronald Reagan

unfair to judge her based on the Couric interview

jazzycmk (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 12:59PM EST (link)

Honestly, I never saw the whole Couric interview. I only saw clips, and then the MSM ran the bad sequences ad nauseum followed by the parody on SNL. Unfortunately, that is what most of the viewing (and voting) public saw.

Was it a bad moment for Palin? Yes. I don’t know why she didn’t just answer the question about what newspapers and magazines she reads instead of saying “All of them.” At a guess, the McCain staffers had her wound so tight at that point that she didn’t want to say anything specific (e.g. – Don’t say “The Weekly Standard” because independents will think that’s too conservative. Don’t say the “New York Times” because that will alienate the base). Instead she equivocated and that allowed the MSM to speculate that she is not well informed or intelligent (or maybe illiterate).

But at the end of the day it was one bad day at the office. What’s more, giving interviews and dealing with reporters is only an adjunct to the job for which she was running. It says little about her ability to govern or lead. Some people are better in interviews than others, and by the end of the campaign she was the most accessible of the 4 candidates, and you didn’t have any further bad moments (despite Drew Griffin on CNN trying to torpedo her with his misleading quote of the Byron York article from National Review).

Furthermore, we know how the press will treat bad moments by Republicans vs bad moments by Democrats. If Palin had said anything remotely equivalent to Biden’s comment about “an international incident” within 6 months to test Obama’s “mettle”, the press would have gone haywire.

Just imagine if Palin had said, “We do need to be worried about John McCain’s age. I might need to be President in 6 months”.

My point is that if we allow the MSM to define our candidates than we’ve already lost. Sarah is only 44, she has a bright future, and she does rally and inspire a significant number of people. She will need to expand that appeal, but if we concede that she can’t be on any further national tickets or that she’s “damaged goods” because of the Couric interveiw and the narrative the MSM created based on that than we have lost because the media will do that time and time again to whomever we run.

See my post on Joe Biden’s moment. This was his “Quayle moment” and it was largely ignored or laughed off as “Joe being Joe”. If Sarah does this she’s ripped for being an idiot.

Sarah has far too many gifts to be written off now.

jcmk

“90% of people don’t care about your problems…..and the other 10% are glad you have them” – former football coach Lou Holtz

 
 
 
 
 

I half expected....

Greg (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 1:55PM EST (link)

…to hear that Palin wasn’t “The One” because her hair isn’t as good as Romney’s.

“The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected.” — Chesterton

Thanks Moe

Wubbies World (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 2:03PM EST (link)

At first I wasn’t sure, but then I remembered about the Obamabot plan to infiltrate this site.

Descent is good, I was just suspicious.

I retract my suspicions.

Red State Strike ForceWubbies World, MSgt, USAF (Retired):
Join The Red State Strike Force
><> If It’s Worth Doing, It’s Worth Doing Right The First Time.

 
 

The Energy Issue--and Palin--will be back

jonreagan (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 2:46PM EST (link)

One issue which will resurface–and which we own–is energy exploration and development. Just this morning, in a clear sign that the Democrats still don’t get it, John Podesta announced that BHO closely reviewing the President’s executive order lifting the ban on offshore drilling. Fine with me; let them bury themselves.

Governor Palin’s expertise in energy was never fully exploited, partly because the price of crude fell so rapidly during Sept-Oct. But as worldwide commodity prices begin to surge again in about a year, the price of gas will be front and center, and we will be able to ask why President Obama re-imposed the ban. Doesn’t want to use our own oil instead of importing it from the Mideast? I mean…after all….didn’t he say he wanted to end our foreign oil addiction?

There will be no better point person to lead this debate than Gov. Palin. And beyond the energy issue, there will be no better person to re-engage the Reagan Democrats, who by then will realize that they helped put a complete fraud into office.

 

Yes. She's not the one...yet. But the future is full of surprises.

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:25PM EST (link)

For one, 2008 is not equal to 2012.

Palin, Jindal, Cantor, Sanford, etc. still have four (4) years to prove their worth. And they have their own chances.

Please don’t limit their possibilities. Technically, Palin has an edge over Jindal and the rest of young gunners. At least, she has already been introduced at the national stage. We still do not know what dangerous and humiliating lies that the MSM and the democrats will throw against the other unvetted young guns, like Jindal and Cantor. But they are equally promising.

In short, let us support all of them, allow them to grow… not limit their opportunities or dishearten them to pursue higher positions. Obama’s recent win shows that it’s not really bad for our young republican leaders to be “ambitious”! It’s the only way to defeat Obama.

