I’ve decided to go in a radically different direction with this latest post. Instead of spouting off opinions, which you can all get anywhere else on here (or any other blog), I’m going to get bold and actually offer predictions here that I’m willing to be held to. Today, in early June, I think we have enough information now to safely make predictions for the rest of the calendar year.
Also, on most blogs, political predictions tend to have the unfortunate quality of reflecting the desires of the predictor. As you can see below, most of what I predict below is NOT what I’d like to see, but what I expect reality to be. Keep in mind, I’m NOT rooting for what’s going to happen below, nor am I being unnecessarily pessimistic to offset whatever biases I may have. I’m just calling it as I see it.
Important Note: All predictions are based on the premise that there are no dramatic surprises in 2009 (ie: new terrorist attacks in USA, shocking events in Iraq/Afghanistan, economy completely collapsing, major White House scandal, etc). If any of these things occur, all bets are off.
With that in mind, here goes:
Economy: Continues to underperform economists’ expectations. Stock market plummets to mid-5000s before ending 2009 in high-6000s. Unemployment surpasses WWII-high at 11.2% in late 2009 before it drops a notch to 10.9%. A second, smaller stimulus ($250-$300 billion) bill is passed in late autumn in response to this. More tea parties follow, but bill passes regardless.
Iraq/Afghanistan: Very little news. Higher than expected casualties in Afghanistan as a variety of secret operations unfold there. Difficult to get any decent news reported on exactly what’s going on there. In Iraq, small uptick in dramatic terror attacks in Baghdad, while ironically small-scale attacks in Baghdad and throughout the country decrease. Plans stay, more or less, on course for major US withdrawal in 2010.
Future of Gitmo: White House decision is finally made to build major expansion to Supermax facility in Florence, Colorado, where Gitmo detainees will be moved to. Colorado congressional delegation goes apesh*t and vows to fight it tooth-and-nail, but Obama will cut secret deal with Reid & Pelosi to rush thru a late-night vote on funding it in an amendment to a major appropriations bill. Colorado delegation votes “No” unanimously, but is ultimately powerless to stop it. Obama announces Gitmo will stay open several extra months beyond original Jan 2010 deadline to wait for construction in Colorado to finish, and will amend his original Executive Order accordingly. Despite enormous White House pressure, less than 50 of the 240 current detainees are accepted by foreign nations before the rest are moved to Colorado.
Health Care: Obama offers up surprisingly center-right health care plan…on the surface. In an effort to get something passed quickly, Obama will appear to eschew single-payer, and offer something similar to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan, which makes health care a responsibility for all individuals to purchase. Obama will actually team up with the Blue Dogs in the House to get a bill drafted, which will pass. Devil is in the details which will include hidden aspects, such that if the plan is underfunded at all, federal government will pick up the tab, which sets in motion the conversion of the entire plan to a single-payer-like system in several years.
Republicans will expose these flaws, which will scare off some Blue Dogs, which will ultimately result in a grand compromise bill which removes some, but not all, “poison pill” aspects. Reid threatens to use reconciliation process to pass a very leftist health care plan as leveage, and Republicans fold. Ultimately, a wierd hybrid center-left bill which has both personal responsibility (for young, healthy, above-poverty individuals) AND single-payer aspects (for very poor individuals) passes. Bogus CBO and OMB numbers show plan to be relatively cheap, but real numbers come out soon after Obama signs it. Nobody is particularly happy, but Obama gets his health care plan passed in 2009, and Congress vows to revisit the issue in 2010.
Sotomayor: Only Jon Kyl & Jeff Sessions on Republican side go after her during her hearings. Kyl presses a little too hard, and Sotomayor snaps back quite viciously, exposing her Latina temper. Republicans sense a chance to make hay about her temperment, but only conservatives are outrraged. Democrats, especially Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) on committee, who attempts to make a name for herself as primary Sotomayor defender, are rattled but remain unanimously behind her. Sotomayor’s snapping does galvonize most Republicans against her, though. No committee Republican is willing to support her, so Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT), as Chair, is forced to embarassingly change the committee rules in a straight party-line vote to get her out of committee. Once on the floor, no filibuster is even attempted and Sotomayor is confirmed in a near-party-line vote by the Senate, 62-38. The only Republicans who vote for her are the two female Senators from Maine. All Democrats support her.
