The President Wants – Universal Health Savings Accounts


President Obama is right about one thing.  Healthcare needs to be addressed.  He also called for universal savings accounts for Americans.  Let us give him a plan.  We have to answer this call from the American people. 

The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 was a great accomplishment for the American people. For the first time we were given the opportunity to save on a tax-free basis for our own and our family’s health needs.  This was accomplished by the establishment of the Health Savings Accounts (HSA).  For the first time consumers were empowered to be incentivized to wisely use their healthcare dollars.  We can only control healthcare costs by empowering consumers.

The time has come to propose an expansion of HSA and make it the universal foundation of American healthcare.  Universal HSA should come with a mandatory major medical indemnity and prescription plan.  These will be the same plans offered to Federal and private-sector employees through their employers.  These are also known as ERISA plans (Employee Retirement Income and Security Act) which national employers choose in order to avoid compliance issues in the 50 individual States.  Any funds contributed to the HSA after the payment of the indemnity premium will be saved for future needs be it co-pays, co-insurance or what the accountholder deems necessary.  The savings accumulated may be left to account holders heirs without estate taxes.

I propose the contributions to be funded directly to individual and household HSA’s with a national modified value-added tax (VAT).  I will call this the “healthcare added tax” or HAT.  The HAT will be assessed when a good arrives at a retail center and a service is rendered.  After the adoption of the HAT funded universal HSA, all employer provided healthcare funding will be taxable.  There will be no need for new enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid for they will be phased out.  Present and near term elderly Medicare and Medicaid enrollees would have their needs after the HSA evaluated in order to ensure that there will be no unconscionable loss to them.

The goal would be to collect at least $7,900 per person.  Estimated Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2008 was $48,000 per capita. The US consumer is 67.5% of GDP.  The HAT tax on goods and services would be 24.5%.  $7,900 is 24.5% of ($48,000 times .675).  In 2007, the average US household spent an average of $32,700 outside of housing.  The HAT would be on average 24.5% of $32,700 for $7,900.  Assume 3.2 persons on average per household is $25,280 per household.  Why the discrepancy? The rich will pay more for the same HSA.

Let us look at an example, a car arrives at an auto dealership that is expected to retail for $25,000.  It does not matter whether the car was manufactured in the US or elsewhere, there will be a 24.5% HAT or $6,125 added when the car is sold.  Sounds expensive? Consider this…the average private sector employer –provided health plan costs $7,200 per year per employee.   That is $7,200 of benefit that an employer spends to pass to an employee tax-free.  If the HAT-funded HAS is in place, wages should rise.

 -          The Federal Government spends $5,400 per household every year on Medicaid and Medicare.

-          The average US State spends nearly $1,050 per person every year on Medicaid.

Healthcare in the United States cost 17 percent of the US Gross Domestic Product in 2008.  The United States pays more for healthcare a percentage of GDP than any other society.  Canada spends 9.7% of its GDP, following the US is Switzerland at 11.6%.  The average for most of the developed world is 9.0%.  Make no mistake about it we have the best healthcare.  Canadians cross the border to seek healthcare in the US.  Great Britain pays its doctors so poorly that they import doctors from the third world to staff their facilities.  A group of doctors in the UK actually executed an act of terrorism.

Healthcare cost growth consistently outpaces GDP growth by 3%.  In 2008, healthcare costs increased by 6.9% over the level in 2007, twice the rate of inflation.  It is estimated that we will increase by 7.4% the dollars spent on healthcare in 2009.  The prognosis for GDP growth in 2009 is not good.  Even in the best of times recently healthcare cost increases have outpaced GDP growth.  The Gross Domestic Product of the US economy grew from 2003 to 2007.  The five year annual average was 3.2% per annum adjusted for inflation. 

The medical profession is interested in a VAT for healthcare.  Please refer to the Journal of American Medicine, October 2008.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

9 Comments Leave a comment

The VAT has worked so well in Europe. -nt-

Brian Simpson (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 8:24PM EST (link)


| My RedState archive |
Important principles may and must be inflexible. ~ Abraham Lincoln

Europe's VAT is to be avoided

tedpomeroy (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 9:31PM EST (link)

I am generally anti-VAT. It is an under the surface tax and I want to keep politicians accountable.

