<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Obama Depression Deepens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zackjk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>zackjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>If I have to choose between being hopelessly naive, or just another Lefty troll, I think I must be the troll. However, I don&#039;t think that the choice you&#039;re giving me is very appropriate. I don&#039;t believe that I&#039;m naive, but then again, someone who is naive probably would be too naive to know that they&#039;re naive. I read all sorts of different blogs, magazines, and journals, from all sides of the political spectrum. I make a point of reading things with which I disagree, so that I can try to understand the viewpoints of people with whom I disagree. I also don&#039;t think I&#039;m a troll, a troll knows that they&#039;re a troll, and they will get off on the discord that they cause. I&#039;m interested in an honest conversation, or debate, I don&#039;t want to get anybody riled up. You say that  he doesn&#039;t intend to put an end to the recession, that in fact he needs to make it worse and prolong to create the circumstances so that he can &quot;transform&quot; America. I see that over the past few months, the number of people losing their jobs has consistently declined. I also see that since bottoming out at around 6500, the dow jones has rebounded by about 3000 points, gaining almost half its value from its time at the bottom. Where&#039;s the extra gasoline he&#039;s pouring on there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have to choose between being hopelessly naive, or just another Lefty troll, I think I must be the troll. However, I don&#8217;t think that the choice you&#8217;re giving me is very appropriate. I don&#8217;t believe that I&#8217;m naive, but then again, someone who is naive probably would be too naive to know that they&#8217;re naive. I read all sorts of different blogs, magazines, and journals, from all sides of the political spectrum. I make a point of reading things with which I disagree, so that I can try to understand the viewpoints of people with whom I disagree. I also don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m a troll, a troll knows that they&#8217;re a troll, and they will get off on the discord that they cause. I&#8217;m interested in an honest conversation, or debate, I don&#8217;t want to get anybody riled up. You say that  he doesn&#8217;t intend to put an end to the recession, that in fact he needs to make it worse and prolong to create the circumstances so that he can &#8220;transform&#8221; America. I see that over the past few months, the number of people losing their jobs has consistently declined. I also see that since bottoming out at around 6500, the dow jones has rebounded by about 3000 points, gaining almost half its value from its time at the bottom. Where&#8217;s the extra gasoline he&#8217;s pouring on there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>Comrade Obama has no desire or intention of putting out the fire.  He needs to keep it going, even make it worse to have any success with his stated goal of remaking America.

You&#039;re either hopelessly naive or just another Lefty troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade Obama has no desire or intention of putting out the fire.  He needs to keep it going, even make it worse to have any success with his stated goal of remaking America.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re either hopelessly naive or just another Lefty troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discerningconservative</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>discerningconservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>he has failed to grab a hose and fight that fire and instead has opted to continue to pour gasoline on it makes him more culpable than the &quot;arsonist&quot; that you speak of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he has failed to grab a hose and fight that fire and instead has opted to continue to pour gasoline on it makes him more culpable than the &#8220;arsonist&#8221; that you speak of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zackjk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>zackjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>The recession started in December 2007. The house was already on fire when he moved in; just because Obama hasn&#039;t put it out yet, it doesn&#039;t mean that he&#039;s the arsonist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recession started in December 2007. The house was already on fire when he moved in; just because Obama hasn&#8217;t put it out yet, it doesn&#8217;t mean that he&#8217;s the arsonist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>I expressly withhold further permission for you to use our servers, rantus.  Further use of our servers, including the registration of new accounts, will put you in violation of federal and possibly state anti-computer-abuse laws and could leave you liable for thousands of dollars in fines and months in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expressly withhold further permission for you to use our servers, rantus.  Further use of our servers, including the registration of new accounts, will put you in violation of federal and possibly state anti-computer-abuse laws and could leave you liable for thousands of dollars in fines and months in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNJim</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>TNJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2229</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rantusresurrectus</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>rantusresurrectus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>
&lt;div style=&quot;color: white;background-color: white;font-size: x-small&quot;&gt;

And you know economics from where? So George W didn&#039;t have anything to do with the current situation we&#039;re in and Obama is responsible for it all?