2009 Midterm elections: Democrats hold the Governor seats in both VA & NJ by the narrowest of margins (less than 2% in both), with NJ actually being closer and going to an automatic recount, because Corzine bombs badly in his two debates with Christie. Republicans are happy they made small gains in both houses of both legislatures in each state. Both parties, predictably, claim victory with the results. Obama stays out of both races, for the most part, only doing radio ads and/or lending his voice to robo-calls.
Obama approval rating: President Obama ends 2009 with a 58-39 approval-disapproval number. Obama never goes over 67 or under 55 in approval for the rest of the year. His disapproval is at its highest (39) at the end of the year. The poor economy ever so slowly (for Republicans’ taste) keeps slowly bleeding away support 1% point at a time, but he does recover 5 points the day after he signs health care reform in mid-October, but the drain restarts. Internal White House polling (never released to the public, but is leaked) shows that public still blames Bush for bad economy, but is unlikely to accept that as an excuse starting in 2010, forcing Obama’s political team to shift strategies and find new scapegoats, which will include references to “Wall Street” among other unpopular groups.
Overall: 2009 just isn’t a good year for the GOP, no matter how you slice it. Yet there’s reason for hope. The public still finds Reid & Pelosi distasteful, and Reid enters 2010 in real danger of defeat in Nevada. Dick Cheney continues to aggressively defend the Bush Administration on all fronts, and in shocks of shocks, manages to boost his approval rating to 45 and Bush’s to 47, which is far higher than they are today. It also helps the Republican brand bounce back several points, which was desperately needed. Obama is still widely popular, but not as widely. Weak economy is still the #1 issue headed into 2010 and forces both parties to shift their entire political strategies based on that.
Daniel Horowitz
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
Jake Walker
If I may alter your prediction, VA Governorship goes to the GOP...
DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 12:09AM EST (link)It is looking very difficult for a Democrat candidate to take the state of VA on the off year especially with the cutting of Do D support contracts which strongly support the VA economy. Higher taxes (property and cigarrettes) along with accelerating foreclosures in Spotsylvania County and Prince William will cause great anger towards the Democratic controlled executive. Terry McFRAUDiffe has a long record of being a liberal with leanings toward tax and spend etc and has little chance of winning the state. I do not disagree with your assessment of NJ.
Second, stock market will end the year at about 8000 rather than 6000 due to news media reporting that the stimulus is working; however the market will dive once gasoline prices reach 3-4 dollars a gallon which will further sink the economy into a great depression. The increased gas prices will push the unemployment rate to what you stated but will not back off in 2010 and will increase to 12.4% by 1st QTR CY10. Dollar sinks to $1.67 to 1 Euro along with increasing inflation pressures while gold ends the year around $1275-max $1500 an ounce.
Foreclosures rates will increase slightly for the remainder of 2009 and will continue to cause home values to tumble another 15% by Xmas.
North Korea will begin to foster conflicts in the DMZ along with challenges at sea in the territorial waters of South Korea. The US will not respond to incursions but rather will seek compromise with China and Russia to resolve conflicts if not directly than through the UN Security Council.
Iran will have tested a nuclear device underground before the end of 2009 and will conduct a test around an American Nabtional Holiday. Israel in response to the sucessful test of an Atomic Bomb based with Uranium of 10-25 kT will attempt to take out the reactors and centrifuges either by direct one step strike or covert operations. The result of an attack will be condemned by the United States and the BO administration.
I could go on with the predictions but I like you see very little information to be optimistic for the future; however the GOP will take VA back from the incognito liberals (fiscal conservatives) in the VA governors mansion. BTW, GOP takes the Lt Governor and the States Attorney.
I see VA going GOP too
Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 12:14AM EST (link)the Democrats do not have any good candidates. However, these days nothing is for sure for the GOP. The press, immigration patterns, and voting fraud are additional obstacles for ANY Republican candidate.
Molon Labe!
Agreed...
DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 12:20AM EST (link)as things look today, McDonnell could win the governor position; however, the GOP has a history of fumbling the football.
I agree with both of you on VA
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 4:33PM EST (link)I think McDonnell will win along with Cuccinelli. There is a strong grassroots movement.
I also agree that the GOP also has the ability to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
The latest Rasmussen poll released on Friday
Scope (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 8:26AM EST (link)has Obama at 39% strongly approve, and 39% strongly disapprove, according to Hannity. Hannity opined that his approval numbers dropped 30 points since his GM government takeover, and his most recent appology tour. I think his approval numbers will drop even more the longer people are unemployed, especially when their unemployment checks run out.
