Immoral Taxation


There were several comments last night that led me to this post, including Perry’s comments about the SS Ponzi Scheme, Cain’s comment about God and taxes, and then of course… the undebated topic of the death tax.

First of all, Cain was right when he suggested that if God requires 10%, shouldn’t the government be happy with 9%.  I think his 9-9-9 plan would be a fantastic goal if we can work our way back down to that, but we won’t be able to get there immediately.  There’s still too much current debt to deal with.  I do believe that the idea of the government requiring over 10% is immoral and unnecessary, and that once government crosses that line, it has become too big for its britches.  That should have been a hint to our leaders years ago that we were headed down a slippery slope.

Secondly, Perry straight-up told it like it is.  It is a lie.  Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme.  It is immoral.  And how dare the government try to convince us that we’re paying into a system that can hold water.  We’re past the point of counting the leaks, there’s now not even any water left!  Anyone who thinks they can save that is smoking something.

Thirdly, if you didn’t think we had an immoral tax system already, try on the death tax for size.  After the government has taxed you back and forth on a million different things repeatedly, the government then claims a large percentage of what you own after you die.  Now that’s true freedom.  That’s what it means to be an American.  Work hard… and then lose it all.  Maybe I should start smoking something…

Finally, for kicks, think about the property tax system.  What are property taxes?  For that matter, what are taxes?  Tribute, right?  A token towards the government that allows and provides for free commerce and free market.  And property taxes are… tribute?  Rent?  The government doesn’t deserve any sort of property tax because it was never intended to be.  Property belongs to you, me, and our neighbors.  Property taxes are immoral and support a feudal system.  Don’t believe me?  What happens if you don’t pay your property taxes?  The government can … drumroll please… take it from you!

So let me sum up: The tax system is immoral.  The government should need no more than 10%.  Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme.  The death tax should get the death penalty.  And… property taxes are the first step to feudalism and service to the god that is government.


The Grave Robbers’ Union


Stealing candy from a baby, mugging a blind person, and knocking over the disabled are examples of things so despicable,  we use these examples to describe a thoroughly immoral person.  This is because we have a norm in this culture which condemns victimizing the weakest in society for financial gain.  The Democratic Party has embraced this complete lack of a philosophical moral compass in order to move capital from the vulnerable to fund their patronage of their special interests.  What can be more defenseless than a corpse?  Most recently, these politicians have tried to make political hay of the tax bill because of the death/estate tax.  They want dead people to pay more of their fair share.  The Party has decided that crawling into the graves of the recently deceased in order to pry the gold fillings from the teeth of dead people is open game.   They’ve come up with some absolutely disgusting excuses for their selfish, power-hungry behavior.

My congressman, regrettably, is a far left machine politician by the name of Keith Ellison, D-MN.  He represents the Democratic Party and its public sector thugs from the city of Minneapolis.  Ellison is furious because the estate tax doesn’t rob dead people enough.  He believes the false narrative that the accumulation of wealth by individuals and families is suspect.  The only way they could possibly have amassed capital is through illegitimate means, namely hiding their money from taxation.

Ellison wrote in his congressional blog:

“Double Taxation Critique is a Myth”

“Contrary to arguments that the estate tax is unfair because it is double taxation, the estate tax system is a fair one.  In fact, much of the wealth accumulated in many estates of this size has never been taxed.  This is because investment gains are not taxed until an investment is sold.  When an investment is not sold during someone’s lifetime, the gains on that investment are never taxed.  The estate tax steps in to address this issue, but is limited to only very wealth estates.”

The number of distortions buried within this statement are breathtaking.  First, he asserts that “most of the wealth accumulated in many estates are not taxed until an investment is sold.”  This premise isn’t backed up with any kind of evidence.  It is asserted as true simply because the leftist narrative argues that capital accumulation is inherently stolen, and therefore untaxed.  Most wealth comes from profits that accrue through efforts, work.  Therefore the initial investments are already taxed as income.  Furthermore, the profits on investments are taxed, as income.  Ellison is trying to thread the needle by arguing that a business investment’s market value of the assets is not taxed as they appreciate.  These capital investments are only taxed when the money is realized from the sale.  As a result, these capital accumulations, from taxed money, have a difference which isn’t subject to the taxman and he thinks it should.

