‘Peace’ Activists Not Sure How to Protest Obama


When is a "peace activist" not interested in "peace"? After an Obama election...

Peace activists are liars. That is the lesson we learn from the Vallejo Times-Herald in the Napa area of California thanks to the hypocritical actions of “peace” activist Patricia Kneisler.

You see, Kneisler has decided to abandon her annual “peace” vigil in Benicia, California. Why would she do that? After all, we are still in Iraq. Not only that but we are about to ramp up actions in Afghanistan if the president can be believed. Why dump the “peace” vigil now since “peace” still hasn’t been achieved?

Let’s let our hippie friend tell us why:

“People are really conflicted now,” Kneisler said, explaining how many of the demonstrators felt they should not be protesting the war while Obama established his administration.

So, let’s get this straight… Bush is OK to protest, Obama is not? Even though the situation has not changed much at all? Why is that, anyway?

At this point Obama is not pulling out of Iraq any faster than the Bush administration had announced plans for doing and he continues to insist that he wants to engage more heavily in Afghanistan. Further, his Afghanistan policy has been one of upping the ante since the presidential campaign. There has been no hint that Obama is going to institute the precipitous retreat that these self-proclaimed peace activists wanted. So, on the face of it, Obama is not bringing “peace” on their terms. Yet, they still won’t protest him?

This makes it obvious that “peace” is not the agenda of the so-called peace movement. Politics is. They wanted a Democrat and did their level best to destroy George W. Bush’s policies to get that Democrat in office. Their guy won. Obama went to the White House and so these “peace vigils” end.

It doesn’t matter one little bit that the troops haven’t come home and that the “peace” they claimed to want hasn’t been achieved.

Obama won.

Quite regardless of any reality, THAT is their “peace.”

It also reveals their lies.



RSS feed

16 Comments Leave a comment

This has been amazing to watch.

jcheney Friday, March 27th at 11:09AM EST (link)

The lefties heard from Obama what they wanted to hear, the so-called ‘conservative elite’ (RINO editorial writers) heard what they wanted to hear and the welfare mentality heard what they wanted to hear, etc. etc., during the campaign. Obama is pretty amazing that he can speak so well out of both sides of his mouth and trick not only liberals, but those pesky, highly educated snobs. It is truly remarkable.

I remember the “peace” movement back in the 60′s and 70′s. What we have today is a ramped up version of that. It’s always been political, but now it’s calculated, yet the hypocrisy you write of is certainly true.

They WANTED to be tricked

Jack_Savage (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 11:40AM EST (link)

Just like Bernie Madoff’s investors wanted to believe that 12% returns were possible, even in down markets, Obama’s sycophants WANTED to hear what they heard. The Hope Obama talked about was just that – hope that what he said could possibly be true.

Yup

jcheney Friday, March 27th at 11:58AM EST (link)

Hope & Change is going to top the list as the most annoying phrase of 2008/2009 and on. Well, that and transparency.

 
 
 

They are not (anti-war) or for peace...

Kyle-MI (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 11:27AM EST (link)

They are anti-American. It is actually even worse than this. They are anti Western culture. They are against the very foundations of what this country was built on. I don’t care about questioning their patriotism. What does it mean to be patriot to a country that is moving in a direction opposed to what you believe? The country they want to live in and the country I want to live in are two different places.

They are not anti-American

ss396 Friday, March 27th at 2:26PM EST (link)

Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Kim Jong-II are anti-American, These peace activists, on the other hand, do not have the courage, the discipline, or the intellectual honesty that it takes to actually have a principled position. That’s what their hypocrisy says about them.

If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.

Almost all are "blame America first" types

JSobieski (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 2:40PM EST (link)

which is at least kissing cousins to anti-Americans.

They never protest anything a foreign country does (except Israel). They protest against the U.S military based on accidental actions, and ignore the purposeful actions of foreign actors.

Sounds pretty close to anti-American to me.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 
 

Hippie-ocrites.

Sharp_Right_Turn Friday, March 27th at 11:50AM EST (link)

Hell hath no fury like a non-combatant.

 

*Choke*

farstar99 (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 12:18PM EST (link)

“I mean, like, you know…he’s like, black and everything. And he’s a socialist. We can’t look like we’re hating on him for expanding the war and keeping us there longer than even Bush intended. IT’S…SO…HARD! *SOB* It’s almost as bad as having to get a job, or take a bath!”

 

Peace for the Rouge Countries and War Against Americans. That's Peace you can believe in. nt

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 1:01PM EST (link)

This is true all over the place

leonidas Friday, March 27th at 1:40PM EST (link)

The “Peace Vigil” in Hudson, NY (NY-20) has disappeared also. For the last several years a sad-looking but persistent little group stood in a park on Saturdays with anti-war signs etc.