McDonnell, Bolling and Cucinelli will do well in the upcoming elections. McDonnell has had double digit leads in polling against all 3 of the Dem. candidates. He will lose only if ACORN is allowed to continue their dirty deeds. Cucinelli is wildly popular in the state, and will be the next Attorney General. I had heard awhile back that Virgil Goode may run against Periello in 2010. I think he has a good chance, but, that will only be if votes found in car trunks are not allowed, as they were in 2008. Goode only lost be a few hundred votes. The votes found a few days later, in Danville, that the polling place forgot to send in put Periello in the winners circle.
There is going to be a MASSIVE hue and cry for extended unemployment
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 8:32AM EST (link)benefits late this year and early next year.
The GOP should agree to an extension with the message that we understand you need this to survive the Obama recession, but condition them on mass reversals of Obama policies on taxes and business regulations that are causing the recession to be longer and deeper since mno one is staring small businesses and investing and haven’t been since 2007 when the dems took over congress.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
The only way to extend unemployment
izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 11:22AM EST (link)is to rollback the rest of the stimulus. Obama will finally realize that the stimulus is actually hurting him. He needs China to keep buying our debt and the only way the Chinese will is if they see real CHANGE in Obama’s attitude about spending. However, if the dems want to expand unemployment will not cutting spending and want to bailout Kalifornia then this will lead to a depression and unemploynment programs will implode anyway.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
I think Bush's thing last year about
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 11:32AM EST (link)helping the forecloser folks was about that he needed to show China he was doing something to help them..
I think policies other than longer UE benefits are leading to a depression, with the
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:41PM EST (link)government employee and power stimulus being a significant part. The budget is the bigger part with the dems tax and reg increase policies since 2007 being the main parts.
UE is a very small part of the stimulus and the budget for the return, IMO, but I recognize the other side on this. But the politics of it in a severe recession and the relatively small size, makes me come down on the other side, respectfully.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Totally agree GC
Scope (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 8:50AM EST (link)It would be unwise for the Republicans to try to block extending unemployment benefits, while everyone is starving and unemployed. It would be a great opportunity for the Republicans to put the blame on Obama for putting people in the unemployment lines, and with no end in site.
BTW I don’t think the VA legislature approved the lengthy extensions for unemployment, and to give it to part timers. They did not want the cost to go to employers after the Feds money ran out.
yes, SC's gov is partly trying that as well - no objection to extending the TIME
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 10:09AM EST (link)for receiving benefits but only objecting to the increase in the amount and the extension to part-time. I support that approach, as to accept the stimulus provision is to put the state on the hook w/o fed funds for future benefits.
But this is issue is going to come back up later this year or next as well due to how bad this recession is going to get.
And I agree that it is VITAL that the GOP be seen as extending the safety net for Obama victims and insisting that they change policies that will get investors and small businesses creators off strike so they can put people to work.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
I disagree
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 11:13AM EST (link)I know UE is employee paid but if extending comes from taxes we should not be pushing for that. We already have the safety net of food stamps they won’t starve like you said.
There are plenty of jobs out there and ways to make money. I don’t see how this is a conservative answer.
I understand why the poor think conservatives are not for the poor now. We call women on welfare welfare queens that recieve $300/month in TANF but we will agree to extended unemployment that pays $2000/month for someone with a mater’s degree, a relatively new car, a house, no dependents and way more skills and resources to earn a living than an illiterate woman with 3 kids and an ill mother to take care that relies on public transportation.
You were getting on to me about the same thing
molybdanthan (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 12:27PM EST (link)With all due respect, is this a hot button, heart-on-sleeve issue for you? If so, this may get a little rough. But please bear with me.
Who’s calling any woman a welfare queen? Before you brought it up, I hadn’t seen it used here, or even heard that term in some time. Until now. And, as in this case, I see it being used to describe the traditional conservative view on poor women. We (you) are putting words in our (my) mouth.
And when have ‘the poor’ ever thought of conservatives as anything other than greedy tycoons? Everyone knows that. Does that change even when the GOP behaves like Dems? Or from one impoverished demographic to the next? No?
That impression is Universal. Finally, the people can agree on something. Thanks MSM, and ever Lib for the last 30 years. Way to drive that point home. They’ve even got us using their terminology to describe ourselves.
