Officials Return From Western Gas Fields ‘Invigorated’ [Redacted]


Sorry, but we respect the intellectual works of others here at RedState. That means we don’t cut and paste entire articles from either traditional or new media sources 1) because it is copyright infringement, and 2) because we expect others to respect our rights to original material published at RedState.

Now, I am not a lawyer and I’m certainly no expert on copyright law, but my understanding of “fair use” is this: it is permissible to quote limited quantities of material from another source, preferably with a link and always with attribution. “Limited quantities” generally means three (3) paragraphs or so. The diarist is expected to analyze, comment, or otherwise amplify on the quoted material.

Material that you own and publish elsewhere should not be excerpted here, but published in full. It is acceptable to link to your personal blog in acknowledging the cross-link.

Oh, and here’s the link to the Western Gas Fields article, from the Rocket-Courier in Wyalusing, PA.

 

 


Around the U.S. in 50 Days: Pennsylvania


In 2012, the Republican Party seems to have learned its lesson from some bad redistricting moves they made a decade earlier. Then, they targeted Tim Holden and the Philadelphia suburbs in a plan that backfired. However, with a current 12-7 advantage in the congressional delegation, the goal this year was to strengthen their existing seats and basically concede Holden’s seat.

For President, it seems that every four years, Pennsylvania is listed as a key swing state. Yet, every four years they vote for the Democrat, each time a little more strongly. That is because the majority of the population lies in the southeastern and southwester corners of the state around the metropolitan hubs of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. Obama won the state in 2008 by nine points. He managed to carry 18 counties including the entire eastern portion of the state. He did so by winning Carbon and Monroe counties , thus claiming a swath of territory from the Delaware border all the way north into the Pocono region and Lackawanna County. But there is a catch- all of those non-Philadelphia counties he won in 2008 (six in total) except one lost population over the decade or showed no growth at all.

Things have certainly changed in Pennsylvania since 2008. In 2010, in an exciting Senate race, conservative Pat Toomey defeated liberal Joe Sestak. That was clearly a repudiation of Obama and his policies. There is also a Republican Governor in Harrisburg and a Republican-controlled legislature. And they made tremendous gains in the House elections also. All this should add up to problems for Obama in 2012 and he will surely be spending time in the state to defend its 20 electoral votes. To do so, due to declining population in the southwestern parts of the state that supported him last year, he will have to increase turnout and rely more on Philadelphia and its non-minority suburban areas. That will be a tough haul, although one should not count out the Philadelphia Democratic machine that has tentacles into the suburbs. Regardless, there is no way Obama will win by nine points this year with approval ratings hovering somewhere near 44%. It will be a close race, but if enough of the conservative areas show increased turnout, especially in the central part of the state, Romney could win this seat. At this point, based solely upon approval ratings, I would call Pennsylvania for Romney.

In 2006, incumbent Senator Bob Casey, a Democrat, defeated then incumbent Republican Rick Santorum in a landslide 17-point victory. He is up for reelection this year. Sensing a rerun of 2010, ten Republicans are lining up to take on Casey this year. In polling of likely GOP primary voters, only two candidates break 10%- former state representative Sam Rohrer and Tim Burns, who lost the 2010 12th District House race. His performance in that race gives Republicans a chance and, in fact, in hypothetical general election match ups, Burns polls the closest to Casey- a 15 point deficit. And although the race will be interesting, Casey should prevail.

Instead of showing greed in redistricting, this time around the GOP decided to shore up incumbent Republicans. First, the easy districts. Democrats Bob Brady and Chaka Fatah will win their Philadelphia-based districts. Likewise, Allyson Schwartz who, although she loses parts of northeast Philadelphia to Bob Brady’s 1st, picks up Democratic areas of Montgomery County. And Mike Doyle in the 14th- which covers Pittsburgh proper- should win.

