<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Vote For Ted Stevens For Senate or Don Young for House At Large in Alaska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-737</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewHyman</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewHyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 05:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-736</guid>
		<description>&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/08/11/sen-ted-steven%E2%80%99s-former-counsel-blast-doj-prosecutors/&quot;&gt;Ted Stevens dies in a plane crash on August 9, 2010.&lt;/A&gt;  Investigation into the people who wrongly prosecuted him continues.

R.I.P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/08/11/sen-ted-steven%E2%80%99s-former-counsel-blast-doj-prosecutors/">Ted Stevens dies in a plane crash on August 9, 2010.</a>  Investigation into the people who wrongly prosecuted him continues.</p>
<p>R.I.P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewHyman</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewHyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Stevens lost to Begich by less than two percentage points.  Subsequently, the U.S. Attorney General dropped all charges against Stevens, due to prosecutorial misconduct.  The investigation of the prosecutorial misconduct is &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/03/AR2009120303123.html&quot;&gt;still ongoing&lt;/A&gt;.

This week, Begich provided the deciding sixtieth vote to approve a takeover by the federal government of the health care industry, including penalties for citizens who do not purchase federally-approved health insurance plans, some of which will provide abortion coverage.  This legislation has not yet become law, because it still has to be reconciled with the House version, which may prove difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stevens lost to Begich by less than two percentage points.  Subsequently, the U.S. Attorney General dropped all charges against Stevens, due to prosecutorial misconduct.  The investigation of the prosecutorial misconduct is <a HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/03/AR2009120303123.html">still ongoing</a>.</p>
<p>This week, Begich provided the deciding sixtieth vote to approve a takeover by the federal government of the health care industry, including penalties for citizens who do not purchase federally-approved health insurance plans, some of which will provide abortion coverage.  This legislation has not yet become law, because it still has to be reconciled with the House version, which may prove difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;should not make anymore policy statements on Alaska without first consulting Achance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With that I now endorse Achance for Senator after Stevens wins and then steps down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should not make anymore policy statements on Alaska without first consulting Achance.</p>
<p>With that I now endorse Achance for Senator after Stevens wins and then steps down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As the previous poster points out, and as the Directors didn&#039;t consider, the ONLY way to hold this seat is by electing Stevens then forcing him to step down.  Then the Alaska law is invoked and we can take our best shot with an election; that won&#039;t be easy either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Begich, like Knowles before him, has been a fairly popular Anchorage mayor.  He has the formidable Knowles organization, and one Helluva bunch of DNC resources and money.  I really don&#039;t know which R would volunteer for that meatgrinder.  The only one that comes to mind that has anything like the money from his own resources is Johne Binkley, but he ran a dismal campaign against Palin when he ran for Governor.  &#039;Course, the only reason he was running was he was bitterly angry with Murkowski for not appointing him to the Senate.  Mike Miller is a good conservative and former President of the Senate.  Has money but not as much as Binkley.  Didn&#039;t do real well in the primary against Lisa Murkowski, but he really didn&#039;t want to beat her, just make her defend the right so Knowles couldn&#039;t run right of her.  Don&#039;t know that Mike could win statewide, but he came within 500 and change votes of being Lt. Gov. and his brother was a Republican Lt. Gov.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since Sarah Palin &quot;outed&quot; Randy Ruderich, Republican organization has been tenuous at best.  Since the FBI started camping out in Alaska, the Party has been in disarray.  I don&#039;t know how many established Republicans would walk into the meatgrinder.  I very consciously established for myself a &quot;bad boy&quot; reputation throughout my career; I just wish I&#039;d done some of the things people think I did.  By the time I was an appointee, whenever the slime machine revved up, I was just living down to my reputation and nobody noticed or cared.  That said, even I have lost my stomach for it in an environment where you simply have to assume that anybody you&#039;re talking to, no matter how well or long you&#039;ve known them, is wearing a wire and is a &quot;cooperating&quot; witness trying to goad or entrap you.  It ain&#039;t a pretty place these days!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the previous poster points out, and as the Directors didn&#8217;t consider, the ONLY way to hold this seat is by electing Stevens then forcing him to step down.  Then the Alaska law is invoked and we can take our best shot with an election; that won&#8217;t be easy either.</p>
