All of this would be RETROACTIVE!!!!
If you think things are a mess now, this would just destroy EVERYTHING.

All laws signed, especially bailout, would have to be rebrokered.

Dems would be so shamed into submission for complicity over this that they would never win another office for generations. GOP would roll everything back to ground zero, tell the Dems to shut up and sit in the corner and speak when spoken to.

But best of all, the MSM would simply implode. No manufacturer would ever want their product associated with an MSM organization ever again.

(Not really a plug, but find the Season 1 Star Trek (orig),”Tomorrow is Yesterday,” where they end up back in Earth orbit, 1969)

Although, I hope this continues as long as there is some merit.

He could have just released his records and been done with it. I don’t think the Obama camp has planned this whole flap.

It is real sad that in America we can’t ask candidates to put proof out in public as condition to running for the highest office in the land.

But it seems to me that this should be addressed at the State level and that a Secretary of State of any particular state should be allowed or perhaps required by State Law to satisfy himself that a candidate for a particular office meets the Constitutional Requirements of that office before that candidate’s name is placed on the State ballot.

We need to get the law changed in a few purplish red states before 2011 so that the Secreatary of State is required to keep Obama off the ballot if he does not produce satisfactory proof of eligibility.

As I posted above, no other person – not even his mother, an American citizen by birth, can renounce Barrack Obama’s citizenship.

As Barrck Obama returned to live in the United States while still a minor child, there was and is no legal necessity to “reclaim” American citizenship.

Some foolidh Americans, in the Twenties and Thirties, took their families and went to the Soviet Union. They and their children became Soviet citizens under Soviet law. However, when those children reached their majority, they were allowed, under American law, to return to the United States. Neither the actions of their parents or Soviet law could destroy their citizenship.

The mere fact that another country may consider a person a citizen under their laws has no effect on that person’s American ciutizenship. The acceptance of and use of another’s countries passport does not destroy American citizenship.

The acts that would destroy a person’s American citizenship cannot be performed by a minor child and neither the child’s parents or guardians can peform those act on the child’s behalf.

I do agree with you, however, that nothing at all is going to be done about the questions surrounding Obama. He will remain POTUS until someone else is voted in.

If the citizenship is claimed through the mother — as is the case here — it is automatic. You know its her kid, she was heavily involved in the birth, to be a bit blunt.

If if the citizenshi is claimed through the dad — Dad must acknowledge paternity before the child is 18.

There is NO restriction that I am aware of that the President cannot be a dual citizen. In this case, natural born US citizen through Mother and then whatever the laws of Kenya apply with regard to his father.

My take — the Republicans need to drop this. There are so many more things of substance to attack him on. Harping on the birth certificate just makes us look like the Democrats who complained about Bush being “appointed” by the US Supreme Court. We have better things to do with our time and resources.

The only evidence in this case is that Obama has not shown his BC, and has only shown his COLB. This is nothing but a shiny object to distract his opposition, and render it a laughingstock.

“We only found out after.” Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

IBM built that computers (punch cards) that ran the Holocaust.

I don’t think I actually believe it, I am just saying that Omar’s argument is garbage.