<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA Makes a Pitch for a Share of BP&#8217;s New Gulf Oil Find</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hondav65</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>hondav65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>Give me a break - the King Fish has been dead and gone forever.

Huey P has nothing to do with Louisiana anymore.  Hell - we didn&#039;t even get a share of these revenues until after Katrina and Congressman Bobby Jindal was the guy that drove the effort for us to get them.

You can argue whatever you want - but the people of Louisiana have more right to those revenues than the people of California do.

Oh but - whatever - it&#039;s just law, hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break &#8211; the King Fish has been dead and gone forever.</p>
<p>Huey P has nothing to do with Louisiana anymore.  Hell &#8211; we didn&#8217;t even get a share of these revenues until after Katrina and Congressman Bobby Jindal was the guy that drove the effort for us to get them.</p>
<p>You can argue whatever you want &#8211; but the people of Louisiana have more right to those revenues than the people of California do.</p>
<p>Oh but &#8211; whatever &#8211; it&#8217;s just law, hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hondav65</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>hondav65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>Look - you&#039;re barking a dead argument - there are revenues that are generated on the oil and if the State doesn&#039;t get them - the Feds do.

Period.

So Barney Frank either gets to spend this money - or Rick Perry or Bobby Jindal do.

No brainer to me.

If you want to change the law to make it where the oil companies pay no revenues to the Feds or the State - but keep it all to themselves - I think most of us would be behind you on that.

But that is not what this thread is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look &#8211; you&#8217;re barking a dead argument &#8211; there are revenues that are generated on the oil and if the State doesn&#8217;t get them &#8211; the Feds do.</p>
<p>Period.</p>
<p>So Barney Frank either gets to spend this money &#8211; or Rick Perry or Bobby Jindal do.</p>
<p>No brainer to me.</p>
<p>If you want to change the law to make it where the oil companies pay no revenues to the Feds or the State &#8211; but keep it all to themselves &#8211; I think most of us would be behind you on that.</p>
<p>But that is not what this thread is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hondav65</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>hondav65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>Louisiana&#039;s oil industry includes drilling and refining.

The only thing I&#039;ll concede to you here is whether or not Texas should get the revenues or Louisiana.  If none of the oil or the support for harvesting it is associated with Louisiana - then we shouldn&#039;t get the dough.  However - I&#039;m willing to bet we&#039;ll play a major role in all that.

I&#039;m not sure you really understand the oil industry down here.  Many of the rigs pump their oil directly ashore via miles of pipeline on the ocean floor.  Many do use tankers to haul it ashore.  All of the rigs require helicopter support - and crews to man the rigs.  Additionally - they require support ships to haul in supplies and crews.  Divers, unmanned vehicles, etc.

Those aren&#039;t coming from Cuba. :D

But in any case - these revenues aren&#039;t just &quot;invented&quot; from whole cloth.  Either the Federal Government gets the money or the State gets the money.  Judging by the way the Feds have been wasting money - I&#039;d say the State is a better steward of that cash - especially with a Republican Governor and Congress.

And I&#039;d also say that I don&#039;t think California should get one penny of the revenues - since they refuse to expand oil drilling off their own coast - another reason for it to stay local.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana&#8217;s oil industry includes drilling and refining.</p>
<p>The only thing I&#8217;ll concede to you here is whether or not Texas should get the revenues or Louisiana.  If none of the oil or the support for harvesting it is associated with Louisiana &#8211; then we shouldn&#8217;t get the dough.  However &#8211; I&#8217;m willing to bet we&#8217;ll play a major role in all that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure you really understand the oil industry down here.  Many of the rigs pump their oil directly ashore via miles of pipeline on the ocean floor.  Many do use tankers to haul it ashore.  All of the rigs require helicopter support &#8211; and crews to man the rigs.  Additionally &#8211; they require support ships to haul in supplies and crews.  Divers, unmanned vehicles, etc.</p>
<p>Those aren&#8217;t coming from Cuba. <img src='http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But in any case &#8211; these revenues aren&#8217;t just &#8220;invented&#8221; from whole cloth.  Either the Federal Government gets the money or the State gets the money.  Judging by the way the Feds have been wasting money &#8211; I&#8217;d say the State is a better steward of that cash &#8211; especially with a Republican Governor and Congress.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d also say that I don&#8217;t think California should get one penny of the revenues &#8211; since they refuse to expand oil drilling off their own coast &#8211; another reason for it to stay local.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>mental masturbation without a strategy to overturn the existing law in question, and frankly, that&#039;s where the left beats the crap out of us every time.  They come up with a philosophy and then they put together a long term strategy to implement it. then they &quot;debate&quot; it.

One of the problems I have with RonPaul&#8482; and your ilk is that it&#039;s all just blather.  Paul has been a member of Congress for 20+ years and he hasn&#039;t managed to get one other CongressCritter to join with him on a single issue.  Nor has he (or you in the above thread) offered anything even remotely resembling a strategy to do anything other than make noise.

You folks are a total waste of time, energy and money.  Now, zip up and run along.  Oh, and nice tooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mental masturbation without a strategy to overturn the existing law in question, and frankly, that&#8217;s where the left beats the crap out of us every time.  They come up with a philosophy and then they put together a long term strategy to implement it. then they &#8220;debate&#8221; it.</p>
<p>One of the problems I have with RonPaul&trade; and your ilk is that it&#8217;s all just blather.  Paul has been a member of Congress for 20+ years and he hasn&#8217;t managed to get one other CongressCritter to join with him on a single issue.  Nor has he (or you in the above thread) offered anything even remotely resembling a strategy to do anything other than make noise.</p>
<p>You folks are a total waste of time, energy and money.  Now, zip up and run along.  Oh, and nice tooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>So you would favor, Chinese or Russian companies claiming rights on U.S. soil (territorial seas) under &quot;natural law&quot;? You&#039;ve gotta admit that sounds pretty nutty.

Nobody has an unlimited right to drill, even on their own property. If Farmer Jones wants to drill an oil well on his South 40, even if he has clear title to the land, he is obliged to obtain a drilling permit from the state regulatory body. This is to ensure some measure of environmental protection so that he doesn&#039;t contaminate his neighbors&#039; groundwater. In most jurisdictions he has to conform to minimum spacing requirements because the state has an interest in ensuring that mineral ownership laws are respected and unnecessarry wells aren&#039;t being drilled. The state is also entitled to severance taxes (see above) from any oil and gas he sells, even though he owns it 100%.

Oil resources are to be conserved and managed and developed in an orderly and environmentally responsible manner. Government has a legitimate oversight role in the process. 

Your way was tried up until the 1920s or so &amp; it didn&#039;t work out so hot:

&lt;img src=&quot;http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/staff/scholle/graphics/OilPC4.jpg&quot; width=&quot;350&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you would favor, Chinese or Russian companies claiming rights on U.S. soil (territorial seas) under &#8220;natural law&#8221;? You&#8217;ve gotta admit that sounds pretty nutty.</p>
<p>Nobody has an unlimited right to drill, even on their own property. If Farmer Jones wants to drill an oil well on his South 40, even if he has clear title to the land, he is obliged to obtain a drilling permit from the state regulatory body. This is to ensure some measure of environmental protection so that he doesn&#8217;t contaminate his neighbors&#8217; groundwater. In most jurisdictions he has to conform to minimum spacing requirements because the state has an interest in ensuring that mineral ownership laws are respected and unnecessarry wells aren&#8217;t being drilled. The state is also entitled to severance taxes (see above) from any oil and gas he sells, even though he owns it 100%.</p>
<p>Oil resources are to be conserved and managed and developed in an orderly and environmentally responsible manner. Government has a legitimate oversight role in the process. </p>
<p>Your way was tried up until the 1920s or so &amp; it didn&#8217;t work out so hot:</p>
<p><img src="http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/staff/scholle/graphics/OilPC4.jpg" width="350"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blooch</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>blooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Art&#039;s latest midnight snack has a little trouble with &quot;Reply to This&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art&#8217;s latest midnight snack has a little trouble with &#8220;Reply to This&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNJim</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>TNJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>I think that was the handle. As for the thing he typed out it was probably a self-portrait after Art&#039;s steamroller went over him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that was the handle. As for the thing he typed out it was probably a self-portrait after Art&#8217;s steamroller went over him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blooch</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>blooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>&quot;disgustedamerican&quot;, or something.  I felt a little pity for the guy for just a minute, as he fed himself to Art.  

Must be some new Saturday night ritual going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;disgustedamerican&#8221;, or something.  I felt a little pity for the guy for just a minute, as he fed himself to Art.  </p>
<p>Must be some new Saturday night ritual going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNJim</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>TNJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Now Art&#039;s rolling him through broken glass.

