Mexican government officials are in the pocket of Mexican drug lords. Members of the Mexican military lend their support to Mexican drug lords. Mexican police double deal by being footsoldiers for Mexican drug lords at the same time they work for the various states. It’s all a great, corrupt mess down there.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s message to Mexico? It’s America’s fault.
And as the violence in Mexico begins to leak across the border into our southwestern states, what is Barack Obama’s idea to help? He wants to disarm our own people by raising the specter of “assault rifles,” a term that has no real meaning, and by re-instituting the “assault weapons” ban in the U.S.
So, another country’s internal corruption and internecine violence is our fault according to Obama and Clinton. And we are going to disarm ourselves in the face of foreign violence to “solve” the problem? Apparently, we are the ones the Mexicans have been waiting for, too. At least we are the ones that Mexican drug lords have been waiting for, anyway.
Naturally, the Old Media have painted this “new attitude” of American foreign policy as a relative good. McClatchy, for instance, praises Clinton’s capitulation to Mexico as a “humble” new policy, her “humility” being “served up” at every stop as she tours our southern neighbor. This new tone is an effort to reverse the problem of a “world opinion of the U.S. which sank deeply” during the Bush years, according to McClatchy.
For its part AFP says that America no longer views Mexico’s violence as the Mexican problem the Bush administration assumed it to be. We are taking “co-responsibility” for the violence as AFP quotes Mexican officials as saying.
It’s all of a piece with Obama’s “Gosh We’re Sorry” tour of the world. And what is the main offering on this tour besides a debasing of the U.S.A.? Money. And big money, too. To start with, Clinton’s “Gosh We’re Sorry” offering to Mexico is 80 million dollars in new spending as a sop to the corrupt nation. This new foreign aid is supposed to go to help Mexico buy new Blackhawk helicopters to assist the Mexican military to interdict drug cartels. But will it go to that end or will some of it end up in the hands of the very drug lords it is supposed to combat? Your guess is as good as mine.
Our government in Washington is almost bankrupt, we supposed to be in an “emergency” situation with our economy and what is Obama planning? 80 million dollars in new spending to Mexico.
Where that 80 mil would better be spent is in shoring up our border with Mexico and making sure their violence doesn’t come across the border in the first place. Let the money be spent on Americans instead of Mexicans if it must be wasted by government.
And lastly, when did Hillary Clinton realize that the role of Secretary of State included making American laws?
“I think these assault weapons, these military style weapons, don’t belong on anyone’s street,” said Clinton who pushed for the ban as a New York senator.
“During the time period from 1994 to 2004, when the ban was in effect, our police in America were able to drive crime down because they didn’t have to worry about these assault weapons getting into the hands of criminals and gang members,” the chief US diplomat said.
“So we will make the case that we need to put more teeth in the law, try to prohibit the sale outside of our borders of these guns,” Clinton said.
Someone needs to remind Her Thighness that she has NO ROLE in “making the case” that a new so-called assault weapons ban needs to be instituted. That is Congress’ and the president’s role, not hers. Her role as Secretary of State does NOT include lawmaking. She is Obama’s mouth on foreign policy, not America’s advocate for new laws, acts, or internal policy ideas.
This is what you signed on for, honey. You are not a Senator anymore. Keep out of matters in which you do not belong.
Meantime, Obama’s new policy of “we are the fault you’ve been waiting for” rolls on. Reaching out to enemies and slighting friends is a wonderful way to… I not sure what it is, actually. Besides stupid, that is.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
She Has a Point...
alamac (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 11:20AM EST (link)…while she is, as usual, wrong about guns, she is correct that the problem is our fault.
Look: If you obstruct freedom you run into problems. If we would RE-LEGALIZE DRUGS AND END THE TOTALITARIAN DRUGWAR, there would be no illegal market. That means no illegal money. And that would be the end of the drug gangs.
Leave the honest gun dealers alone. Let’s TRUST FREEDOM and re-legalize drugs. The Mexican gangsters would then have to find honest work. Problem solved.
http://ideas.rebuildtheparty.com/pages/general?all=true
My idea is No. 7–please vote for it! alamac
The problem with legalizing drugs is
mdredstater Friday, March 27th at 12:06PM EST (link)first, you don’t necessarily do away with the drug gang/cartel problem because legalization supposedly would create a soaring demand for what would now be consumer products. Lots of money to be had.
