I wouldn’t normally watch “The View” or anything associated with it. Michelle Malkin did a wonderful job of handling a handfull of raging libs and she definately came off as the most reasonable person in the room.

…truer words may never have been spoken before or since…

was that, after Michelle Malkin stating that the only retorts that libs have had are “Well, Bush did it too,” and after Joy Behar had already been smacked down for pulling the rubber-glue argument before Michelle’s smackdown…well, Joy did it to close the interview. The only thing she did throughout the entire interview was the rubber-glue argument.

Tell me again: why do people find her compelling enough to listen to her for an hour a day, 5 days a week?

They did their best to derail, to obfuscate, to change the topic, and to throw out lie after lie after lie. Anything to keep MM from getting her message across.

And failed.

in the mission in Iraq.

So do I.

So true. She is awesome! Ms. Malkin is so direct and to the point while still classy. AMAZING!!

So true. She is awesome! Ms. Malkin is so direct and to the point while still classy. AMAZING!!

was my entry to EPU’s first contest of “what would you rather do than watch Obama’s healthcare speech.” Someone, had put beets with that View watching and I agreed that would really do me in…

Joy’s comment of how conservatives are a “different group of thinking” was down right insulting. What’s wrong with wanting honesty and right and wrong to be the same for everyone? I know I am being unkind, but I can’t help but say Joy is one of the most obnoxious, condescending liberals out there.

But I did notice one thing, I thought there was some acceptance from the audience for Michelle throughout the segment. Also, at the end there was applause for their taking home a copy of her book. I think that audience was engaged with Michelle.

And again, I want to tell you how much I enjoyed meeting and talking with both you and your husband at the Gathering. You are an amazing person and I look forward to more of your work.

She keeps quoting what someone wrote about the book as being a fact from the book rather than pulling a quote from the book.

She and Joy are so freaking clueless.
“Why don’t you want to move on from Bush?”
- Uh, maybe because he’s not the President any more?
“What would you suggest instead?”
- Well, how about sticking to promises regarding lobbyists, transparency, hopey-changey, etc.?

OOooh Joy Behind is so obviously out of fire power and out classed by Malkin …lovely!!! she and elisabeth are so drop dead gorgeous–my goodness, poor Joy is a living example of diversity in full bloom there!

There isn’t enough space here to place the number of ‘lobstahs’ (as we say here in Maine) to properly rate the Malkin performances!

in the room is great.

Purporting reasonable facts under a reasonable timeline is better.

Here’s the context:
You cannot state that a president that has been in office for 8 months could be compared to a president that has been in office for 8 years, to do so is UNREASONABLE. That is where conservatives fail horribly and lose the most credibility.

It goes to flexibility: Most people don’t know what’s going on in their job within 3 years. We expect the president to have at least 1 in office before a full criticism is warranted. Not a few months. The timeline is an EPIC FAIL.
Her demands for information and accountability should first go to the Bush Administration, and then in 2011, to the Obama administration.
A book generated touting failure within 6 months of an (basically guaranteed) 4-year administration of an American presidency, proves a design to foment dissent and possibly treason rather than expose misconduct.

This is a nation of law, and the law demands a reasonable attempt to execute/prevent / protect / defend. A statement as absolute as the one presented is unreasonable and therefore does not conform to national standards of the application of law – and the basis for the republic.

the principle of the thing for penning something this non-sensical and idiotic:

“This is a nation of law, and the law demands a reasonable attempt to execute/prevent / protect / defend.”

Where on God’s earth do they *find* these people?

She really made her points. Michelle is a prime example of how we must make these people question the Obama’s administration’s tactics and behaviors. The czars are really the Achilles Heel of this corrupt group of thugs that the press must expose. The amount of power these unelected, unregulated people have is very dangerous. I don’t think the general public even knows about these people, who are wingnuts for the most part, and the press refuses to even glance in their general direction. Perhaps Malkin’s appearance will give pause and question to ordinary citizens. Maybe their demand for information will force the state-run press to publish the administration’s actions. We may have some hope and change after all.