<p>Begich, like Knowles before him, has been a fairly popular Anchorage mayor.  He has the formidable Knowles organization, and one Helluva bunch of DNC resources and money.  I really don&#8217;t know which R would volunteer for that meatgrinder.  The only one that comes to mind that has anything like the money from his own resources is Johne Binkley, but he ran a dismal campaign against Palin when he ran for Governor.  &#8216;Course, the only reason he was running was he was bitterly angry with Murkowski for not appointing him to the Senate.  Mike Miller is a good conservative and former President of the Senate.  Has money but not as much as Binkley.  Didn&#8217;t do real well in the primary against Lisa Murkowski, but he really didn&#8217;t want to beat her, just make her defend the right so Knowles couldn&#8217;t run right of her.  Don&#8217;t know that Mike could win statewide, but he came within 500 and change votes of being Lt. Gov. and his brother was a Republican Lt. Gov.</p>
<p>Since Sarah Palin &#8220;outed&#8221; Randy Ruderich, Republican organization has been tenuous at best.  Since the FBI started camping out in Alaska, the Party has been in disarray.  I don&#8217;t know how many established Republicans would walk into the meatgrinder.  I very consciously established for myself a &#8220;bad boy&#8221; reputation throughout my career; I just wish I&#8217;d done some of the things people think I did.  By the time I was an appointee, whenever the slime machine revved up, I was just living down to my reputation and nobody noticed or cared.  That said, even I have lost my stomach for it in an environment where you simply have to assume that anybody you&#8217;re talking to, no matter how well or long you&#8217;ve known them, is wearing a wire and is a &#8220;cooperating&#8221; witness trying to goad or entrap you.  It ain&#8217;t a pretty place these days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-669</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;than Stevens and I was astounded by what a seemingly minor remodel of my dining room just cost me.  Living the way he does between AK and DC, mostly DC, it is unlikely that he&#039;d have a clue what the work really cost and may well have thought he was paying for it.  Add to that the notorious cheapness and sense of entitlement that most Alaska politicians have.  One thing you&#039;ll NEVER see is an Alaska elected official reaching for his own wallet or picking up the tab.  Don&#039;t know how long you&#039;ve been around, but Rep. Vic Kohring, now a guest of the US, was notorious for showing up at all the &quot;receptions&quot; and stuffing his pockets with food.  I like smoked salmon and king crab as well as the next guy, but I really can&#039;t see stuffing either in my suit jacket pockets!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As to the rest, if they could make the case against Ben, they would have.  There is the slightest possibility that somebody in the Bush Administration noticed what the FBI was doing here and told them to lay off until after the election.  Or, tactically, they now have a conviction against the old man that could cause him to die in jail; that is a serious bargaining position.  That&#039;s what they&#039;ve done with Bill Allen; the old Roman thing: slit your wrists and we&#039;ll spare your family.  They&#039;re still holding that over him.  You&#039;ll note he hasn&#039;t been sentenced and he won&#039;t be until the FBI is done here.  I know the guy and had lots of opportunities to pal around in Room 604 - thank God I was smarter than that.  I&#039;ll guarantee you that he would recite any script that the FBI gave him to keep his family from being charged and to allow them to keep some of the money from getting rid of VECO.  The FBI plays a nasty, nasty game.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>than Stevens and I was astounded by what a seemingly minor remodel of my dining room just cost me.  Living the way he does between AK and DC, mostly DC, it is unlikely that he&#8217;d have a clue what the work really cost and may well have thought he was paying for it.  Add to that the notorious cheapness and sense of entitlement that most Alaska politicians have.  One thing you&#8217;ll NEVER see is an Alaska elected official reaching for his own wallet or picking up the tab.  Don&#8217;t know how long you&#8217;ve been around, but Rep. Vic Kohring, now a guest of the US, was notorious for showing up at all the &#8220;receptions&#8221; and stuffing his pockets with food.  I like smoked salmon and king crab as well as the next guy, but I really can&#8217;t see stuffing either in my suit jacket pockets!</p>