The HAT or healthcare added tax defines a specific purpose for the funds. The funds will flow directly to the beneficiaries.

Also the VAT is accrued at several points in production. The HAT will be assessed once at the place where the good or service meets the ultimate consumer.

The HAT will equalize domestic and imported goods. For example a mattress made in India has no healthcare expense added in at the factory whereas an American manufacturer will need to recapture the employee health plan cost in the pricing of the good. The HAT will be assessed at the retail point be it imported or domestic.

 
 

HAT or VAT...

reddog53 (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 8:36PM EST (link)

Every VAT has been increased over its initial limit. Health Care costs go up because the revenue source is disconnected from the customer who obtains the service. Your proposal does the same thing.

If the average consumer spends $32,400 per year, and has to add another $7900 for the HAT, this can only work if their wages go up by the same amount. If employers are now spending $7200, that means that $700 more has come out of the employee’s compensation to pay the HAT. With other costs laid on the employer (increase in income tax, carbon tax, taxes to absorb universal education, etc), there’ s no chance that all $7200 currently used for health care will be given to the employee. There’s every reason to believe that this will effectively reduce buying power of the employee.

Also, what happens when the consumers get spooked and stop spending, as they are doing today? Less revenue to the HAT, lowered service, and the start of a downward spiral.

In the end, having government pay the whole deal for health care eventually means we all pay, since we are the source of the government’s income either directly or indirectly. There’s no free lunch.

More Free Lunch

tedpomeroy (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 9:42PM EST (link)

Couple of things I did not elaborate on. Take a Detroit made car, this car has $1,700 of healthcare cost priced into it when it arrives at the dealer showroom.
The HAT removes this and should knock down the wholesale cost of US made items.

Spooked, consumers are already spooked. They spend on household average $2,800 per year out of pocket on healthcare. No need with the universal HSA.

Speaking of lunch I envision that disportionate amount come from consumables such as food, alchohol and tobacco. The Federal portion of alchohol & tobacco taxes will go to the HAT. Food will be taxed according to a health impact schedule by nutrionists. No HAT on fruits and vegetables but a 2 liter bottle of Classic Coke may go to $2.00. The biggest threat to the US health is Type 2 diabetes from obesity.

 
 

Leave your HAT on your head and stick it

mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 10:43PM EST (link)

where the sun doesn’t shine.

 

Better idea

Brian Simpson (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 10:56PM EST (link)

Let’s let the stuff that is working (without requiring new tax structures that would then be implemented once politicians found out that they could get away with them) work. Like this.


| My RedState archive |
Important principles may and must be inflexible. ~ Abraham Lincoln

The Problem With the Current HSA

tedpomeroy (Diary) Wednesday, March 11th at 6:14AM EST (link)

The Aetna of course would be one of the providers of the universal HSA.The current problem is that it is employer provided.  Given the current and coming high unemployment rate under Obamanomics the dark side is going to use the level of unemployment to their advantage in pushing a Federal government plan.  Also, retirees whose numbers are going to grow will be flooding the Medicare rolesWe are really stuck in the proverbial rock and hard place.

We need a plan that takes the burden off the employer and is universal.

The US consumer is 67.5% of the economy. The consumer pays anyway either through lower wages, increased prices or taxes.

 
 

You're almost right.

itrytobenice (Diary) Wednesday, March 11th at 12:47PM EST (link)

HSAs are wonderful and they should be expanded as much as possible. There is nothing to make a consumer a responsible consumer like spending his own money. (Witness the opposite effect in the actions of your US Congress!!)

But the gov’t should not fund it. They should eliminate state restrictions on interstate commerce regarding health insurance. They should place restrictions on insurance companies which wish to sell insurance on an interstate basis, so as to prevent them from closing pools and squeezing individual purchasers out of the pools.

There may be other restrictions or subsidies that would help keep insurance companies competing and fair but this would get us started.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

Single biggest problem

Common_Cents (Diary) Wednesday, March 11th at 1:20PM EST (link)

Single biggest problem. “Consumer” of health care is nearly completely taken out of the equation. The same person that “brags” about getting a new $20,000 hip paid by insurance will hit you on the head w/ their cane if you short change them a nickel at walmart.

We need to re engage the consumer as a spending watchdog for healthcare.

Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from, behind, the Back Nine.
Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.