<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shades of 1984: Socialist International Expunges Carol Browner&#8217;s Links to Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=102#comment-295</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clear that you&#039;re not here to play along, so we&#039;re gonna have to ask you to move on.  Yeah.  So if um, you can not comment anymore at all, and not come back even without asking the directors for permission, that&#039;d be great.  So yeah, if you can do that, that&#039;d really be great.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clear that you&#8217;re not here to play along, so we&#8217;re gonna have to ask you to move on.  Yeah.  So if um, you can not comment anymore at all, and not come back even without asking the directors for permission, that&#8217;d be great.  So yeah, if you can do that, that&#8217;d really be great.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rorshach</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>rorshach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=102#comment-294</guid>
		<description>So the Prime Minister of Great Britain, the President of the Republic of Chile, the Minister of the Environment of Spain, the Minister of State for External Affairs of India, and the President of the Republic of Panama, all fervent allies of the US are all evil radical socialists? Thats strange, maybe the US should jump on the bandwagon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Prime Minister of Great Britain, the President of the Republic of Chile, the Minister of the Environment of Spain, the Minister of State for External Affairs of India, and the President of the Republic of Panama, all fervent allies of the US are all evil radical socialists? Thats strange, maybe the US should jump on the bandwagon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=102#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Put a nice milquetoast in the Secretary or Commissioner slot that can be easily confirmed.  Make sure he/she understands that their only job is to look good, and put somebody who is competent and ruthless in charge in a Special Assistant or similar position that doesn&#039;t have to face confirmation.  Works better when you have a majority in the legislative body so you don&#039;t have to worry about your figurehead being hailed up for hearings, but that&#039;s not that big a deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put a nice milquetoast in the Secretary or Commissioner slot that can be easily confirmed.  Make sure he/she understands that their only job is to look good, and put somebody who is competent and ruthless in charge in a Special Assistant or similar position that doesn&#8217;t have to face confirmation.  Works better when you have a majority in the legislative body so you don&#8217;t have to worry about your figurehead being hailed up for hearings, but that&#8217;s not that big a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=102#comment-292</guid>
		<description>http://www.socialistinternational.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticleID=1779</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.socialistinternational.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticleID=1779</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: in_awe</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>in_awe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=102#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else find that the appointment of &quot;Czars&quot; for cars, global warming, etc. is worrisome because it allows the President to appoint people to very powerful positions without any confirmation by Congress? At this rate, pretty soon all the cabinet members will report to an unvetted Czar appointee of the President. When did we revert to a monarchy or acquiesce to a dictatorship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else find that the appointment of &#8220;Czars&#8221; for cars, global warming, etc. is worrisome because it allows the President to appoint people to very powerful positions without any confirmation by Congress? At this rate, pretty soon all the cabinet members will report to an unvetted Czar appointee of the President. When did we revert to a monarchy or acquiesce to a dictatorship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodsman</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/01/12/shades-of-1984-socialist-international-expunges-carol-browners-links-to-group/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>woodsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/?p=102#comment-290</guid>
		<description>noticeably shrinks when they get pushed into the limelight of a more diverse group.  

I find it interesting how in a group of their own peers they freely offer their viewpoints, but once the light is shining on them they scamper away like rats under a more dissenting discussion.

So, they change or hide their views until they get what they want.  Sound like anyone else recently elected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noticeably shrinks when they get pushed into the limelight of a more diverse group.  </p>
<p>I find it interesting how in a group of their own peers they freely offer their viewpoints, but once the light is shining on them they scamper away like rats under a more dissenting discussion.</p>
<p>So, they change or hide their views until they get what they want.  Sound like anyone else recently elected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