<p>As to the rest, if they could make the case against Ben, they would have.  There is the slightest possibility that somebody in the Bush Administration noticed what the FBI was doing here and told them to lay off until after the election.  Or, tactically, they now have a conviction against the old man that could cause him to die in jail; that is a serious bargaining position.  That&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve done with Bill Allen; the old Roman thing: slit your wrists and we&#8217;ll spare your family.  They&#8217;re still holding that over him.  You&#8217;ll note he hasn&#8217;t been sentenced and he won&#8217;t be until the FBI is done here.  I know the guy and had lots of opportunities to pal around in Room 604 &#8211; thank God I was smarter than that.  I&#8217;ll guarantee you that he would recite any script that the FBI gave him to keep his family from being charged and to allow them to keep some of the money from getting rid of VECO.  The FBI plays a nasty, nasty game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKSteveB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>AKSteveB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and probably always will be is..what the hell was the motivation to go after Ted.  Is he factually guilty of what he was charged with, yeah.  You can&#039;t really blame the jury, the charges were such low lying fruit, that they would have had to have practiced jury nullification to acquit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reality of this thing is Bill Allen was a guy who liked being a bigshot.  Stevens wasn&#039;t big on spending his own money, he played a bit fast and loose with dotting his i&#039;s and crossing his t&#039;s, they raid the Girdwood place and all they could come up with was this minor stuff.  They had to know nobody was gonna make their career on this, and well ..the prosecution sucked.  In the meantime, no charges towards the kid (Ben Stevens) or Don Young.  Too strange.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and probably always will be is..what the hell was the motivation to go after Ted.  Is he factually guilty of what he was charged with, yeah.  You can&#8217;t really blame the jury, the charges were such low lying fruit, that they would have had to have practiced jury nullification to acquit.</p>
<p>The reality of this thing is Bill Allen was a guy who liked being a bigshot.  Stevens wasn&#8217;t big on spending his own money, he played a bit fast and loose with dotting his i&#8217;s and crossing his t&#8217;s, they raid the Girdwood place and all they could come up with was this minor stuff.  They had to know nobody was gonna make their career on this, and well ..the prosecution sucked.  In the meantime, no charges towards the kid (Ben Stevens) or Don Young.  Too strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;about what constitutes a jury of ones&#039; peers.  We can also have a good argument about residents of DC sitting on either federal grand juries or trial juries.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a reason the prosecutors chose the trivial reporting charges that have never been brought against anyone before.  I suspect you could round up a pretty good mess of Congresscritters with a little scrutiny.  They wanted a charge they could bring in DC!  You&#039;ll note that they&#039;ve done nothing with the much more substantial allegations about earmarking to benefit his son and former staffers; they&#039;d have to bring those charges to the federal district court in Anchorage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Alaska juries have not been reticent to convict our own when corruption charges, even fairly flimsy ones, have been brought against them.  We have three legislators in the clink right now and one more probably on the way over their dealings with the same Bill Allen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just really don&#039;t believe that Stevens or any other relatively wealthy white Republican elected official can get a fair trial in DC.  I know that were I ever charged with some sort of official misconduct I&#039;d move Heaven and Earth to try to get a change of venue out of Juneau; it would be hard for any high ranking public officer to get a fair trial here and all but impossible for a high-ranking Republican public officer to get one.  Likewise, when I was with the State, I was more than happy to make six figure settlement offers even in cases I thought we should win to avoid the tender mercies of a Juneau jury.  Capital cities are company towns and jury trials are an easy place to take it out on the company.  In DC you get to throw geography, race, and class in the mix as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about what constitutes a jury of ones&#8217; peers.  We can also have a good argument about residents of DC sitting on either federal grand juries or trial juries.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason the prosecutors chose the trivial reporting charges that have never been brought against anyone before.  I suspect you could round up a pretty good mess of Congresscritters with a little scrutiny.  They wanted a charge they could bring in DC!  You&#8217;ll note that they&#8217;ve done nothing with the much more substantial allegations about earmarking to benefit his son and former staffers; they&#8217;d have to bring those charges to the federal district court in Anchorage.</p>
<p>Alaska juries have not been reticent to convict our own when corruption charges, even fairly flimsy ones, have been brought against them.  We have three legislators in the clink right now and one more probably on the way over their dealings with the same Bill Allen.</p>