As I was saying, if anyone’s poor, it’s because the Dems have made it so. And, if I may be so bold, I think Moe would agree:
http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/06/06/ensuring-that-the-poor-are-always-with-us-san-francisco-edition/
They’ve had plenty of opportunities to spread the wealth around, even before the O. And somehow, even though it’s trillions of dollars, it’s never enough. Nor will it ever be enough.
Can’t get rid of any of the safety nets, or cut one lifeline. That would be like taking the food directly off a child’s plate. It’s just too hurtful to envisage. Isn’t that right?
So, instead, we’ll just take this debate off the table. Might as well, since it’s been framed in such a way that suggesting reform is tantamount to starving kids.
Long live the Queen.
my point is that women on welfare
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 12:57PM EST (link)are called welfare queens and there seems to be such a problem with welfare specially cash assistance it but we are ready give people that may not even have dependents and probably have more resources and skills to earn a living way way way more money than without than what a TANF recipient would recieve…and from stimulus money too
I haven't heard the term welfare queen in 10-15 years - nt
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:33PM EST (link)Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
also it is
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:02PM EST (link)a hot button issue for me and I am trying to understand the conservative point of view on it and what are real solutions to it. I see lots of misconceptions about it too and that upsets me when I see it. I’m not hijacking another thread about it though.l It just stood out to me the way there was no hesitancy to give stimulus money out in the form of unemployment but TANF is such a problem. For the first time I understood how the abjectly poor may have that point of view against conservatives. I haven’t even seen that view in my lifetime but it is reported on here that many of the poor have that view.
Here's what you do mom
Vegas_Rick (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:18PM EST (link)Take away the safety nets. The guy on the high wire plans his life’s moves much more carefully and executes those moves with more precision when there is no net. Same thing with real life.
Churches and families are there for the real emergency situations.
My daughter paid for full day kindergarten for my youngest granddaughter. Lately, she’s had trouble making the $300 monthly payment. Her initial thought was that the school should cut her a break because times are tight. The school on the other hand, said “Pay up or dis-enroll.” No exceptions.
My daughter found the money by cutting back in other areas.
The point is, it’s human nature to take the easy way out. If there is one
.
“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington
“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.
The desire to turn back the clock 75 yrs is strong, and
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:37PM EST (link)it probably would be better if states and private charity dealt with this issue exclusively, but the only plausible way to do it politically would be to have a comprehensive plan that included a transition period, but I certainly am open on the matter. And certainly, as my initial post indicated, I mostly support Sanford’s position.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
People should always have a place to go for help
Vegas_Rick (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:46PM EST (link)in truly tough times. I just think it should be a real hassle to apply for government assistance. And it should require frequent renewal hassles. Being on the government dole should be somewhat unpleasant.
Another thought. I think money spent on vocational training or retraining, basic money management skills, and very short-term child care are better ideas than welfare programs. Anytime the government hands out checks, corruption and abuse are not far behind.
“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington
“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.
agreed on first paragraph, but given the beaurocrats
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:55PM EST (link)that have to be hired to administer the latter, I favor checks. Milton Friedman’s argument for the negative income tax comes to mind or C Murray’s ideas on a similar program that would drastically cut costs in welfare, etc by eliminating most of the govt workers and mailing checks. So much of the stimulus evil is not the UE or other safety net $$, but rather the massive funds for what will be permanent govt workers that we will have to pay for, forever.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
We already have neg taxes -EITC is one of them nt
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 5:08PM EST (link)nt
exactly right - but Friedman's and Murray's plans are much more extensive
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 5:18PM EST (link)and would eliminate a huge chunk on the federal bureaucracy.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
no to the hassle
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 4:52PM EST (link)No it shouldn’t be a hassle. I’m not saying we should have welfare but if we have it, it should not be a hassle because when it is you can’t focus on getting on your feet, you focus on meeting their requirements for weeks and weeks. It just leaves you more_stuck. Also the most vulnerable people that really need it can’t deal with the hassle. When it is a hassle, what we have is groups of people that learn how to deal wtih beauracry that get help for years and years and years and people that may need it but don’t have the same paper pushing skills don’t get it short term when it could really help them.
I disagree with short term child care too. I think there should be 0 of that. We already have free vocational training like pell grants and JTPA, and a few other programs. I’d rather give a check to a woman and she pays her mom $50 to watch her baby for the week or it go to pay a private preschool , the child is much safer and there is no nea indoctrination and there is no expansion of gov funded preschools and daycares. Even if it went to a private preschool that accepted gov vouchers the schools would have to meet more regulations.