By 2012, one of our young bloods will be “The One”. And I will be glad to support “The One”.

If you are rooting forthe old boys, please think again. Note that most of them like Romney and Huckabee are currently “unelected” by the people. Technically, they don’t have any constituents at present.

In 2012, the incumbent will be the Great Obama, the original The One. Contenders must worthy of the Great Obama.

I don’t think that the recylced candidates of 2008 primaries can be worthy of Great Obama’s time anymore. 2012 will already be a different ball game.

WE NEED NEW FACES WHO ARE WORTHY OF THE CHALLENGE AGAINST THE GREAT FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT!

Huckabee running against any Democrat will make 1964

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:49PM EST (link)

and the performance of Barry Goldwater look like “the good old days”.

Huckabee should get a job selling shoes.

Not to mention the magic line...

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:53PM EST (link)

We need a young hot shot conservative from California which would give us a good chance of winning that state and all of its electoral votes.

Given the fact that there isn’t a “hot shot conservative” of any age anywhere in the state of California, which was later admitted to by this idiot, his cred is several notches below zero.

I didn't do a very good job but I was trying to point out that

Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 5:00PM EST (link)

it always seems that women conservatives are marginalized using words such as “charming”, etc. My point in asking him was, well if Governor Palin is just charming, then which conservative women would be good contenders. You are correct with your list but I wanted him to answer the question.

The aftermath of the election with staffers (or whomever) trying to place the failure on Governor Palin irritates me. She is dynamic, she smart and she is tough. But that doesn’t seem to be enough for some who are easy to dismiss her.

To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher

I agree

David Hinz (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 5:09PM EST (link)

actually they dismiss her because they fear her!

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:37PM EST (link)

Exactly!

Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 10:40PM EST (link)

:-)

To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher

Watch the rest of the interview

Sean (SIConservative) (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 10:47PM EST (link)

I caught the interview after the fact on youtube and was incredibly embarassed by her performance. Candidates have bad days, absolutely, and will say things that are taken out of context by the MSM. It appeared to me to be well beyond that.

Like it or not, we have to accept that the MSM, including its internet outlets, are the primary resources for the average voter. Sure, we can use the internet, talk radio, conservative publications, etc. to communicate amongst ourselves and to generate activism. We’re the choir, though. If we want to win elections, we have to compete on the playing field that we have rather than the one we’d like to have.

I’d also suggest that you recognize that the best would-be public officials shouldn’t necessarily be nominated. If people don’t win, they don’t get to govern. I’m not suggesting that we compromise our values to do so, only that we need to run electable conservatives and libertarians even if they are not necessarily the ones we’d like to see in power.

It’s an imperfect system and one that is definitely unfair to our side. That’s not going to change unless and until slews of conservatives decide to start studying and training for jobs in the MSM. I just think that the sooner we stop acting like that’s not true or trying to wish it away and start adjusting our game plan accordingly, the better off we’ll be.

A worthy battle to pick

whitman4562001 (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 2:35AM EST (link)

SI

yes I agree it sounds like an overwhelming task. But as you say to pick our battles, this to me is the one to pick. A tough and bloody campaign? Yes… but one with a jackpot of electoral votes as a reward. I am not blind to the fact that we may not be able to do it next election. However, we need to at least throw Californian Conservatives a lifle line. Maybe tell them that help is on the way. At the most, do a better job at promoting good conservative canidates in California– even if that means supporting a conservative running for dog catcher.

A worthy battle to pick

whitman4562001 (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 2:35AM EST (link)

SI

yes I agree it sounds like an overwhelming task. But as you say to pick our battles, this to me is the one to pick. A tough and bloody campaign? Yes… but one with a jackpot of electoral votes as a reward. I am not blind to the fact that we may not be able to do it next election. However, we need to at least throw Californian Conservatives a lifle line. Maybe tell them that help is on the way. At the most, do a better job at promoting good conservative canidates in California– even if that means supporting a conservative running for dog catcher.

A worthy battle to pick

whitman4562001 (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 2:35AM EST (link)

SI

yes I agree it sounds like an overwhelming task. But as you say to pick our battles, this to me is the one to pick. A tough and bloody campaign? Yes… but one with a jackpot of electoral votes as a reward. I am not blind to the fact that we may not be able to do it next election. However, we need to at least throw Californian Conservatives a lifle line. Maybe tell them that help is on the way. At the most, do a better job at promoting good conservative canidates in California– even if that means supporting a conservative running for dog catcher.

not sure what happened

whitman4562001 (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 2:38AM EST (link)

sorry folks, only clicked once… not sure why it posted three times… so, don’t come after me with pitch forks.