The other problem is that legalization will expand existing problems possibly to dangerous levels. You say, “it’s your body and you should be allowed to put whatever you want into it so long as you are not hurting others.” But you are. Would you want the school bus driver taking your kids to school to be on crack? Would I want the captain of my next flight to be buzzing on weed? Would you want someone in a high security position to…well, I hope you see where I’m coming from.
In a huge way though, Hillary IS right (that was hard to say ). It’s our fault because we create the demand.
mdredstater...although I am not really for legalization...I still don't think your argument holds water...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 12:16PM EST (link)everything you said could be said of alcohol, yet we allow the production and sale and rely on the individual to be responsible enough to not drive while drinking, and we punish those who are not responsible.
As far as Hillary being right…well I would say that the real problem is the porous border not any drug trade that may cross it. Mexico dug much of this hole all on their own…they killed their own economy and allowed the govt to be infiltrated with criminals. Blaming us in any way is a stretch as far as I am concerned.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
I understand your point, but...
alamac (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 12:35PM EST (link)…the evidence does not indicate that legality = increased use.
Examples abound: Switzerland v. Norway (one illegal, the other legal, no difference in addiction); Holland (legal pot, but lower use amongst underage people than here); and–big point–our own country, where we had little problem with drugs until we instituted prohibition which created the illegal market. And I tell you: I’d rather have a bus driver high on pot than drunk on alcohol–there is no relationship between the dangerousness of drugs and its status as being legal or illegal.
Also: The idea that the illegal market would continue if drugs were legal is nonsensical. Sure, after we created the alcohol gangs with prohibition, they continued after alcohol re-legalization–but only because there were other illegal markets (drugs & prostitution, mostly) for them to exploit. There are no “alcohol gangs” now. Once again: Oppression fails. Freedom works.
We have to keep in mind that most people can use drugs without problem. For the ones who, for whatever reason, are unable to control their behavior: Targeted laws aimed at people who cause damage, and a good set of policies to help people off of drugs when they finally get enough of being addicted, work much better than imprisonment, where they only learn how to be better criminals.
TRUST FREEDOM–RE-LEGALIZE!
The difference is trade relations
Slightly_Askew (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 12:42PM EST (link)We can sanction China if they sell us Nike shoes made with lead paint and assembled by 4 year olds. We could sanction Mexico for selling us marijuana that was harvested and transported by thugs and murderers. Right now, we as a people have zero control over where the drugs in this country come from, how they are manufactured/grown, what element profits from their distribution, etc.
Also, legalization does not mean that you remove all restrictions on a product. That is the most common strawman the anti-legalization crowd uses: “Legalize pot and 11 year olds will be swapping joints like baseball cards in homeroom”. You decriminalize the production/distribution while maintaining regulation for public health and safety.
Status quo of the Libs
franklinslocke Friday, March 27th at 11:28AM EST (link)This is what Libs do. Blame the US for everything. It is always our fault, Then is the wealthy’s fault Then, finally, is the Republicans fault. It is NEVER their fault nor someone else’s. Look Mexico is a mess because of Mexico. We have tried to help but they need to take responsibility for their own country. Our drug problem is not the only reason nor the main reason why Mexico is falling into chaos.
http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/
You forgot
mdredstater Friday, March 27th at 12:08PM EST (link)It’s Bush’s fault and the Reagan budget cuts too! :^p
I wrote about this subject last weekend nWTH, before Clinton's statements...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 11:31AM EST (link)See here.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
She doesn't even get the irony
red4ever (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 11:34AM EST (link)of her statements. She said the current violence is the result of decades of failed US policy. Umm, Madam Secretary, that includes YOUR husband’s administration, of which you claim you were so involved. So, when you say it is OUR fault, you mean it is YOUR fault.
It is certainly not the fault of the hard working Americans who obey the law and deplore the violence on our border and the porousness of said border that makes it so easy to come here.
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante
Not just HRC, BO as well...
evanm (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 12:40PM EST (link)From the Press Conference the other day:
I thought I was the only one that found this extraordinary. Glad to see that was not the case!