Ellison believes these capital increases are ‘free money’ to the inheritor and they are never taxed during the deceased’s lifetime.  The horror of it all.  Ellison sees this increase in the investment as a kind of ‘stealing’ from the government because it was never subject to his greedy little paws.  So, instead of singling out the actual capital appreciation, Ellison wants every single part of the estate taxed at a higher level, just to ‘get’ this small part that isn’t realized and isn’t actually real upon death of the owner.  Ellison seethes with the injustice of a hard-working father and mother passing down their savings to their family.  If even a mere 10% of the estate is gained through appreciation, the entire estate should be raped at a 45% rate.  This is what Ellison calls ‘fair.’

Ellison furthers this class warfare scenario by attempting to divide and conquer.  His insistance that only ‘very wealthy estates’ would see a tax burden is relative.  The $5 million floor is too high.  Ellison believes $3.5 million would ‘get’ more of those greedy, evil capitalists and the money they cling to so bitterly.  Perhaps at one time $3.5 million was a huge amount of money, but as a result of the rampant inflation of Keynesian economic policies and the collectivists’ insistance of cheap money, that number places small, family owned businesses and farms within his taxing zone.  After considering property values, inventory, equipment, and all other manner of assets in a small business, this number reaches deep into the very heart of small business America.

Not that Ellison cares.  All that money is out there for the taking.  If he can just sway enough people to help him swipe the watch off grandpa’s wrist for sale at a public auction, he’s gained more political assets to pay off his union thugs and environmental whackos for another year.

My New Yorker carpetbagging senator, the Unfunny Comic, Al Franken, thinks this is just too unfair as well.  Franken joined a bunch of class envy-warriors in June to rob dead people at increasingly higher rates, ostenstibly to teach them a lesson.  Franken, his fellow Socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and three other America Worsters proposed a tax package that would subsequently ‘reach back’ in time to punish those hateful people who cheated the taxman by dying in 2010.

  1. Reinstating the federal estate tax retroactively to January 1, 2010, with a $3.5 million estate tax exemption and initial 45% estate tax rate (the exemption and tax rate that were in effect in 2009).
  2. For estates valued above $10 million and below $50 million, a 50% estate tax rate.
  3. For estates valued above $50 million, a 55% estate tax rate.
  4. For estates valued above $500 million, a 10% surtax.

So, what would the effect of this kind of legislation have upon the American economy.  Well, the class warriors argue this would somehow help the middle class.  Franken argues on the Senate floor, “This proposal will help ease the burden of middle class families who are now expected to close the budget gap.”  How?  Franken has voted for increased spending by the federal government that exceeds anything ever imagined.  The federal deficit has grown to over a trillion dollars every year.  How is a few billion going to help the middle class when Franken’s Democratic/Socialist Worker’s Party cannot stop spending everything in sight.

Franken believes the confiscation of capital will lower the capital holdings of the families of dead people which will increase the number of lower income and middle class as a percentage of the population.  It will do nothing to increase the income of other people, it just lowers the bar for those who have accumulated capital, thereby making it more equal.

What would actually have happened if the Vermont socialist and the New York carpetbagger had their way was the markets would be flooded with sales of investments to pay off excessive tax bills.  The markets would become undercapitalized and have to shrink.  The businesses would be forced to close shops and factories and layoff workers.  The number of unemployed poor and middle class Americans would grow.  The capital stolen from the pockets of dead people would pay off government unions and social welfare advocates.  This capital would just become pocket money for the Democratic Party hacks to further bribe more voters and spread their misinformation schemes on public airwaves.

No one would get richer.  Everyone would get poorer.  The pie would shrink.  The cacophony of the left would only grow louder, which is really what they want.

The class enviers are not done.  They are absolutely philosophically committed to screwing the dead as much as they can.  Representative Betty McCollum, D-Saint Paul of the Minnesota Fourth Congressional District pushes this ‘eat the rich’ narrative with a barely coherent call for an increase in the death tax.

“This is a deal that will continue to explode the deficit while the rich get richer and struggling middle class families get crumbs. The Republicans successfully held unemployed Americans hostage to give even more tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires. This plan is irresponsible, and I will oppose it.”

