Pelosi: Screw Barack’s ‘Bi-Partisanship’ AND The GOP


Once again Nancy Pelois has told Barack Obama that he can take his desire for a post-partisan Washington and shove it. Pelosi has left little doubt that she doesn’t give a flying fig about the bi-partisan method of governing to which Obama continually pays lip-service.

So, will President Obama take these slaps from Pelosi lying down or will he stand up for what he keeps claiming he is truly interested in? Will this president allow the Speaker of the House to drive his agenda without his input?

Thus far, it seems that he will. It is starting to become glaringly obvious that Barack Obama isn’t taking any part in the actual process. He just gives good press conference and then retreats back into the White House to leave the real work to others. And those “others” (like Democrats Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid) are not interested in their president’s sparkling ideals. Not only do Reid and Pelosi have no interest in heeding Obama’s lofty call to work across the aisle with the GOP but they want to crush the GOP without mercy. It’s partisan business as usual as far as the Democrats in Congress are concerned.

Politico reports that on Friday, Pelosi met with reporters and blasted anyone that opposed her. “In a statement sure to rile Republicans, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Friday dismissed calls for bipartisanship as ‘process’ arguments extraneous to passing a stimulus bill…” She went on to say that, “Washington seems consumed in the process argument of bipartisanship, when the rest of the country says they need this bill.”

First of all, that last bit is an outright lie. “The rest of the country” is NOT saying they “need this bill.” According to a recent CBS poll, support for the stimulus is in no way overwhelming.

Slightly more than half the country approves of President Obama’s $800 billion-plus stimulus package, a new CBS News poll finds. But support for the bill has fallen 12 points since January, and nearly half of those surveyed do not believe it will shorten the recession.

That same poll shows that the overwhelming majority of respondents want a bi-partisan bill, and this runs exactly the opposite of Pelosi’s actions and claims.

Eighty-one percent of Americans say the stimulus bill should be a bipartisan effort. Just 13 percent think it is okay for a bill to be passed with only the backing of the Democratic majority.

If Pelosi gets her way and makes this a damn the GOP effort, this will eventually bite Obama’s favorable poll ratings. After all, eventually people will realize that Obama is powerless as a leader and cannot change the partisanship of his own party.

It remains to be seen, however, if this is all really what Obama wants in the end. Does he really care at all about bi-partisanship? Or is he taking the high ground with his airy speeches but cynically allowing the liberal attack dogs in Congress to scuttle the lofty rhetoric because, in truth, he doesn’t want any bi-partisan effort at all?

Even if this more cynical view of Obama’s motives isn’t true, that his calls for a bi-partisan effort are actually his fervent wishes, if he fails to lead his own party to this end it will be seen as either a failure to lead, or an out right lie in the first place on Obama’s behalf. In either case, Obama fails as president.

We also need to point out one more bit of leftist doggerel that puts the stamp of liar to their SOP (standard operating procedure). Catch this line in the Politico piece:

Pelosi — speaking to reporters on the second day of her retreat with House Democrats at a swank Williamsburg, Va., golf resort…

The Democrats are having a “lavish retreat” in these harsh economic times? But wait, aren’t these the same people, the same leftist Democrats, that attack corporations for lavish “retreats” and perks just like the ones they are currently enjoying?

Hypocrites. Plain and simple.

(Photo credit: Bloomberg)


Category: ,

RSS feed

18 Comments Leave a comment

Why would Obama want bipartisanship ?

beaming Saturday, February 7th at 5:43AM EST (link)

Working with one party in Chicago seemed to work okay for him.

 

BO doesn't have any more intention...

Red_Wing (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 5:46AM EST (link)

…of being bi-partisan than Pelosi, or Reid.

He wants only to be perceived that way.

That is evidenced clearly enough by his smack down of Eric Cantor with the “We won” comment, and the 14 days of tyranny we have all witnessed thus far!

It’s a shame, but it’s true.

“Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself”. ~M. Friedman

 

BS

davod Saturday, February 7th at 7:30AM EST (link)

This is BS. The really liberal parts of the bill will stay ijn.

DAVOD

 

The real test of who is a real Republican will be

Achance (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 7:41AM EST (link)

the vote on the conference committee report. The House Democrats will put many of their goodies back in and pitch the conference committee report to the Senate. We’ll see if there are only three Republicans on that vote.

In Vino Veritas

Do they need 60 votes on the conference vote?

Brian Hibbert (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 8:13AM EST (link)

Is that subject to the same cloture rules as the original legislation?

Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.

Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots

Think so, but not sure.

Achance (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 8:19AM EST (link)

If the Rs were smart, they’d all vote for cloture then all vote against the bill. That’s what they should have done on the bill itself and leadership should have kneecapped Spectre, Snow, and Collins. If they’re not going to vote with you, why are they even in the Caucus?

In Vino Veritas

 
 
 

Voting 'Present'

ss396 Saturday, February 7th at 8:44AM EST (link)

“It remains to be seen, however, if this is all really what Obama wants in the end. Does he really care at all about bi-partisanship? Or is he taking the high ground with his airy speeches but cynically allowing the liberal attack dogs in Congress to scuttle the lofty rhetoric because, in truth, he doesn’t want any bi-partisan effort at all?”