I knew I should have grabbed some popcorn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Art&#8217;s rolling him through broken glass.</p>
<p>I knew I should have grabbed some popcorn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>I think, read, and write very carefully, so don&#039;t admonish me; you came to a gunfight with a dull knife.

In the case of the Gulf, the US bought the territory from France, remember that Jefferson guy you were referring to.  That territory was chattel to the US government, just like you buying a lot for future development.  First it was all military districts, then territories, then states.  The states&#039; territorial control goes out to three or, usually, twelve miles.  Beyond that, the territory belongs to the US government out to treaty lines, usually 200 miles.  In that zone between the states&#039; sovereignty and the territorial limit of the US, the property is the common wealth of the US; it belongs to all of us, fool.  Were it not for the blood and treasure expended by the US in the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Civil War, even the Spanish American War, it would belong to some other country.  Thus, the US claims it, owns it, leases it, and derives revenue from it.  The only question here is whether it shares that revenue with Louisiana because LA has to deal with the impact of the infrastructure support of developing the field.

Now some of us actually know something about both government and the oil industry.  Those of you who don&#039;t should perhaps choose another subject to argue about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, read, and write very carefully, so don&#8217;t admonish me; you came to a gunfight with a dull knife.</p>
<p>In the case of the Gulf, the US bought the territory from France, remember that Jefferson guy you were referring to.  That territory was chattel to the US government, just like you buying a lot for future development.  First it was all military districts, then territories, then states.  The states&#8217; territorial control goes out to three or, usually, twelve miles.  Beyond that, the territory belongs to the US government out to treaty lines, usually 200 miles.  In that zone between the states&#8217; sovereignty and the territorial limit of the US, the property is the common wealth of the US; it belongs to all of us, fool.  Were it not for the blood and treasure expended by the US in the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Civil War, even the Spanish American War, it would belong to some other country.  Thus, the US claims it, owns it, leases it, and derives revenue from it.  The only question here is whether it shares that revenue with Louisiana because LA has to deal with the impact of the infrastructure support of developing the field.</p>
<p>Now some of us actually know something about both government and the oil industry.  Those of you who don&#8217;t should perhaps choose another subject to argue about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccbin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>jccbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>When I build a PC server, it is mine. When I sell it, it becomes the customer&#039;s. Yes, the government gets its piece of the action, in taxes, fees, etc. But the product is mine or the customers.

The point you tried to make, was that the gov&#039;t gets a piece of the action from the get-go, because of common wealth of the nation. Again, that&#039;s fine. That&#039;s the law. 

What I&#039;m really asking is: Does government have this power legitimately? Do all things flow from government or are there things which are unalienable - such as property, that we willingly assign to government for safeguard and management? (Yes, we do).

Then, doesn&#039;t it behoove use to occasionally review how well the government is safeguarding our wealth, and take action if necessary?

I think you were wrapped up in the process that you understand and know so well, that you missed my point about that very process being in need of scrutiny.

Now you can call me more names if that makes you feel better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I build a PC server, it is mine. When I sell it, it becomes the customer&#8217;s. Yes, the government gets its piece of the action, in taxes, fees, etc. But the product is mine or the customers.</p>
<p>The point you tried to make, was that the gov&#8217;t gets a piece of the action from the get-go, because of common wealth of the nation. Again, that&#8217;s fine. That&#8217;s the law. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m really asking is: Does government have this power legitimately? Do all things flow from government or are there things which are unalienable &#8211; such as property, that we willingly assign to government for safeguard and management? (Yes, we do).</p>
<p>Then, doesn&#8217;t it behoove use to occasionally review how well the government is safeguarding our wealth, and take action if necessary?</p>
<p>I think you were wrapped up in the process that you understand and know so well, that you missed my point about that very process being in need of scrutiny.</p>
<p>Now you can call me more names if that makes you feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Oil under the OCS is the common wealth of the US.  Your position is that it should be given to any entity that sticks a drill in it because they bought the drill.  My position, and I think Vladimir&#039;s though I won&#039;t speak for him, is that the oil below the OCS has value and its development has costs.  The only question is whether the US gets all the value and LA absorbs all the costs or whether LA gets some of the value.  If that&#039;s hard for you, you&#039;re too stupid to engage in political and economic discussions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil under the OCS is the common wealth of the US.  Your position is that it should be given to any entity that sticks a drill in it because they bought the drill.  My position, and I think Vladimir&#8217;s though I won&#8217;t speak for him, is that the oil below the OCS has value and its development has costs.  The only question is whether the US gets all the value and LA absorbs all the costs or whether LA gets some of the value.  If that&#8217;s hard for you, you&#8217;re too stupid to engage in political and economic discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccbin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>jccbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, etc. The Founders of this country. They got it from Cicero. 