<p>I just really don&#8217;t believe that Stevens or any other relatively wealthy white Republican elected official can get a fair trial in DC.  I know that were I ever charged with some sort of official misconduct I&#8217;d move Heaven and Earth to try to get a change of venue out of Juneau; it would be hard for any high ranking public officer to get a fair trial here and all but impossible for a high-ranking Republican public officer to get one.  Likewise, when I was with the State, I was more than happy to make six figure settlement offers even in cases I thought we should win to avoid the tender mercies of a Juneau jury.  Capital cities are company towns and jury trials are an easy place to take it out on the company.  In DC you get to throw geography, race, and class in the mix as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: streiff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>streiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;but I&#039;m not a Director.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but I&#8217;m not a Director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamecock</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>gamecock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-665</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Senators are nothing wore than glorified yea/nay voters on issues that are usually very clear cut. They are a proxy vote. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No need to insist one&#039;s barber be a saint either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The damage from an Obama with a 60 votes senate would be incalculable and permanent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;more later&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senators are nothing wore than glorified yea/nay voters on issues that are usually very clear cut. They are a proxy vote. </p>
<p>No need to insist one&#8217;s barber be a saint either.</p>
<p>The damage from an Obama with a 60 votes senate would be incalculable and permanent.</p>
<p>more later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merevaudevillian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>merevaudevillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-664</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts on a coordinated &quot;endorse the third party&quot; statement?  That might be most effective.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on a coordinated &#8220;endorse the third party&#8221; statement?  That might be most effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-663</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Elect Stevens, force him out when he is sentenced, and hold a special election.
Why you are against the house member, I don&#039;t know. But do the same thing.
Democrats are stealing our milkshakes, using rules on us that they &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; follow.
The heck with voting out Stevens.
When I see Feinstein and Reid and Rangle under indictment for their respective crimes, I will start worrying about a guy who got a deal on his remodeling.
Heck, where is that Grand Jury probe into Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, anyway?
I am sick and friggin&#039; tired of laws that only apply to Republicans. Almost as tired as us cheerfully cooperating with democrats in applying those laws to us.
Jefferson is going to get &lt;em&gt;re-elected&lt;/em&gt; for the second time since his money was found.
That racist Florida impeached judge is getting re-elected.
Teddy Kennedy has spent going on 40 years in office.
We toss out guys for making sexist comments to women.
Democrats know just how to play to win.
We are the ones they play.
I am for one tired of being their fools and giving away my milkshake.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elect Stevens, force him out when he is sentenced, and hold a special election.<br />
Why you are against the house member, I don&#8217;t know. But do the same thing.<br />
Democrats are stealing our milkshakes, using rules on us that they <em>never</em> follow.<br />
The heck with voting out Stevens.<br />
When I see Feinstein and Reid and Rangle under indictment for their respective crimes, I will start worrying about a guy who got a deal on his remodeling.<br />
Heck, where is that Grand Jury probe into Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, anyway?<br />
I am sick and friggin&#8217; tired of laws that only apply to Republicans. Almost as tired as us cheerfully cooperating with democrats in applying those laws to us.<br />
Jefferson is going to get <em>re-elected</em> for the second time since his money was found.<br />
That racist Florida impeached judge is getting re-elected.<br />
Teddy Kennedy has spent going on 40 years in office.<br />
We toss out guys for making sexist comments to women.<br />
Democrats know just how to play to win.<br />
We are the ones they play.<br />
I am for one tired of being their fools and giving away my milkshake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akrunner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>akrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-662</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First, I highly doubt Stevens would resign.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, if he did, Palin is unable to appoint a successor after the nepotism of the Murkowski appointment (people up here were furious).  There was a ballot initiative that removed from the governor the ability to appoint a successor in cases of a sitting US senator&#039;s resignation, and instead calls for a special election within 90 days.  My understanding is that there would be no interim representation, and Alaska would just have an empty seat for up to three months.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I highly doubt Stevens would resign.</p>
