It’s important to know what we’re facing in the 2012 Presidential Election and crucial that we get a grasp on who our enemies really are – most of us will concentrate on selecting the right candidate to represent us in 2012. But there is a much bigger picture that probably should be addressed before we’re blindsided again by the Liberal News Media.

This article addresses a few of Obama’s Czars today and the Federal Reserve – it will require due diligence on all our parts to find out who controls our Government. All of the people referenced here are Jews and most are connected to the Rothschild group or Zionists as they’re called.

Global Warming Czar – Carol Browner attempted to hide her involvement with a Socialist group, but her DNA remains; she advocates global governance believing wealthy Countries must lower their economic status to address climate change.

Car Czar - Steven Rattner is director of Obama’s Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry. Another bad apple connected to Rothschild and executive of Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley and Lazard Freres (All Jewish owned banks.)

Guantanamo/Military Jails Czar – Daniel Fried is a Clinton redo and appointed by Obama to give relief to the terrorist detainees in Guantanamo Bay. A Rothschild enthusiast and not the kind of person we want running any portion of our Government.

Here is more of Obama’s dirty Czar list and they all have ties to Rothschild. Kenneth Feinberg, Larry Summer, Cass Sunstein, Alan Bersin and Todd Stern and Obama’s dirty Czar list seems to be unending.

These Czars have a carta blanche pass to do whatever they want while hiding behind closed doors. Congress appears to be powerless or maybe they just don’t care what the Czars are doing at any given time.

We all wonder who is the puppeteers behind the Federal Reserve – they’re very illusive and difficult to track, but here again we find that common denominator (Rothschild) They have misused the Jews for many moons and hid behind their religion; it’s only a mirage, a cover up in their attempt to implement “A New World Order.” Here’s a who’s who in the Federal Reserves.

Benjamin S. Bernanke, Chairman – JEWISH
Donald L. Kohn – JEWISH
Kevin M. Warsh – JEWISH
Randall S. Kroszner – JEWISH
Frederic S. Mishkin – JEWISH
For a complete run down on the Federal Reserve go to:

http://www.freestatevoice.com.au/finance/item/969-who-runs/owns-the-federal-reserve-banks-incorporated

75% of the twelve “District Banks” are controlled by Jews attached to Rothschild Zionists. Who Owns the Federal Reserve Banks, well look no further they are owned by Jews Rothschild Bank of London. Not surprising Chase Manhattan of NY (David Rockefeller) is included. In fact the New York Branch is all powerful.

Check out our board members running the Federal Reserve:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/default.htm

http://www.zionistjewfedreserve.com/custom.html

We must face this corruption head on and probably one of the best things we can do is vet and hand pick the men and women who will control our House of Representatives and our Senate.

2012 is going to be much more difficult then 2010, because it is a Presidential year and there is no limit to their money – their power rests in the positions they hold.

I don’t know the answers, but I know God is alive and well and if we but ask he will give us the wisdom and guidance to see us through the relentless onslaught of those who want to destroy our Nation.

May God Bless America
As Always,
Little Tboca

Criticism of President Obama’s appointment of Elizabeth Warren to oversee the establishment of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) – the Dodd-Frank Act’s contribution to growing the federal bureaucracy – has focused on Obama’s end-run around the Senate confirmation process.  By making Warren the White House czar for the CFPB instead of the agency’s director, Obama allows her to “effectively run the agency” (quoting the New York Times) while skirting both the Constitution’s requirement that “officers” of the federal government be confirmed by the Senate and the troubling questions about Warren’s anti-business bent that would inevitably have been part of her Senate confirmation hearings.

While the President’s attempt to defeat the constitutional checks and balances provided by the confirmation process is troubling enough, Warren’s appointment as White House czar is undoubtedly also intended to defeat the checks and balances provided by Congressional oversight.  Such oversight typically involves testimony by Cabinet and sub-Cabinet officials before Congressional committees and the subpoenaing of agency documents.