So, McCollum, barely cognizant of reality in the best of times, believes that dead people are the real problem with the budget.  Dead people are greedily ‘stealing’ the prosperity of the living.  They are reaching out from the grave to explode the budget.  Her votes to increase the federal budget by 30% aren’t the problem.  It isn’t her spending Chinese borrowed money on dog parks and watercolor art classes that caused these budget issues.  It’s the mean, maniacal dead who have more than their fair share.

Meanwhile, the poor working class (public sector unions) and middle class (public educators) are getting the raw deal.  They have to work over 180 days a year while accruing lifetime pension and health care benefits for thirty years past retirement.  They must struggle with paid union meetings and educational opportunities, which increase their pay scale.  These poor, put-upon classes will be forced to wait until age 60 to move to Arizona and Florida while milking the Minnesota system.  How terrible it is for her pet special interests to have to wait for us to fund their leisure.

Betty wants us to climb into the grave, rip the inherited, (therefore untaxed) engagement ring off grandma’s finger, fish the gold moneyclip out of grandpa’s pocket (gift from his company retirement and therefore untaxed), and if necessary the cuff links (inherited gift, once again untaxed) to fund her political allies’ piggish ways.  You see, the government, in Betty’s eyes, is the only fair arbitor of economic prosperity.  Certainly the market and the hard work of the individual cannot be taken into account.  We must descend into madness robbing graves and marginalizing our fellow citizens in order to grow political power.

We are seeing a Democratic Party that has become so corrupt and so money hungry, the very idea of moral behavior escapes them.  Not too many years ago, there were Democrats who believed in capitalism and the individual worth of human work.  It wasn’t so long ago that a Democrat could actually say proudly they believed in limited government involvement in other people’s lives.  That is no longer truth.  The escapees from the Marxist asylum of academia have taken control.  They are busy stealing from everyone who isn’t a bona fide ally and to hell with the rest of us.  We are witnessing a kind of economic thuggery which is dangerous and inept.  This kind of shallow thinking and deceptive rhetoric are destroying our economy, our government, and our freedom.  We are living in sad times indeed.

Crossposted at Looktruenorth.com


Today in Washington – December 14, 2010


Taxes and spending are on the House and Senate agenda for today.  After the Senate passes the President’s tax deal, the House may blow up the compromise by changing the Death Tax.  Later this week, Senate appropriators are reportedly trying to sneak through a massive new Omnibus spending bill.  They are planning on offering an Omnibus Spending bill as a complete substitute for the Continuing Resolution, a bill to fund the federal government at 2010 levels with some changes.  The Omnibus Spending bill was secretly negotiated between House Democrat Appropriators and some Senate Republican Appropriators as a last ditch effort to pass some earmarks and increase spending for fiscal year 2011.  Conservatives are also concerned that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) may try to bring up the New START Treaty early next week.

Today, the Senate resumes debate of the tax compromise bill as an amendment to H.R.4853.  Senators Kid Bond (R-MO) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) will give farewell speeches later today.  The Senate is expected to complete work on the tax measure today or tomorrow, then they must take up an end of year spending bill before the current measure runs out at the end of the week.  The House has 16 Suspension votes scheduled for today and will take up the Senate passed tax bill later this week.

Read More →


Today in Washington – December 14, 2010


Taxes and spending are on the House and Senate agenda for today.  After the Senate passes the President’s tax deal, the House may blow up the compromise by changing the Death Tax.  Later this week, Senate appropriators are reportedly trying to sneak through a massive new Omnibus spending bill.  They are planning on offering an Omnibus Spending bill as a complete substitute for the Continuing Resolution, a bill to fund the federal government at 2010 levels with some changes.  The Omnibus Spending bill was secretly negotiated between House Democrat Appropriators and some Senate Republican Appropriators as a last ditch effort to pass some earmarks and increase spending for fiscal year 2011.  Conservatives are also concerned that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) may try to bring up the New START Treaty early next week.

Today, the Senate resumes debate of the tax compromise bill as an amendment to H.R.4853.  Senators Kid Bond (R-MO) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) will give farewell speeches later today.  The Senate is expected to complete work on the tax measure today or tomorrow, then they must take up an end of year spending bill before the current measure runs out at the end of the week.  The House has 16 Suspension votes scheduled for today and will take up the Senate passed tax bill later this week.

