Comments on: Birthers and Hoffman Supporters Need Not Apply. Who’s Next?

By: billyd

billyd — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:32:32 +0000

Redstate was and is against Doug Hoffman? Are we talking about the same redstate.com? Perhaps you should do some google searches on Erick Erickson and Doug Hoffman prior to saying something like that. As far as the 3rd party crack. Ya. We don’t support a 3rd party getting into a race and taking votes from a republican candidate that was voted in through a primary by the registered republicans from the area in which they are running. NY23. That didn’t happen.
As far as the birther garbage goes. Can you please just let it go? Obama was elected by the majority of voters. Most had no idea what they were voting for, but that isn’t a requirement to vote. Finally, let’s assume that you manage to dig up a document that proves Obama is not a US citizen. Then what? He gets removed from office? Biden would then be president. Is that what you want? Or are you then saying that the election would have to be thrown out, Obama and Biden would then be removed from office and a new vote would be scheduled. In the meantime, who would be president???? That’s right! It’s Nancy Pelosi!!! Is that what you really want? Just let it go. It’s over. We’ve got this dolt for 4 years. And everyone on here is doing everything they can to make sure it’s no more than that.

By: discerningconservative

discerningconservative — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:42:43 +0000

of Portman supporting the stimulus? His statement after the stimulus passed said that he didn’t believe that it did anything to stimulate the economy and suggested the need for tax cuts and focus on job creation. Of course after reading this nonsensical piece, I wouldn’t expect anything less from you.

By: Martin Knight

Martin Knight — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:41:27 +0000

By: mschmitt

mschmitt — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:36:02 +0000

By: Erick Brockway

Erick Brockway — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:34:47 +0000

Whew.

Here, political correctness of a different sort runs deep.

Where? Spell it out.

By: mschmitt

mschmitt — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:31:22 +0000

The meaning of that statement about Hoffman went totally unnoticed by me; I was sure s/he was making the point that we supported him despite the third party. My goodness.

By: penguin2

penguin2 — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:29:52 +0000

a word you said. What are you talking about?

By: mschmitt

mschmitt — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:28:47 +0000

1. If you’re interested in the birth certificate issue, see (for example) http://wnd.com

2. If you’re interested in defending Sarah, defend Sarah — there are plenty of us here who do. Pretty much you’ve got Art who has some good reasons for disliking her and a bunch of people who like her.

3. We have damn good reasons to dislike Crist.

4. We have damn good reasons to support the guy in Ohio; who Rush Limbaugh described yesterday as — paraphrasing — “a solid, Reagan conservative”, with no qualifying mention of the car salesman.

5. There was no primary in NY-23. REPEAT: no primary. All bets are off.

Any more questions?

By: Martin Knight

Martin Knight — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:23:47 +0000