The Legitimate Comparison Between Ronald Reagan and Sarah Palin


I think I have it on pretty good authority that the comparisons between Sarah Palin and Ronald Reagan are legitimate. Not because have any special insight, but because Ronald Reagan’s own conservative son wrote the following about Sarah Palin in an essay entitled “Welcome Back, Dad”:

I’ve been trying to convince my fellow conservatives that they have been wasting their time in a fruitless quest for a new Ronald Reagan to emerge and lead our party and our nation. I insisted that we’d never see his like again because he was one of a kind.

I was wrong!

Wednesday night I watched the Republican National Convention on television and there, before my very eyes, I saw my Dad reborn; only this time he’s a she.

And what a she!

In one blockbuster of a speech, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin resurrected my Dad’s indomitable spirit and sent it soaring above the convention center, shooting shock waves through the cynical media’s assigned spaces and electrifying the huge audience with the kind of inspiring rhetoric we haven’t heard since my Dad left the scene.

This was Ronald Reagan at his best — the same Ronald Reagan who made the address known now solely as “The Speech,” which during the Goldwater campaign set the tone and the agenda for the rebirth of the traditional conservative movement that later sent him to the White House for eight years and revived the moribund GOP.

Last night was an extraordinary event. Widely seen beforehand as a make-or-break effort — either an opportunity for Sarah Palin to show that she was the happy warrior that John McCain assured us she was, or a disaster that would dash McCain’s presidential hopes and send her back to Alaska, sadder but wiser.

Obviously un-intimidated by either the savage onslaught to which the left-leaning media had subjected her, or the incredible challenge she faced — and oozing with confidence — she strode defiantly to the podium and proved she was everything and even more than John McCain told us.

Much has been made of the fact that she is a woman. What we saw last night, however, was something much more than a just a woman accomplishing something no Republican woman has ever achieved. What we saw was a red-blooded American with that rare, God-given ability to rally her dispirited fellow Republicans and take up the daunting task of leading them — and all her fellow Americans — on a pilgrimage to that shining city on the hill my father envisioned as our nation’s real destination.

… Welcome back, Dad, even if you’re wearing a dress and bearing children this time around.

Personally, I don’t like comparing people. There will never be another Roanld Reagan, just like there will never be another Sarah Palin. But Michael Reagan understands what was important about his dad. Conservatives don’t wax poetic over Reagan because of his budgets. The American people didn’t love Reagan because of his backroom deals with Rosty and Tip. And history doesn’t remember Reagan because he served eight years as governor.

History remembers special moments. People are inspired by special moments. Special moments made Reagan great. “The speech” made him great. A “shining city on a hill” made him great. “Tear down that wall” made him great. In an era of malaise, Reagan’s ability to connect with people, inspire them, and make them feel good about their country made him a transformative figure. He changed the course of history because he changed the way people looked at their country.

No, Sarah Palin is not another Ronald Reagan, but she does share some rare gifts with Reagan. Reagan’s own son sees it. If you have an issue with that, tell Ronald Reagan’s own son that you know more about Ronald Reagan than he does, if you dare be so arrogant.

If a conservative leader preaches conservatism and no one listens, was conservatism actually preached?



RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

Yes, I remember that column...

Third Street (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 2:13AM EST (link)

…it was written when national familiarity with Sarah Palin was less than one week old. At the time, I was heard to make excited comparisons to Reagan, too.

I wonder if Michael Reagan’s feelings are the same today?

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

Third Street, you jump right in to make a snark remark on Swamp's...

penguin2 (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 4:18AM EST (link)

diary? Is that your plan, every Palin diary, come in say something like that? I’ve stayed out of the Palin diaries, due to too much discord, but neither do I think people should try to start trouble either.

Personally, I don’t see a problem between Swamp’s comparison of Reagan’s “ability to connect with people, inspire them, make them feel good about their country,” and his seeing Sarah in the same light. Many of us do, in the context of how we hear her connect to the traditional American foundation that is meaningful to us. Even people here who do not care for her, give her that much. Art, at least, gives us facts regarding the politics behind the issues that come up.

As far as Michael Reagan’s feelings go, well, I don’t think he was that politically unaware. And, as evidenced by the people who have turned out to see and hear her since then, the comments likely would still stand.

That is my two cents worth and I have no desire to aid anyone in starting trouble in these diaries, but remarks like this grow tiresome. IMHO, give it a rest.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

Sigh.

Third Street (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 4:26AM EST (link)

Factual statements aren’t “snark”, nor did I intend them to sound that way.

It’s funny that Swamp Yankee wrote this diary, ’cause I honest-to-God had been thinking about this particular Michael Reagan column over the last few days, and wondering whether he would still draw the comparison after her dramatic resignation and the things we’ve learned about her over the last year. I don’t know; maybe he would. I’m not going to tell M. Reagan he didn’t know his own dad. But neither am I going to agree that Sarah Palin is in any way R. Reagan’s reincarnation.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

Fair enough, Third.

penguin2 (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 4:40AM EST (link)

My take away on the Reagan thing is simply the ability to connect with the people, there are analogies that fit. Reagan was Reagan, our next leader needs to be defined in their own right, not an “authentic” reproduction. Many of us are reading the diaries even if we are not commenting, and after the acrimonious discourse in the Palin diary the other day, your comment jumped out at me.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

I do regret that the comments in that diary spun out of control the way they did.

Third Street (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 5:01AM EST (link)

And I have no desire to instigate a repeat of that. A lot of people aren’t going to like my opinion of Palin, which I am definitely keeping in mind as I write these comments.

You are absolutely correct that Palin or whomever we nominate needs to be defined as her or his own woman or man. The GOP has trapped itself into the nostalgic yearning for “another Reagan” every four years, setting a standard for its presidential candidates they can’t possibly meet. Ronald Reagan was a once-in-a-lifetime figure; we’re never going to get another one, just as we’ll never get another Washington, Lincoln, or Coolidge (a personal favorite of mine). It’s unfair to Sarah Palin to compare her to Ronaldus Magnus because it invites all sorts of comparisons to the ways in which she is not. At the same time, it serves as a reminder of her deficiencies as a potential candidate.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

 
 

I think he definitely does

hbgconservative Tuesday, November 24th at 12:17PM EST (link)

I listen to Michael Reagan’s radio show frequently and always reaps her with praise whenever he talks about her. Her views and principles haven’t changed since then, either. While not an actual reincarnation of anybody, Michael’s point was she’s just as principled in conservatism as his father was. She just has a different style and method of how she wants to talk about conservatism.