On the Republican side, Todd Platts is retiring from the 4th (basically the former 19th) leaving Eric Maloney the heir apparent. The 5th is safely Glenn Thompson’s while in the 6th, Jim Gerlach lost the middle of Montgomery County, but gains the rural sections of Chester and Bucks counties. He will likely face Mark Trivedi in a rematch of 2010. The 8th- basically Bucks County- should go to Mark Fitzpatrick while Bill Shuster will win the 9th. In the 16th District, Joe Pitts appears safe although he lost some conservative areas while picking up a little bit of blue territory in the Reading area. Finally, Tim Murphy in the 18th, Pittsburgh’s southern suburbs, will win as well.

Tim Holden, a Democrat representing a Republican district, was a target in 2002 although not this time around. While shoring up GOP incumbents elsewhere, Holden’s hold on this district was strengthened by giving his district the Scranton area. The 12th District showed the greatest change mainly due to decreased population in this part of the state. Mark Critz and Jason Altmire- two Democratic incumbents- will face off in a primary battle with an edge to Altmire. Normally,this would intimate a Democratic hold. However, the GOP has some strong candidates themselves in Keith Rothfus. Recently, house majority leader Mike Turzai decided to enter the race. Because of redistricting, Jim Christiana of Beaver City, an up and coming player in the Pennsylvania GOP, may run since he was drawn into the district. Given that either Altmire or Critz will emerge from a primary weakened and the quality of GOP opposition plus redistricting, look for a GOP seat gain here.

By picking up Butler and Armstrong counties, Republican Mike Kelly’s bid against Missa Eaton should be a GOP retention. The strange looking 7th District will feature Pat Meehan against 2010 Senate loser Joe Sestak. However, it looks as if Sestak will go down to his second election defeat in two years as the district does not look favorable to Sestak. By redistricting the Scranton area away from Tom Marino’s 10th District, he too should win reelection. And the same goes for Lou Barletta in the 11th. Because Scranton was placed in Holden’s district, one would have to say that Barletta is breathing a little easier, although he remains marginally vulnerable.

Perhaps the hardest seat for the GOP to retain in 2012 will be the 15th District. Although it picked up some conservative territory in rural Lebanon County, Charlie Dent will likely find a tough challenger in either John Callahan, the popular mayor of Bethlehem or Rich Daugherty, Lehigh County’s Democratic Party Chair. However, Dent has probably positioned himself sufficiently as a moderate to win over just enough of the more “urban” areas of the district.

To conclude, given the changes in the areas where Obama performed well in 2008, he cannot count on winning them again this time around. Is it enough to change the outcome? That is the big question. His approval ratings remain not that great and he may have lost many independents in the Philadelphia suburbs. Hence, at this point, it looks like their 20 electoral votes will go to Romney. The Democrats will manage to retain their Senate seat in the form of Bob Casey. In the House, the delegation will change from 12-7 GOP to 13-5 GOP which represents, in effect, a two seat Republican gain in the House.

Running totals thus far:
Obama 145 electoral votes to 219 for Romney;
Net gain of 2 Governors;
Net gain of 4 Senate seats, and;
Net loss of 5 House seats.

Next: New York


Shale Gas & Conventional Gas: From Pennsylvania to New Mexico


January 12-13, 2012, Lea County Event Center, Hobbs, NM, EnergyPlex Conference Series 2012

HOBBS, N.M., Dec. 20, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — On January 12 and 13, the Economic Development Corporation ofLea County and the New Mexico Tech University’s New Mexico Center for Energy Policy will kick off the EnergyPlex Conference 2012 Series with Shale Gas & Conventional Gas: From Pennsylvania to New Mexico. This conference will discuss the issues surrounding the development of shale gas using Lea County, NM and Bradford County, PA as case studies.

Panelists will address the state and national economic implications of shale and conventional oil and long-term planning strategies. Keynote speakers for lunch sessions will include U.S. Congressman Steve Pearce on Thursday and Pennsylvania State Representative Tina Pickett and New Mexico Lt. Governor John Sanchez on Friday.

Panel discussions will be comprised of industry experts and government officials who will present information on topics including: Shale Gas: A Technology Play that Changed Scarcity to Plenty; Shale Gas: Regulation and Opposition; and Natural Gas in Two Counties: Organizing for Long-Term Economic Development and Public Benefits.