In sharp contrast, the Obama White House has made it clear that its czars cannot be compelled to testify before Congress and will not be allowed to testify voluntarily.  Thus, Warren’s appointment guarantees that the powerful new CFPB will be largely exempt from the openness and transparency Obama promised for the entire government.  That exemption will come in particularly handy for Obama if the GOP takes controls of either house of Congress in November, giving Republicans oversight authority as the CFPB begins its mischief-making next year.

The late Senator Robert Byrd foresaw this problem in February 2009 when he wrote to Obama to express his concern about the President’s excessive use of czars, warning that czars

are not accountable for their actions to Congress, to cabinet officials, and to virtually anyone but the president.  They rarely testify before congressional committees, and often shield the information and decision-making process behind the assertion of executive privilege.  In too many instances, [they] have been allowed to inhibit openness and transparency, and reduce accountability.

Under the terms of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Treasury Department, rather than a White House czar, should be running the CFPB until a director is named.  But Obama got around that requirement by giving Elizabeth Warren a dual appointment as a special adviser to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.  While Congressional committees cannot compel Warren to testify in her capacity as an assistant to the President, Congress may argue that she can be so compelled in her capacity as a Geithner adviser.  But don’t get your hopes up since executive privilege provides the Obama Administration with counterarguments.

At the end of the day, Warren is likely to be as unaccountable as the President’s other czars, but with an added and dangerous twist.  Obama’s use of White House czars to exempt long-established, largely stable agencies from transparency and accountability has been dangerous enough.  But this latest attempt, aimed at shielding from accountability a brand new, poorly understood agency – one likely to be riddled with the mistakes and misjudgments found in any startup – is recklessly irresponsible.

Criticism of President Obama’s appointment of Elizabeth Warren to oversee the establishment of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) – the Dodd-Frank Act’s contribution to growing the federal bureaucracy – has focused on Obama’s end-run around the Senate confirmation process.  By making Warren the White House czar for the CFPB instead of the agency’s director, Obama allows her to “effectively run the agency” (quoting the New York Times) while skirting both the Constitution’s requirement that “officers” of the federal government be confirmed by the Senate and the troubling questions about Warren’s anti-business bent that would inevitably have been part of her Senate confirmation hearings.

While the President’s attempt to defeat the constitutional checks and balances provided by the confirmation process is troubling enough, Warren’s appointment as White House czar is undoubtedly also intended to defeat the checks and balances provided by Congressional oversight.  Such oversight typically involves testimony by Cabinet and sub-Cabinet officials before Congressional committees and the subpoenaing of agency documents.

In sharp contrast, the Obama White House has made it clear that its czars cannot be compelled to testify before Congress and will not be allowed to testify voluntarily.  Thus, Warren’s appointment guarantees that the powerful new CFPB will be largely exempt from the openness and transparency Obama promised for the entire government.  That exemption will come in particularly handy for Obama if the GOP takes controls of either house of Congress in November, giving Republicans oversight authority as the CFPB begins its mischief-making next year.

The late Senator Robert Byrd foresaw this problem in February 2009 when he wrote to Obama to express his concern about the President’s excessive use of czars, warning that czars

are not accountable for their actions to Congress, to cabinet officials, and to virtually anyone but the president.  They rarely testify before congressional committees, and often shield the information and decision-making process behind the assertion of executive privilege.  In too many instances, [they] have been allowed to inhibit openness and transparency, and reduce accountability.

Under the terms of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Treasury Department, rather than a White House czar, should be running the CFPB until a director is named.  But Obama got around that requirement by giving Elizabeth Warren a dual appointment as a special adviser to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.  While Congressional committees cannot compel Warren to testify in her capacity as an assistant to the President, Congress may argue that she can be so compelled in her capacity as a Geithner adviser.  But don’t get your hopes up since executive privilege provides the Obama Administration with counterarguments.

At the end of the day, Warren is likely to be as unaccountable as the President’s other czars, but with an added and dangerous twist.  Obama’s use of White House czars to exempt long-established, largely stable agencies from transparency and accountability has been dangerous enough.  But this latest attempt, aimed at shielding from accountability a brand new, poorly understood agency – one likely to be riddled with the mistakes and misjudgments found in any startup – is recklessly irresponsible.