Short-Circuiting ObamaCare at the State Level


George Will has a good one today at WaPo talking about how States might potentially head-off any Federal incursion into their own health care systems.

It’s not easy, but basically the plan would be for the State’s to enact Amendments to their own Constitutions guaranteeing that private choice in medical care shall not be infringed nor penalties imposed for failing to obtain coverage. Will recounts an Arizona initiative to do just that:

In 2006, long before there was an Obama administration determined to impose a command-and-control federal health-care system, a young orthopedic surgeon walked into the Goldwater Institute here with an idea. The institute, America’s most potent advocate of limited government, embraced Eric Novack’s idea for protecting Arizonans from health-care coercion. In 2008, Arizonans voted on Novack’s proposed amendment to the state’s Constitution:

“No law shall be passed that restricts a person’s freedom of choice of private health care systems or private plans of any type. No law shall interfere with a person’s or entity’s right to pay directly for lawful medical services, nor shall any law impose a penalty or fine, of any type, for choosing to obtain or decline health care coverage or for participation in any particular health care system or plan.”

Read the article for Will’s Constitutionality analysis, which effectively boils down to ‘it very well might be found Constitutional’. The only thing I’ll add to it is that the question, I think, will ultimately come down first to whether Congress intended to completely “occupy the field” and second, more importantly, whether Congress even has the right to do so with an issue such as Health Care.

So who goes first? Oklahoma? Texas? Will notes that despite being outspent 5 to 1 by opponents of the initiative, the measure lost by less than 9,000 votes out of 2.1 million cast. That’s good news for State’s that want to get a jump on throwing up as many roadblocks to ObamaCare as possible.

So be the first to call your Governor and suggest it. Hell I may even do so with Jersey’s newly-minted Republican, if only for shits and giggles.

Russ


Category: , , , , , ,

RSS feed

10 Comments Leave a comment

Problem here is like public schools

GregInFla (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 5:07PM EST (link)

We choose to homeschool but still pay all the school taxes. Likewise, the hundreds of billions in new taxes in the bill would still apply to the states that opt out.


– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.

 

Well that's part of it

thatsright (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 5:17PM EST (link)

Part of the question would be how far 10th amendment sovereignty goes. The opt-out provision has been floated a couple of times, but I wonder whether such a provision would be mandatory to save the Constitutionality of ObamaCare as a whole. If so, then no, I don’t think an opted-out State could be forced to contribute taxes to the program.

These are the murky Constitutional questions that will inevitably arise IF ObamaCare passes. I knew them better when I was taking my tests but suffice to say they are far from worked out.

Thanks for the comment Greg and I personally agree with you as well on the injustice of public education robbery.

Russ

Russ Cote
www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/

 

That's why the cut in Medicare funding and

Achance (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 6:27PM EST (link)

they’ll hold federal Medicaid match hostage as well. States that don’t play on O-Care will either have to pay the whole tab on M/M or have their citizens pay the taxes but do without the care. Ain’t happenin’!

In Vino Veritas

5 [nt]

Bill S (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 8:37PM EST (link)

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

true

thatsright (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 9:16PM EST (link)

In instances such as this, I’d agree that unreasonable decorum is indeed for suckers.

What the hell is [nt] anyway?

Thanks bs.

Russ

Russ Cote
www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/

NT = "no text"

Bill S (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 10:25PM EST (link)

It means “my entire comment is in the comment title and I don’t need to put anything in the comment body (“your thoughts”). If you don’t put [NT] or (NT) or -NT- (or some other combination that I don’t remember), you’ll get a prompt saying “Error: please type a comment.” when you try to save your comment.

I have an entire “Redstate How-To” diary sitting in my drafts folder. I need to publish it some time in the next couple of days. It contains answers to that and other burning questions… ;-)

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

My favorite quirk is the "kowalski", LOL nt

mschmitt (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 10:31PM EST (link)

usque ad finem

Jabberwocky

thatsright (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 10:52PM EST (link)

I’m coining that.

BS, make it happen and if you’re not looking to get paid, I’ll host your guide proudly.

What the f&%$ is a Kowalski?

Russ Cote
www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/

OK, it's published

Bill S (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 11:23PM EST (link)

Check the front page, or see

here

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 
 
 
 
 

And another question arises

thatsright (Diary) Thursday, November 19th at 9:15PM EST (link)

That’s right, and the Supreme Court has said that the Feds can attach conditions to the receipt of federal funds.

However, ObamaCare is a different beast altogether, including several mandates that may be Unconstitutional on their own. The question then is whether the Feds can withhold federal Medicaid dollars from a state who opts out if the program being forced on the State itself contains Unconstitutional mandates.

I’m betting that the 5 we have there now would say no, the Feds can’t do that.

I’m hoping it never gets that far, but from what I know and remember of ConLaw, no way SCOTUS allows the Feds to withhold Medicaid funds to coerce compliance with ObamaCare.

Thanks for the comment AChance.

Russ

Russ Cote
www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/