<p>However, if he did, Palin is unable to appoint a successor after the nepotism of the Murkowski appointment (people up here were furious).  There was a ballot initiative that removed from the governor the ability to appoint a successor in cases of a sitting US senator&#8217;s resignation, and instead calls for a special election within 90 days.  My understanding is that there would be no interim representation, and Alaska would just have an empty seat for up to three months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>SIConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-661</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The guy has been convicted by a jury of his piers.  What more could you possibly want?  Or do you think that the jury was filled with DSCC staffers?  The Stevens case could go through the appeals process all the way to the Supreme Court, with him losing unanimously all the way, and you&#039;d still say that every judge ruling on the case was picking on him because he&#039;s Alaskan.  When you don&#039;t report hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal favors from people who stand to benefit personally from your actions as a government official, there&#039;s a problem, one that&#039;s punishable by over three decades in prison.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for being brought up on charges for being a Republican, I doubt the prosecution would have had enough evidence to convict in his case.  That said, that has nothing to do with why he should have resigned from the Senate long ago.  He has embarassed his Party, his state, and his country, and will continue to do so as long as he fights the conviction.  He belongs in prison and will hopefully live out his days there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, as for the earmark deal, I&#039;ll take it without hesitation provided that the money that currently goes to earmarks instead goes either toward debt reduction or tax relief rather than to more bureaucracy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy has been convicted by a jury of his piers.  What more could you possibly want?  Or do you think that the jury was filled with DSCC staffers?  The Stevens case could go through the appeals process all the way to the Supreme Court, with him losing unanimously all the way, and you&#8217;d still say that every judge ruling on the case was picking on him because he&#8217;s Alaskan.  When you don&#8217;t report hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal favors from people who stand to benefit personally from your actions as a government official, there&#8217;s a problem, one that&#8217;s punishable by over three decades in prison.</p>
<p>As for being brought up on charges for being a Republican, I doubt the prosecution would have had enough evidence to convict in his case.  That said, that has nothing to do with why he should have resigned from the Senate long ago.  He has embarassed his Party, his state, and his country, and will continue to do so as long as he fights the conviction.  He belongs in prison and will hopefully live out his days there.</p>
<p>Finally, as for the earmark deal, I&#8217;ll take it without hesitation provided that the money that currently goes to earmarks instead goes either toward debt reduction or tax relief rather than to more bureaucracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;nt&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><nt></nt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriousLaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriousLaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody in the Senate is a bigger crook than Dirty Harry of Nevada. He has spent his career using public money and his Senate seat to make his family members rich. Hopefully they&#039;ll get him before the next election. Unless the Dems have made his corrupt actions legal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He and Stevens should be bunk buddies in the slammer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody in the Senate is a bigger crook than Dirty Harry of Nevada. He has spent his career using public money and his Senate seat to make his family members rich. Hopefully they&#8217;ll get him before the next election. Unless the Dems have made his corrupt actions legal.</p>
<p>He and Stevens should be bunk buddies in the slammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2006_personoftheyear</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>2006_personoftheyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-658</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;of said Liberal blogs, I will use the example of Daily Kos since its the one most similar to here in layout that I read.  And they don&#039;t generally do endorsements the way they do here.  Like for example, when McCain clinched the nomination, the people in charge here made a big front-page endorsement.  No such thing happened on Daily Kos.  Part of this was that RS was more divided than dkos over the primary, but also because it&#039;s just a difference in the way the two are run.  If you asked kos what he thought of the freezer guy, he&#039;d say that he doesn&#039;t like the him and would say good riddance to him, but that he doesn&#039;t do endorsements, and even if he did it would be personal and not for the whole site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You don&#039;t even have to like kos to agree with me; he would say (I would agree) that even from a cynical POV, Jefferson&#039;s presence does more harm than good, considering it is only one seat (in a district with a PVI D+28, at a time that Dems are overperforming those numbers) but always provides a counterpoint to Dem arguments about corruption.