Read More →


Brad Sherman (D, CA): most tone-deaf Congressman?


I know that this would be a title with a lot of contenders, but let’s look at the evidence.  It’s not because he’s for a death tax: that’s just ordinary tone-deafness, coupled with the standard Democratic politician’s assumption that it was all really their money all along, and they were just letting individual citizens hold on to it for a while.  It’s not even that Congressman Sherman is demanding, in exchange for his vote, that the negotiated rate of 35%  over 5 million (far too high, by the way) be retroactively applied to 2010.

It’s that the man apparently expects anybody sane to take him up on his offer.  The Politico article delicately put the likelihood that Republicans would agree to this as being ‘questionable;’ the actual response from the GOP would be far earthier, and a good deal more direct.  You might remember that in 2009 a trial balloon was floated to keep the 2010 death tax at 45% over 3.5 million; it got shot down in the Senate.  The current number essentially duplicates the 2009 death tax rate, and echos a compromise put together by Senators Kyl and Lincoln earlier in the year; and if the tax compromise doesn’t pass the rate goes to 55% over 1 million in January.  The White House does not want to explain that to the American people.  Brad Sherman, on the other hand, is a five-term Congressman from a double-digit partisan district, which means that he was about due to start Embracing The Crazy anyway*.  So, probably no real surprises here.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*I’m not the sort who will give a Troofer like Alex Jones traffic, but here’s a link to the search results that’ll show the Congressman appearing on Jones’ show to explain away his Embrace Of The Crazy… which pretty much tells you everything that you need to know, right there.


Brad Sherman (D, CA): most tone-deaf Congressman?


I know that this would be a title with a lot of contenders, but let’s look at the evidence.  It’s not because he’s for a death tax: that’s just ordinary tone-deafness, coupled with the standard Democratic politician’s assumption that it was all really their money all along, and they were just letting individual citizens hold on to it for a while.  It’s not even that Congressman Sherman is demanding, in exchange for his vote, that the negotiated rate of 35%  over 5 million (far too high, by the way) be retroactively applied to 2010.

It’s that the man apparently expects anybody sane to take him up on his offer.  The Politico article delicately put the likelihood that Republicans would agree to this as being ‘questionable;’ the actual response from the GOP would be far earthier, and a good deal more direct.  You might remember that in 2009 a trial balloon was floated to keep the 2010 death tax at 45% over 3.5 million; it got shot down in the Senate.  The current number essentially duplicates the 2009 death tax rate, and echos a compromise put together by Senators Kyl and Lincoln earlier in the year; and if the tax compromise doesn’t pass the rate goes to 55% over 1 million in January.  The White House does not want to explain that to the American people.  Brad Sherman, on the other hand, is a five-term Congressman from a double-digit partisan district, which means that he was about due to start Embracing The Crazy anyway*.  So, probably no real surprises here.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*I’m not the sort who will give a Troofer like Alex Jones traffic, but here’s a link to the search results that’ll show the Congressman appearing on Jones’ show to explain away his Embrace Of The Crazy… which pretty much tells you everything that you need to know, right there.


Today in Washington – July 22, 2010


So much for President Obama’s promises of economic stimulus.  The New York Times reports that moments after the President signed a new law to expand regulation over the financial sector, one business group complained that the new law will discourage job growth.

The Business Roundtable complained in a statement that the law “takes our country in the wrong direction” and may discourage investment and job growth, echoing concerns made by the United States Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations.

I wonder how many jobs the President destroyed or failed to create with this new law?  The House is voting on two postponed suspension bills, an extension of unemployment benefits (H.R. 4213), and the “Multiple Peril Insurance Act.”  The Senate is scheduled to vote on H.J. Res. 83, a joint resolution approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and S.Res. 591, a resolution recognizing and honoring the 20th anniversary of the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  After those votes the Senate will resume consideration of the “Small Business Jobs” bill.

Read More →


Today in Washington – July 22, 2010


So much for President Obama’s promises of economic stimulus.  The New York Times reports that moments after the President signed a new law to expand regulation over the financial sector, one business group complained that the new law will discourage job growth.

The Business Roundtable complained in a statement that the law “takes our country in the wrong direction” and may discourage investment and job growth, echoing concerns made by the United States Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations.

