<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell is a Few Fries Short of a Happy Meal.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1059</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>I think that Congressman Culberson tried to express exactly those ideas.  It was awfully hard to hear him over the braying of Mr. O&#039;Donkey.

Your comment is an excellent talking point, of which there are many on RedState and elsewhere, including at Town Halls.  Has anybody tried to collect them for the benefit of our Republican candidates and spokesmen?  They seem to have a very difficult time developing themselves, sometimes.

&quot;Government takeover of health care.&quot;

&quot;Government option.&quot;

&quot;Border fence first.&quot;

&quot;Fix Medicare and the VA first.&quot;

&quot;It isn&#039;t bad to try to help the very needy to survive.&quot;

&quot;The free market is built on competition.&quot;

&quot;The profit motive is the most powerful incentive there is to eliminate waste and reduce costs.&quot;

&quot;No bill is better than a bad bill.&quot;

&quot;Identify the problem before attempting to solve it.&quot;

Used judiciously, they can help.  Our spokesmen &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt; need to understand the principles behind them, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Congressman Culberson tried to express exactly those ideas.  It was awfully hard to hear him over the braying of Mr. O&#8217;Donkey.</p>
<p>Your comment is an excellent talking point, of which there are many on RedState and elsewhere, including at Town Halls.  Has anybody tried to collect them for the benefit of our Republican candidates and spokesmen?  They seem to have a very difficult time developing themselves, sometimes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Government takeover of health care.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Government option.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Border fence first.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Fix Medicare and the VA first.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It isn&#8217;t bad to try to help the very needy to survive.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The free market is built on competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The profit motive is the most powerful incentive there is to eliminate waste and reduce costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No bill is better than a bad bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Identify the problem before attempting to solve it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Used judiciously, they can help.  Our spokesmen <b>do</b> need to understand the principles behind them, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>The pleasure was mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pleasure was mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>It was really nice meeting you at the RS gathering in Atlanta.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was really nice meeting you at the RS gathering in Atlanta.  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/susannah/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Furthermore, being really angry can definitely make a person act crazy.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furthermore, being really angry can definitely make a person act crazy.  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/susannah/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drohan00</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>drohan00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>he&#039;s just really mad that the whole healthcare idea is going down the tubes.  He is angry because he worked for Moynihan in 1993-94 and he knows what it feels like for the Democrats to squander a large majority in congress.  

I don&#039;t think we should cut him some slack, he just hates it when he loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s just really mad that the whole healthcare idea is going down the tubes.  He is angry because he worked for Moynihan in 1993-94 and he knows what it feels like for the Democrats to squander a large majority in congress.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we should cut him some slack, he just hates it when he loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguin2</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>penguin2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>It used to drive me crazy, wondering why O&#039;Reilly or some of the other commentators on Fox would not &quot;call them out&quot; or stop the spin.  the stuff pouring from the guests mouths was so bizarre and dishonest, I couldn&#039;t stand for them to get away with it.  Then I sat back and decided if I could see how disingenuous the guests were being, then maybe others could too.  In the more flagrant of the spots, one could almost laugh.  I say &quot;almost.&quot;

And I do remind myself, it is after all a business, and if those guests get ground into the dirt, they won&#039;t go on the shows.  So, let them show themselves for the mean and nasty idiots they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to drive me crazy, wondering why O&#8217;Reilly or some of the other commentators on Fox would not &#8220;call them out&#8221; or stop the spin.  the stuff pouring from the guests mouths was so bizarre and dishonest, I couldn&#8217;t stand for them to get away with it.  Then I sat back and decided if I could see how disingenuous the guests were being, then maybe others could too.  In the more flagrant of the spots, one could almost laugh.  I say &#8220;almost.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I do remind myself, it is after all a business, and if those guests get ground into the dirt, they won&#8217;t go on the shows.  So, let them show themselves for the mean and nasty idiots they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>You make some excellent points here.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some excellent points here.  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/susannah/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I always aim to entertain.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always aim to entertain.  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/susannah/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>Help our local stations (who will probably be much more tuned in to issues and treat us fairly).  They also will allow longer, in-depth answers, which can be used by us later in a trimmed down version if advantageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help our local stations (who will probably be much more tuned in to issues and treat us fairly).  They also will allow longer, in-depth answers, which can be used by us later in a trimmed down version if advantageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1049</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that GE didn&#039;t have him committed after that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that GE didn&#8217;t have him committed after that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My premise is that the Republican Party has leaders that actually think about strategies for getting their message out. I know I probably need to “check my premises” — first, that the Party has leaders, and second, that they actually attempt to come up with strategies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re also guessing that they try to think.

