What ever Ronald Regan would do, Oboma does the opposite? Like the anti Christ…

Perhaps CNN is right if that “casual viewer” has no clue what Ronald Reagan was all about!

They are banking on the fact that most viewers were educated by the teacher’s union and therefore only know what they want them to know. Once the “casual viewer” leaves school, their education is continued by a multi-media extravaganza of movies, television, pop music and nicely print paper.

So yes CNN the “casual viewer” thinks exactly what you want them to.

Can’t we just assume by now that, after massaging him into the presidency, the mainstream media is going to do everything possible to promote him as every bit as good as they initially thought? If not, they’d be implicitly admitting they were duped and asleep at the switch. The question isn’t whether or not he was going to be anointed as a beacon of greatness; the question is when and how soon it would happen. The answer, of course, is one month.

The other thing we need to appreciate is that Barack is good at campaigning, but even more than that, he enjoys it. If the campaign has taught him anything, it’s that charisma works better than substance. The plan and the promises can change. People even expect that. As long as his is charismatic, and as long as he is campaigning effectively, whatever today’s plan is will carry a good flock of blind enthusiasts.

This administration isn’t too hard to figure out. It’s just a continuation of the campaign – changing ideas and policies all clothed in this vague concept of hope and change.

It’s the ghost of the Pruitt-Igoe Housing Project.

to take the advice of his buddy and pal, Bill Clinton, who the other day admonished him for being too negative. I didn’t see a single resemblance to Ronald Reagan, and am offended by those who would make that comparison! So he’s going to cure cancer – yet cancer treatments will be one of the first “non-essential” types of medical care eliminated under socialized medicine! He wants to double the spending on education – providing indoctrination – er – education from birth until you get a job. Washington D.C. spends more per capita on education than any other city – and has the WORST educational system in the country (probably followed by Chicago). There was more double-speak and outright contradictions in that speech than anything I have probably ever heard. I followed the on-line commentary here at RedState – that was probably the only thing that kept me from hurling a hammer through the TV screen! I think WTH very succinctly made the most accurate comparisons, above. Give me liberty or give me death, and I’m telling you, if as much of my liberty is lost as it sounds like is going to be, I’d prefer death!

It makes no sense. I mean, the era (read error) of Reagan is over. His policies failed and we are now reaping those seeds of poor ideas implemented on the heels of another great leader (Carter).

Why would CNN wish to bring Obama to Reagan’s level? It seems that one would wish to draw stark differences to such a failed President and his policies and talking points.

OR, is this simply another example of trying to have it both ways? I think we know the answer.

It keeps growing with no end in sight.

It grows with a vengence and speed unlike anything we have seen.

It is draining our bank accounts as we fight it.

It seems as if nothing we do will slow it’s growth.

Soon it will rob us of the ability to fight it.

Soon your life, liberty & happiness will be snuffed out.

According to the Historians, Reagan is only ranked 8 or 9. FDR is ranked 3. And Lincoln is ranked No. 1.

Why not compare Obama to Lincoln…. The Number 1? This is a big dishonor to The One.

I swear you are nothing to the despised MSM if you are a Republican until you are DEAD and suddenly you are a GREAT….I really hate them!

schools too well… By claiming, apparently approvingly, that Obama is ‘Reaganesque’, they may goad younger people than myself to go find out what Reagan actually was about.

Follow me on this… since the 80s, I’ve heard nothing good about Reagan in the press. He was supposed to be a senile old fool, who somehow could deliver a line, probably because he had once been an actor. Now, I was there when he was POTUS. But younger people, who weren’t, must be confused to hear the same press now comparing their guy to Reagan, as if that were supposed to be a GOOD thing. If 5% of them, in their bafflement at hearing Reagan’s name spoken without apparent derison, go out and see what Reagan actually did and how he did it, we may actually come out of this ahead.

There was nothing inspiring about the speech, unless I was a government employee or lefty group. I was disgusted watching Pelosi jump up and applaud what she believes are great initiatives and laws they passed. For CNN to compare this chump to Reagan is an insult. Reagan has more leadership and competence, even in his grave, than Obama will ever have.

Every time this buffoon opens his mouth, investors vote with their feet moving at a high rate of speed. Another word for it is running.

Let’s give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he has good intentions. That is even worse then if he was purposely trying to destroy the economy because that would suggest he is just too dumb and stubborn to figure out that everything he is doing is wrong.

Raise taxes during a recession? Brilliant! Increase government porkulus during times of record deficits? Brilliant! Keep printing money at a time of recrd debt? Brilliant!

I see Obama as a Captain Queeg figure. I see this ending very badly.

alright!