How come that doesn&#039;t sound very plausible?

&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="color: white;background-color: white;font-size: x-small">
<p>And you know economics from where? So George W didn&#8217;t have anything to do with the current situation we&#8217;re in and Obama is responsible for it all?</p>
<p>How come that doesn&#8217;t sound very plausible?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>I could only come up with this comparison (the data seem to be incomplete; it&#039;s certainly hard to decipher for an amateur like me):

In &lt;b&gt;August, 2009&lt;/b&gt;

The civilian labor force was 154,577,000  (non-military, I suppose)
Employed:                            139,649,000
Unemployed:                          14,928,000

Not in labor force:                  81,509,000
Government employment:      22,487,000  (non-military, I suppose)

So total of unemployed, not in force, plus government seems to be 118,924,000.
&lt;i&gt;Non-government employed seems to be&lt;/i&gt; 139,649,000 less 22,487,000, or &lt;i&gt;117,162,000.&lt;/i&gt;

Based on my assertion that government employees do not pay taxes (we pay them for them, indirectly) &lt;b&gt;the total tax burden seems to be paid by less than half of potential workers.&lt;/b&gt;  And that apparently doesn&#039;t count the military, who are also government employees.

Not clear, I know, but it would take an expert to find the exact numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could only come up with this comparison (the data seem to be incomplete; it&#8217;s certainly hard to decipher for an amateur like me):</p>
<p>In <b>August, 2009</b></p>
<p>The civilian labor force was 154,577,000  (non-military, I suppose)<br />
Employed:                            139,649,000<br />
Unemployed:                          14,928,000</p>
<p>Not in labor force:                  81,509,000<br />
Government employment:      22,487,000  (non-military, I suppose)</p>
<p>So total of unemployed, not in force, plus government seems to be 118,924,000.<br />
<i>Non-government employed seems to be</i> 139,649,000 less 22,487,000, or <i>117,162,000.</i></p>
<p>Based on my assertion that government employees do not pay taxes (we pay them for them, indirectly) <b>the total tax burden seems to be paid by less than half of potential workers.</b>  And that apparently doesn&#8217;t count the military, who are also government employees.</p>
<p>Not clear, I know, but it would take an expert to find the exact numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stRichard</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>1stRichard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>Count those collecting, no longer bothering looking work, part time employment underemployed, and factor in government employed. Could it be true that right now we have almost half the people supporting the other half? 

What percentage of the population is government employed or on government entitlement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count those collecting, no longer bothering looking work, part time employment underemployed, and factor in government employed. Could it be true that right now we have almost half the people supporting the other half? </p>
<p>What percentage of the population is government employed or on government entitlement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas_Hauber</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas_Hauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>I answered my own question.  Took me awhile, but I was finally able to find the BLS report:
http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered my own question.  Took me awhile, but I was finally able to find the BLS report:<br />
http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas_Hauber</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas_Hauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2217</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know what the adjustment was for July&#039;s unemployment rate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what the adjustment was for July&#8217;s unemployment rate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/09/04/the-obama-depression-deepens/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/streiff/?p=281#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>But I think he has a right to be depressed, given the devastation his fantasies are causing the country,  given his polling numbers, and given the number of people who are turning out at the Tea Parties and town halls to blister his allies.  

I mean, he&#039;s losing &lt;i&gt;David Brooks&lt;/i&gt;.

So yeah, he should be depressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I think he has a right to be depressed, given the devastation his fantasies are causing the country,  given his polling numbers, and given the number of people who are turning out at the Tea Parties and town halls to blister his allies.  </p>
<p>I mean, he&#8217;s losing <i>David Brooks</i>.</p>
<p>So yeah, he should be depressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