At one time I would have agreed with a boycott.  Now, I&#039;d prefer that the interviewees go on air with knowledge of tactics to turn the lefties&#039; craziness back on them, sort of like verbal jiu jitsu.  I admire Congressman Culberson for sticking it out to the end.  I might have called O&#039;Donnell an idiot and left him with nobody to talk to about halfway through the segment.  I wonder when he would have noticed he was talking to himself literally as well as figuratively.

Back to strategy and tactics.  I used to get peeved at Bill O&#039;Reilly because he didn&#039;t call out the libs who wouldn&#039;t answer his questions; wouldn&#039;t get off the Dem talking points.  Yet, he would let them spin after a while.  In fact, his is sort of the direct opposite of O&#039;Donnell&#039;s approach.  I no longer disapprove of Bill&#039;s manner of treating his guests.  His spinning guests are always obvious.  He doesn&#039;t have to call them &quot;liars,&quot; as O&#039;Donnell seems wont to do.

He has always said that the viewers can see what is happening for themselves.  I now agree.  If you aren&#039;t drunk on Kool-Aid, it&#039;s obvious that it was O&#039;Donnell who went over the cliff.

Anyway, far better for &#039;Pubs to make the questioner look uninformed or just plain biased and let the public decide for itself who is right.  Culberson did it by trying to keep O&#039;Donnell on the subject.  When O&#039;Donnell didn&#039;t like the answers he was getting, he tried to change the subject.  Culberson commented civilly on what was happening, and it made O&#039;Donnell look foolish.  Calling a guest a liar is definitely bad form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My premise is that the Republican Party has leaders that actually think about strategies for getting their message out. I know I probably need to “check my premises” — first, that the Party has leaders, and second, that they actually attempt to come up with strategies.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re also guessing that they try to think.</p>
<p>At one time I would have agreed with a boycott.  Now, I&#8217;d prefer that the interviewees go on air with knowledge of tactics to turn the lefties&#8217; craziness back on them, sort of like verbal jiu jitsu.  I admire Congressman Culberson for sticking it out to the end.  I might have called O&#8217;Donnell an idiot and left him with nobody to talk to about halfway through the segment.  I wonder when he would have noticed he was talking to himself literally as well as figuratively.</p>
<p>Back to strategy and tactics.  I used to get peeved at Bill O&#8217;Reilly because he didn&#8217;t call out the libs who wouldn&#8217;t answer his questions; wouldn&#8217;t get off the Dem talking points.  Yet, he would let them spin after a while.  In fact, his is sort of the direct opposite of O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s approach.  I no longer disapprove of Bill&#8217;s manner of treating his guests.  His spinning guests are always obvious.  He doesn&#8217;t have to call them &#8220;liars,&#8221; as O&#8217;Donnell seems wont to do.</p>
<p>He has always said that the viewers can see what is happening for themselves.  I now agree.  If you aren&#8217;t drunk on Kool-Aid, it&#8217;s obvious that it was O&#8217;Donnell who went over the cliff.</p>
<p>Anyway, far better for &#8216;Pubs to make the questioner look uninformed or just plain biased and let the public decide for itself who is right.  Culberson did it by trying to keep O&#8217;Donnell on the subject.  When O&#8217;Donnell didn&#8217;t like the answers he was getting, he tried to change the subject.  Culberson commented civilly on what was happening, and it made O&#8217;Donnell look foolish.  Calling a guest a liar is definitely bad form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>on ESPN.  Once you wander into crazy town, they cut your mike.

McLaughlin let him filibuster for about 3 minutes there, then interrupt the others as they tried to refute him.