“The purpose of this conference is to bring together shale gas and conventional gas producing counties to discuss the opportunities and challenges of the regulations, economics and energy security surrounding this natural resource,” says conference co-organizer, Lisa Hardison, President and CEO of the Economic Development Corporation of Lea County. Dr.Daniel Fine, Research Associate for the New Mexico Center for Energy Policy/ New Mexico Tech and co-organizer of the conference adds, “Another important element of this conference examines how new innovations in technology to produce shale gas can lower energy costs for consumers and create productive jobs.” Douglas McLinko, County Commission Chair forBradford County Pennsylvania further explains that this conference “is an exciting first step towards creating a national core of county leadership focused on shale and conventional gas.”

Participants can register for the conference through the www.energyplexnm.com website. A registration fee of $50 covers entrance into the conference, meeting materials, and two lunches.

For more information about the conference, to see a full agenda, and to register, please visit www.energyplexnm.com.

Conference Dates
January 12, 2012, 7:45 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
January 13, 2012, 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Lea County Event Center
5105 N Lovington Hwy • Hobbs, NM 88240 USA
On the Web: www.energyplexnm.com

 

SOURCE Economic Development Corporation of Lea County

Back to top

RELATED LINKS
http://www.energyplexnm.com


Analyzing the new Pennsylvania district map.


The new redrawn Pennsylvania Congressional map is out, and it’s… well. If you ever wondered whether elections have consequences, then wonder no more.

Executive summary: two of the least powerful PA Democratic Congressmen have been thrown into Thunderdome and told to fight each other; the other five PA Democrats have been, ah, reassured that their seats are safe; and the nine PA Republicans have had their seats generally tweaked and shored up to minimize any possibility of losing their seats any time soon.

And the best adjective to describe PA Democrats’ reaction to this one is probably ‘impotent.’

Read More →


Analyzing the new Pennsylvania district map.


The new redrawn Pennsylvania Congressional map is out, and it’s… well. If you ever wondered whether elections have consequences, then wonder no more.

Executive summary: two of the least powerful PA Democratic Congressmen have been thrown into Thunderdome and told to fight each other; the other five PA Democrats have been, ah, reassured that their seats are safe; and the nine PA Republicans have had their seats generally tweaked and shored up to minimize any possibility of losing their seats any time soon.

And the best adjective to describe PA Democrats’ reaction to this one is probably ‘impotent.’

Read More →


Analyzing the new Pennsylvania district map.


The new redrawn Pennsylvania Congressional map is out, and it’s… well. If you ever wondered whether elections have consequences, then wonder no more.

Executive summary: two of the least powerful PA Democratic Congressmen have been thrown into Thunderdome and told to fight each other; the other five PA Democrats have been, ah, reassured that their seats are safe; and the nine PA Republicans have had their seats generally tweaked and shored up to minimize any possibility of losing their seats any time soon.

And the best adjective to describe PA Democrats’ reaction to this one is probably ‘impotent.’

Read More →


Did 2010 create change in Kansas’ elected Republicans? – Column from “The Monitor”


The following is my article in The Monitor.  The Monitor is the re-branded name for The Citizen, and it’s the Kansas City Metro’s premier center-right print and online publication.  Make sure and bookmark KCMonitor.com for regular updates on news from Kansas, Missouri, and the Kansas City area.  Click here to learn where to find one of the 200 locations distributing this free print newspaper.

This article is re-published with permission.

Did 2010 Create Real – Or Just Expedient – Change Among Elected Republicans?

Independent voters – who are largely conservative, particularly on fiscal issues – will throw out either political party when it says one thing and does another

Also:

– Koch brothers (the wrong ones) receive a death threat;
– Major school choice progress nation-wde

May 4, 2011

by Benjamin Hodge

In 1994, Republicans captured both Houses of Congress for the first time in four decades.  Those Republicans were sent to change Washington, but Washington soon changed the Republicans, who by 2006 were functioning as a pro-life, somewhat-less socialist version of the Democratic party.

When Republicans spend like Democrats, the result is both bad policy and bad politics.  Independent voters – who are largely conservative, particularly on fiscal issues – will throw out either political party when it says one thing and does another.

Read More →