I do think diversion is a program that should be looked into more, agreeing not to be on TANF for 6 months they will give you a larger cash amount for something to help you find employment again (like tools for work etc).
I think checks are better because it is less Nanny state-ish, and I say this from experience dealing with stuff like subsidize daycare. I’ve also recieved TANF in two different states and the that had no work requirements was much better as far as helping me in a crisis. The problem is people’s character, the welfare to work programs I believe are just an expansion of government, but republicans think they are better because they want a solution to people’s character of not doing their best. We can’t make people industrious though.
I gotta work just had to chime in
another no to state/local
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 5:07PM EST (link)the programs that are end up being racist against a certain group applying for help.
Also no to the feds and state contracting out with private/church agencies. Foster/adoption is a huge disaster and much of the fraud and abuse and death of children in care has has gone on under private charities/church run places that the government contracts with. Bush’s fed money to church charities made me sick.
"I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it."
Karina (Diary) Monday, June 8th at 5:18AM EST (link)~Benjamin Franklin
These are socialist programs designed for income redistribution. Where is the incentive to get out of them? We are doing those people and our country a great injustice by rewarding the nonproductive and harming the productive. This is not a country founded on “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need”. We have got to stop this downward spiral before we are all on gov’t payrolls with no producers left. Unfortunately, this seems to be the prime goal of the past few administrations. This is the progressive goal.
5 for Franklin, 5 for You -nt
molybdanthan (Diary) Monday, June 8th at 6:32AM EST (link)Vegas I totally understand! nt
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:29PM EST (link)Reagan was for a safety net for the truly needy including UE, which is, btw, employER paid
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:31PM EST (link)but I certainly recognize the reluctance to extend them for more weeks and am myself against extending them to part-time workers no matter what and am against increasing the any of the benefits per person as well esp via higher taxes. But extending them for more weeks doesn’t raise employer taxes, but I still think it is an honorable position for not extending them in any event. I just disagree due to two reasons: the length and depth of this recession and the political situation.
btw, Reagan cited ONE example of a welfare Queen and that was woman that was scamming the system for thousands per month.
And I do understand that under any system their will be injustices given the difficulty of writing a law, as a lawyer, due to the limitations of language.
But given the move from an agrarian to an industrial society, I do favor a federal safety net for the truly needy as did Reagan. This includes soc sec.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
I agree with you and Reagan, GC
Vegas_Rick (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:35PM EST (link)I think there should be safety nets for the truly needy and exceptional circumstances. I just think they are less prone to abusive expansion if they are kept at the state and county levels.
“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington
“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.
agreed - nt
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:37PM EST (link)Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
UE
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 1:55PM EST (link)I thought they were employee/employer paid too, so why do we need $ from the stimulus to extend them. Is the money to extend them from the stimulus funds just to cover the administration of it?
That it’s coming from tax payer is the part I am having a hard time with compared to the attitude about TANF.
I’ve seen welfare queen used on here at least a few times.
Yeah, today, by you
molybdanthan (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 2:35PM EST (link)But I’m still new here, so I might have missed all the other times.
yup molybdanthan I'm just making it up and baiting like a troll
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:01PM EST (link)I posted something that I observed to Mike and Scope who both know I’m a sincere poster.
Never said you were insincere
molybdanthan (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:15PM EST (link)Wouldn’t be prudent, at this juncture.
I’ve been reading up on TANF. It led me to a bunch of interesting court cases, and some troubling facts inherent to so many government relief programs. We can get to that part later.
But it also proves that Republicans DO care about the poor. Even if the poor don’t care about Republicans. After all, it came into being when the GOP ran Congress, and was renewed when, again, the GOP ran Congress.
I didn't say they didn't care.
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:36PM EST (link)I didn’t say republicans were anti-poor. I didn’t even know most poor were not republicans until I came here on RS. I was making a point about the difference in attitude about giving tax $ to the laid off vs TANF recipients. I can understand why the poor may think that seeing what a 180 difference there is between how we view the two prograns, extended UE from stimulus funds vs TANF. TANF recipeints are stereotyped and thought have lots of attributes put on them and all sorts of drama & misconcenptions over it but not so with extended UE recipients. A man with and MBA in finance that has 15 years working as an investment banker with no children and a new car and owns a home we have no issue with giving him stimulus money because he is laid off but there is a huge issue with giving it a woman with dependents and no marketble skills.
oops just saw it was employer only
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:02PM EST (link)but I could have sworn I’ve seen unemployment insurance come out of my checks back in the day.