You are ascribing motives to President Obama. He has no motives. He has no stance. He has no convictions. He has no vision. He has no substance. As long as the heavy lifting is being done by others, they are the ones who will endure the blame while he loftily floats above and separate from it. He is still voting ‘present’, lest he find himself having to accept responsibility. By the end of his Presidency, comparing him to Nero will be a kindness.

If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.

Isn't that being two faced?

gekster (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 11:36AM EST (link)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

 

Yes, Obama does have motives...

conservativemusician Sunday, February 8th at 12:07AM EST (link)

His motives, his stance, his convictions, his vision, and his substance are all socialist to the core. He is the modern incarnation of Karl Marx…except with a “better tan”.

He is also highly partisan – even more so than Pelosi or Reid. He can delude himself all he wants into believing that the electorate voted for this kind of change, but we did not and this is being evidenced by the bill’s growing unpopularity on both sides of the aisle. In the end, BO will get the blame for the havoc that will ensue from this socialist bill. The best thing he could do would be to start over with a pure tax cut package, but that would be rational and we certainly can’t have that. Losers have no say anymore…and we lost, remember?

Not motives, but reactions

ss396 Sunday, February 8th at 9:08AM EST (link)

He doesn’t have motives so much as he has reactions. Even motivation toward socialism requires a depth of character, and firmness of conviction that he simply lacks. His life has been imbued with nanny-state, government-cum-elite-runs-things environment his entire life, and his reactions emanate from that core.

He is like the dog who chases cars: what to do with it if it ever catches one? He has attained a pinnacle of power and prestige, and he thought he knew what he wanted to do with it, but he doesn’t. He doesn’t have a vision for his Office. Broadly he does (“I won”), but he has no clear idea how to transform this into specific policies and execution. Anyone can say “we must work together” but he has no clue how to bring that about.

What has he done since being elected (besides having to backtrack on staff nominations)? He has made speeches, and urged the folks to the lofty goals of stimulus and bipartisanship and unity and on and on; big deal – he has not offered even one specific policy prescription, preferring to let Pelosi and Reid take the political hits. Every mistake made during his campaign was somebody else’s fault; every stance he tried withered and crumbled at the first sign of serious opposition; press relations less than adulatory make him testy. These actions are reactive, not motivated or visionary. His speech is lofty, his actions are petty. I cannot accord to him the strength of character that it would require for him to have ‘motive’.

Cheers.

If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.

 

And yes, we lost

ss396 Sunday, February 8th at 9:16AM EST (link)

Except that every member of the House was up for election too, and they won – in face of a cratering economy, Bush unpopularity, the Democrat surge, and the headiness of the Obama ticket.

I think that they missed a good ‘gotcha’ opportunity when Obama met with the House Republicans, and told them “I won”. They should have responded “So did we, Mr. President, so did we.”

If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.

 
 
 

Good question, Achance

Josh Painter (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 8:48AM EST (link)

It begs another question: What good are they?

In the Mel Gibson flick “Payback”:

[Porter shoots Val in the leg, puts a cigarette in Val's mouth and takes a cigarette for himself]

Porter: You got a light?
Val: What?
Porter: You got a light?
Val: No.
Porter: Then what good are you?

[Porter shoots Val in the face]

- JP

“An armed society is a polite society” – Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon” (1942)

 

If they won't vote with the caucus, they shouldn't be in it.

Achance (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 8:57AM EST (link)

Take away their committee assignments and any ranking member status they have. Imagine Snarlin’ Arlen not being able to demonstrate his radiance on the Judiciary Committee.

I don’t think it would be any great loss, certainly not in this Congress; there aren’t going to be any close votes on anything consequential. Even this 60 vote crap is just that, crap. The only thing I could see a filibuster on something like that UN Treaty that really does abolish state sovereignty, and I’m not at all sure we could avoid cloture even on something that awful.

In Vino Veritas

I couldn't agree more

Jack_Savage (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 9:41AM EST (link)

Why on earth would a Senator stop self-aggrandizing behavior when there are absolutely no consequences? And if there are no consequences, why would we believe that the leadership is not complicit?

The fact of the matter is that if you are not strong on fiscal issues, you are simply not a Republican. We need to realize that Republicans are working with 38 votes in the Senate, and adjust accordingly.

I renovate houses for fun. When you come across an area with rotten wood, you can do one of two things. Do things right by getting rid of the rot and replacing it with something reliable, or patch over it and wait for the house to fall down.

This is another bad, bad day for America.

 

Stripping.

itrytobenice (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 10:57AM EST (link)

Agreed. If you can’t oppose this bill and all bills that resemble it, you’re not a Republican, you’re not a conservative, you’re not a fiscon, you’re not anything that should be in any position of leadership in our party or gov’t.

They should be stripped of all power and authority other than the power to vote and run for the cameras. Let it be obvious that we, as a party, won’t encourage enemy infiltrators.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

AMEN!!

Terilyn Donaldson (Diary) Saturday, February 7th at 11:30PM EST (link)

n/t

SURVIVING IN WYOMING…


 
 
 

Perhaps we could send Spectre one of these

6eorge Jetson (Diary) Sunday, February 8th at 12:18AM EST (link)

click on image above to view actual bobblehead (nt)

6eorge Jetson (Diary) Sunday, February 8th at 12:21AM EST (link)