Tea Party Fiscal Concerns Based on Social Conservative Morals


Recently, some Republicans have demanded that social conservatives sit down and shut up so Republican successes, unimpeded by social controversies, can fix our fiscal difficulties. But this is not just a problem with a few isolated Republicans, it is a symptom of greater establishment Republican malaise. These people choose to believe that Tea Party and other conservative support for Republicans is based entirely on fiscal issues and that they need not risk losing votes by taking a controversial position of action on social conservative issues.

 

These establishment Republicans have requested that social conservatives remain silent so they can gain or maintain power to deal with jobs, the economy and excess government spending. But recent research has found that Tea Party and other conservative supporters and voters for Republican candidates, are largely social conservatives that are also Pro-Life, Pro-Traditional Marriage, Pro-Family and anti-homosexual agenda.

 

Many of these Republican supporters see our fiscal difficulties as a moral issue rooted deep in their social conservative, religious and moral, right versus wrong foundational beliefs. Elected officials selling taxpayer favors to the highest bidders is a moral issue. Overspending and incurring insurmountable debt that destroys our prosperity and passes this burden to our children is clearly a moral issue.

 

The Crony Capitalism that goes on between government and powerful business and financial interests provides monopolistic and anti-competitive advantages in return for campaign and other direct or indirect support. These powerful interests have been propped up by corrupt government officials, and these interests and their political cronies are greatly enriched at the expense of the taxpayer and their homes, small businesses, and the American economy. Without question, this is also seen as a major moral flaw.

 

Tea Party and other conservatives, that have in recent times supported Republicans, may have been less vocal and demanding on social issues over the past few years. But Republicans who presume that these supporters are unattached to social conservative issues and that these issues can be deferred indefinitely, do so at their own risk.

 

If these Tea Party and many other conservative Republican supporters have truly given their efforts and votes to these candidates to restore honor and morality in government, not solely to fix money problems, any demand for social conservatives to sit down and shut up, if obeyed, would be disastrous for Republicans.

 

The Tea Party and other social conservatives are not an obstacle to Republican successes that needs to be beaten back to allow Republicanism to flourish, they are the very substance of Republican victories. As we have relearned recently, politicians that disrespect their constituents, their voters and supporters, often suffer dramatically shortened political life-expectancies. For more information on the Tea Party and social conservative issues, go to the following link:

 

http://freedomyetrings.blogspot.com/2011/02/is-tea-party-ducking-social.html


RSS feed

8 Comments Leave a comment

BRILLIANT piece!

heartlander (Diary) Sunday, February 6th at 5:16PM EST (link)

I admire your insights, and your skill in articulating them. Bravo!

One of the reasons I admire Sarah Palin (and no, I’m not supporting her for President, I just think she’s our primary standard-bearer) is that she was the first one to publicly call out the Dem’s outrageous spending-and-debt-increasing orgy as “immoral.” That was the word she used — because it does indeed constitute theft, and from people who are not even here yet to defend themselves against it, i.e., generations to come!

“The still, small voice of God in every human soul is the greatest ally of the pro-life cause, and why it will ultimately prevail.”
–Donald R. McClarey

Back to Reagan's 3-legged stool

YnotNOW (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 12:27PM EST (link)

Yes, fiscal issues are moral issues. And moral issues have fiscal impact. Even foreign policy and strong national defense are moral issues (i.e. stand up for freedom and be the “shining city on a hill” that influences people throughout the world), and certainly have fiscal consequences.

The 3-legged stool of conservatism (fiscal, social, defense) does not stand well unless all legs are strong!

YnotNOW
If not me, who? If not now, when?

55555 nt

Scope (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 2:03PM EST (link)
 
 
 

They seem to want our votes, just not our opinions. nt

Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 1:56PM EST (link)

The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)

rightwingmom52, I would agree with this

lineholder (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 2:15PM EST (link)

but on the other side of that situation was the “rabbit hole” comment that hit me as being condescending of social conservatives, to say the least.

We seem to have a lot of “open mouth and insert foot” syndrome going on right now, don’t we?

 
 

There is going to have to be some balance

Scope (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 2:19PM EST (link)

between those that have fiscal only concerns, namely the libertarian leaning Tea Parties, and like organizations. Hopefully the many social conservative groups that have backed away from CPAC, because of the inclusion of some groups of people that are anything but social and/or national security conservatives will open the wound, drain the infection, and let the wound heal, or they will wind up on the dust heap of history.

Here is an interesting article I read back in January- CPAC vs. Social and National Security Conservatives

http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011010912534/us/politics-and-economics/cpac-vs-social-and-national-security-conservatives.html

ps- Somehow I don't see Ron Paul

Scope (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 2:23PM EST (link)

and his crew being invited to the Values Voters Summit.

 
 

Well done.

Bill S (Diary) Monday, February 7th at 9:43PM EST (link)

I missed this one on Saturday. Great job.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins