UPDATE: Chris Christie Calls for Teachers Union Official’s Dismissal


By Matt Rooney | Cross-posted at SaveJersey.com

UPDATE, 12:59 PM: Things just got more interesting for Vincent Giordano, Save Jerseyans. StateHouseSteps is reporting that Governor Christie called for his resignation/dismissal this morning at a Westfield town hall meeting…

Developing…

10:43 AM: Save Jersey was the first to call out NJEA Executive Director Vincent Giordano for his remarkably elitist remarks on Saturday’s “New Jersey Capitol Report” show. Yes, it was offensive… even for a union stooge!

You remember the quote:

“Well, you know, uh, life’s not always fair and I’m sorry about that…” (click here and listen to the clip)

It still boils my blood 48 hours later!

Mr. Giordano’s gross insensitivity to the plight of low income kids treading water in failing school districts caught the attention of national outlets, too, after Save Jersey spread the word via social media. And then the heat was on yet again for a union that’s been on the ropes since Governor Christie’s ’09 election.

So much heat, in fact, that the NJEA took a rare step yesterday afternoon: trying to explain /justify/rationalize their idiocy in a press release.

Click here to read a pdf of the full press release.

Please note that I described the release as an attempt to rationalize Mr. Giordano’s elitism; would asking for a simple apology been too much? I guess so…

Read More →


Around the U.S. in 50 Days: New Jersey


New Jersey is my home state and I consider it the California of the east coast, but things are looking up. In 2012, the political news will be a mixed bag of news and results. On the presidential front, Obama won this state in 2008 with 57% of the vote. In fact, the state has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1988. Hell, we haven’t had a Republican Senator since the 1970s. Generally, Democratic presidential candidates carry somewhere between 53% and 57% of the vote. That sounds about right for 2012, although one would venture it will be at the lower end of the range. However, New Jersey has one less electoral vote this year. While Obama’s job approval nationally hovers around the 44% mark, in New Jersey it stands at 51.3%. That is safe enough territory to give their 14 electoral votes to Obama.

Incumbent Democratic Senator Robert Menendez is up for reelection. Originally appointed to fulfill the term of Jon Corzine when he became one of the most disastrous Governors in New Jersey history, he won a full term in 2006 with 53% of the vote against Tom Kean, Jr., the son of the former Governor. In early 2011, Menendez had a job approval rating of 44%, but by early 2012, it stands in the mid 30s. Sensing vulnerabilities, the GOP has been hard pressed to find a viable candidate to take him on in 2012. But first, he will actually face a primary challenge from Gwen Diakos, a defense contractor, who until recently was a registered Republican. She is a political novice going up against a well-funded ($10 million and counting) opponent. Additionally, in his tenure as head of the DSCC, he is credited with keeping the Senate in the hands of the Democrats in 2010 despite the political mood at the time. Many other incumbent Senators who successfully defended their seats attribute that success to Menendez and have promised their financial support.

Thus far, only state senator and Christie ally Joseph Kryillos has declared his candidacy for the GOP and this sets up a little intrigue and subplot in the election. There is not exactly good blood between Menendez and Christie and Kryillos is a Christie friend and ally. As US Attorney in New Jersey, Christie initiated an investigation into some questionable practices and activities by Menendez. Although no indictments have been returned, the investigation remains active. Democrats claim the whole thing is politically motivated. At the time, it was alleged that Christie was on the Alberto Gonzalez “hit list” of US Attorneys. Suddenly, his name came off the list after the investigation against Menendez was initiated. Welcome to New Jersey politics.

Should Kryillos emerge the winner from the primary, it would be a well-funded Democrat against a Christie ally- a surrogate Christie, if you will. Polling at this point puts Kryillos about 12 points down. There are other names being mentioned and with a June primary, there is plenty of time for decisions to be made. State senator Mike Doherty has been mentioned and would appeal to the more conservative/Tea Party factions of the party. However, out of deference to Christie and GOP unity, he opted against a primary challenge, and this only enhances his chances for a run, possibly against Lautenberg should he decide to run again. Tom Kean, Jr. might present a better challenge this time around. Not short on money, the Kean name in New Jersey is akin to the Kennedy name in Massachusetts. The knock on Kean is that he is a less than energetic campaigner and personality. Hypothetical polling puts him down by 5 points to Menendez, but that may be attributable to name recognition.

There are two other names out there that bear mentioning. One is Anna Little, the Tinton Falls resident, who threw a scrare into Frank Pallone in the 2010 6th District race losing by only 16,000 votes. In fact, she managed to carry Pallone’s home Monmouth County after aligning herself with the Tea Party. The other name is former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs who has been making some political noise. He certainly has the name recognition and star quality. One scenario has Dobbs running as an independent, but that would likely steal votes from any GOP candidate and allow Menendez to win with a plurality.

With the current congressional delegation 7-6 in favor of the Democrats, the state loses a seat in the House in 2013. Prior to 2010, the delegation count was 8-5. The state has a bipartisan redistricting commission and when the final map was released and approved in December, it became quickly obvious that the Republicans had gained an advantage. With no incumbents announcing any intention to retire, it was obvious that an incumbent-incumbent race was inevitable somewhere. And since population growth in the northern part of the state was in decline or stagnating, obviously any changes would occur there. Once this was done, all the pieces fell into place.

Of the twelve new districts, five have absolutely no interest- the 1st, 2nd, 8th, 10th, and 12th- three Democrats and two Republicans. Originally the most vulnerable Republican was freshman John Runyan in the 3rd District. However, his district became more favorable to the GOP when rural areas of Burlington County were added and Democratic Cherry Hill was removed. Although not likely out of the woods yet, he became a little safer. Likewise, Chris Smith, another Republican, was made safer when his main opponent was drawn out of his area.

In the 6th District, Frank Pallone appears safe and even safer if Little opts for a Senate run, although she has also expressed interest in another run at Pallone. Leonard Lance, the Republican in the 7th District, originally faced a couple of serious challengers, but both are now out for different reasons. Jun Choi was drawn out of the district while Ed Potosnak, who faced off against and lost to Lance in 2010, withdrew to accept a job with the New Jersey League of Conservation Voters. I mention Rush Holt in the 12th District only because challenger Ed Beck, a South Brunswick businessman, has been gaining some ground and notice for the GOP. That leaves the 5th and 9th districts.

Steve Rothman, a Democrat, was drawn into a potential contest against Republican incumbent Scott Garrett in the 5th District. Looking at that district, the territory clearly favors Garrett. The 5th stretches along the northern border with New York wrapping around to the Pennsylvania border to the west. It is considered New Jersey’s hinterlands- perfect Republican territory. When redistricted, it picked up some of Rothman’s territory, but not enough to alter its Republican nature. Rothman would be hard-pressed to win over voters in these areas. Instead, Rothman decided to run in the neighboring 9th District. Rothman’s home base of Teaneck has much more in common with the Hackensack-based 9th District held by Democrat Bill Pascrell. Of course, that sets up a Democratic primary between Pascrell and Rothman. That leaves Terry Duffy or Adam Gussan to run against Garrett in the 5th, and likely lose. Thus, the good news out of New Jersey for the GOP is a new delegation count of 6-6, a one seat Democratic loss.

In a sense, the Democratic belly aching illustrates their hypocrisy. Their main argument is that a 6-6 split is not truly representative of New Jersey’s blue status. However, it was a Democrat- Steve Rothman- who decided not to go head-to-head against a Republican when he had the chance. It is the Democratic Party that cannot field a viable candidate in the 2nd, 3rd, or 5th districts, nor in those central parts of the state, including Ocean County, a growing Republican bastion. It is the Democratic strongholds of the northern part of the state that have shown the greatest population losses over the decade. While it may be true that to win statewide all one need do is win six or seven northern counties, that is not true at the congressional district level. It proves that even sensible Democrats will flee from excessive taxation and regulation which have characterized New Jersey under successive Democratic administrations.

To conclude, Obama claims their 14 electoral votes while Menendez become the default choice as Senator. However, the Democrats lose a seat in the congressional delegation representing a one seat GOP gain.

Running totals thus far:
Obama with 217 electoral votes to 223 to the GOP;
net gain of 2 Governors;
net gain of 4 Senate seats;
net loss of 6 House seats.

Next: Delaware, Maryland and DC


Teachers Union Leader to Poor Families: “Life’s Not Always Fair”


By Matt Rooney | Cross-posted at SaveJersey.com

I know we’re focused on “higher” education today at the blog, Save Jerseyans, but New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) Executive Director Vincent Giordano really stepped in it this weekend. Big time.

He appeared on Saturday’s NJTV “New Jersey Capitol Report” to discuss recent developments in the state’s never-ending education debate. When questioned about the fairness of New Jersey’s low income families being financially unable to afford the option of moving their children to better performing schools, Mr. Giordano was cold, dismissive, and completely unsympathetic to their plight.

The exact quote?

“Well, you know, uh, life’s not always fair and I’m sorry about that…” (click here and listen to the clip)

No kidding! At least he’s “sorry.”

I am, too.

Governor Christie recently pegged Mr. Giordano’s salary at $550,000 per year; the NJEA claims he’s only making $300,000.

I think he’s overpaid either way, Save Jerseyans.

And his “hey, they can technically transfer” argument is pure sophistry.

The “choice” he alludes to is illusory. Sure, it’s easy to send your kid to an academically and culturally stronger school when you earn $300,000 from public union dues. The 1%, including President and Mrs. Obama. But for the rest of us? School choice means scrimping and saving to pay both private school tuition AND property tax levies tied to education funding.

It’s a false choice, Save Jerseyans. Shame on Mr. Giordano for pretending otherwise.

__________________

Matt Rooney is a New Jersey attorney, conservative commentator, and the founder & Blogger-in-Chief of New Jersey’s #1 conservative blog, Save Jersey. You can learn more about Matt and the Christie Revolution by visiting today!


Lisa Jackon has a Bridge to Sell You


By Matt Rooney | Cross-posted at SaveJersey.com

Here’s your daily dose of political levity, Save Jerseyans.

President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator and the former New Jersey Deptartment of Environmental Protection (DEP) Commissioner under Jon Corzine (quite a resume, huh?), Lisa Jackson, is returning to New Jersey later this month. She has openly accused Congressional Republicans of endangering millions of lives for opposing her draconian measures.

For what, pray tell?

The answer is in today’s AC Press

Read More →


Has Romney Sidelined Christie Over the Tax Records Issue?


By: Brian McGovern | Cross-posted at SaveJersey.com

The Republican Primary battle has been heating up in the first in the south state of South Carolina over the last week with multiple debates and nasty ads flying back and forth between the candidates. My notable observation has been the odd absence of one of Mitt Romney’s most famous supporters, Governor Chris Christie.

In the last two primary states, Governor Christie has been in the forefront of the Romney campaign strategy. He brought his Jersey attitude with him to Iowa, a state where the Romney campaign was barely playing until a mere two weeks before the primary, and helped the presumptive nominee score a tied-for-first win that was seemingly out of no where. Then in New Hampshire Christie against made appearances with Romney as his support in the Granite State continued to grow leading up to primary day.


So now, as we close in on poll openings in South Carolina, the state where the pundits so often claim that Republican nominees are chosen, why is the Governor suddenly absent from the stage? It cannot be for a lack of Christie’s popularity in South Carolina, the red southern state would likely be a prime location for Christie’s aggressive attitude at otherwise tame Romney events. It also is unlikely to be the Governor’s schedule in New Jersey. Over the last few days Christie has been doing town hall meetings in New Jersey while heading to New York in the mornings and evenings to do shows like Hannity, Morning Joe, the Today Show, and Fox & Friends, just to name a few. So what could it be then?

Two words: Income taxes.

The topic has been plaguing the Romney campaign for over a week. Opponents from both parties have been demanding that Mitt release his personal income tax records, something his father became known for back in the 1960s when he ran for President. In two debates this week Romney gave terribly dodgy answers to personal tax related questions, so bad that if I were the former Governor, I would have fired the handler responsible for crafting that answer immediately this morning.

Governor Christie has publicly stated, when on television presumably to be a surrogate, that Romney should get his records out there in the open for everyone to see, if for no other reason so that the campaign can finally move past the issue. With every new interview, Christie seems to reiterate the point, while other Romney spokesmen seem to just tow the campaign line that the records will be released in April after the nomination is locked up.

One has to wonder whether this obvious disagreement in strategy may have been enough for the Romney camp to sideline Christie for the time being while the attention surrounding Romney’s wealth and tax rate settles. Unfortunately, this decision may have been made to their detriment. Romney has let an 18 point lead over Newt Gingrich drop to a statistical tie. Christie may have been the catalyst needed to get the momentum going again, but in all likelihood now it would be too late. Hopefully they have the sense to bring Governor Christie back on stage for Florida, which could very well be the deciding state in the schedule.


Christie’s Tax Cut Provides Winning Contrast to Democrat-style Class Warfare


By Matt Rooney | Cross-Posted at The Save Jersey Blog

How many times have we heard the old refrain?

Around the water cooler or while stranded at your cousin’s birthday party: “Com’on! They’re all the same! There’s no difference between Democrats and Republicans! It doesn’t matter which you crooked party you vote for!”

Too often your cranky Aunt Sue is right, Save Jerseyans. That’s why bipartisanship for bipartisanship’s sake doesn’t win elections. Americans don’t care if their leaders get along; if they truly preferred harmony and accord in the public arena, then “reality” television shows like MTV’s Jersey Shore wouldn’t be ratings blockbusters. Voters tell pollsters they like peace, want it, need it, and so on. No one wants other people to think they’re turned on by conflict! It’s not polite or proper, right? But rest assured that what the fickle masses are really craving is a compelling contrast between the major parties.

In yesterday’s ‘State of the State’ address, Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ) took one gigantic step towards securing his own reelection by providing such a contrast.

The centerpiece of the Governor’s 2012 plan is an across-the-board 10% income tax cut at a time when other populous states are hiking their rates rates.

God knows this is welcome news. The Garden State’s tax burden is among the worst in the nation and income taxes rates are no exception, ranging from 1.4% for residents earning only $20,000 annually all the way up to 8.97% for residents bringing home $500,000 or more by year’s end. Visit the treasury department to see where you fall.  According to the Tax Foundation, ”New Jersey’s 2008 state-level individual income tax collections were $1,457 per person, which ranked 6th highest nationally.”

The Governor’s plan will consequently reap significant benefits for every single New Jersey taxpayer. That includes the single working mother on your block and the successful business owner down the street, both of whom would see tangible relief in a bad ecomony. Compare this approach with that of a major economic competitor, New York State, where Andrew Cuomo is raising taxes from 150-to-200% on New Yorkers earning less than $100,000 while those earning over $1 million are slated for a tax cut. How can New York businesses recruit with that kind of a tax structure as an impediment?

New Jersey Democrats aren’t any more original than their Empire State counterparts. Less so, if we’re being honest. They’re already attacking Christie’s plan for providing too little relief  to low income residents. I look forward to fat cat Democrat legislators like Senate President Sweeney trying to convince young families that a few extra hundred dollars come tax time is chump change not worth keeping! And the Sweeney-Oliver proposal for 2012 is more astounding evidence of advanced tone-deafness: a massive 17% increase to the cost of doing business in New Jersey. If this plan wins out, businessmen trying to choose between Manhattan and Hoboken for a new expansion will continue to opt for Pennsylvania or North Carolina instead… or perhaps even the murky bottom of the Hudson River? Of course, I wouldn’t be surprised if the treasury department responded by hiring professional divers.

I only hope that the Christie cut makes it to the surface. Whether he can get his 10% tax cut past a solidly-Democrat state legislature is an open question, even for a man famous for inter-party miracles. It’s helpful that Americans are rapidly tiring of the Democrat Party’s cynical class warfare tactics. My fellow New Jerseyans are no exceptions. Sadly, redistricting virtually guaranteed Democrat legislative dominance for another decade by shielding incumbents from popular sentiment in embarrassingly gerrymandered districts. Bottom line: we may be treading water for awhile until real tax reform is won.

But the Governor’s proposal is hardly a fruitless endeavor even in the short term. By setting forth a bold tax reform proposal, Chris Christie is giving New Jersey voters a clear rationale to return him to Trenton next November. Taxpayers will face down an unambiguous choice in the polling booth: whether to (1) reelect a principled incumbent Governor who believes in New Jersey’s ability to generate prosperity, or (2) roll the dice on a Democrat challenger who believes in Trenton’s ability to spend your money better than you.

I’m confident we’ll make the right decision in two year’s time, just as I’m confident that growing hosts of politicians around the country will rely on Governor Christie’s courageous example in the months and years ahead. More than any other Republican leader out there today, Chris Christie continues to provide the substantive contrast we need to win the battle for America’s future. God bless him for it.

________

Matt Rooney is a New Jersey attorney, conservative activist and the founder & Blogger-in-Chief of New Jersey’s #1 conservative blog, Save Jersey. You can learn more about Matt and the Christie Revolution by visiting today!


NJ Legislature Rule Number One: Prioritize The Uncecessary


gay marriage, priority number one?This week the NJ legislature began it’s new session.  Among the most important issues for New Jersey today:  Uneployment well above the national average, failing inner-city schools, astronomical property tax rates, Vinny leaving the Jersey Shore… All legitimate concerns say the NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney but what New Jersey needs to focus on now is… gay marriage?

Sweeney said he wants the bill to be sent to committees for vetting “right away” and expects the measure be ready for full legislative votes by March.

This is another political stunt by the Democrats to take the spotlight off of Governor Christie’s prioritization to tackle the real problems New Jersey faces.

Let’s not forget to mention that this bill came up for a vote during the Jon Corzine lame duck session, and failed.  And if the Democrats had a brief moment of amnesia, the Governor has repeatedly vowed to veto any such legislation [video]. In 2006, the NJ Supreme Court “directed the state to provide same-sex couples with marriage rights or their equivalent” and the legislature answered with a civil union bill.  Equal rights, right? Now, in 2012, the LGBT lobby wants to take their quest for “equal rights” to redefine the term marriage. Setting aside my deep disagreement with this idea for a moment.  Why are 7 judges and a few dozen legislators making decisions to remove a centuries old institution?  Shouldn’t this be decided by the voters?

Governor Christie agrees.  In 2009 after his election he said:

If societal change like that is to occur. It has to be approved by the voters, by the people of this state. Not by 7 men or women in black robes and certainly not by 120 people in the state legislature.  It should have to be done, if its going to be done, it has to be done by the voters.  Not by elected or appointed people.

Before allowing the Democratic leadership to whip their caucus into voting on such a ”significant, historic societal change” that they may not subscribe to, Governor Christie should announce once again, he will veto any legislation and that this should be put on a public referendum. Thirty-one other states have decided to let their citizens decide same sex marriage laws.  If New Jersey wants “marriage equality” then the people should do it the most democratic way possible. Until that happens, the legislature should be focusing on the real problems facing New Jersey.  Like will Vinny get over his anxiety and return to Seaside before the summer ends.

Crossposted at http://www.billmurphyblog.com 


Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) Scares Off Steve Rothman


You know who had a really good Christmas? Rep. Scott Garrett had a GREAT Christmas.

Garrett, who Erick noted could have had a raw deal from NJ Republicans, wound up getting a very friendly district (R+4 and kept most of Warren and Sussex County which account for the lion’s share of his Republican votes) and then earlier tonight wound up not having an incumbent Democrat to fight in the district as earlier tonight liberal Rep. Steve Rothman decided to challenge Rep. Bill Pascrell in June rather than face the wrath of Tea Party Republicans in Northern New Jersey.

What does this mean for NJ’s 2012 cycle? Well it will mean that Garrett will probably wind up with a Democrat challenger who has no real shot at winning, the rest of the NJ delegation will probably look the same with the loss of either Rothman or Pascrell after June (smart money is on Rothman losing his bid as Pascrell has friends throughout the Bergen County machine), and the NJ Senate seat being a lock for Menendez unless a good Republican can step up and really challenge Menendez.


Will New Jersey Oust Scott Garrett?


Scott Garrett, the solidly conservative Congressman from New Jersey may be on the verge of getting a raw deal thanks to a bipartisan redistricting commission in New Jersey. Garrett could be the one Republican thrown into a district with a Democrat. Some background is here.

This is unfortunate because his district is starkly different from the rest of the state. He’s got small and mid-sized cities, towns and rural areas – pretty much everything else in New Jersey is either suburban or urban. It’s basically an “L” in the western & northern part of the state. So to merge with another district, the new district would have to entail the suburban New York areas – resulting in a rather bizarre gerrymander. The latest rumor is that Garrett will be put into a district with Steve Rothman – a domestic liberal and foreign policy hawk who can raise a ton of cash if he’s in a competitive race since he’s on the Appropriations Committee and is very well liked by pro-Israel donors. Garrett can obviously raise money, too, but why should someone who can help candidates around the country be forced into an expensive fight against a strong Dem when Cong. Lance would make much more sense to be merged in with a Democrat given the various existing constituencies?

Read More →


Will New Jersey Oust Scott Garrett?


Scott Garrett, the solidly conservative Congressman from New Jersey may be on the verge of getting a raw deal thanks to a bipartisan redistricting commission in New Jersey. Garrett could be the one Republican thrown into a district with a Democrat. Some background is here.

This is unfortunate because his district is starkly different from the rest of the state. He’s got small and mid-sized cities, towns and rural areas – pretty much everything else in New Jersey is either suburban or urban. It’s basically an “L” in the western & northern part of the state. So to merge with another district, the new district would have to entail the suburban New York areas – resulting in a rather bizarre gerrymander. The latest rumor is that Garrett will be put into a district with Steve Rothman – a domestic liberal and foreign policy hawk who can raise a ton of cash if he’s in a competitive race since he’s on the Appropriations Committee and is very well liked by pro-Israel donors. Garrett can obviously raise money, too, but why should someone who can help candidates around the country be forced into an expensive fight against a strong Dem when Cong. Lance would make much more sense to be merged in with a Democrat given the various existing constituencies?

Read More →