In a what-was-he-thinking move, Representative Peter King (R-NY) has recently introduced H.R. 414, the Camera Phone Predator Alert Act which is aimed at preventing “predators” from taking illicit photos of others in public with cell phones. The bill will force cell phone manufacturers to make the camera feature of a cell phone emit a noise so that it will be audibly obvious when a picture is taken.
As the bill summary at Thomas.loc.gov states:
Requires any mobile phone containing a digital camera to sound a tone whenever a photograph is taken with the camera’s phone. Prohibits such a phone from being equipped with a means of disabling or silencing the tone. Treats the requirement as a consumer product safety standard and requires enforcement by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
Really? So now we are mandating sounds here? Should we begin to make laws that devices of every kind emit some sort of sound to alert everyone in the vicinity that something has been used in their presence, and predicate it all on “public safety”? And, what if someone doesn’t like the particular sound chosen? Are we going to sue to get the sound we like? Will the government then make rules of what kind of sound is made, how loud, how long? Will there be great volumes of the sorts of sounds “allowed” for one thing or another? Clicks for cameras? Star Trek-like swooshing sounds when doors open?
I do understand the principle here. King wants to stop creeps from taking photos in public that will be used for invasive and prurient interests. But, come on. Really? Is THIS the way to do it? And I can’t help but wonder, what is to prevent the same creeps from just switching to video mode and later singling out via a computer the specific frame he wants to use? And will Peter King then force cell phone makers to add that mechanical whirr we used to hear in old fashioned crank movie cameras so as to “alert” everyone that a movie is being shot on a cell phone?
And what about the level of sound. What if the perv is, say, in a loud bus? Will King’s patented clicky sound have to be so loud that everyone can hear it over the drone of the engine? So how loud must this click be? Will we be required to each carry a giant speaker on our shoulders to amplify our government approved clicky sound to an acceptable decibel? And, what about the deaf? Will each cell phone user be required to hire a person that does American Sign to alert any potential deaf people around that a cell phone picture is about to be taken? Should we tap all blind people on the shoulder to let them know we are about to take a photo so that we can keep our pal, Representative King, and his government jack-boots off our backs?
And, how abut a bail-out to cover the costs of all these new regulations? I doubt I’ll be able to hire my own private American Sign expert for free!
This is just one more example of the absurd length that the nanny state ultimately achieves. Next government will be mandating that electric cars be fitted with speakers to be used to make the car sound like it has a 440 Hemi under the hood — for everyone’s “safety,” of course. (ooops, already done) Hey, I have an idea… Maybe Congress will intervene to make noises more listener friendly to “help” everyone out? Maybe we can make Janeane Garofalo’s voice less grating?
Oh, wait. I have a really great idea… maybe King can mandate that firearm silencers be manufactured to make a noise. That way we can all know when someone is shooting at us. Those silencers are just too darn quiet.
…thank you… I’m here all week. Try the veal.
But, seriously, this is all just more regulation for no substantive reason. Another example of the meddling fingers of government in our lives and another example of onerous crap piled onto manufacturing.
The worst thing about this stupid bill is that King is a Republican.
As Republicans we need to reiterate to our representatives in government that less regulation is our goal, not more meddling in our lives. Less ruling, tastes like liberty, Representative King. Taste the liberty, will you?
(Photo credit: nymag.com)
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Better outlaw zoom, that allows sneaky shots too
weave (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 7:08AM EST (link)I have a Nokia N95 camera-phone. The beast cost me $750 about two years ago. It is 5 megapixel, auto-focus, and a decent lens for a camera phone. Now there are phones that are 8 megapixels costing much less. My first camera-phone in 2003 took 240×320 fixed-horrible-focus shots.
My point is, as these cameras get much better, which is inevitable, if one wants to take creepy pictures of kids they could be hundreds of feet away from them and either zoom in or take the pic at full resolution and crop out the subject they want. Any noise would be inaudible.
As for my N95, for whatever reason, the U.S. version is not able to have the shutter sound silenced, but the European version has that feature. The “fix” is to flash the phone with EU firmware.
Many photographers don’t want a shutter noise because it often scares away animals. I know it often makes my cats run off when I sneak up on them for a shot. If you don’t get it right the first time, they run.
So I’m in full agreement. Yet another not-needed law. But hey, if this doesn’t pass at the federal level, Obama can free each state to make their own mandatory-shutter noise laws, each with a different standard for loudness and type of sound.
politicians
Caleb Howe (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 7:13AM EST (link)… fear the citizen armed with a camera more than anyone else. Compulsory clicky sounds is the next best thing to what they secretly wish they could do: prevent us from ever seeing them unscripted under any circumstances.
This is a bad precedent. It should be resisted.
Caleb Howe (formerly known as absentee)
Memo
Kenny Solomon (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 7:25AM EST (link)Memo
To: President Government
From: Kenneth L Solomon
Re: Personal Request, Important
May I go to the bathroom ?
Cheers !
Term limits sounding better all the time
fisk2521 Tuesday, January 27th at 8:31AM EST (link)What the H…!!! Is this all our Congressman can come up with right now at this minute? It boggles the mind to think that anyone would actually spend time on this when we are in an economic crisis that threatens our very future and the President is using it to change our way of life entirely.
For God’s sake King, look around and do something worthwhile.
LDavis
Ya know.......
USNJIMRET (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 8:36AM EST (link)This is another time when, it seems to me, that the effort to prevent a ‘crime’ from taking place is the completely wrong approach. Rather then punish, or even inconvenience, the entire cell phone camera using population with this wrong headed idea, make the punishment for using that camera in a inappropriate manner severe!
Laws already exist to punish sickos for the taking of photos considered lewd, etc., of children. Toughen the punishment!!
But in another example of “feel good” legislation, this will find favor with ‘moderate’ republicans and lots of democrats!
Actually wouldn’t be surprised if it ends up adopted n some fashion or other.
It'll pass, guaranteed. [nt]
Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 8:51AM EST (link)“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
Let's hope not
Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 9:12AM EST (link)It has no co-sponsors, so let’s hope that is a sign that everyone else is looking at King and say, “WHA???”
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Please tell me this is a joke
JustLeaveMeAlone (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 9:44AM EST (link)At least we don’t need a noise to tell us an idiot is talking. We can assume that whenever this Congressman opens his mouth.
“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Enforcement of this law = joke
ColbyS Tuesday, January 27th at 9:44AM EST (link)If camera phones with no clicky are made illegal, then only criminals will have camera phones with no clicky.
After seeing the ease with which the iPhone hacks were implemented, I’m guessing any 2-bit voyeur with a soldering iron could get rid of the offending chime.
Meanwhile, me the Joe Citizen who doesn’t illegally hack my phone, if I see a large group of people stomping someone on the street, I can’t covertly pretend to be on my cell but secretly be taking pictures of the crime to bring the guys to justice.
Welcome to Japan...
TokyoNose Tuesday, January 27th at 10:24AM EST (link)This has been the standard in Japan for a number of years. (Presumably) men were surreptitiously taking pictures up women’s skirts on crowded trains, and the artificial shutter noise was adapted as a method of foiling them.
Circumvented in 3 seconds, or less
Darin_H (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 1:00PM EST (link)All this law will do is just annoy everyone without stopping what it intends to stop. Does King actually live in our world? Or does he live in some magical world where people can’t disable this?
A visionary coward says that anger can be power, as long as there’s a victim on TV – Flat Top, Goo Goo Dolls