I wonder how many jobs the President destroyed or failed to create with this new law?  The House is voting on two postponed suspension bills, an extension of unemployment benefits (H.R. 4213), and the “Multiple Peril Insurance Act.”  The Senate is scheduled to vote on H.J. Res. 83, a joint resolution approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and S.Res. 591, a resolution recognizing and honoring the 20th anniversary of the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  After those votes the Senate will resume consideration of the “Small Business Jobs” bill.

Read More →


Why Eliminating the Death Tax Matters to You


Most of us, myself included, think the death tax is a burden only for wealthy people who get left exorbitant amounts of money. The following article from the Heritage Foundation explains how it affects everyone, as wealthy people invest less (which means less businesses and jobs) and inherited businesses are often sold or closed, because the people inheriting it don’t have the outright money to pay the death tax…it is all tied up in the business.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/07/the-economic-case-against-the-death-tax

Annmarie Spiciarich is a retired police sergeant. She has a MA in Forensic Psychology, with a certificate in Terrorism from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. She currently works as a community mental health counselor at a suicide hotline.
Check out her website and contact her at:
www.NotWithoutRepresentation.com or her blog at http://NotWithoutRepresentation.blogspot.com.

Category: , , , ,

Planet Albany to run out of money in June (plus, news from its moon, David Paterson)


Albany (the capital of New York, the Empire State) has been called “Planet Albany”, as in, ‘What kind of planet are these legislators on?”

From Capitol Confidential:

Megna: We’re out of money in June
April 9, 2010 at 3:01 pm by Rick Karlin
Gov. Paterson’s Budget Director Robert Megna just held a press briefing at the Capitol and he reiterated the governor’s earlier prediction that the state will basically run out of cash in early June. “Even with hitting our (revenue) projections we run out of money the first week of June,” Megna said explaining that period marks a troubling convergence: School aid payments, including the $2.1 billion that were delayed last month, are due as are Medicaid reimbursements .

At the same time, the state by then won’t have tallied all of its income and sales tax revenue and it will have just finished paying out income tax refunds in May.

“Our cash flow problems are unprecedented,” said Megna, who said he couldn’t rule out the prospect of some short term borrowing — a practice that was supposed to have disappeared with budget reforms in the early 1990s.

Wonderful. A typical comment:

The unions will not make concessions adequate for what NY needs. Paterson will not do what is necessary. The legislature will do nothing as usual. This IS Albany.
Comment by Rolio — April 10th, 2010 @ 8:03 am

Here’s a big example of what’s bankrupting New York–the teachers unions–from Sunday’s New York Post:

NY school spending doesn’t add up
Why it’s out of control
By Raymond J. Keating
Posted: 2:36 AM, April 11, 2010
During the state budget crisis, lawmakers moan that there’s simply nothing that can be cut. Yet during the fat times, the budget increased at rates far greater than inflation. Begging the question — why does it cost so much more to run New York than it did 10 years ago?

Let’s take just one category, spending on public schools, where the numbers are staggering — and, from a taxpayer’s perspective, deeply distressing.
(…)
Total per-pupil public school spending hit $19,350 in 2008-09, up from $10,356 in 1998-99. Unsurprisingly, New York’s spending is the most lavish compared to the other states. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, no other state spent more than New York, which exceeded the US average by 66%.
(…)
New York, by the way, had the second-highest average public school teacher salary among the states in 2008-09, at $64,336 — which exceeds the US average by 21%.

NYS public employees recently got 4% pay raises. The NY Daily News said it was no April Fools joke:

Pay raises for state workers is no April Fool’s Day joke for Gov. Paterson
Bill Hammond

Friday, April 2nd 2010, 4:00 AM
If you run into any state workers today, be sure to congratulate them on the 4% raises they just got – despite the worst fiscal crisis to slam New York in generation.

They darn well ought to thank you back, because the rest of us are going to suffer for their good fortune.

That nice bump for 120,000 unionized employees will cost Albany $433 million it simply doesn’t have right now, given the gaping $9 billion hole in its budget.
(…)
The two main unions for state workers – the Civil Service Employees Association and the Public Employees Federation – were predictably unmoved. They flatly refuse to discuss giving up anything – not the raises averaging $2,560 per member, not their Cadillac health insurance for life, not their plush pensions, not their short work week, generous overtime or copious days off.
(…)
Paterson and legislative leaders should be demanding with one voice that CSEA and PEF renegotiate contracts that make no sense in a major recession. They should put layoffs back on the table. And they should get ready declare a fiscal emergency and freeze pay by statute if the unions don’t talk turkey.