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of said Liberal blogs, I will use the example of Daily Kos since its the one most similar to here in layout that I read.  And they don&#8217;t generally do endorsements the way they do here.  Like for example, when McCain clinched the nomination, the people in charge here made a big front-page endorsement.  No such thing happened on Daily Kos.  Part of this was that RS was more divided than dkos over the primary, but also because it&#8217;s just a difference in the way the two are run.  If you asked kos what he thought of the freezer guy, he&#8217;d say that he doesn&#8217;t like the him and would say good riddance to him, but that he doesn&#8217;t do endorsements, and even if he did it would be personal and not for the whole site.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t even have to like kos to agree with me; he would say (I would agree) that even from a cynical POV, Jefferson&#8217;s presence does more harm than good, considering it is only one seat (in a district with a PVI D+28, at a time that Dems are overperforming those numbers) but always provides a counterpoint to Dem arguments about corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-657</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s no comparison between him and Stevens.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no comparison between him and Stevens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I ran into him and &quot;the general,&quot; his ANC staffer, at the Captain Cook one night.  Over much Amber, we solved all the World&#039;s problems. At that time, I was a faceless, nameless bureaucrat that neither would have had any reason to know or care about in any more than an abstract or philosophical sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It was just a nice evening; the kind you can have in any working class hero bar here.  It&#039;s just that the working class hero happened to be a Congressman and his principal aide.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since then I&#039;ve gotten to know him better.  So, OK, he wouldn&#039;t be on my Christmas card list, but I&#039;ve known a lot of people I liked less.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into him and &#8220;the general,&#8221; his ANC staffer, at the Captain Cook one night.  Over much Amber, we solved all the World&#8217;s problems. At that time, I was a faceless, nameless bureaucrat that neither would have had any reason to know or care about in any more than an abstract or philosophical sense.</p>
<p>It was just a nice evening; the kind you can have in any working class hero bar here.  It&#8217;s just that the working class hero happened to be a Congressman and his principal aide.</p>
<p>Since then I&#8217;ve gotten to know him better.  So, OK, he wouldn&#8217;t be on my Christmas card list, but I&#8217;ve known a lot of people I liked less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/the_directors/2008/10/27/redstate-endorses-mark-begich-democrat-for-s/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you are going to write this then you need to let the Paultards back onto Red State.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is no way that you can write this and endorse two Dems over two Republicans at this late in the game and beat the crap out of conservatives who like Paul (I don&#039;t ... I think he&#039;s crazy on a couple of levels) and others who pound on McCain.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You wax eloquent on &quot;the primary is over its time to get behind McCain&quot; and then pull this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stevens -- okay .. maybe ... but TACTICALLY, it&#039;s better to elect Stevens and then have him kicked out of the Senate and replaced in an election then to put a Democrat in now.  Stevens wins and is kicked out or resigns then you have a pretty good chance to run the AG or the Lt. Gov against a Dem in the special election.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don Young -- hate his guts, but he&#039;s not convicted of anything.  I sent Parnell money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a tactical mistake and hypocritical as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And that&#039;s coming from someone who (95% of the time) thinks you guys walk on water.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to write this then you need to let the Paultards back onto Red State.</p>
<p>There is no way that you can write this and endorse two Dems over two Republicans at this late in the game and beat the crap out of conservatives who like Paul (I don&#8217;t &#8230; I think he&#8217;s crazy on a couple of levels) and others who pound on McCain.</p>
<p>You wax eloquent on &#8220;the primary is over its time to get behind McCain&#8221; and then pull this stuff.</p>
<p>Stevens &#8212; okay .. maybe &#8230; but TACTICALLY, it&#8217;s better to elect Stevens and then have him kicked out of the Senate and replaced in an election then to put a Democrat in now.  Stevens wins and is kicked out or resigns then you have a pretty good chance to run the AG or the Lt. Gov against a Dem in the special election.</p>
<p>Don Young &#8212; hate his guts, but he&#8217;s not convicted of anything.  I sent Parnell money.</p>
<p>This is a tactical mistake and hypocritical as well.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s coming from someone who (95% of the time) thinks you guys walk on water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

