the theory is the science guy who must prove the theory.

warming mongers have become in the past couple of weeks. Basically they are saying “who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes.”
Nye can use those ballett tap shoes he invented to dance around the fact that much of the so-called evidence on global warming is being discredited on a weekly basis.

We would expect no less from a Maddow-endowed “expert.”

(Note to self: Never, ever allow kids to watch this ignorant boob on TV.)

Also on a TV comedy show on Comedy Central called “Almost Live”. I think he carried the jokes over to the whole AGW debate.

…the Smart Set says cold weather is no evidence of anything. But they go on to say it is evidence that the theory is right. I’m not making this up.

The new State Religion. Isn’t there something in the Constitution about that?

As in the Nobel Peace Prize being miscast as a Science Prize.
Or declaring that the very partisan political group that ‘Awards’ said prize does so without bias.
Just enough of a kernel of truth in the lie to give one the wiggle room needed should the lie be challenged.
Considering how many years he has in the TV ‘Education’ field, Mr Nye KNOWS that his false presentation of facts has a long term positive, for his side, result.
After all, how many people believe that Sarah Palin is the one who said that she can see Russia from her house? And parrot that ‘fact’ as evidence of her lack of intelligence?
Same thing here.
Present, from an invented position of scientific “authority”, facts and ideas that are demonstrably incorrect, and you grow a few more soldiers in your decades long war of disinformation and coerced adherence to their preferred solution, more government control of everything.
All cloaked in a very non threatening geek who produces children’s television ‘programming’, a word with more then one meaning!

We’re also unpatriotic if we don’t find the world of the ‘Green Police’ – which is where we are headed – all that savory.

Come back to us, Mr. Wizard!

Found a few more unpatriotic folks for ya.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece

Meanwhile the administration is moving forward to control our economy via agencies like the NOAA, which has been put forward as the government authority on climate change.

We can’t let ourselves be distracted by the talking heads.

“We all feel it in our—in our hearts.”

And that why and where the science stopped being important to the eco-socialist goals of promoting the global warming fraud… When *feelings* are more important than *facts* insanity rules…

You are smarter and know how to think about solving scientific/engineering problems, not covering them up. Though there is a pun in there when thinking about the geological aspects….

I had no idea he wasn’t a “scientist.” He is just another Hollywood elitist who thinks he knows something and believes he is smarter than the rest of us. Sort of like the Hollywood types who know more about foreign policy than people like Ambassador Bolton. OTOH, with the current admin, Hollywood does match up.

Right here.
Even translated for the dummies at HuffPo.

Note to lefties;
“Don’t be afraid to see what you see.” -Ronald Reagan

Activists taking Action

Join the RedState Strike Force

Senate Conservatives Fund	House Conservatives Fund
The Precinct Project	Jeff Gorell for Assembly

Conservatives Victorious in 2010

pretty much why the GW debate is a hoax; therefore, they call me anti-science well I am anti science if this is what they call science. BTW B.S. SUNYIT Photonics and Applied Mathematics 10 years design engineer patents with my former company yup, I am DONTREADONME The Science Guy and I gave myself 3 honorary PhDs yup that’s about as much as an honorary degree is worth.

Bill Nye? Isn’t he a second-rate Professor Beakman?

sayeth the experts Maddow and Nye, does not disprove Climate Change.”

but one hurricane does? I assume that Maddow and Nye were cheering Al Gore as he stood in front of the 50 foot image of hurricane Katrina and tied it to “global warming”.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html

From our friends in Britain who appear to have had enough of this silly climate change foolishness. There politics is different than ours. They do not have that hard core democratic base with disposable income like here. The money they lost, the jobs they lost makes a bitter people even more bitter. If Al Gore were British he’d be moving.

http://truthandcommonsense.com/2010/02/15/suing-global-warming-for-loss-of-wages-lifestyles-can-it-be-done/

In my post I ask the question can we sue? I figure the governments won’t (unless extreme pressure is brought by the voting public). So it is left up to some enterprising young attorney to file the first suit and freeze any records. It can be argued that if these scientists knew the statistics they were offering as evidence were falsified a crime occurred. Like I said in my post, imagine if a big Pharma company put out a drug that harmed the public KNOWING the drug trials were faked, they’d be sued and probably put out of business. The world has lost TRILLIONS of dollars over the years with all the bull demanded by those using global warming stats as facts. Somebody needs to sue somebody for a whole lot of money.

Now we can’t get everybody involved, but targeting the core group in the email scandal would be a good start. Trust me, like I said in my post, the only thing wimpier than scientists is Bill Maher. They’ll roll over like trained puppies.

Erick, know anybody looking to be famous?

The only “expert” on climate is GOD! All the rest are phony Nobel “Peace” Prize winners…

You bet it is. If someone driving a train is told that the bridge up ahead is out, but chooses to ignore the data, he endangers the lives of everyone on the train. If that train is America, if the driver is us, and if the danger is global warming, then perhaps ignoring it is unpatriotic. Let me explain.

Weather is complex, to be sure, but some things are unambiguous signs of global warming. Take rising oceans, for instance. The increased turbulence from climate change may result in freak snow storms, perhaps in places that rarely see snow, but the overall picture is clear. The rising of oceans means something is melting. Measurable ocean rise means that a whole lot of something is melting. Melting means global warming. Simple. There may be local cold snaps, but globally we have clear-cut signs of warming. Just take a look at this article about disappearing islands:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100324/ap_on_sc/as_india_disappearing_island

Nature doesn’t respect party lines, or the economics of big business. You can ignore where this train is headed, or you can do something about it. Just because the other party touts global warming and this party ridicules it does not govern what each of us thinks and does as individuals. Each of us, as Americans, are responsible. Don’t blindly follow the train. Don’t let disbelief or the clutter of “he said, she said” confuse the issue.

If we don’t take responsibility for the endangerment of America and humanity what does that make us?

How could global warming endanger humanity? The most obvious way is the displacement of millions from coastal areas as a result of rising sea levels (already underway). Ruining Shanghai, Tokyo, London, New York, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco and others could have an adverse effect on world economy. The temporary loss of New Orleans from Katrina was an expensive lesson.

Increased drought in some areas (including food producing areas), plus increased flooding in others could upset the global food supply (including the domestic food supply). What will you tell your children about the global warming “hoax,” if they don’t have food to eat because we did nothing?

Increased turbulence in the world economy from the above effects would likely result in regime changes, destabilization, wars and more disruptions. And yes, disruptions to business.

Personally, I like big business. I especially like responsible big business. I like big business that pays more than lip service to caring about their customers and the future of this planet. It would be a shame to have our precious big business go the way of other big beings 65 million years ago. The dinosaurs couldn’t do anything about their own plight. The sad thing is, our big lumbering beings can do something, but will bruised ego and greed get in the way? I hope not.

Twelve thousand years ago, after thousands of years of natural global warming, glacial melt resulted in a severe return to Ice Age conditions that lasted 1300 years. This was a period known as the Younger Dryas. So, yes, global warming can result in another Ice Age, as counter-intuitive as that may seem. Weather is complex and unpredictable, locally. Globally, the picture is clear. Will we wake up in time to do something meaningful about it?