But don&#039;t forget the author of &lt;i&gt;Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them&lt;/i&gt; was recently &quot;elected&quot; to the Senate.  I guess it helps to be able to shout down your opponent.  It also helps to have George Soros&#039;s money, or GE&#039;s money, behind you.

Entertaining and enlightening as always, Susannah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on ESPN.  Once you wander into crazy town, they cut your mike.</p>
<p>McLaughlin let him filibuster for about 3 minutes there, then interrupt the others as they tried to refute him.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t forget the author of <i>Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them</i> was recently &#8220;elected&#8221; to the Senate.  I guess it helps to be able to shout down your opponent.  It also helps to have George Soros&#8217;s money, or GE&#8217;s money, behind you.</p>
<p>Entertaining and enlightening as always, Susannah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>Betcha O&#039;Donnell doesn&#039;t have anything like that in &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; closet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betcha O&#8217;Donnell doesn&#8217;t have anything like that in <i>his</i> closet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoguePolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>RoguePolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that conservatives need to boycott watching these guys.

If I understand ColdWarrior; the question is why Republican politicians allow themselves to go be smeared by Democrat party operatives on national TV.

As Culberson pointed out; most &quot;regular people&quot; type conservatives stopped watching smear TV a long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that conservatives need to boycott watching these guys.</p>
<p>If I understand ColdWarrior; the question is why Republican politicians allow themselves to go be smeared by Democrat party operatives on national TV.</p>
<p>As Culberson pointed out; most &#8220;regular people&#8221; type conservatives stopped watching smear TV a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoguePolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>RoguePolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that conservatives need to boycott watching these guys.

If I understand ColdWarrior; the question is why Republican politicians allow themselves to go be smeared by Democrat party operatives on national TV.

As Culberson pointed out; most &quot;regular people&quot; type conservatives stopped watching smear TV a long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that conservatives need to boycott watching these guys.</p>
<p>If I understand ColdWarrior; the question is why Republican politicians allow themselves to go be smeared by Democrat party operatives on national TV.</p>
<p>As Culberson pointed out; most &#8220;regular people&#8221; type conservatives stopped watching smear TV a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lammo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Lammo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1042</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>Steve was good enough to post this video in the comments section of this same diary that I cross-posted on The Minority Report.  It is absolutely hilarious.  In this video, Lawrence O&#039;Donnell is &quot;interviewing&quot; (and I use that word generously) Peter Schiff, but he literally talks twice as much as him, perpetually interrupts him, and repeatedly puts words in his mouth.  It is classic Lawrence O&#039;Donnell--the only thing that&#039;s missing is the shouting and the name-calling.  Anyway, I thought that it was worth sharing and might serve as a good source of inspiration for the contest that Penguin suggested.

&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;349&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/zYEtTkanDx0&amp;border=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowScriptAccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/zYEtTkanDx0&amp;border=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; allowScriptAccess=&quot;always&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;349&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve was good enough to post this video in the comments section of this same diary that I cross-posted on The Minority Report.  It is absolutely hilarious.  In this video, Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell is &#8220;interviewing&#8221; (and I use that word generously) Peter Schiff, but he literally talks twice as much as him, perpetually interrupts him, and repeatedly puts words in his mouth.  It is classic Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell&#8211;the only thing that&#8217;s missing is the shouting and the name-calling.  Anyway, I thought that it was worth sharing and might serve as a good source of inspiration for the contest that Penguin suggested.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zYEtTkanDx0&amp;border=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zYEtTkanDx0&amp;border=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="349"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNJim</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/susannah/2009/08/15/lawrence-odonnell-is-a-few-fries-short-of-a-happy-meal/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>TNJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/susannah/?p=421#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>who has the same last name as me:

He&#039;s a Super Bowl win short of a career.

Thank you, ma&#039;am. I&#039;ll be signing autographs out in the hall. You, of course, get the extra large John Hancock style autograph. Heck, I&#039;ll even draw a little football with a 12 in it so you can pretend it&#039;s from that Jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who has the same last name as me:</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a Super Bowl win short of a career.</p>
<p>Thank you, ma&#8217;am. I&#8217;ll be signing autographs out in the hall. You, of course, get the extra large John Hancock style autograph. Heck, I&#8217;ll even draw a little football with a 12 in it so you can pretend it&#8217;s from that Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