I didn&#039;t say if you found something on MY or someone else&#039;s land, it was yours. When an explorer discovers something, it is theirs. I was pointing out that, current treaties aside, BP did the work and the profit from that work should be theirs first. That&#039;s all.

Geez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, etc. The Founders of this country. They got it from Cicero. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say if you found something on MY or someone else&#8217;s land, it was yours. When an explorer discovers something, it is theirs. I was pointing out that, current treaties aside, BP did the work and the profit from that work should be theirs first. That&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>Geez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dugas</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dugas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>nt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still a law on the books and until you go and make a compelling case for it&#039;s repeal, it still the law. Philosophy don&#039;t mean jack if there is a law on the books on mineral rights. As for not debating something, that&#039;s something we don&#039;t do here. You might want to debate it in an energy blog instead. As for any insult, you opened yourself to them, so take it like a man and not a mouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still a law on the books and until you go and make a compelling case for it&#8217;s repeal, it still the law. Philosophy don&#8217;t mean jack if there is a law on the books on mineral rights. As for not debating something, that&#8217;s something we don&#8217;t do here. You might want to debate it in an energy blog instead. As for any insult, you opened yourself to them, so take it like a man and not a mouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dugas</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dugas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>You never mentioned a WORD about working outside of existing laws until JUST this post.  And fantasy is all well and good but if you think for a minute you&#039;re going to some how write the government out of this you are nuts.  And please,  basically you are saying if I find something valuable on your land and I work or produce it it&#039;s mine and you are out of luck.
&quot;I am talking about natural law, that says if you find it, produce it, it is yours.&quot;
Whose natural law is that I might ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You never mentioned a WORD about working outside of existing laws until JUST this post.  And fantasy is all well and good but if you think for a minute you&#8217;re going to some how write the government out of this you are nuts.  And please,  basically you are saying if I find something valuable on your land and I work or produce it it&#8217;s mine and you are out of luck.<br />
&#8220;I am talking about natural law, that says if you find it, produce it, it is yours.&#8221;<br />
Whose natural law is that I might ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Well, certainly not for a lousy ten bucks.  They&#039;re not Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, certainly not for a lousy ten bucks.  They&#8217;re not Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>And your side was noted for the total losers you are.

It really doesn&#039;t matter whether anybody bans you, now it would be an act of kindness.  You are only going be engaged on slow weekends, otherwise you&#039;ve pretty well Hinz Rule&#039;d yourself.

Nobody insulted you, they just pointed out the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And your side was noted for the total losers you are.</p>
<p>It really doesn&#8217;t matter whether anybody bans you, now it would be an act of kindness.  You are only going be engaged on slow weekends, otherwise you&#8217;ve pretty well Hinz Rule&#8217;d yourself.</p>
<p>Nobody insulted you, they just pointed out the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccbin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>jccbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>nt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccbin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/05/la-makes-a-pitch-for-a-share-of-bps-new-gulf-oil-find/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>jccbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=747#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>Who is apparently intimating that he will pay Moe or Neil to ban me or somehow threaten me with a rubber chicken in the cloak room.

Again, Richard, you are choosing to not debate the philosophy, only the applied law as it stands. That&#039;s fine. But it doesn&#039;t address my point at all. I&#039;m happy to agree to not discuss it, just because you guys don&#039;t want to. All one had to say was that. The insults about my heritage, location, political affiliation were not necessary. But I&#039;m sure they were fun for Achance, Vlad. I hope they enjoyed beating up on me, big men that they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is apparently intimating that he will pay Moe or Neil to ban me or somehow threaten me with a rubber chicken in the cloak room.</p>
<p>Again, Richard, you are choosing to not debate the philosophy, only the applied law as it stands. That&#8217;s fine. But it doesn&#8217;t address my point at all. I&#8217;m happy to agree to not discuss it, just because you guys don&#8217;t want to. All one had to say was that. The insults about my heritage, location, political affiliation were not necessary. But I&#8217;m sure they were fun for Achance, Vlad. I hope they enjoyed beating up on me, big men that they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

