When We Voted for Unions to Run State Gov’t…


... oh, wait. NO ONE voted for these thugs to get power.

It’s a good thing that California’s public employee union is taking it’s rightful place at the head of our government by proposing new taxes for us to pay. Why when we voted to give a union power to control government, I… oh, wait. No one ever voted to put a union in charge of government fiscal policy or give them the role of creating new taxes to burden us all with. How, could I have forgotten that these union thugs are not elected officials?

How could I forget it? Why it’s easy to forget this small fact because our Democratic lawmakers act as a rubber stamp for the unelected, unconstitutionally empowered unions, that’s why.

So, what am I talking about this time? Well, apparently, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) decided that it had a duty to propose new taxes on oil, liquor and tobacco to “help” with California’s budget shortfall, that’s what. And the SEIU is going to waste one million dollars of its members money in the effort, too.

Imagine the arrogance of this union thinking it has a duty to create new taxes for us? Appointing themselves to the role of elected officials imagining that they have a role in suggesting fiscal policy and spending millions to do it, to boot!

And what is this for? Is this being proposed out of the kindness of their hearts? Are they concerned over government waste and over spending? Do they want to help bring government into line with fiscal responsibility?

Nope.

They just want to save some state jobs that might otherwise have to be cut because they are wasteful, unnecessary jobs in the first place. Soak the rich, force business to float high paid, state workers that don’t do much anyway. Yeah, THAT’S the ticket to fiscal responsibility, alright!

Union largess is one of the main reasons that governments all across the country have become top heavy, money wasting, behemoths that have lost all track of budgetary restraint and long ago left any sense of responsibility to the voters in the dust.

It’s one thing for a union to sign onto a legislator’s efforts. It’s even acceptable for a legislator to get a union’s input on a bill at some point. But for unions to act as the implementor of legislative efforts? That is a step over the line that bespeaks of arrogance in the extreme.

And for no lawmakers to denounce this union’s presumption speaks loads about the subservience of lawmakers to said union. There was a time when lawmakers jealously guarded their privilige. Now they just sit around and wait the big, fat check from the unions to come in so that they can rubber stamp what the union tells them to do. It’s a disgusting incident all the way around.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

13 Comments Leave a comment

Cassandra Washington...not a bad idea....

techsan (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 9:14AM EST (link)

In the comments of the LA Time blog entry linked above

Posted by: Cassandra Washington | June 10, 2009 at 03:56 PM

I would like to propose a 50% state income tax on all the employees of the seiu that will go directly to the general fund to pay for themselves. That way they can avoid layoffs and get the same tax increase they want to give to us.

Not a terrible idea. If the SEIU is so interested is playing with other people’s money…why not grab some dollars from the up-to 300,000(!) home-care health workers that are SEIU members. They can manage their own little socialist utopia that can fail on it’s own. Can’t their own members “do without”?

Ok..that last question is rhetorical.

In the end, all we have on our side of the debate are facts and history.

LOL

Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 10:17AM EST (link)

Yep

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

 
 

Counterattack SEIU

Kyle-MI (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 10:59AM EST (link)

What would it take to get a ballot initiative that bans CA state government workers from forming or joining unions?

Good Question - I'd Sign It!

IJB Friday, June 19th at 12:07PM EST (link)

Those poor sucker signature collectors were trying to get me to give my signature to a repeal of Prop. 8 initiative. I ignored them.

But if someone comes up with an anti-public unions prop., I’ll give over my signature so fast your head would swim!

 

Bad idea

seandparnell (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 5:34PM EST (link)

This is America, and people can join any group they want to – see “amendment, the first” and “assembly, peaceable” for further reading.

Now, what you may mean is that you want to prohibit any special priveleges unions may have in the negotiating/collective bargaining process. That would be far more appropriate to what you have in mind.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org

I am ok with that proposal, too

Kyle-MI (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 1:32PM EST (link)

Although I do not think that the “peaceable” part of the First Amendment can be claimed by unions.

Also keep in mind that the Constitution is not a suicide pact.

 
 
 

What are you talking about?

seandparnell (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 5:31PM EST (link)

Look, I’m not endorsing the positions the SEIU is pushing, but the last time I checked the First Amendment ensures that every citizen, acting individually or on concert with their fellow citizens, has the right to ask the government to do pretty much anything – even dumb things.

You’ve got every right to criticize the SEIU and what they propose (that, too, is part of the First Amendment), but I think you’re getting a little carried away here – they aren’t trying to be the “implementor” of legislative efforts – they’ve still got to find a legislator willing to submit a bill that would enact their agenda, and then get it passed just like any other bill. A far cry from what you seem to be suggesting.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org

What...

Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 9:54PM EST (link)

What exactly did I “suggest”? I didn’t say they shouldn’t be allowed to offer their ideas about taxes. I said it is arrogant to do so and that the idiots we elect should be telling them to shove it because they (the unions) weren’t elected to implement taxes. There was no suggestion that the law should be used to shit them up.

But, if you want to know exactly what I think about public employees unions, I think they should be directly outlawed. A union for state workers is entirely antithetical to good government on nearly every level.

Just put it this way: what is a union for if not to “get stuff” for its members. A union is NOT for the job, the work the outcome of labor. A union does not care a whit abut the product. A union is an extortion racket meant to take as much as possible from an employer.

That being true WHO is a public employee’s employer? That would be us, the tax payers. So, in the case of a public employees union, WHO is the one being extorted with no eye to the work or the end product? That would be TAXPAYERS.

Unions are a bad idea all the way around, but at least in the private sector their efforts only hurt one business owner or its investors and that hurt can be offset by other efforts and profits. But in a public employees union we get all the pain and NO gain from a union.

They should be outlawed. Period.

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

Ooops

Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 9:55PM EST (link)

First paragraph should say shut them up, not shi… well, not what I typed.

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

 
 

????...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 10:00PM EST (link)

seriously, where the heck did you get the idea of what you just said from W_TH’s diary? BTW, I love your little advertisement for yourself at the bottom. Center for Competitive Politics Indeed.

 

Disagree, seanparnell; public employees and their agents

Achance (Diary) Saturday, June 20th at 10:49AM EST (link)

should be prohibited from acting singularly or in concert to influence the outcome of any election, ballot proposition, initiative, legislative action etc. beyond their individual right to cast a vote. The federal Hatch Act has been gutted as well as similar prohibitions in almost all states. This has had the effect of turning public employee unions into socialist labor parties like the European model, something trade unions never adopted here.

Having spent much of my adult life as a public employee, I sincerely believe that checking that constitutional right should be the price of public employment. It would actually be a great benefit to many public employees, especially upper level merit system employees who come under tremendous political pressure. This would firmly place them off-limits in the political extortion that takes place around every election. I know that when I was a fed, I was very happy to say, “I’m Hatched,” whenever I got pinched for a contribution or “encouraged” to go to a fundraiser.

In Vino Veritas

 

Given your position on public employee unions Sean

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, June 20th at 10:56AM EST (link)

you should change the name of your organization to the Center for Uncompetitive Politics.

 
 

Even at the County level

deevee Saturday, June 20th at 10:29AM EST (link)

about all unions are good for is fleecing the taxpayer.

It is a sad state of affairs when the unions have more say in local government than the elected officials.

The moral of the story is vote for conservative individuals or as a conservative run for office yourself. I did.