There’s been a little kerfluffle about that. The NYS fiscal year ends March 31st, and the new budget must be ready by April 1st. It’s almost always late, and an emergency bill is required. From the New York Times:

Paterson Says He’ll Suspend Pay Raises for Workers
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and JEREMY W. PETERS
Published: April 8, 2010
ALBANY — Gov. David A. Paterson said Thursday that he would unilaterally withhold scheduled pay raises for thousands of state workers because New York had too little cash to afford them.

The decision, which public employee unions are likely to challenge in court, came after union leaders refused to renegotiate a contract with the state that granted union workers a 4 percent raise beginning on April 1.

The governor and state lawmakers are struggling to close a $9 billion state budget gap and have yet to agree on a new budget, which is now more than a week overdue. A series of emergency bills, containing short-term appropriations for essential government functions, have kept the state in business since the fiscal year ended on March 31.

Mr. Paterson will suspend the raises by including no money for them in his next emergency bill, which the Legislature will probably pass in the next few days.

So that’s the situation NYS and Planet Albany now finds itself. The state will run out of cash by June, but darn it, the public employees want their 4% raises and they want them now and it’s an emergency and screw the taxpayers and everyone else.

Making matters worse is that the governor, David Paterson, has shown that he is a true moon of Planet Albany. From a New York Post editorial:

Death, taxes — and Dave
Posted: April 08, 2010
Everyone knows of life’s two certainties: death and taxes. In New York, there’s a third: death taxes.

And while not everyone might know about that last one, one person you’d surely expect to know is: the governor.

Unless that’s David Paterson.

Asked on a radio show yesterday if New York has an inheritance tax, Paterson stammered, then pleaded ignorance.

“Uh, currently, I think there’s a gap in the inheritance tax,” he said on the Brian Lehrer program.

“That’s the federal one,” Lehrer corrected him. “I don’t know if New York has one or not.”

“I don’t either,” Paterson admitted.

Astonishing.

Raymond J. Keating, on his blog, was astonished:

Friday, April 09, 2010
Death Tax? I Forgot
Sometimes you simply cannot make things up. In New York, Governor David Paterson was on the radio and revealed an astonishing gap in his knowledge about taxes.
(…)
No one should be surprised that taxes are so high in New York. Apparently, leading politicians cannot remember what taxes are already imposed.

Raymond J. Keating
Chief Economist
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

David Paterson has been in Albany for at least 25 years as a state senator, lieutenant governor, and governor, and he can’t tell you if New York State has a death tax?

How much of a joke is New York? These are your leaders who are raising your taxes?

Fortunately, the Working Families Party (ACORN+SEIU) is coming to the rescue with new tax ideas. Yes, I’ve mentioned the soda tax, but everyone’s doing that now. Meet the new “bonus tax,” supported by the WFP-controlled NYC Comptroller John Liu. The WFP’s Dan Cantor explained it all in The Huffington Post:

Time for a New York Bonus Tax: An Open Letter to Albany
Posted: April 6, 2010 04:39 PM
Dan Cantor
Executive Director of the Working Families Party
(…)
Our proposal:

A 25% tax on all bonuses worth more than $50,000 where the recipient’s total compensation is $250,000 or more.

The tax scales up to a 50% rate on all bonuses worth more than $50,000 where the recipient’s income exceeds $500,000.
(…)
It’s a matter of basic fairness.

Almost 50% of Americans pay no income taxes, and the 50% who do pay taxes must see their taxes increased to pay their “fair share” as “a matter of basic fairness.” It’s always that way.

Do you know what high wealth individuals will do? They will move to Florida or Texas in an instant! Do you think high wealth people are stupid? You don’t need to be on Wall Street anymore–you can do electronic transactions from anywhere. You’ll do them from the lowest taxed state.

This is the situation that New York finds itself in. I now live in Texas, watching with amazement at how the place I was born sinks to the very financial bottom.

There are lessons to be learned from this disaster, and leaders to be found and to step up.