Of course it wasn’t anti-war, it was just anti-Bush and anti-America.

Hypocrites.

Leonidas

 

And now Pakistan.....

beaming Friday, March 27th at 2:17PM EST (link)

Distraction of the day to implement the next block of socialism while we’re not looking ………..with the help of some republicans.

 

Obama tried. People died.

6eorge Jetson (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 3:18PM EST (link)

What are we trying to achieve in Afghanistan?

Following the September 11 attacks, we definitely needed to deliver a punch in the nose to the country and regime that served as the home to the locus of the terrorist planning. Done. Check.

Obama’s assessment of the importance of the wars in Iraq vs Afghanistan has been all wrong. What is the strategic importance of Afghanistan? Iraq has the resources and sufficiently educated populace to be a beacon to ambitious young Arabs seeking opportunity. Afghanistan offers a rough terrain and populous with no where near a sufficient aggregate education to function as a modern economy.

And let’s say, unlike the Russian effort, the US is successful. If you were a terrorist, what would you do? I’m thinking, move somewhere else.

Provided Obama doesn’t undermine our success in Iraq, the replacement of Saddam with a more-or-less market economy will provide a self-sustaing stream of dividends for years to come. Not necessarily close cooperation with the US–Iraq will surely follow its own interests–but by offering Arabs actual prosperity as an alternative to frustration distractions (symbolic terror acts on the other side of the globe), George Bush has altered the course of history for much the better.

 

what we get now...

larryp Friday, March 27th at 3:53PM EST (link)

Is “Dope and Chains”….

 

I AM SO SAD!!

semperfione Friday, March 27th at 7:46PM EST (link)

Does this mean that Code Pink want be attending Committee Hearings in our State Capitol like they have for the last eight years. That is so sad! I enjoyed seeing the Clowns. Don’t get to go to the Circus anymore, to busy watching C-Span. Well I guess the Democrat Chairman of these important Committees, that had become Ring Masters, will be joining the ranks of all of the Americans that their Liiberal Polices have put out of work. Maybe now the Chairmans can get a Teleprompter instead of reading from the Code Pink Signs.

 

History repeating itself

Next93 (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 10:50PM EST (link)

I remember when, after the US pulled out of South Vietnam with the agreement that we’d be there to help if the North invaded, the “peace” movement had not one word to say when, a few months later, the North violated the peace agreement and invaded the South once more. They also had not one word to say when Vietnam invaded Laos and, IIRC, Cambodia.

And not one word in the media about how war was, apparently, only immoral when waged by Americans.

At least back then, they were willing to protest the war even when a Democrat was in the White House.

Obama was The One in 2008.
He’ll be a BIGGER one in 2012.

 

FYI

1stRichard (Diary) Saturday, March 28th at 9:04AM EST (link)

This should give you some insight to their reasoning

*****************

Why we burned the flag.
Re: Amherst Forum (Admin)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:39:02 GMT
From: burningissue

We are a group of people from the local community who are responsible for the flag-burning protest at the Assembly for Patriotism at Amherst College on Thursday, October 18, 2001. We don’t have one identity. We represent no institution. We each come from different struggles, and we all bring different ideas to the table. We are writing to respond to the heated dialogue surrounding last Thursday’s events to explain our motivations behind this action.

The American flag represents freedom, democracy, and unity to some, but to others it symbolizes the opposite. The United States of America is built upon a history of violence and repression. This began with the genocide of Native Americans who inhabited this land before the arrival of European colonizers and it continued as Black people were brought here as slaves to provide the labor necessary for the country’s development. Still today, Mexicans living in the West are regarded as “illegal aliens” in a land that was their home long before it was conquered by the U.S. in 1848, and immigrants continue to arrive every day to this country sold on the “American dream”, only to be forced into menial work deemed unfit for “real Americans.” The construction and maintenance of America depends on the marginalization and exploitation of those excluded.

This nation was shaped not only by founding fathers, politicians, generals and businessmen, but also by the popular struggles that resisted them, from slave revolts and “Indian wars” to the Civil Rights Movement and urban uprisings. While many struggled for liberation, the U.S. military fought wars of conquest for global supremacy and economic domination in the name of freedom. Freedom means different things to different people. Freedoms of property ownership and upward mobility are granted to some Americans at the expense of freedoms of survival and self-determination for much of the rest of the world. At this time, the American flag is being invoked to celebrate one particular vision of freedom, without regard to contradictions within and resistance to that vision.

And it rambles on for much the same…….

*************************

I don’t see any reason why they should stop protesting, all their reasons are still there…