The pre-stimulus formula is for a base of 26 weeks
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:08PM EST (link)The stimulus provides extra funds for extra weeks, increased benefit amount per week and adds part-time workers for the first time, all for three years. After the 3 years though, the mandate would remain in effect sans the fed dollars and so the states would have to raise taxes on their businesses to fund the then unfunded fed mandate.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Thanks Mike :) nt
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 3:29PM EST (link)mom2oneson- You are far from illetrate, as your posts indicate
Scope (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 7:48PM EST (link)that you know every nuance of the “free money” position. You fight for every welfare program, while bashing the Conservative position of “the government doesn’t need to take care of me.” I’m quite surprised that you have gotten so much sympathy here. It just proves that the Conservative position is not so insensitive. You some how have weddled your posts into, “I am so poor, I have 3 sons, an I just can’t get a better, higher paying position. You post here frequently, and always somehow come out on the position of “Your great need for Welfare. Maybe Welfare Mom might be an appropriate description for your position. From your posts, you sure don’t sound to me that you are in a position that you have “no skills.” And, you seem to be here all the time, fighting for your poor station in life. Personnaly, I think you are a phony.
Scope
mom2oneson (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 8:51PM EST (link)I don’t know why you are attacking me. Comparing attitudes towards different forms of redistribution of tax money is not fighting for every welfare program. Talking about how a group might percieve those attitudes is not fighting for welfare. Discussing the administration of welfare programs and how that helpsor harms the recipients is not fighting for them. Discussing people’s situations is not fighting for welfare. Where you got the sympathy stuff from I have no idea.
If you are upset about something else and I happen to be in your path I understand but please don’t keep attacking me. I love this board and the members and this is a great place to dialogue with like minded people.
Prediction Threads Are Always Fun
exitsfunnel Sunday, June 7th at 3:36PM EST (link)I don’t think that much of what you’ve written is necessarily too far off, though I do think that McDonnel has a slightly better than even chance of winning in VA. I also think that your prediction of mid 5000s for the DJIA is way off. I’d be really surprised to see it below 7500. I’m way bearish on the economy and think that the worst is still ahead, but with the general expectation of (possibly very) high inflation in the medium term, I don’t think that people will be abandoning the market en masse.
Here’s one happy prediction which falls just outside of your window: when the House convenes in January ’10, Nancy Pelosi will not be the Speaker of the House.
-exits
Why not Christie?
Return to Revolution (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 5:30PM EST (link)I’m not following NJ too closely but the latest polls have Christie ahead by about 9 pts. Why do you think he will lose?
Out of hand Constitutional fetishist
His "Safer" Prediction Is NJ
IJB Sunday, June 7th at 5:57PM EST (link)Historically, NJ always shows Republicans ahead, or within striking distance, about this many months before the election.
Then, inevitably, polls will tighten (or the Dem pulls ahead), and then the Dems end up winning comfortably on election day. It’s happened about a bizillion times over the last 10-15 years.
Based on current polling results, I imagine the Dems may still be able to pull out the NJ Gov. race, but the ultimate vote will be 51-49% for them at best, and may even be closer to 50-50.
That said, I don’t agree with the poster on VA – at this point, I really don’t see how the GOP can lose in VA, especially if the Dems are stupid enough to nominate McAuliffe. That’ll be as close to a “slam dunk” as they come.
As a Virginian, better to be cautious than overly confident.
penguin2 (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 6:21PM EST (link)I had not realized until this election how well the Republicans can snatch defeat from victory!
Interesting about New Jersey. Too bad, I was being hopeful, but I can see how that plays out.
Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills
Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List
Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots
Interestingly, in 2005...
Moe Lane (Diary) Sunday, June 7th at 6:56PM EST (link)…we had somewhere around 303K people voting in the Republican primary
http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=34&year=2005&f=0&off=5&elect=2
,,,and 330K this year.
http://elections.nj.com/dynamic/files/elections/2009/by_state/NJ_Page_0602.html?SITE=NJNEWELN&SECTION=POLITICS
The Democrats had 225K in 2005
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Jersey_gubernatorial_election,_2005#Democrats
…and something like 194K this year.
I don’t know if that’s really significant, but it does at least suggest that the Democrats have an enthusiasm deficit this run-through.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.