In the Chicago Sun-Times on October 29, Andrew Greeley said that Barack Obama simply cannot beat racism to become president of the United States. He’s consumed by all the talk of racism during this campaign and he sees it everywhere he turns. Of course, Greeley is right. There is a lot of talk of racism. But he isn’t right about where it’s coming from. You see, Greeley is claiming that racism is the sole reason that anyone wouldn’t support Obama and he worries that racist talk is coming in torrents from Obama’s opponents. The truth is, though, that the only people talking about racism is Obama and his most earnest supporters. People like Greeley.
Greeley and Obama’s other supporters claim that anyone that opposes Obama is a racist. But the reality is that Obama’s opponents are not talking much of or worried about the fact that Barack Obama is a black man. Obama’s supporters, however, are acting just like the worst example of a McCarthyite in the respect that they see “racists” under their bed at night, around every corner, and in every dark closet. Greeley and his ilk see racists lurking everywhere… whether they exist or not.
In fact, in his fevered imagination, Greeley thinks that racists fill both parties and that they had marked Obama for destruction at the very outset saying that, “his rivals perceived that they had to destroy him.” He marks the early battleground as the “haters on the Internet” and then claims that the Democrat Party itself took up the anti-Obama bigotry.
The next assault came from his fellow Democrats. He was too quick, too disciplined, too well-organized to disappear as he should have. Therefore the litany of contempt began. He lacked experience. He was not ready to be commander in chief. No one knew how he would act in time of crisis. He needed more seasoning. Others had worked for similar causes in the heat of the day. They were entitled. All he had ever done was give one good talk.
But, do you notice something odd abut the anti-Obama arguments that Greeley lists as coming from his own Party? Did you notice that not one of those reasons are race-based complaints? Inexperience is not inherently a racist charge. Neither is the “unknown” of how Obama will “act in time of crisis.” Neither is the charge that Obama jumped ahead of the line of people patiently waiting for the Democratic nod and that had been around longer than he.
Greeley also lists what he thinks were the Republican’s reasons for being anti-Obama.
If his opponent was going to do him in, he would have to attack Sen. Obama’s character, a favorite strategy of Republicans for the last 20 years. He was a celebrity, as shallow as the pop tarts. His eloquence was phony. He was an extreme liberal, he was a socialist, he was a terrorist. He was a threat to the American way of life, he was not like the rest of us. He was not a patriotic American. In a time of crisis the country needed a proven, patriotic American.
Yet, again, Greeley seems to insist that this is all because of racism. In fact, one finds that few of the many negatives that Greeley claims folks heaped upon Obama are examples of obvious racism.
Yet, strangely, every single substantive reason that anyone would use to oppose Obama is ascribed firmly to racist intent as far as Greeley is concerned. Here’s how Greeley sums up what he feels is the real intent behind each of the reasons he presented:
In other words, he faced the same race card that President Nixon played in 1972, only the card had another name now — “experienced, patriotic, American.”
So, every single reason offered to oppose Obama by Whites, Republicans, Hispanics, Democrats, women, men… they are ALL really mere racist epithets in disguise?
This is astonishing for its utter lack of reasoned reflection. Certainly there was opposition to Obama inside and outside the Democrat Party and, as to be expected, from the GOP. But, it obviously wasn’t insurmountable and it was never based on race. There has been no real out-cry about Obama’s race in any venue, in any debate, in any advertisement, in any legitimate political opposition.
Still, Greeley sees racism everywhere. He is fixated on it, fascinated by it. He is consumed by it as brilliantly as the light of all the suns in the universe. There is a medical word that describes someone who sees things that aren’t there. You know what that word is, I’m sure.
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Every black person in America should shake McCain's hand
Shaggy_Dog (Diary) Friday, October 31st at 9:49AM EST (link)McCain’s absolute refusal to make an issue out of Obama’s 20 year membership in his black hate church still floors me. If a white candidate of any political persuasion had attended a similar church, he would have- appropriately- been blown out of the water within 48 hours of the story coming out.
But McCain has scrupulously avoided any attacks against Obama that could be construed as having any racial element. Even the totally legitmate Rev. Wright issue that probably could put him over the top. That’s what I call country first- McCain would rather lose an election than hurt race relations in America.
Since Obama was the one who claimed that Republicans would attack him “because he didn’t look like other Presidents on the dollar bill,” if Obama wins he will owe McCain a big apology- or at least thanks- for the principled non-racial campaign that McCain has run.
Who cares...
Bill S (Diary) Friday, October 31st at 9:51AM EST (link)why he loses? As long as he loses, I’ll be quite happy, thank you.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
Another Chicago Catholic Priest
ILLINOIS_CONSERV (Diary) Friday, October 31st at 11:18AM EST (link)who has no conscience when it comes to supporting candidates with radical pro-abortion voting records. I have written to Cardinal George about this issue and his silence when it comes to dealing with priests like Greeley and Pfleger. I sit in church and hear the pleas for prayer and financial support for pro-life initiatives and yet these so called priests do exactly the opposite! And there is nothing but silence from the church hierarchy. Why is that? I demonstrate in front of Planned Parenthood offices in an effort to curb the killing of innocent babies while Father Pfleger curses on a Church altar, and he and Greeley openly support a candidate who voted against medical treatment for babies that survive abortions. Why is that? Where is the outrage! I would like an answer from the Catholic church in Chicago.
The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing – Edmund Burke
I'm sure race will play a part
clove Friday, October 31st at 12:03PM EST (link)Go find Jive Turkey and ask him who he’s voting for and why? I’m sure McCain will win, especially if the left keeps bringing up race, people don’t like that. It’s a insult, and very well could provoke racism. Obama would lose , because of his ideas. Go ask some of the black people why they voted for McCain or will, if they say race I’ll be shocked. It’s not his race, it’s his views toward America. Even though, I’m sure race alone will play a part,but that’s not what worries people. He worries people, him, the individual.